人類學的民族志文本寫作范式經歷了隨意寫作、科學民族志和實驗民族志三種范式,本文分析了在人類學史中推動民族志文本寫作范式轉移背后的動力,指出了科學民族志文本寫作的優勢和缺點,三種實驗民族志文本寫作體裁的優勢和不足之處,質疑了實驗民族志的學術理念付諸實踐的可行性。最后指出了在實驗民族志的學術理念喧囂過后,人類學民族志文本寫作的趨勢又重新回歸到了科學民族志范式。

The anthropological ethnographic writing has gone through three paradigms of random writing, scientific ethnography and experimental ethnography. This paper analyzes the driving force behind the transfer of ethnographic writing paradigm in the history of anthropology, the advantages and shortcomings of the three paradigms mentioned above, and question the feasibility of putting the academic idea of the experimental ethnography into practice. Finally, it points out that the trend of anthropological ethnographic writing has returned to the paradigm of scientific ethnography after the hurly of academic idea of the experimental ethnography.