[目的/意義]Web 2.0時代,學術論文影響力評價研究一分為二:傳統學術論文影響力評價研究和基于Altmetrics的學術論文影響力評價研究。由于Altmetrics研究工具的缺陷性,國內學術論文無法測度其社會影響力和社會關注度。依據國內學術論文數據特點,豐富國內學術論文評價影響力評價體系是十分有必要的。[方法/過程]為了綜合考慮被引頻次與被引時間對學術論文價值的影響,文章引入了學術論文引證因子,并基于即年指標、影響因子及5年期影響因子定義了即年因子、2年期引證因子和5年期引證因子。此外,運用因子分析獲取學術論文被引頻次、即年因子、2年期引證因子和5年期引證因子的成分得分系數矩陣,從而形成國內學術論文影響力指標體系。[結果 /結論]測度發現:與單一指標的評價結果相比,學術論文的影響力有所變動。并認為國內學術論文影響力由學術論文的被引頻次和被引時間綜合決定。

[Purpose/significance] In Web 2. 0 era,the researches of academic papers' influence are divided into two parts:the research of academic papers' influence based on traditional indexes and the research of academic papers' influence based on Altmetrics. Due to the deficiency of Altmetrics research tools,the social influence and social concern of domestic papers cannot be measured. According to the characteristics of the domestic academic papers' data,it is necessary to enrich the evaluation system of the academic papers' influence. [Method/process]In order to comprehensively consider the influence of citation frequency and citation time,this study introduces the citation factors of academic papers. Based on the immediacy index,influencing factor and5-year impact index,the paper defines immediacy factor,2-year citation factor and 5-year citation factor. Then using factor analysis method,the paper obtains component score coefficient matrix of citation frequency,immediacy factor,2-year citation factor and 5-year citation factor of academic papers. Therefore,it forms domestic academic papers' influence system. [Result/conclusion]The measurement shows that compared to the evaluation results based on a single indicator,the academic papers' influence from citation perspective has changed. And it is considered that the citation frequency and citation time of academic papers comprehensively determine the influence of domestic academic papers.