:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大數據應用於輿論研究的現狀與反思
書刊名:現代傳播:中國傳媒大學學報
作者:曾凡斌
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(2)
頁次:132-138
主題關鍵詞:大數據輿論研究情感分析
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
國內大數據應用于輿論的相關研究多是基于實用主義的角度展開,其研究主要集中于為政府或企業輿論應對而進行的對策和策略研究,其包括大數據與輿論的監測、分析和預警;大數據與輿論管理、引導;利用大數據各種具體的方法,如信息熱詞、百度搜索詞等來分析輿論,但其存在著缺乏理論指導等問題。國外大數據應用于輿論的研究特點主要是建立在理論指導下的實證研究,其采用了各種新的手段和方法,并與傳統社會科學研究的各種方法相結合,及多從情感角度切入分析輿論。本研究指出未來國內大數據應用于輿論的研究需要有以下方面的改進:議程設置假說等理論需要成為相關研究的指導;多種方法綜合應用提高相關研究的信度與效度;通過情感分析促進相關研究。
期刊論文
1.Golder, Scott A.、Macy, Michael W.(2011)。Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures。Science,333(6051),1878-1881。  new window
2.Gayo-Avello, D.(2011)。Don't turn social media into another' Literary Digest' poll。Communications of the ACM,54(10),121-128。  new window
3.王來華、林竹、畢宏音(2004)。對輿情、民意和輿論三概念異同的初步辨析。新視野,2004(5),64-66。  延伸查詢new window
4.張元龍(2009)。關於「輿情」及相關概念的界定與辨析。浙江學刊,2009(3),182-184。  延伸查詢new window
5.Linh, Dang-Xuan、Stieglitz, Stefan、Wladarsch, Jennifer、Neuberger, Christoph(2013)。An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods。Information, Communication & Society,16(5),795-825。  new window
6.李彪、鄭滿寧(2014)。社交媒體時代的網路輿情--生態變化及輿情研究現狀、趨勢。新聞記者,2014(1)。  延伸查詢new window
7.袁麗娜(2014)。大數據時代大眾傳媒輿論引導策略。傳媒,2014(2)。  延伸查詢new window
8.唐濤(2014)。基於大數據的網路輿情分析方法研究。現代情報,2014(3)。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳越、李超零、黃惠新(2011)。網路輿情監測與預警中的知識庫研究。圖書情報工作,2011(2)。  延伸查詢new window
10.姜飛、黃廓(2013)。把握大數據時代契機推動我國網路社會管理更加科學化。中國廣播,2013(5)。  延伸查詢new window
11.張倩(2013)。大數據在突發事件政府決策中的應用。東北農業大學學報(社會科學版),2013(6)。  延伸查詢new window
12.尹亞輝(2013)。大數據時代網路輿情傳播形態與引導戰略。新聞知識,2013(12)。  延伸查詢new window
13.翟云、王益民(2014)。領導幹部的大數據心理困境與消解。領導科學,2014(31)。  延伸查詢new window
14.李梅、張毅、陳瑞學(2015)。面向決策支持的社會輿情大數據服務機制研究。理論月刊,2015(9)。  延伸查詢new window
15.喻國明、王斌、李彪、楊雅(2013)。傳播學研究:大數據時代的新範式。新聞記者,2013(6)。  延伸查詢new window
16.喻國明(2013)。呼喚「社會最大公約數」:2012年社會輿情運行態勢研究--基於百度熱搜詞的大數據分析。編輯之友,2013(5)。  延伸查詢new window
17.喻國明(2013)。構建社會輿情總體判斷的大數據方法--以百度海量搜索數據的處理為例。新聞與寫作,2013(7)。  延伸查詢new window
18.喻國明(2014)。基於語料庫方法的輿論熱詞數據庫的構建--以2011-2013年全國兩會輿情中心詞和關聯詞的發現與分析為例。新聞與寫作,2014(1)。  延伸查詢new window
19.喻國明(2015)。當前社會輿情的結構性特點與分析性發現--基於2014年中國社會網路輿情的大數據分析。江淮論壇,2015(5)。  延伸查詢new window
20.李彪(2013)。微博中熱點話題的內容特質及傳播機制研究:基於新浪微博6025條高轉發微博的數據挖掘分析。中國人民大學學報,2013(5),10-17。  延伸查詢new window
21.康偉(2012)。突發事件輿情傳播的社會網路結構測度與分析--基於「11.16校車事故」的實證研究。中國軟科學,2012(7)。  延伸查詢new window
22.李金海、何有世、熊強(2014)。基於大數據技術的網路輿情文本挖掘研究。情報雜誌,2014(10),1-6+13。  延伸查詢new window
23.Conway, B. A.、Kenski, K.、Wang, D.(2015)。The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,20(4),363-380。  new window
24.Guo, L.、Vargo, C.(2015)。The Power of Message Networks: A Big-Data Analysis of the Network Agenda Setting Model and Issue Ownership。Mass Communication and Society,18(5),557-576。  new window
25.Reshef, D. N.、Reshef, Y. A.、Finucane, H. K.、Grossman, S. R.、McVean, G.、Turnbaugh, P. J.、Lander, E. S.、Mitzenmacher, M.、Sabeti, P. C.(20111216)。Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets。Science,334(6062),1518-1524。  new window
26.DiGrazia, J.、McKelvey, K.、Bollen, J.、Rojas, F.(2012)。More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as A Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior。PLoS One,8(11)。  new window
27.Jensen, Michael J.、Anstead, Nick(2013)。Psychological Investigations: Tweets, Votes, and Unknown Unknowns in the Republican Nomination Process。Policy & Internet,5(2),161-182。  new window
28.Jungherr, A.(2014)。The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content。Journal of Communication,64(2),239-259。  new window
29.Park, J.、Baek, Y. M.、Cha, M. Y.(2014)。Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nonverbal Cues in Emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from Big Data Analysis。Journal of Communication,64(2),333-354。  new window
30.劉曉偉(2014)。李普曼新聞傳播思想在民國時期的引介與接受。新聞與傳播研究,2014(5)。  延伸查詢new window
31.Giglietto, F.、Selva, D.(2014)。Second Screen and Participation: A Content Analysis on A Full Season Dataset of Tweets Fabio Giglietto & Donatella Selva。Journal of Communication,64,260-277。  new window
32.劉軍華(2015)。大數據視野下統計數據質量演變的信息回歸、分佈與趨勢。統計與信息論壇,2015(9)。  延伸查詢new window
33.Emery, S. L.、Szczypka, G.、Abril, E. P.、Kim, Y.、Vera, L.(2014)。Are You Scared Yet? Evaluating Fear Appeal Messages in Tweets about the Tips Campaign。Journal of Communication,64,278-295。  new window
34.謝金林(2011)。情感與網路抗爭動員--基於湖北「石首事件」的個案分析。公共管理學報,2011(1月號)。  延伸查詢new window
35.郭小安(2013)。網路抗爭中謠言的情感動員:策略與劇目。國際新聞界,2013(12)。  延伸查詢new window
36.Franch, F.。(Wisdom of the Crowds) 2010 UK Election Prediction with Social Media。Journal of Information Technology & Politics,6(2),87-110。  new window
37.Thelwall, Mike、Wilkinson, David、Uppal, Sukhvinder(2010)。Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(1),190-199。  new window
38.McCombs, Maxwell E.、Shaw, Donald L.(1972)。The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media。The Public Opinion Quarterly,36(2),176-187。  new window
39.Neuman, W. Russell、Guggenheim, Lauren、Jang, S. Mo、Bae, Soo Young(2014)。The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data。Journal of Communication,64(2),193-214。  new window
40.Vargo, C. J.、Guo, L.、McCombs, M.、Shaw, D. L.(2014)。Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election。Journal of Communication,64(2),296-316。  new window
41.Albrecht, S.、Lübcke, M.、Hartig-Perschke, R.(2007)。Weblog Campaigning in the German Bundestag Election 2005。Social Science Computer Review,25(4),504-520。  new window
會議論文
1.Guo, L.、McCombs, M.(2011)。Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects。The annual meeting of the International Communication Association。Boston, MA。  new window
2.O'Connor, B.、Balasubramanyan, R.、Routledge, B. R.、Smith, N. A.(2010)。From Tweets to Polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series。Fourth International AAAI conference on Weblogs and Social Media,(會議日期: 2010/05/23-05/26)。AAAI。122-129。  new window
3.Williams, C. B.、Gulati, G. J.(2008)。What is a social network worth? Facebook and vote share in the 2008 presidential primaries。Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,(會議日期: 2008/08/28-08/31)。Boston, MA。  new window
4.Sang, E. T. K.、Bos, J.(2012)。Predicting the 2011 dutch senate election results with twitter。The Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media,(會議日期: 2012/04/23)。Avignon:Association for Computational Linguistics。53-60。  new window
5.Tumasjan, A.、Sprenger, T. O.、Sandner, Philipp G.、Welpe, I. M.(2010)。Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment。The 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,(會議日期: 2010/05/23-05/26)。Washington, DC。  new window
6.Gloor, P. A.、Krauss, J.、Nann, S.(2009)。Web Science 2.0: Identifying Trends through Semantic Social Network Analysis。2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering,(會議日期: 2009/08/29-08/31),215-222。  new window
7.Guo, L.、McCombs, M.(2011)。Toward the Third Level of Agenda Setting Theory: A Network Agenda Setting Model。Symposium conducted at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication。St. Louis, MO。  new window
8.Gayo-Avello, D.、Metaxas, P.、Mustafaraj, E.(2011)。Limits of Electoral Predictions Using Social Media Data。The International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,(會議日期: 2011/07/17-07/21)。Barcelona。  new window
9.Chung, J.、Mustafaraj, E.(2011)。Can Collective Sentiment Expressed on Twitter Predict Political Elections?。The Twenty-fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,(會議日期: 2011/08/07-08/11)。San Francisco, CA。1770-1771。  new window
圖書
1.Poincare, Henri(1952)。Science and Hypothesis。New York:Dover Publications, Inc.。  new window
2.Turner, Jonathan H.、Stets, Jan E.、孫俊才、文軍(2007)。情感社會學。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳力丹(1999)。輿論學:輿論導向研究。北京:中國廣播電視出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.孟小平(1989)。揭示公共關係的奧秘--輿論學。中國新聞出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉建明(1988)。基礎輿論學。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Kusnetzky, Dan。What is "Big Data?",http://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-big-data/。  new window
2.Lindsay, R.。Predicting Polls with Lexicon,http://Languagewrong.tumblr.com/post/55722687/predicting-polls-with-lexicon。  new window
3.Upton, G.。Does Attractiveness of Candidates Affect Election Outcomes?,http://com/lib/files/AttractivePoliticians.pdf。  new window
4.Goldstein, P.,Rainey, J.(2010)。The 2010 Elections: Twitter isn't A very Reliable Prediction tool.,https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/11/the-2010-midterms-twitter-effect-not-a-very-reliable-election-prediction-tool.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Guo, L.。Toward the Third Level of Agenda Setting Theory: A Network Agenda Setting Model。Agenda Setting in A 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.楊國斌(2011)。悲情與戲謔:網路事件中的情感動員。新媒體事件研究。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE