With the development of media technology,the United Kingdom,the United States and China have to face the judicial governance of copyright disputes in new s aggregation. Through comparison,the unique problem that our judicial system faces in dealing w ith copyright disputes of new s aggregation is that the plaintiff’s appeal is not clear,w hich leads to the randomness of the court’s trial scope. The key problem that our country’s judicature faces in dealing w ith the copyright dispute of new s aggregation is the mechanical transplant of the judgment standard of information netw ork communication behavior and the uninhibited change of the identification of "should know " of aggregation service provider. In this paper,w e think that w e can make the plaintiff file direct infringement and indirect infringement on the original petition,so as to make clear the goal of the petition; The judgment standard of information netw ork communication behavior adheres to the joint use of Server Standard,User Perception Standard and the distribution of burden of proof. In the identification of "should know ",w e insist that duty of care is the principle,and review obligation is the exception.