自媒體時代,公眾意見對司法裁判的影響顯著提升,呈現出民意左右審判的現象,背后則是司法公信力問題。以影響性訴訟案件為標本,基于理性的解釋,可以從表現各異的個案中透示出影響公眾對刑事案件評判的核心要素,即以信任、聲譽和互動為核心的內在要素,以交易成本為核心的外在要素。通過公眾對刑事司法的信任度、美譽度以及互動性的量化評估,比較公眾與基層司法官的認識差異,反映出理性選擇的背后是違反司法規律導致的司法公信力不彰。當前的司法改革,需要努力彌合這種認識上的差異,堅守法治理念和尊重司法規律,并以此為基礎形塑公眾與刑事司法的良性關系

In this age of We-Media,there has been a significant increase in the influence of public opinion upon judicial verdicts,leaving courts at the mercy of public opinion.Underlying this phenomenon is the problem of judicial credibility.As some influential lawsuits show,rational interpretation can identify,from amidst the variety of individual cases,the core factors affecting public assessment of criminal cases:both the internal factors centering on trust,reputation and interaction,and the external factors centering on transaction costs.A quantitative evaluation of the degree of public trust,confidence and interaction with the criminal justice system enables us to compare the differences in the public’ s understanding and that of grassroots legal officials,revealing that a low level of judicial credibility arising from judicial violations underlies rational choice.The current judicial reform must strive to remedy these gaps in awareness and must adhere to the concepts of the rule of law and respect for judicial rules,with a view to developing good relations between the public and criminal justice