:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論澳大利亞檢察官的職權與職業保障
書刊名:比較法研究
作者:李新季美君
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(1)
頁次:170-182
主題關鍵詞:檢察官職權職業保障改革建議ProsecutorsProsecuting powersOccupational securityProposals of reform
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
檢察官是檢察權行使的主體。世界各國賦予檢察官職權的大小與該國的歷史文化傳統、憲政制度和司法制度等因素密切相關。而檢察官職業保障制度是促進檢察官依法獨立行使檢察權,實現司法公正的重要條件。澳大利亞檢察官的主要職權為提起公訴權,但不同級別的檢察官可行使的權力大小不同,其在職業保障方面的特色為高職位的終身制與高工資高福利待遇,而這也是世界上主要國家在檢察官職業保障方面的共同特點。我國當前的檢察改革,應以我國國情及傳統習慣為基礎,遵循司法權的發展規律,合理配置檢察權,適當提高檢察官的福利待遇,以促進檢察隊伍的精英化、專業化,增強檢察官的職業自豪感與榮譽感。
The prosecutors are the subjects to exercise those prosecuting powers. Due to different history,cultural traditions,constitutional systems and judicial systems,each country stipulates the extensive or narrow prosecuting powers for their prosecution service. The system of occupational security of prosecutors is an important condition in promoting the prosecutors to perform their powers independently as well as realizing the judicial justice. In Australia,the main powers of the prosecutors are to prosecute criminal cases. However,prosecutors with different ranks may perform different prosecuting powers. As to the occupational security,the Australian prosecutors enjoy high salaries and good welfares,which is a common characteristic of the occupational security in main west countries in the world. Therefore,during the process of current procuratorial reform in China,on the basis of national conditions and traditional accustoms as well as obeying by the developing rules of judicial powers,we should reasonably allocate the prosecuting powers and improve the welfares for prosecutors properly in order to promote the excellentization and specialization of the team of prosecutors and enhance their professional sense of pride and honour.
期刊論文
1.朱孝清(2009)。檢察官客觀公正義務及其在中國的發展完善。中國法學,2009(2)。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝佑平、萬毅(2002)。檢察官當事人化與客觀公正義務--對我國檢察制度改革的一點反思。人民檢察,2002(5)。  延伸查詢new window
3.何強、凌雯(2014)。加強檢察官職業保障的幾點建議。人民檢察,2014(18)。  延伸查詢new window
4.季美君(2011)。澳大利亞指控協商制度透視。華東政法大學學報,2011(3)。  延伸查詢new window
5.季美君、薩齊科・保羅(2012)。白俄羅斯檢察制度的發展。國家檢察官學院學報,2012(6)。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊薪玉(2016)。檢察官職業保障制度研究。法制博覽,2016(2),174-175。  延伸查詢new window
7.高麗蓉、姜昕(2011)。檢察官身份保障制度之完善。人民檢察,2011(6),58-60。  延伸查詢new window
8.韓慶祥、張健(2012)。中國特色社會主義建設實踐的內在邏輯與發展趨向。中國社會科學,2012(3)。  延伸查詢new window
9.王守安(2015)。論檢察官職業保障機制的建構。河南社會科學,2015(6)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何家弘(2008)。檢察制度比較研究。中國檢察出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Smith, Adam(1759)。The Theory of Moral Sentiments。  new window
3.宋遠升、閔銀龍(2007)。最新國外刑事司法制度研究。東南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.甄貞(2010)。檢察制度比較研究。法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Macintyre, Stuart(2004)。A Concise History of Australia。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.(2016)。世界各國刑事訴訟法(大洋洲卷)。中國檢察出版社。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Tedeschi, Mark。澳大利亞皇家檢察官在刑事司法中的作用。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.萬毅(20150623)。德國檢察官「與法官一樣獨立」。  延伸查詢new window
2.季美君(20161011)。未曾發生嚴重腐敗的老牌帝國。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20161101)。反重大欺詐局是重要反腐敗機構。  延伸查詢new window
4.季美君,薩齊科・保羅(20150127)。白俄羅斯給予檢察官廣泛的職權和保障。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE