資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.118.198.61)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
漢語詞彙測驗中的性差項目功能差異
書刊名:
測驗年刊
作者:
曹亦薇
/
侯傑泰
作者(外文):
Cao, Yi-wei
/
Hau, Kit-tai
出版日期:
1999
卷期:
46:1
頁次:
頁119-128
主題關鍵詞:
詞彙測驗
;
項目功能差異
;
一致性項目功能差異
;
非一致性項目功能差異
;
Vocabulary test
;
DIF
;
Uniform DIF
;
Non-uniform DIF
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:19
語文能力測驗的某些試題,會否因涉及一些與性別有關的活動對男或女生不利?例如女生不熟悉冰球,如出現與冰球有關的詞彙,即使與男生能力相同也表現較差。本研究運用兩種方法(SIBTEST與IRT-LR方法)檢查一個實際的漢語詞彙測驗的39個項目,看是否有這種性別上的差異(項目功能差異,DIF)。在兩個初三團體(共1608人)的男女生比較分析中,發現39個詞彙中有七個屬一致性DIF的項目,兩個有非一致性DIF傾向的項目。在α=.05水平下,兩個樣本的性差DIF的一致性百分比達74%(SIBTEST法)和87%(IRT-LR法)。同一樣本內兩種方法探測結果的一致性百分比均為90%。本文還討論了影響DIF項目的一些可能性,以及如何在項目分析中處理這些項目的方法。
以文找文
In a language achievement test, are there items disadvantageous to male or female students because their content contains sex difference related activities? For example, female students do not like ice-hockey and despite their similar ability to males, females may still perform much worse. In the present study, we used two methods (SIBTEST and IRT-LR) to examine whether any of the 39 items in an actual Chinese vocabulary test showed this kind of sex difference (sex differential item functioning, DIF). In two groups of Junior Secondary Three (N=1608) students, it was found that seven items were of uniform DIF type (different difficulty only), while two showed non-uniform DIF (different discrimination and difficulty). The percentage of agreement between the two groups of students were 74% and 87% (α=.05) in SIBTEST and IRT-LR methods respectively. The percentage of agreement of the two methods with the same subjects was reasonably high 90% (α=.05). The possible reasons leading to DIF and ways of handling these items in the Chinese vocabulary test were also discussed.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Clauser, B. E.、Mazor, K. M.(1998)。Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17(1),31-44。
2.
Stout, W. F.(1990)。A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation。Psychometrika,55(2),293-325。
3.
Zwick, R.、Donoghue, J. R.、Grima, A.(1993)。Assessment of differential item functioning for performance tasks。Journal of Educational Measurement,30,233-251。
4.
Shealy, R.、Stout, W.(1993)。A method-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF。Psychometrika,58,159-194。
5.
Chang, H.-H.、Mazzeo, J.、Roussos, L.(1996)。Detecting DIF for polytomously scored items: An adaptation of the SIBTEST procedure。Journal of Educational Measurement,33(3),333-353。
6.
Kim, S. H.、Cohen, A. S.(1991)。A comparison of two area measures for detecting differential item functioning。Applied Psychological Measurement,15,269-278。
7.
Mellenbergh, G. J.(1982)。Contingency table models for assessing item bias。Journal of Educational Statistics,7,105-118。
會議論文
1.
曹亦薇(1997)。項目反應理論基礎上的初中詞彙理解能力的測量。第三屆海峽兩岸心理與教育測驗學術研討會。臺北。
延伸查詢
2.
Strassberg-Rosenberg, B.、Donlon, T. F.(1975)。Content influences on sex differences in performance on aptitude tests。The annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education。Washington, DC。
圖書
1.
Boldt, R. F.(1983)。Status of research on item content and differential performance on tests used in high education。Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service。
2.
Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(1990)。PC-BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models。Mooresville, IN:Scientific Software。
3.
Thissen, D.(1991)。MULTILOG: A user's guide。Mooresville, IN:Scientific Software, Inc.。
圖書論文
1.
Thissen, D.、Steinberg, L.、Wainer, H.(1993)。Detection of difference of item functioning using the parameters of item response models。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
2.
Burton, E.、Burton, N. W.(1993)。The effect of item screening on test score and test characteristics。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
3.
Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.(1988)。Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
4.
Linn, R. L.(1993)。The use of differential item functioning statistics: A discussion of current practice and future implications。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
5.
O'Neill, K. A.、McPeek, W. M.(1993)。Item and test characteristics are associated with differential item functioning。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
6.
Thissen, D.、Steinberg, L.、Wainer, H.(1988)。Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。
7.
Zieky, M.(1993)。Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
集中識字教學法對國小四年級學生增進一般字彙知識表現的效果之研究
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code