我國《民法典》包含了債總規范的內容,但未設置獨立的債法總則體系結構。沒有債法總則的民法典,更需要含有債法總論的民法學。識別我國《民法典》中的債總規范,有利于司法審判給出準確而全面的裁判依據,有利于立法部門找準今后完善債法制度的方向,有利于增加私人行為模式的選項,有利于奠定民法學教學和研究的基礎。債總規范的識別,要準確把握債之關系的本質和提取公因式的立法技術。《民法典》在債的主體、債的標的、債的效力、債的保全、債的移轉、債的消滅等方面,多有實質意義上的債總規范。民法學須加強對這些規范的解釋,闡釋它們本身涵蘊的意旨,以為法律的正確適用定位導航。

The Civil Code of PRC has not set up an independent part of general provisions of law of obligation.The absence of any part of general provisions of law of obligation within a Civil Code makes it all the more urgent for the inclusion of general theory into the science of civil law.The identification of the general provisions of law of obligation in the Civil Code of PRC is of great use in at least four ways:first,it aids the judicial bodies in their formulation of an accurate and comprehensive basis for judgment;second,it helps the legislative branch find the right direction to improve the obligation law system in the future;third,it provides more options in the mode of private behavior;last but not least,it lays a good foundation for the teaching and research of civil law.In order to identify the general provisions of law of obligation,we should truly grasp the essence of the obligatory relationship and the legislative technique of common factor method.In a substantial sense,the Civil Code of PRC includes such general provisions of law of obligation as their subjects,objects,effects,preservation,assignment,and extinction.In order to provide guidance on their correct application,the interpretation of these provisions,especially their connotations,should be strengthened.