臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：信息治理與社會歧視--中國隱私立法的策略與實踐
書刊名：社會學研究
作者：楊彪
作者(外文)：Yang, Biao
出版日期：2015
卷期：2015(6)
頁次：26-48+242-243
主題關鍵詞：信息治理；統計性歧視；人格性歧視；信號傳遞；隱私立法
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
隱私治理的實際效果，很大程度上取決于不同利益群體或個人的隱私偏好選擇。信息時代下的隱私治理問題首先要回答的是誰在隱私保護中獲益。傳統的賦權式治理思路忽視決策者的認知能力和內心動機等心理影響因素，引發了統計性歧視和人格性歧視這兩種偏差現象。研究表明，加強隱私控制會造成信息屏蔽，帶來統計性歧視問題;而強化隱私自決則會誘導信號傳遞，帶來人格性歧視問題。為了擺脫上述治理困境，應修正中國隱私治理的總體方向，探尋復雜約束條件下的隱私決策變量，采取溫和適度且科學高效的干預措施，從而更加精確地預測和規制隱私行為。
The actual effect of privacy governance to a large extent depends upon the preferences expressed in the privacy choice of different interest groups or individuals.The issue of privacy governance in the information age must ask the question of who benefits from the protection of privacy.The traditional idea of entitlement governance often ignores the psychological factors of the decision maker，such as his/her cognitive ability and motivation.This causes statistical discrimination and personality discrimination.This study shows that reinforcing privacy control causes the problem of statistical discrimination by shielding normal information flow.At the same time，strengthening privacy self-management causes the problem of personality discrimination by inducing signal transmission.In order to resolve the above dilemmas，China should modify its overall direction of privacy governance，explore the privacy decision variables in the complex situation full of constraints，as well as taking moderate，scientific and efficient interventions.By doing so it can predict and regulate privacy acts in a more accurate manner.
期刊論文
1.Beales, J. Howard III、Muris, Timothy J.(2008)。Choice or Consequences: Protecting Privacy in Commercial Information。The University of Chicago Law Review，75，109-136。  new window
2.景軍(2006)。泰坦尼克定律：中國愛滋病風險分析。社會學研究，2006(5)，123-150。  延伸查詢new window
3.Sovern, Jeff(1999)。Opting In, Opting Out, Or No Options At All: The Fight for Control of Personal Information。Washington Law Review，74，1033-187。  new window
4.Solove, Daniel J.(2013)。Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma。Harvard Law Review，126(7)，1879-1903。  new window
5.Calo, Ryan(2014)。Digital Market Manipulation。George Washington Law Review，82(4)，995-1051。  new window
6.劉能(2005)。愛滋病，汙名和社會歧視：中國鄉村社區中兩類人群的一個定量分析。社會學研究，2005(6)，136-164。  延伸查詢new window
7.Aronson, E.、Bridgeman, D.(1979)。Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，5(4)，438-446。  new window
8.Jolls, Christine、Sunstein, Cass R.、Thaler, Richard H.(1998)。A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics。Stanford Law Review，50(5)，1471-1550。  new window
9.Crawford, V. P.、Sobel, J.(1982)。Strategic Information Transmission。Econometrica，50(6)，1431-1451。  new window
10.白俊、連立帥(2012)。信貸資金配置差異：所有制歧視抑或稟賦差異?。管理世界，2012(6)。  延伸查詢new window
11.葛玉好、曾湘泉(2011)。市場歧視對城鎮地區性別工資差距的影響。經濟研究，2011(6)。  延伸查詢new window
12.行紅芳(2007)。熟人社會的汙名與汙名控制策略--以愛滋病為例。青年研究，2007(2)。  延伸查詢new window
13.胡淩(2012)。網絡安全、隱私與互聯網的未來。中外法學，2012(2)。  延伸查詢new window
14.蔣傳海(2010)。網絡效應、轉移成本和競爭性價格歧視。經濟研究，2010(9)，55-66。  延伸查詢new window
15.李春玲、李實(2008)。市場競爭還是性別歧視--收入性別差異擴大趨勢及其原因解釋。社會學研究，2008(2)。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉亮、章元、李韻(2012)。農民工地域歧視與就業機會研究。統計研究，2012(7)。  延伸查詢new window
17.萬海遠、李實(2013)。戶籍歧視對城鄉收入差距的影響。經濟研究，2013(9)。  延伸查詢new window
18.王利明(2012)。隱私權概念的再界定。法學家，2012(1)。  延伸查詢new window
19.夏國美、楊秀石(2006)。社會性別、人口流動與愛滋病風險。中國社會科學，2006(6)。  延伸查詢new window
20.徐曉軍(2009)。內核-外圍：傳統鄉土社會關係結構的變動--以鄂東鄉村愛滋病人社會關係重構為例。社會學研究，2009(1)。  延伸查詢new window
21.張新寶、任彥(2013)。網絡反腐中的隱私權保護。法學研究，2013(6)。  延伸查詢new window
22.Acquisti, Alessandro、Brandimarte, Laura、Loewenstein, George(2015)。Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of Information。Science，347(6221)，509-514。  new window
23.Ayres, Ian(1991)。Fair Driving: Gender and Race Discrimination in Retail Car Negotiations。Harvard Law Review，104。  new window
24.Brandimcute, L.、Acquisti, A.、Loewenstein, G.(2013)。Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox。Social Psychological and Personality Science，4。  new window
25.DePaulo, B. M.、Moms, W. L.(2006)。The Unrecognized Stereotyping and Discrimination Against Singles。Current Directions in Psychological Science，15。  new window
26.Holzer, H. J.、Raphael, S.、Stoll, M. A.(2006)。Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks and the Racial Hiring Practices of Employers。Journal of Law and Economics，49(2)，451-480。  new window
27.Jolls, C.、Sunstein, C. R.(2006)。Debiasing through Law。The Journal of Legal Studies，35(1)，199-242。  new window
28.Kunda, Z.、Oleson, K. C.(1997)。When Exceptions Prove the Rule: How Extremity of Deviance Determines the Impact of Deviant Examples on Stereotypes。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，72。  new window
29.Lundbeig, S. J.(1991)。The Enforcement of Equal Opportunity Laws Under Imperfect Information: Affirmative Action and Alternatives。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，106。  new window
30.McAdams, R. H.(1996)。Group Norms, Gossip, and Blackmail。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，144。  new window
31.Montjoye, Y. D.、Hadaelli, L.、Singh, V. K.、Pentland, A. S.(2015)。Unique in the Shopping Mall: On the Reidentifiability of Credit Card Metadata。Science，347。  new window
32.Peppet, S. R.(2011)。Unraveling Privacy: The Personal Prospectus and the Threat of A Full-Disclosure Future。Northwestern University Law Review，105(3)，1153-1204。  new window
33.Pcrsico, N.(2002)。Racial Profiling, Fairness, and Effectiveness of Policing。The American Economic Review，92。  new window
34.Persico, N.、Todd, P. E.(2005)。Passenger Profiling, Imperfect Screening, and Airport Security。The American Economic Review，95。  new window
35.Schwab, S.(1986)。Is Statistical Discrimination Efficient?。The American Economic Review，76。  new window
36.Sckwartz, P. M.(2005)。Privacy Inalienability and the Regulation of Spyware。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，20。  new window
37.Schwartz, P. M.、Solove, D. J.(2011)。The PH Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information。New York University Law Review，86。  new window
38.Slovic, P.(1995)。The Construction of Preference。The American Psychologist，50(5)。  new window
39.Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob(2008)。Privacy versus Antidiscrimination。The University of Chicago Law Review，75，363-381。  new window
40.Strahilevitz, L. J.(2013)。Toward a Positive Theory of Privacy Law。Harvard Law Review，126(1)，2010-2042。  new window
41.Sunstein, C. R.(2013)。Deciding by Default。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，162。  new window
42.Weber, R.、Crocker, J.(1983)。Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，45。  new window
43.景軍(2006)。愛滋病謠言的社會淵源：道德恐慌與信任危機。社會科學，2006(8)，5-17。  延伸查詢new window
44.Cialdini, Robert B.、Goldstein, Noah J.(2004)。Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity。Annual Review of Psychology，55(1)，591-621。  new window
45.Jange, Edward J.、Schwartz, Paul M.(2002)。Modern Studies in Privacy Law: Notice, Autonomy and Enforcement of Data Privacy Legislation: The Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act, Information Privacy, and the Limits of Default Rules。Minnesota Law Review，86，1219-1232。  new window
46.Lewis, G.(2011)。Asymmetric Information, Adverse Selection and Online Disclosure: The Case of eBay Motors。The American Economic Review，101，1535-1546。  new window
47.Phelps, Edmund S.(1972)。The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism。American Economic Review，62(4)，659-661。  new window
48.Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob(2008)。Reputation Nation: Law in an Era of Ubiquitous Personal Information。Northwestern University Law Review，102，1667-1738。  new window
49.Stiglitz, Joseph E.、Weiss, Andrew(1981)。Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information。American Economic Review，71(3)，393-410。  new window
50.Spence, Michael(1973)。Job Market Signaling。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，87(3)，355-374。  new window
51.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology，91(3)，481-510。  new window
圖書
1.張維迎(2013)。博弈與社會。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.阿倫森•埃略特、提摩太•D. 威爾遜、羅賓•M. 埃克特、侯玉波(2012)。社會心理學。北京：世界圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Posner, Richard A.、蘇力(2002)。正義/司法的經濟學。北京：中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.弗爾邁伊•海爾特、王志毅(2012)。自然的經濟史。杭州：浙江大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor、Cukier, Kenneth、盛楊燕、周濤(2013)。大數據時代：生活、工作與思維的大變革。浙江杭州：浙江人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Turkle, S.、周逵、劉菁荊(2014)。群體性孤獨。杭州：浙江人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張曉輝(2012)。大眾媒體變遷中的隱私公開現象研究。北京：中國傳媒大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Goffman, E.、馮鋼(2008)。日常生活中的自我呈現。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Altman, Irwin、Taylor, Dalmas A.(1973)。Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
10.Allport, Gordon W.、Clark, Kenneth、Pettigrew, Thomas(1954)。The Nature of Prejudice。MA：Addison-Wesley。  new window
其他
1.Peteison, C.(2010)。Losing Face: An Environmental Analysis of Privacy on Facebook，http://etc.cpeterson.org/research/workingpapers/2010/losingface_workingpaper.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1051（臺灣：1043，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2219088 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68011793
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上