在當前"原生態文化"保護運動的熱潮中,存在著兩種互相對立的理解進路與保護方案:批駁論與辯護論,二者分別在"結構"與"歷史"之間各持一端。這種爭論遮蔽了文化保護背后的社會總體面向。云南省洱源縣土風計劃的實踐說明,"原生態文化"的維系與保護過程,是多元主體與理念的并接過程,是社會結構與歷史實踐碰撞后的總體呈現,地方社會與民族關系為這種"并接"提供了文化底色。我們應該以第三條思路,即地方社會場域中的并接視角來理解這場文化保護運動及其中涉及的多元主體關系。

In the current preservation movement of original eco-culture,there are two opposite understanding approaches and protection plans: criticizing theory and defending theory,each sticking to its own argument in "structure"and "history". This debate has obscured the general social orientation behind cultural protection. The practice of the Plan to Protect Local Cultural Heritage in Eryuan County of Yunnan Province shows that the maintenance and protection process of eco-culture is a process to merge the plural subjects and ideas and an overall presentation of the collision between social structure and historical practice.The local society and ethnic relation have provided cultural background for this merging. We should adopt the third way of thinking,that is,to understand this cultural protection movement and the plural subject relation in it from the perspective of merging in the field of local society.