臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國公司法視角下控制股東信義義務的本義與移植的可行性
書刊名：比較法研究
作者：朱大明
出版日期：2017
卷期：2017(5)
頁次：45-58
主題關鍵詞：公司法；比較法；控制股東；信義義務；法律移植；Company law；Comparative law；Controlling shareholder；Fiduciary duty；Transplantation of law
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
由于特殊的歷史背景,控制股東濫用權利損害公司以及其他股東利益的情形在我國非常普遍。因此,如何有效規范控制股東的行為一直是我國公司法中的一個重要問題。對此,很多學者主張我國應當引入美國公司法中的控制股東信義義務規則。但是,本文通過深入考察美國公司法中的控制股東信義義務規則,全面整理美國公司法中控制股東信義義務規則的兩大模式,即馬薩諸塞州模式與特拉華州模式的基本內涵、現狀與存在的問題,提出由于美國控制股東信義義務規則所要解決的問題與我國當下多有差異,因此認為我國不宜引入美國公司法中的控制股東信義義務規則,而應當通過法解釋學的方法,有效運用我國《公司法》第20條之規定來實現規范控制股東行為的目標。
Due to the special historical background,it is very common in China that the controlling shareholders injure the interests of the company or of other shareholders by abusing the shareholder ’s rights. Therefore,how to regulate controlling shareholders’ acts has always been a significant problem in China’s company law. Many scholars allege that China should introduce the fiduciary duty rule under American corporation law. However,after delving deep into the fiduciary duty rule and combing the two models under the rule,i. e. Massachusetts model and Delaware model,including the basic concepts,current situation,and existing problems,this article believes that it is implausible to introduce the American fiduciary duty rule into China. The reason is that there are too many differences between the problems aimed to solve in China and America. The proper way to regulate controlling shareholders ’acts is to apply Article 20 under the current Company Law through legal interpretation.
期刊論文
1.Siegel, Mary(2004)。Fiduciary Duty Myths in Close Corporate Law。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，29(2)，377-489。  new window
2.Art, Robert C.(2003)。Shareholder Rights and Remedies in Close Corporations: Oppression, Fiduciary Duties, and Reasonable Expectations。The Journal of Corporation Law，28，371-418。  new window
3.Ragazzo, Robert A.(1999)。Toward a Delaware Common Law of Closely Held Corporations。Washington University Law Quarterly，77，1099-1151。  new window
4.Rock, Edward B.、Wachter, Michael L.(1999)。Team Production in Business Organizations: Waiting for the Omelet to Set: Match-Specific Assets and Minority Oppression in Close Corporations。The Journal of Corporation Law，24，913-948。  new window
5.Dickerson, Claire Moore(1993)。Is It Appropriate to Appropriate Corporate Concepts: Fiduciary Duties and the Revised Uniform Partnership Act。U. Colo. L. Rev.，64，111-157。  new window
6.O'Kelley, Charles R. Jr.(1992)。Filling Gaps in the Close Corporation Contract: A Transaction Cost Analysis。Northwestern University Law Review，87，216-242。  new window
7.Means, Benjamin(2010)。A Contractual Approach to Shareholder Oppression Law。Fordham Law Review，79，1161-1203。  new window
8.Thompson, Robert B.(1993)。The Shareholder's cause of Action for Oppression。Business Lawyer，48，699-726。  new window
9.Dammann, Jens(2015)。The Controlling Shareholder's General Duty of Care: A Dogma That Should Be Abandoned。University of Illinois Law Review，2015(2)，479-506。  new window
10.劉凱(2009)。控制股東的信義義務及違信責任。政法論壇，2009(2)。  延伸查詢new window
11.姚金海、潘榕芳(2009)。上市公司控制股東受信義務的引入。證券市場導報，2009(6)。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱慈蘊(2004)。資本多數決原則與控制股東的誠信義務。法學研究，2004(4)，104-116。  延伸查詢new window
13.Moll, Douglas K.(2009)。Shareholder Oppression in Texas Close Corporations: Majority Rule (Still) Isn't What It Used to Be。Tex. J. Bus. L.，43，21-24。  new window
14.Anabtawi, Iman、Stout, Lynn(2008)。Fiduciary Duty for Activist Shareholders。Stan. L. Rev.，60，1255-1266。  new window
15.Hoffman, David A.(2006)。The "Duty" to Be a Rational Shareholder。Minnesota Law Review，90，537-611。  new window
16.Karmel, Roberta S.(2004)。Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Investors?。Bus. Law.，60，1-2。  new window
17.Loewenstein, Mark J.(1999)。Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.: A Historical Perspective。W. New Eng. L. Rev.，33，339-363。  new window
18.Young, George Parker、Circelli, Vincent P.、Walter, Kelli L.(2013)。Fiduciary Duties and Minority Shareholder Oppression from the Defense Perspective: Differing Approaches in Texas, Delaware, and Nevada。Tex. J. Bus. L.，45，257-320。  new window
19.Moscow, Cyril、Ankers, Norman C.(1998)。Oppression of Minority Shareholders。Mich. Bar J.，77，1088-1092。  new window
20.Klausner, Michael(2006)。The Corporation Theory of Corporate Law: A Generational Later。J. Corp. L.，31，799-780。  new window
21.Charny, David(1991)。Hypothetical Bargains: The Normative Structure of Contract Interpretation。Mich. L. Rev.，89，185-187。  new window
22.Thompson, Robert B.(1990)。The Law's Limits on Contracts in a Corporation。The Journal of Corporation Law，15，377-415。  new window
23.Dalley, Paula J.(2004)。The Misguided Doctrine of Stockholder Fiduciary Duties。Hofstra L. Rev.，33，175-222。  new window
24.Talbott, Malcolm D.(1959)。Restitution Remedies in Contract Cases: Finding a Fiduciary or Confidential Relationship to Gain Remedies。Ohio State University. College of Law，20(2)，320-327。  new window
25.Miller, Sandra K.(1999)。How Should U. K. and U. S. Minority Shareholder Remedies for Unfairly Prejudicial or Oppressive Conduct Be Reformed。Am. Bus. L. J.，36，579-627。  new window
26.Mitchell, Lawrence E.(1990)。The Death of Fiduciary Duty in Close Corporation。U. Pa. L. Rev.，138。  new window
27.Dailey, Paula J.(1999)。The Law of Partnership Expulsions: Fiduciary Duty and Good Faith。Cardozo L. Rev.，21。  new window
28.Mitchell, Lawrence E.(1997)。The Naked Emperor: A Corporate Lawyer Looks at RUPA's Fiduciary Provisions。Wash. & Lee L. Rev.，54，465-482。  new window
29.Velasco, Julian(2010)。How Many Fiduciaries Duties Are There in Corporate Law。S. Cal. L. Rev.，83，1231-1308。  new window
30.Dent, George W. Jr.(2001)。Gap Fillers and Fiduciary Duties in Strategic Alliances。Bus. L.，57，55-86。  new window
31.Stevenson, Shannon Wells(2001)。The Venture Capital Solution to the Problem of Close Corporations Shareholder Duties。Duke L. J.，51，1139-1148。  new window
32.Meinhardt, Mark(2001)。Investor Beware: Protection of Minority Shareholder Interests in Closely Held Limited Liability Organizations: Delaware Law and Its Adherents。Washburn L. J.，40，288-290。  new window
33.Kang, Sang Yop(2013)。Re-Envisioning the Controlling Shareholder Regime: Why Controlling Shareholders and Minority Shareholders Often Embrace。U. Pa. J. Bus. L.，16，843-882。  new window
圖書
1.習龍生(2006)。控制股東的義務和責任研究。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.范世乾(2010)。控制股東濫用控制權行為的法律規制。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王繼遠(2010)。控制股東對公司和股東的信義義務。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bauman, Jeffrey D.(2007)。Corporations: Law and Policy。  new window
5.Fletcher, William Meade(2000)。The Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations。  new window
6.Ellis, M.(1988)。Fiduciary Duties in Canada。Toronto：De Boo。  new window
7.Pinto, Arthur R.、Branson, Douglas M.(2009)。Understanding Corporate Law。  new window
8.Balotti, R. Franklin、Finkelstein, Jesse A.(1996)。The Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organizations。  new window
9.劉俊海(2015)。現代公司法。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Olson, Mancur(2000)。Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorship。Basic Books。  new window
11.Cox, Ames D.、Hazen, Thomas Lee(2003)。Corporations。  new window
圖書論文
1.湯欣(2006)。控股股東的受信義務--從美國法上移植？。轉型中的公司法的現代化。社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：829（臺灣：808，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68346090
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上