[目的/意義]學術論文影響力的全面評價成為新的關注點。對比發現中美國際學術論文影響力的差異與不足,有助于提高我國在國際學術上的影響力。[方法/過程]文章基于被引頻次和使用次數對SCI,SSCI收錄的2012—2016年間的中美圖書情報學領域所發表的學術論文的影響力進行比較研究。[結果 /結論]研究發現:(1)與美國相比,雖然我國學術論文發文量較低,但是在被引頻次、最近180天的使用次數和2013年至今的使用次數所占比分布均優于美國。(2)兩年后學術論文受眾關注程度達到穩定狀態。可以通過提高學術論文的學術質量和創新性來增加使用次數,提高學術論文的社會影響力。并指明我國圖書情報學后續發展、論文的不足及未來的研究。

[Purpose/significance] The comprehensive evaluation of academic papers’ influence has become a new topic. Comparing and discovering the differences of international influence of Chinese and American academic papers can help to improve China’s international academic papers’ influence. [Method/process] Based on times cited and usage count,this paper compares the international influence of Chinese and American academic papers in Library and Information Science published from2012 to 2016 and collected in SCI and SSCI. [Result/conclusion] Firstly,compared with the America,the number of academic papers published in SCI and SSCI of our country is low. However,the proportions of distribution of times cited,usage count of the last 180 days and usage count since 2013 are better than the America. Secondly,the degree of the attention of academic papers reaches a stable state after 2 years. The number of usage count and social impact of academic papers can be increased by improving the academic quality and innovation. The paper also points out the development of Library and Information Science in our country,its deficiency,and future research.