一、中文書目
1.林千乃，2009，網路社群互動現象之詮釋性研究，國立台灣大學未出版博士論文。
2.張春興，1994，教育心理學，台北市，東華。
3.張仁家、胡俊宏、呂玉琪，2005，『從產業結構的變遷論台灣高等技職教育的因應與發展』，國際工程技術教育研討會。
4.鄭村棋、陳文聰、夏林清譯， Paul Watzlasick、 John H. Weakland、Richard Fisch著，2005，與改變共舞(Change : principles of problem formation and problem resolution)，台北市，遠流。
5.曾瑞譙，2006，『大專技職校院面對出生率降低的學校經營管理壓力與因應之道』，學校行政雙月刊，第四十六期：310~325頁。
6.顧淑馨譯，Brown, J. S.與 Duguid, P.著，2001，資訊革命了什麼？台北市，先覺。
7.謝定助、謝清佳、洪銘建，2007，『研究方法典範移轉？——國內資訊管理領域論文之調查』，資訊管理學報，第十四卷，第四期：1~29頁。
8.程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯，Kuhn, S. Thomas著(1970)，1991，科學革命的結構，台北市，遠流。
二、英文書目
1.Bandler,R.,and J.Grinder,1982, Reframing : Neuro Linguistic Programming and the Transformation of Meaning, Moab, Utah : Real People Press.
2.Barrett, M., 1999, “Challenges of EDI Adoption for Electronic Trading in the London Insurance Market,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol.8, pp.1-15.
3.Bartlett, F. C.,1932, Remembering：A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. New York & London：Cambridge University Press.
4.Bartunek, J. and M. Moch, 1987, “First Order, Second Order, and Third Order Change and Organization Development Interventions : A Cognitive Approach,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol.23,no.4,pp.483-500.
5.Bartunek, J.,1984,”Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order,” Administrative Science Quarterly,vol.29,no.3, pp. 355-372.
6.Bateson, G.,1972, Steps to an Ecology of Mind：Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, New York : Ballantine Books.
7.Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann, 1967, The Social Construction of Reality, New York : Anchor Books,.
8.Bergman, M., J.L. King and K. Lyytinen,2002, “Large Scale Requirements Analysis Revisited: The Need for Understanding the Political Ecology of Requirements Engineering,” Requirements Engineering, vol.7, no.3, pp.152-171.
9.Bijker, W. E. ,1995, “Sociohistorical technology studies,” in T. Pinch (ed.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 229-56.
10.Bijker, W. E. and J. Law,1992,Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.Bijker, W. E.,1997,Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.Boland, Jr., R., 1978, “The Process and Product of System Design,” Management Science, vol.24, no.5, pp.887-898.
13.Boland, Jr., R., 1979, “Control, Causality and Information Systems Requirements,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.4, no.4, pp.259-272.
14.Boland, Jr., R., and R. Greenberg, 1988, ”Metaphorical Structuring of Organizational Ambiguity,” in L. R. Pondy, R.J. Boland, Jr., and H. Thomas (eds), Managing Ambiguity and Change, New York: Wiley , pp.17-32.
15.Boland, Jr., R., and R. Greenberg, 1992, “Method and Metaphor in Organizational Analysis,” Accounting, Management and Information Technology, vol.2, no.2, pp.117- 141.
16.Boland, R. J. Jr.,1985, “Phenomenology： A Preferred Approach to Research in Information Systems, “ in E. Mumford, R. A. Hirschheim,G. Fitzgerald and A. T. Wood-Harper(eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems,New York：North-Holland,pp.193-201.
17.Bolman, L.G. and T.E. Deal,1991, Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership, San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass.
18.Bostrom, R. P., and J.S. Heinen, 1977,“MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective Part I-- The Causes,” MIS Quarterly, vol.1,no.3, pp.17-32.
19.Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid, 1995,”Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,” in M. D. Cohen, and L. S. Sproull(eds.), Organizational Learning, Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
20.Chua, W. F.,1986, ”Radical Developments in Accounting Thought,” The Accounting Review,vol.61,no.4, pp. 601-633.
21.Clegg C.,C. Axtell ,L.Damadoran, B. Farbey, R. Hull and R. Lloyd-Jones,1997, “Information Technology: A Study of Performance and the Role of Human and Organizational Factors,” Ergonomics,vol.40, pp.851–871.
22.Cobb, S. ,1993, “Empowerment and Mediation: a Narrative Perspective”, Negotiation Journal, vol.9,no.3, pp. 245-61.
23.Curtis, B., H. Krasner and N. Iscoe , 1988, “A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol.31, no.11, pp.1268- 1287.
24.Dagwell, R. and R. Weber, 1983, “Systems Designers’ User Models: A Comparative Study and Methodological Critique,” Communications of the ACM, vol.26, no.11, pp.987–997.
25.Davidson, E. ,2006,”A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol.42,no.1, pp.23-39.
26.Davidson, E. and D. Pai, 2004, “Making Sense of Technology Frames: Promise, Progress, and Potential,” in B. Kaplan, D. Truex, D. Wastell, T. Wood-Harpe, and J. DeGross (eds.), Relevant Theory and Informed Practice: Looking forward from a 20 Year Perspective on IS Research, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 473-491.
27.Davidson, E., 2002, “Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination,” MIS Quarterly, vol.26,no.4, pp.329-358.
28.Davidson, E.,1996,Framing Information Systems Requirements：An Investigation of Social Cognitive Processes in Information Systems Delivery, Doctorate Thesis at Sloan School of Management, MIT.
29.Davidson, E.,1997, “Changing Frames or Framing Change? Social Cognitive Implications of Organizational Change during IT Adoption,” 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA, Hawaii.
30.Davis, C. J. and E.M. Hufnagel, 2007, “Through the Eyes of Experts: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective on the Automation of Fingerprint Work,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 681-703.
31.Deaux, K, F.C. Dane and L. S. Wrightsman,1993,Social Psychology in the ''90s (6th eds.), Pacific Grove , CA : Brooks/Cole.
32.Dougherty, D., 1992, “Interpretative Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,” Organization Science, vol.3,no.2, pp.179-202.
33.Fiol, C., 1994,”Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organizations,” Organization Science, vol.5,no.3, pp. 403-420.
34.Fiske, S. T. and S. E. Taylor,1991, Social Cognition, New York: McGraw-Hall.
35.Frederick, W. C. and J. Weber, 1987, “The Values of Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and Normative Implications,” in W. C. Frederick (eds.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 9,pp.131-152. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
36.Gallivan, M., 2001, “Meaning to Change: How Diverse Stakeholders Interpret Organizational Communication about Change Initiatives,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol.44, pp.243-266.
37.Ginzberg, M., 1981, ”Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions,” Management Science, vol.27 ,no.4 ,pp.459-478.
38.Gioia, D., A. Donnellon and H.P. Sims, 1989,”Communication and Cognition in Appraisal: A Tale of Two Paradigms,” Organization Studies,vol.10,no.4, pp. 503-530.
39.Gioia, D.,1986,”Symbols, Scripts, and Sensemaking: Creating Meaning in the Organizational Experience,” in H. Sims Jr., D. Gioia and Associates (eds.),The Thinking Organization, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, pp. 49-74.
40.Gregory, K. L., 1983, “Native-View Paradigms: Multiple Cultures and Culture Conflicts in Organizations,” Administration Science Quarterly, vol.28, no.3, pp.359–376.
41.Harris, S.G., 1994,”Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-based Perspective,” Organization Science, vol.5,no.3, pp.309-321.
42.Hastie, R.,1981,”Schematic Principles in Human Memory,” in E. T. Higgins, C. A. Herman and M. P. Zanna(eds.), Social Cognition : The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.Hedberg, B. and E. Mumford,1974, “The Design of Computer Systems, Man''s Vision of Man as an Integral Part of the System Design Process,” in E. Mumford and H. Sackman(eds.), Human Choice and Computers, New York : North-Holland, pp. 31-59.
44.Heeks, R.,2003, “eGovernment for Development Success and Failure Rates of eGovernment in Developing/Transitional Countries: Overview”, IDPM, University of Manchester,UK,Retrieved April,2005,from http://www.egov4dev.org/sfoverview.htm.
45.Hirschheim, R. and H. Klein, 1989, “Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development,” Communications of the ACM, vol.32, no.10, pp.1199-1216.
46.Hirschheim, R. and M. Newman, 1991, “Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic,” Information Systems Research, vol.2,no.1, pp.26-62.
47.Hochstrasser B. and C.Griffiths,1991,Controlling IT Investment, London : Chapman Hall.
48.Howcroft,D.,N. Mitev and M. Wilson,2004,”What We May Learn from the Social Shaping of Technology Approach,” in J. Mingers and L. Willcocks(eds.),Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, England：John Wiley & Sons,pp.329-371.
49.Hsu, C.,2009,“Frame Misalignment: Interpreting the Implementation of Information Systems Security Certification in An Organization” European Journal of Information Systems, vol.18,no.2, pp. 140-150
50.Hughes, T.,1987,”The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems : New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51-82.
51.Iivari, N. and P. Abrahamsson, 2002, “The Interaction between Organizational Subcultures and User-Centered Design—A Case Study of an Implementation Effort,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
52.Kearney A.T. ,1990, Barriers to the Successful Application of Information Technology, London: Department of Trade and Industry and CIMA.
53.Khoo, M., 2001, “Community Design of DLESE Collections Review Policy: A Technological Frames Analysis,” in Proceedings of the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 157-164.
54.Klein, H. K. and M. D. Myers,1999, “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly,vol.23,no.1, pp.67-94.
55.Kling, R. and S. Iacono, 1989,“The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems,” Technology and People, vol.5, no.1,pp.7-28.
56.Kuhn, S. T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
57.Kuhn, S. T.,1965, “Reflection on My Critics,” in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.Kuhn, S. T.,1983, “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability,” in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association),pp.669-688.
59.Kumar, K. and N. Bjørn-Andersen, 1990, “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of IS Designer Values,” Communications of the ACM, vol.33, no.5, pp.528-538.
60.Latour, B.,1987, Science in Action : How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.Latour, B.,1991, “Technology Is Society Made Durable” in J. Law (eds.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, pp.103-31.
62.Law, Y. and J. Lee-Partridge,2003,”Towards a Strategy for Sense-Making of Empirical Knowledge Management Perceptions—The TFL Methodology,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (CD-ROM). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
63.Lee, Allen S.,1989, “A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies,” MIS Quarterly ,vol13,no.1, pp. 33-50.
64.Levy, A., and U. Merry, 1986, Organizational Transformation：Approaches, Strategies, Theories, New York : Praeger.
65.Lin, A. and L. Silva, 2005, “The Social and Political Construction of Technological Frames,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol.14, pp.49-59.
66.Lin, A. and T. Cornford, 2000, “Framing Implementation Management,” in S. Ang, H. Krcmar, W. J. Orlikowski, P. Weil and J. J. DeGross (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems, pp. 197-205.
67.Linderoth, H.C. J. and G. Pellegrino, 2005, “Frames and Inscriptions: Tracing a Way to Understand IT-Dependent Change Projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 415-420.
68.Lord, R.. and R. Foti,1986, “Schema Theories, Information Processing, and Organizational Behavior,” in H. Sims, Jr., D. Gioia, and Associates (eds.),The Thinking Organization, San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, pp.20-48.
69.Lyytinen, K. J. and O. K. Ngwenyama, 1992, “What Does Computer Support for Cooperative Work Mean? A Structurational Analysis of Computer Supported Cooperative Work,” Accounting, Management & Information Technology, vol.2,no.1, pp. 19-37.
70.MacKenzie, D. and J. Wajcman, 1985, The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
71.Malhotra, A., J. Thomas, J. Carroll and L. Miller, 1980,”Cognitive Processes in Design,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol.12,no.2, pp.119-140.
72.Markus, H. and R.B. Zajonc,1985, “The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology,” in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology (vol.1), New York: Random House.
73.Markus, M. L. and J. Pfeffer, 1983, “Power and the Design and Implementation of Accounting and Control Systems,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.8,pp.205-218.
74.Markus, M. L., 1983, “Power, Politics and MIS Implementation,” Communications of the ACM, vol.26,no.6,pp.430-444.
75.Markus, M.L. and D. Robey, 1988, “Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research,” Management Science, vol.34, no.5, pp.583-598.
76.Markus, M.L. and N. Bjørn-Andersen,1987, ”Power over Users: Its Exercise by System Professionals,” Communications of the ACM, vol.30, no.6,pp.498-504.
77.McGovern, T. and C. Hicks, 2004, “How Political Processes Shaped the IT Adoption by a Small Make-to-Order Company: A Case Study in the Insulated Wire and Cable Industry,” Information and Management, vol.42, pp.243-257.
78.McLoughlin, I., R. Badham and P. Couchman, 2000, “Rethinking a Political Process in Technological Change: Socio-Technical Configurations and Frames,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol.12, pp.17-37.
79.Mengesha,N.T.,2008,”The Role of Technological Frames of Stakeholders’ in IS Development： A Case Study from Ethiopia,” The 31st Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia.
80.Minsky, M., 1975, “Framework for Representing Knowledge,” in P.H. Winston(eds.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, NY: McGraw-Hill, pp.211-277.
81.Moch, M. and J. Bartunek, 1990, Creating Alternative Realities at Work: The Quality of Work Life Experiment at Food Company, New York：Harper Business.
82.Moch, M., and W. C. Fields, 1985, “Developing a Content Analysis for Interpreting Language Use in Organizations,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol.4, pp.81-126.
83.Morgan, G.,1986, Images of Organization, Beverly Hills: Sage.
84.Myers, M. D. and D. E.Avison,2002,“An Introduction to Qualitative Research in Information Systems,” in M. D. Myers and D. E. Avison (eds.),Qualitative Research in Information Systems, London : Sage , pp.3-12.
85.Newman, M. and F. Noble, 1990, “User Involvement as an Interaction Process : A Case Study,” Information Systems Research, vol.1, no.1, pp.89-113.
86.Nocera, J.A., L. Dunckley and H. Sharp, 2007, “An Approach to the Evaluation of Usefulness as a Social Construct Using Technological Frames,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 22, no.1-2, pp.153-172.
87.Orlikowski, W. and J. Baroudi,1991,”Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research,vol.2,no.1, pp.1-28.
88.Orlikowski, W. J. and D. C. Gash, 1992,”Changing Frames : Understanding Technological Change in Organizations,” Working Paper 3368-92, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge：Mass.
89.Orlikowski, W. J. and D. C. Gash, 1994, “Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,” ACM Transaction on Information Systems, vol.12, no. 2, pp. 174-207.
90.Ovaska, P., M. Rossi and K. Smolander, 2005, “Filtering, Negotiating and Shifting in the Understanding of Information System Requirements,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.17, pp.31-66.
91.Palmer, I. and R. Dunford, 1996, “Conflicting Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualizing Their Use in the Field of Organizational Change”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 619-717.
92.Pfeffer, J.,1981, Power in Organizations, Marshfield, Mass. : Pitman.
93.Pinch, T. F. and W. E. Bijker,1984,”The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and Technology Might Benefit Each Other,” Social Studies of Science, vol.14,pp.399-441.
94.Pinch, T. F. and W. E. Bijker,1987,”The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and Technology Might Benefit Each Other,” in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch(eds.) ,The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge,MA : MIT Press, pp. 399-441.
95.Porac, J. F., H. Thomas and C. Baden-Fuller, 1989, Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 26, no.4, pp.397-416.
96.Puri, S. K., 2006, “Technological Frames of Stakeholders Shaping the SDI Implementation : A Case Study from India,” Information Technology for Development, vol.12, no.4, pp.311-331.
97.Purvis, R. and V. Sambamurthy, 1997, “An Examination of Designer and User Perceptions of JAD and the Traditional IS Design Methodology,” Information & Management, vol.32, pp.123-135.
98.Robey, D. and M. L. Markus, 1984, “Rituals in Information System Design,” MIS Quarterly, vol.8, no.1, pp.5- 15.
99.Robey, D. and M. Newman, 1996,”Sequential Patterns in Information Systems Development: An Application of a Social Process Model,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems,vol.14,no.1, pp. 30-63.
100.Sahay, S., M. Palit and D. Robey, 1994,”A Relativist Approach to Studying the Social Construction of Information Technology,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol.3, pp.248-258.
101.Salaway, G., 1987, “An Organizational Learning Approach to Information Systems Development,” MIS Quarterly,vol.11 ,no.2, pp.245-264.
102.Schneider, D., 1991,”Social Cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol.42,pp. 527-61.
103.Shaw, N., J. Lee-Partridge and J. Ang, 1997, “Understanding End-User Computing through Technological Frames,” in J. J. DeGross and K. Kumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems, pp.453-459.
104.Shaw, N., J. Lee-Partridge and J. Ang, 2003, “Understanding the Hidden Dissatisfaction of Users toward End-User Computing,” Journal of End User Computing, vol.15, no. 2, pp.1-22.
105.Siau, K. and X. Tan, 2006, “Using Cognitive Mapping Techniques to Supplement UML and up in Information Requirements,” Journal of Computer Information Systems,vol.46, no.5, pp.59-66.
106.Simon, H. A.,1991, “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organization Science, vol.2,no.1, pp.227-236.
107.Smircich, L., 1983, “Organizations as Shared Meaning,” in L. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, Gareth and T. Dandridge (eds.),Organizational Symbolism , Greenwich, CT：JAI Press, pp.55-65.
108.Sobreperez,P,2008,”Technological Frame Incongruence, Diffusion and Noncompliance,” in Open IT-based Innovation : Moving towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion , IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, a Springer Series in Computer Science, Boston : Springer, pp. 179-196.
109.Standish Group ,2009, CHAOS Summary 2009, Retrieved May 4, 2009,from http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php
110.Standish Group, 2001, Extreme chaos, Retrieved May 4, 2009,from http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/extreme_chaos.pdf
111.Standish Group,1995, Chaos 1995, Dennis, Massachusetts : Standish Group International.
112.Standish Group,1997, Chaos 1997, Dennis, Massachusetts : Standish Group International.
113.Taylor, S. E. and J. Crocker, 1981, “Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing,” in E. T. Higgins, C. A. Herman and M. P. Zanna(eds.), Social Cognition : The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114.Van Maanen, J. and E. Schein, 1979, “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization,” Research Organization Behavior, vol.1, pp.209-264.
115.Walsh, J. ,1995, “Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes From a Trip down Memory Lane,” Organization Science, vol.6,no.3, pp.280-321.
116.Walsh, J. and L. Fahey, 1986,The Role of Negotiated Belief Structures in Strategy Making, Journal of Management, vol.31, pp. 873-896.
117.Walz, D., J. Elam and B. Curtis, 1993, “Inside a Software Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing, and Integration,” Communications of the ACM, vol.36,no.10,pp.63-77.
118.Watzlawick, P., J. Weakland and R.Fisch,1974, Change. New York : W. W. Norton.
119.Weber, R. and J. Crocker, 1983, “Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.45,no.5,pp.961- 977.
120.Weick, K. E., 1979, “Cognitive Processes in Organizations,” Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.1, no.1, pp.41-74.
121.Weick, K. E., 1996, “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies,” in J. M. Shafritz and J. S Ott (eds), Classics of Organization Theory, 4th Ed., Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company, pp.561-577.
122.Williams,R.,1997, ”The Social Shaping of Information and Communications Technologies,” in R. Williams(eds.), The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways, New York：St Martin’s Press, pp.299-338.
123.Wood, R. and A. Bandura, 1989,”Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management,” Academy of Management Review,vol.14,no.3, pp.361-384
124.Yin, R. ,1993,Applications of Case Study Research, London：Sage.
125.Yin, R.,1989, Case Study Research：Design and Methods, London：Sage.
126.Yoshioka, T., J. Yates and W. Orlikowski, 2002, “Community-Based Interpretive Schemes : Exploring the Use of Cyber Meetings within a Global Organization,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.