:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:評阿忒奈奧斯對柏拉圖敘事可信性的批判--以蘇格拉底軍旅生涯史實為例
書刊名:史學史研究
作者:李艷輝
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(4)
頁次:82-88
主題關鍵詞:阿忒奈奧斯柏拉圖蘇格拉底軍旅生涯可信性AthenaeusPlatoSocratesMilitary careerCreditability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
柏拉圖提到蘇格拉底曾到三地作戰:波提戴亞、安非波里斯、德里昂,但阿忒奈奧斯對他的記載提出否定。阿忒奈奧斯的目的在于從對哲學家的批判入手否定哲學的權威。他對柏拉圖的史實批駁暴露出種種錯誤,不足為信。柏拉圖的記載基本準確,但受個人感情的影響,他的細節也有待商榷。
Plato referred that Socrates fought three battles,one in Potidaea,one in Amphipolis and another in Delium,but it’s doubted,even denied by Athenaeus,a later writer in the early Roman Empire. Athenaeus sought to challenge philosophy by criticizing philosophers. However,he was not convincing owning to some mistakes in his argument. Basically,Plato’s description was accurate,but it remained to be queried in some details due to his favouritism toward Socrates.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top