:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:基於均布與替代計量的學術影響力實時評價體系實踐
書刊名:情報理論與實踐
作者:曹進軍
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(5)
頁次:71-75+64
主題關鍵詞:學術影響力學術交流替代計量學術評價評價體系Academic influenceAcademic exchangeAltmetricsAcademic evaluationEvaluation system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
[目的/意義]"互聯網+"環境下圖書館學科服務的廣度與深度應該進一步拓展,在學科發展與評估中發揮積極的作用。[方法/過程]首先分析學科服務、學術計量與學科評估的現狀,對自然出版指數的評估方法加以改造,利用期刊的被引半衰期對期刊影響因子加以修正,引入通訊作者、多種期刊分區、H5指數等因素進行加權。在此基礎上,參照替代計量的理念,利用Wo S、EBSCO、Elsevier等商業數據庫與第三方開源組織的核心接口,構建一個實時跟蹤的學術影響力評價體系。[結果/結論]實踐體現兩個特點:實時跟蹤與計量指標的綜合性和客觀性。[局限]評價體系需要在實踐中進一步驗證其效果。
[Purpose/significance] The breadth and the depth of library subject service should be further expanded in internet + environment. The positive function of subject service must be reflected in subject development and evaluation. [Method/process] The status quo of academic service,academic measurement and subject evaluation is analyzed,and the evaluation method of natural publishing index is modified. The influencing factors of journals are modified by using the half-life of journals. The factors such as communication author,multiple periodicals,H5 index are introduced. On the basis of this,a real-time tracking system of academic influence evaluation is constructed by using the core interfaces of Wo S,EBSCO,Elsevier and other third party open source organizations. [Result/conclusion] The practice embodies two characteristics: real-time tracking and measurement indicators with comprehensiveness and objectivity. [Limitations] The evaluation system needs to be further validated in practice.
期刊論文
1.Bernard, A. B.、Busse, M. R.(2004)。Who wins the Olympic Games: Economic resources and medal totals。The Review of Economics and Statistics,86(1),413-417。  new window
2.池曉波、陳潔(2015)。需求導向的學科服務「套餐」模式的探索與思考--以浙江工業大學圖書館學科服務為例。高校圖書館工作,2015(3),18-20。  延伸查詢new window
3.王睿、胡文靜、郭瑋(2014)。高Altmetrics指標科技論文學術影響力研究。圖書情報工作,58(21),92-98。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hicks, Diana、Wouters, Paul、Waltman, Ludo、De Rijcke, Sarah、Rafols, Ismael(2015)。Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics。Nature,520(7548),429-431。  new window
5.初景利(2012)。我國圖書館學科服務的難點與突破。中華醫學情報雜誌,21(4),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉曉娟、周建華、尤斌(2015)。基於Mendeley與WoS的選擇性計量指標與傳統科學計量指標相關性研究。圖書情報工作,59(3),112-118。  延伸查詢new window
7.竇天芳、張成昱、張蓓(2013)。ResearcherID現狀分析及應用啟發。圖書情報工作,58(4),40-45。  延伸查詢new window
8.席劍霄(2015)。OAuth2_0協議及其應用模式研究。軟件導刊,14(7),23-26。  延伸查詢new window
9.邱均平(2015)。Altmetrics指標在機構知識庫中的應用研究。圖書情報工作,59(2),100-105。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Li, Xuemei、THELWALL, M.(2012)。F1000, mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators。The 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators,451-551。  new window
其他
1.(2009)。The research excellence framework: a brief guide to the proposals,https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/researchstaff/documents/refguide.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE