:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:控規調整的技術管理要素與方法研究--兼論實質內容安排的重要性
書刊名:城市規劃
作者:衣霄翔趙天宇肖飛宇
出版日期:2020
卷期:2020(11)
頁次:45-51
主題關鍵詞:控制性詳細規劃控規調整實質正義技術管理必要性合理性Regulatory planRegulatory plan adjustmentSubstantive justiceTechnical managementNecessityRationality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
控制性詳細規劃調整是為控規得以更好地實施而建立的彈性和優化機制,但在實踐中卻常常產生很多消極問題。據此前一項案例研究,目前控規調整的制度建設中以程序性安排為主,實質內容的缺失是造成控規調整管理中論證隨意、審查不到位和決策盲目的重要原因之一,因此,需要通過統一的技術管理加強控規調整的實質性審查,令決策有據可循。本文結合上述案例的實際情形和研究結論,從實質內容的意義和作用機制解析入手,探討了基于完善實質內容的控規調整技術管理體系和方法,包括對論證的要求、控規調整的合法性、適用性、必要性和合理性5方面技術管理要素,并嘗試建構相應的審查與決策機制,為控規調整設置一定的入門、成立和通過條件提供參考性建議。
Regulatory plan adjustment is a flexible optimization mechanism established for better implementation of regulatory plan,but in practice it often produces many negative problems.According to a previous case study,the system of regulatory plan adjustments prioritizes the procedural arrangements,and lacks substantive content arrangement,which is one of the important causes for random argumentation,inadequate examination,and blind decision-making in the management of regulatory plan adjustments.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the substantive examination of regulatory plan adjustment through unified technical management,so that the decision-making has evidences to follow.Based on the actual situation and research conclusion of the above case,this paper analyzes the meaning and action mechanism of substantive contents.Then the paper discusses the technical management system and methods of regulatory plan adjustment based on improving the substantive content,including five technical management factors:requirements for argumentation,as well as the legitimacy,applicability,necessity,and rationality of regulatory plan adjustment.It attempts to develop a corresponding examination and decision-making mechanism,providing a reference for setting a certain entry,establishment,and passing conditions of regulatory plan adjustment.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE