【目的/意義】本研究旨在探索我國人文社科成果評價研究的脈絡、隊伍、熱點、存在問題及趨勢,為推動人文社科評價研究提供參考。【方法/過程】以《中國知網學術期刊網絡出版總庫》為數據源,采用文獻計量、共詞分析、聚類分析等方法,從年度分布、來源期刊分布、核心作者、機構分布、高被引文獻、基金支持,以及研究內容等7個方面對1636篇文獻進行了綜合評析。【結果/結論】研究結果顯示中國的人文社科評價研究始于1982年,社科評價研究主要集中在對期刊或論文的評價指標體系、評價方法和評價標準三方面,并且多數以對期刊的評價代替對論文的評價。中國人文社科評價的主體不夠健全,評價體系不夠完善,評價對象不夠全面。構建中國特色的人文社會科學,必須構建具有中國特色的人文社會科學評價體系、評價主體和評價對象。

【Purpose/significance】The purpose of this thesis was to provide the reference for the development of Chinese humanities and social science evaluation research with the aid of in-depth analysis of the research context, current teams,hot spots, existing problems and growing trends of Humanities and Social Science Evaluation in China.【Method/process】The annual distribution, source journal distribution, core author and affiliation distribution, highly cited document situation,foundation items and research contents were discussed comprehensively according to 1636 papers from the database named China National Knowledge Infrastructure by means of bibliometrics, co-word analysis and cluster analysis.【Result/conclusion】Research results showed that the achievement evaluation researches of humanities and social science in China began in 1982, and the researches were to be focused on the evaluation index system, method and criteria of journal or article and most of them paid too much attention to journal evaluation instead of an article itself. Researches also showed that the Chinese evaluation subject,evaluation system and evaluation object all existed faults. In order to establish humanities and social science with Chinese characteristics, the evaluation index system, evaluation subject and evaluation object must be built with Chinese characteristics.