:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:基于文獻計量的科學家學術譜系學術影響力的研究
書刊名:情報理論與實踐
作者:呂瑞花常歡
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(1)
頁次:76-78+58
主題關鍵詞:學術譜系文獻計量方法評價體系學術影響力Academic pedigreeBibliometrical methodEvaluation systemAcademic influence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
科學家學術譜系研究是科學史領域的一個新興的研究方向,學者多采用歷史學或科學社會學方法,以學術傳承為線索繪制學術譜系,梳理學術傳承脈絡。文章在文獻計量學基礎上,引入學術譜系影響力的概念,并提出了個體學術影響力、代際學術影響力、學術譜系總學術影響力和學術譜系學術影響力貢獻度4個指標,上述定量指標可用以發現學術譜系內的杰出科學家,評估相同領域、同時期不同代際以及不同譜系的學術地位。此方法完善了已有的學術譜系定量評價體系,豐富了學術譜系研究和評價的方法。同時該研究中采用改進的H指數--W指數作為衡量學者個人學術影響力的主要指標,克服了學術譜系內成果重復計量、結果失允的情況。
Scientists academic pedigree research is an emerging research direction in the field of science history. Scholars often use the academic heritage as a clue to draw academic pedigree,and to comb academic inheritance vein by history or sociology of science. This paper introduces the concept of academic pedigree influence in Bibliometrics and proposes systematic scaling of academic pedigree influence,which includes individual academic influence, intergenerational academic influence,academic pedigree influence and the personal contribution to academic pedigree influence. These four indicators can be applied to find out the best scientists in the academic pedigree and evaluate the academic status of different generations or pedigrees in the same field and time. This method improves the quantitative evaluation system of academic pedigree, and enriches the methods of academic pedigree research and evaluation. At the same time, the paper uses W index( the improved H index) as the main indicator to measure the individual academic influence,and avoid the situation of repeated measurement and loss of results in the academic pedigree.
期刊論文
1.Kelley, E. A.、Sussman, R. W.(2007)。An academic genealogy on the history of American field primatologists。American Journal of Physical Anthropology,132(3),406-425。  new window
2.烏雲其其格、袁江洋(2009)。譜系與傳統:從日本諾貝爾獎獲獎譜系看一流科學傳統的構建。自然辯證法研究,2009(7),57-63。  延伸查詢new window
3.李昕升、夏如兵(2013)。以楊開渠為中心的水稻科學家學術譜系研究。農業考古,2013(1),265-270。  延伸查詢new window
4.Russell, T. G.、Sugimoto, C. R.(2009)。MPACT family trees: quantifying academic genealogy in library and information science。Journal of Education for Library and Information Science,50(4),248-263。  new window
5.David, S. V.、Hayden, B. Y.(2012)。Neurotree: a collaborative, graphical database of the academic genealogy of neuroscience。PLoS One,7(10),135-139。  new window
6.張忻、萬鵬飛(2015)。基於SCI-E數據庫的學者學術影響力研究。科技進步與對策,2015(16),115-119。  延伸查詢new window
7.常歡、呂瑞花、張佳靜(2016)。學術譜系內的合作網絡研究。情報理論與實踐,2016(4),14-19。  延伸查詢new window
8.張春霆(2009)。如何評價一名科研人員的學術表現?--關於論文引用次數泡沬問題及解决方案。科技導報,10(5),416-417。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE