:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主題地圖在同行評議專家庫構建中的應用
書刊名:圖書館論壇
作者:劉丹葉繼元
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(3)
頁次:80-86
主題關鍵詞:主題地圖同行評議專家庫學術評價知識組織Topic mapsPeer reviewExpert databaseAcademic evaluationKnowledge organization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
同行專家在同行評議中起著關鍵性作用,同行專家一般來源于同行評議專家庫。我國同行評議專家庫存在專家信息以線性模式為主、未呈現專家之間的關聯等問題。文章提出將主題地圖技術應用于同行評議專家庫構建,利用專家主題地圖按主題集中相關信息資源和揭示專家之間關聯的優勢,以優化"小同行"專家的選擇和有效實施回避制度。
Experts play an important role in the peer review and they are selected from the expert databases,so studies on expert databases are very essential. At present, there are some problems in the inventory of expert databases in China,mainly in the accuracy of subject areas,the linear model of expert information which fails to reveal the relationships between experts. This paper proposes to build the experts database using the topic maps,so as to select the experts who have the same research subjects,and to carry out the avoidance system effectively.
期刊論文
1.葉繼元(2010)。人文社會科學評價體系探討。南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版),2010(1),1-14。  延伸查詢new window
2.Callaham, M. L.、Wears, R. L.、Waeckerle, J. F.(1998)。Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance。Annals of Emergency Medicine,32(3),318-322。  new window
3.Callaham, M. L.、Schriger, D. L.(2002)。Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers。Annals of Emergency Medicine,40(3),323-328。  new window
4.Schroter, S.、Black, N.、Evans, S.、Carpenter, J.、Godlee, F.、Smith, R.(2004)。Effects of training on quality of peer review: Randomised controlled trial。British Medical Journal,328(7441),673-678。  new window
5.Black, N.、Van Rooyen, S.、Godlee, F.、Smith, R.、Evans, S.(1998)。What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal。Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association,280(3),231-233。  new window
6.Zuber, M. A.(2001)。Underrepresentation of women among peer reviewers and textbook authors in medicine in Germany。Medizinische Klinik,96(3),173-180。  new window
7.Alfonso, F.(2010)。The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elites" reviewers。Neurologia,25(9),521-529。  new window
8.Sbhroter, S.、Tite, L.、Hutchings, A.、Black, N.(2006)。Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors。Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association,295(3),314-317。  new window
9.Tonks, A.(1995)。Reviewers chosen by authors。BMJ Clinical Research,311(6999),210。  new window
10.Schroter, S.、Black, N.(2008)。What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?。Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,101(10),507-514。  new window
11.Desai, C.(2008)。Reviewing the peer review。Indian Journal of Pharmacology,40(1),1-2。  new window
12.劉丹(2012)。國內同行評議專家庫研究綜述。重慶大學學報,2012(5),87-91。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE