:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:漢語詞彙測驗中的性差項目功能差異
書刊名:測驗年刊
作者:曹亦薇侯傑泰
作者(外文):Cao, Yi-weiHau, Kit-tai
出版日期:1999
卷期:46:1
頁次:頁119-128
主題關鍵詞:詞彙測驗項目功能差異一致性項目功能差異非一致性項目功能差異Vocabulary testDIFUniform DIFNon-uniform DIF
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
     語文能力測驗的某些試題,會否因涉及一些與性別有關的活動對男或女生不利?例如女生不熟悉冰球,如出現與冰球有關的詞彙,即使與男生能力相同也表現較差。本研究運用兩種方法(SIBTEST與IRT-LR方法)檢查一個實際的漢語詞彙測驗的39個項目,看是否有這種性別上的差異(項目功能差異,DIF)。在兩個初三團體(共1608人)的男女生比較分析中,發現39個詞彙中有七個屬一致性DIF的項目,兩個有非一致性DIF傾向的項目。在α=.05水平下,兩個樣本的性差DIF的一致性百分比達74%(SIBTEST法)和87%(IRT-LR法)。同一樣本內兩種方法探測結果的一致性百分比均為90%。本文還討論了影響DIF項目的一些可能性,以及如何在項目分析中處理這些項目的方法。
     In a language achievement test, are there items disadvantageous to male or female students because their content contains sex difference related activities? For example, female students do not like ice-hockey and despite their similar ability to males, females may still perform much worse. In the present study, we used two methods (SIBTEST and IRT-LR) to examine whether any of the 39 items in an actual Chinese vocabulary test showed this kind of sex difference (sex differential item functioning, DIF). In two groups of Junior Secondary Three (N=1608) students, it was found that seven items were of uniform DIF type (different difficulty only), while two showed non-uniform DIF (different discrimination and difficulty). The percentage of agreement between the two groups of students were 74% and 87% (α=.05) in SIBTEST and IRT-LR methods respectively. The percentage of agreement of the two methods with the same subjects was reasonably high 90% (α=.05). The possible reasons leading to DIF and ways of handling these items in the Chinese vocabulary test were also discussed.
期刊論文
1.Clauser, B. E.、Mazor, K. M.(1998)。Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17(1),31-44。  new window
2.Stout, W. F.(1990)。A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation。Psychometrika,55(2),293-325。  new window
3.Zwick, R.、Donoghue, J. R.、Grima, A.(1993)。Assessment of differential item functioning for performance tasks。Journal of Educational Measurement,30,233-251。  new window
4.Shealy, R.、Stout, W.(1993)。A method-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF。Psychometrika,58,159-194。  new window
5.Chang, H.-H.、Mazzeo, J.、Roussos, L.(1996)。Detecting DIF for polytomously scored items: An adaptation of the SIBTEST procedure。Journal of Educational Measurement,33(3),333-353。  new window
6.Kim, S. H.、Cohen, A. S.(1991)。A comparison of two area measures for detecting differential item functioning。Applied Psychological Measurement,15,269-278。  new window
7.Mellenbergh, G. J.(1982)。Contingency table models for assessing item bias。Journal of Educational Statistics,7,105-118。  new window
會議論文
1.曹亦薇(1997)。項目反應理論基礎上的初中詞彙理解能力的測量。第三屆海峽兩岸心理與教育測驗學術研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Strassberg-Rosenberg, B.、Donlon, T. F.(1975)。Content influences on sex differences in performance on aptitude tests。The annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Boldt, R. F.(1983)。Status of research on item content and differential performance on tests used in high education。Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service。  new window
2.Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(1990)。PC-BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models。Mooresville, IN:Scientific Software。  new window
3.Thissen, D.(1991)。MULTILOG: A user's guide。Mooresville, IN:Scientific Software, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Thissen, D.、Steinberg, L.、Wainer, H.(1993)。Detection of difference of item functioning using the parameters of item response models。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
2.Burton, E.、Burton, N. W.(1993)。The effect of item screening on test score and test characteristics。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
3.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.(1988)。Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
4.Linn, R. L.(1993)。The use of differential item functioning statistics: A discussion of current practice and future implications。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
5.O'Neill, K. A.、McPeek, W. M.(1993)。Item and test characteristics are associated with differential item functioning。Differential Item Functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
6.Thissen, D.、Steinberg, L.、Wainer, H.(1988)。Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
7.Zieky, M.(1993)。Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE