:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:作為公共傳播的民主商議及其意義--一項針對浙江基層商議實踐的問卷調查
書刊名:新聞與傳播研究
作者:閆文捷
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(11)
頁次:12-33+126
主題關鍵詞:民主商議公共傳播公共性民主懇談
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
在我國,國家治理中民主商議與公共傳播之間有什么內在聯系?其傳播效果如何?通過對浙江省溫嶺市與樂清市基層鄉村的問卷調查數據的分析,論文集中考察了民主商議對提高政府權威以及培育現代公民特征等方面的影響。結果顯示,商議實踐可以提高公眾的政治信任,并從多個方面積極影響公眾對政府績效與現有政治制度的評價。同時,民主商議對培育現代公民具有同樣正面的效果——商議實踐不僅有助于增強人們的政治興趣,還可以激發他們參與日常的政治討論和地方選舉投票。論文希望借助實證研究,對通過商議實踐推動公共傳播、培育公共性等問題進行反思,并展示將民主商議作為研究命題納入傳播學發展的重要意義。
This study attempts to examine the intrinsic relationship between democratic deliberation and public communication as well as the communicative effects of deliberation in China’s governance.By analyzing data from sample surveys conducted in multiple vil ages in Wenling city and Yueqing city of Zhejiang province,this paper analyzes the influence of democratic deliberation on promoting governmental authority and cultivating modern citizenship characteristics.The results show that deliberative practice can not only enhance political trust,but also positively affect the public’s evaluations of multiple indicators of government performance and existing political institutions.The results also suggest a range of positive effects that democratic deliberation may have on promoting modern citizens,in terms of stimulating political interest and participation in everyday political talk and local voting.It is our hope that,through this empirical study,we will further reflect upon the questions about how to reform public communication and cultivate publicity through democratic deliberation,and in the meantime that we could shed light on the significance of bringing deliberation research into the communication studies.
期刊論文
1.He, Baogang、Warren, Mark E.(2011)。Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development。Perspectives on Politics,9(2),269-289。  new window
2.何包鋼、王春光(2007)。中國鄉村協商民主:個案研究。社會學研究,2007(3)。  延伸查詢new window
3.林尚立(2003)。協商政治:對中國民主政治發展的一種思考。學術月刊,2003(4)。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡百精、楊奕(2016)。公共傳播研究的基本問題與傳播學範式創新。國際新聞界,2016(3),61-80。  延伸查詢new window
5.薛瀾、張帆、武沐瑤(2015)。國家治理體系與治理能力研究:回顧與前瞻。公共管理學報,2015(3)。  延伸查詢new window
6.張軍、胡柳娟(2016)。提升國家治理能力視閾下的制度建設研究。青海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),2016(4)。  延伸查詢new window
7.馮建華(20170400)。公共傳播的意涵及語用指向。新聞與傳播研究,2017(4),113-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.邵任薇、翁丹莉(2015)。新媒體環境下的政府公共傳播策略分析。特區實踐與理論,2015(1)。  延伸查詢new window
9.王勇(2010)。論新媒介環境下的政府公共傳播。昆明理工大學學報(社會科學版),2010(6)。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬德普(2014)。協商民主是選舉民主的補充嗎?。政治學研究,2014(4)。  延伸查詢new window
11.馬得勇、張國亞(2015)。選舉抑或協商:對兩種鄉鎮民主模式的比較分析。國外理論動態,2015(6)。  延伸查詢new window
12.He, B.(2014)。From Village Election to Village Deliberation in Rural China: Case Study of a Deliberative Democracy Experiment。Journal of Chinese Political Science,19,133-150。  new window
13.Fishkin, James S.、He, Baogang、Luskin, Robert C.、Su, Alice(2010)。Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China。British Journal of Political Science,40(2),435-448。  new window
14.Knobloch, K. R.、Gastil, J.(2015)。Civic (re) Socialisation: The Educative Effects of Deliberative Participation。Politics,35(2),183-200。  new window
15.Fung, A.(2001)。Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences。Journal of Political Philosophy,11(3),338-367。  new window
16.Burkhalter, Stephanie、Gastil, J.、Kelshaw, T.(2002)。A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups。Communication Theory,12(4),398-422。  new window
圖書
1.Bohman, James(2000)。Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy。MIT Press。  new window
2.Faulks, K.(2000)。Citizenship。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Jacobs, Lawrence R.、Cook, Fay Lomax、Delli Carpini, Michael X.(2009)。Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.何包鋼(2008)。協商民主:理論、方法和實踐。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Gutman, A.、Thompson, D.(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot be Avoided in Politics, and What Should be Done about It。Cambridge, MA:Belknap。  new window
6.Gastil, J.、Deess, E. P.、Weiser, P. J.、Simmons, C.(2010)。The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。中共中央關於全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定,http: //www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-11/15/content_2528179.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Dryzek, J.(2000)。Introduction: The Deliberative Turn in Democracy Theory。Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.何俊志(2012)。民主工具的開發與執政能力的提升--解讀溫嶺「民主懇談會」的一種新視角。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.房寧(2012)。溫嶺「民主懇談」機制的觀察與分析--發自草根的新型民主。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳奕敏(2012)。從民主懇談到參與式預算。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.任仲平(2012)。四川的選舉民主與浙江的協商民主--我國基層民主發展模式的一項比較研究。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳剩勇、吳興智(2012)。公民參與與地方公共政策的制定--以浙江省溫嶺市民主懇談會為例。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳奕敏(2012)。參與式預算的溫嶺模式。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.徐斯儉、吳建忠(2012)。在治理改革中走向民主:浙江溫嶺鄉鎮人大參與式預算之個案研究。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.李凡(2012)。中國地方政府公共預算改革的實驗和成功--對浙江溫嶺新河鎮公共預算改革的觀察。從民主懇談到參與式預算。北京:世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fishkin, J. S.、Luskin, R. C.(1999)。Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue。The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication。Mahwah:Erlbaum。  new window
11.Fun, A.(2011)。Minipublics: Designing Institutions for Effective Deliberation and Accountability。Accountability through Public Opinion: From Inertia to Public Action。Washington, DC:World Bank Publications。  new window
12.Tilly, C.(1995)。Citizenship, Identity and Social History。Citizenship, Identity and Social History: International Review of History Supplement。Cambridge:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE