1.Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1987. Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size. Review of Economics & Statistics, 69(4): 567-574.
2.Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4): 678-690.
3.Afuah, A. 2002. Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.Archibugi, D., and Planta, M. 1996. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9): 451-468.
5.Audretsch, D. B., and Acs, Z. J. 1991. Innovation and Size at the Firm Level. Southern Economic Journal, 57(3): 739-744.
6.Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
7.Barney, J. B., and Zajac, E. J. 1994. Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 5-9.
8.Breitzman, A. F., and Mogee, M. E. 2002. The Many Applications of Patent Analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28(3): 187-205.
9.Breitzman, A. F., Thomas, P., and Cheney, M. 2002. Technological Powerhouse Or Diluted Competence: Techniques For Assessing Mergers Via Patent Analysis. R&D Management, 32(1): 1-10.
10.Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., and Malerba, F. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1): 69-87.
11.Brouwer, E., and Kleinknecht, A. 1999. Innovative output, and a firm''s propensity to patent.: An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6): 615-624.
12.Brown, M. G., and Svenson, R. A. 1998. Measuring R&D Productivity Research-Technology Management, 41(6): 30-35.
13.Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., and Zhao, Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6): 515-524.
14.Cantwell, J., and Piscitello, L. 2000. Accumulating Technological Competence: Its Changing Impact on Corporate Diversification and Internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1): 21-51.
15.Chang, S.-M., and Chang, S.-B. 2006. Exploring Technologic Characters of Finance Group in Business Methods: Using Patent Content Analysis and Citation Network. The Business Review, Cambridge, 5(2): 122-129.
16.Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C. 2009. Using Neural Network to Analyze the Influence of the Patent Performance upon the Market Value of the US Pharmaceutical Companies. Scientometrics, 80(3): 637-655.
17.Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C. 2010a. Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network. Scientometrics, 82(1): 75-82.
18.Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C. 2010b. Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share, and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry by using artificial neural network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2): 153-169.
19.Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C. 2010c. The Nonlinear Nature of the Relationships between the Patent Traits and Corporate Performance. Scientometrics, 82(1): 201-210.
20.Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C. 2010d. The relationship between a firm''s patent quality and its market value -- The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1): 20-33.
21.Chiu, Y.-C., Lai, H.-C., Lee, T.-Y., and Liaw, Y.-C. 2008. Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6): 875-892.
22.Chiu, Y.-C., Lai, H.-C., Liaw, Y.-C., and Lee, T.-Y. 2009. Technological scope: diversified or specialized. Scientometrics, 82(1): 37-58.
23.Cincera, M. 1997. Patents, R&D, and Technological Spillovers at the Firm Level: Some Evidence from Econometric Count Models for Panel Data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(3): 265-280.
24.Clark, K. 1987. Investment in new Technology and Competitive Advantage. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge; Strategies for Industrial innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co.
25.Cockburn, I. M., and Henderson, R. M. 2001. Scale and scope in drug development: unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Health Economics, 20(6): 1033-1057.
26.Cohen, W. M., and Klepper, S. 1996. Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(2): 232-243.
27.Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
28.Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., and Covin, T. J. 1990. Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high- and low technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6): 391-412.
29.Crepon, B., and Duguet, E. 1997. Estimating the Innovation Function from Patent Numbers: GMM on Count Panel Data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(3): 243-263.
30.Crosby, M. 2000. Patents, Innovation and Growth. Economic Record, 76(234): 255-262.
31.De Carolis, D. M. 2003. Competencies and Imitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Their Relationship with Firm Performance. Journal of Management, 29(1): 27-50.
32.Ernst, H. 1998. Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4): 279-308.
33.Ernst, H. 1999. Evaluation of Dynamic Technological Developments by Means of Patent Data. Berlin: Springer Corporation.
34.Ernst, H. 2001. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy, 30(1): 143-157.
35.Garcia-Vega, M. 2006. Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2): 230-246.
36.Gemba, K., and Kodama, F. 2001. Diversification dynamics of the Japanese industry. Research Policy, 30(8): 1165-1184.
37.Granstrand, O. 1998. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27(5): 465-489.
38.Granstrand, O., and Oskarsson, C. 1994. Technology diversification in ''MUL-TECH'' corporations. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 41(4): 355-364.
39.Granstrand, O., Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. 1997. Multi-Technology Corporations: WHY THEY HAVE "DISTRIBUTED" RATHER THAN "DISTINCTIVE CORE" COMPETENCIES. California Management Review, 39(4): 8-25.
40.Granstrand, O., and Sjolander, S. 1990. Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations. Research Policy, 19(1): 35-60.
41.Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375-387.
42.Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-1707.
43.Grindley, P. C., and Teece, D. J. 1997. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review, 39(2): 8-41.
44.Hafeez, K., YanBing, Z., and Malak, N. 2002. Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: a structured methodology for identifying core competence. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 49(1): 28-35.
45.Hagedoorn, J., and Cloodt, M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8): 1365-1379.
46.Hall, B. H. 2002. A Note on the Bias in the Herfindahl Based on Count Data. In A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, Citations, and Innovations. MA.: MIT Press: Cambridge.
47.Hall, L. A., and Bagchi-Sen, S. 2002. A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4): 231-244.
48.Harhoff, D., Schererc, F. M., and Vopeld, K. 2003. Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights. Research Policy, 32(8): 1343-1363.
49.Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., and Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship. Econometrica, 52(4): 909-938.
50.Hirschey, M., and Richardson, V. J. 2001. Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1): 65-82.
51.Hsiao, C. 1986. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.Jacquemin, A. P., and Berry, C. H. 1979. Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359-369.
53.Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
54.Katila, R., and Ahuja, G. 2002. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194.
55.Kodama, F. 1986. Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry. Science, 233(4761): 291-296.
56.Lai, H.-C., Chiu, Y.-C., Liaw, Y.-C., and Lee, T.-Y. 2009. Technological Diversification and Organizational Divisionalization: the Moderating Role of Complementary Assets. British Journal of Management.
57.Lai, K.-K., and Wu, S.-J. 2005. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing and Management, 41(2): 313-330.
58.Lanjouw, J. O., and Schankerman, M. 2004. Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. The Economic Journal, 495(4): 441-465.
59.Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 111-125.
60.Leten, B., Belderbos, R., and Van Looy, B. 2007. Technological Diversification, Coherence, and Performance of Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6): 567-579.
61.Markides, C. C., and Williamson, P. J. 1994. Related Diversification, Core Competencies and Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 149-165.
62.Montalvo, J. G. 1997. GMM Estimation of Count-Panel-Data Models with Fixed Effects and Predetermined Instruments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 15(1): 82-89.
63.Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., and Olivastro, D. 1997. The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology and Public Science Research Policy, 26(3): 317-330.
64.Narin, F., Noma, E., and Perry, R. 1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4): 143-155.
65.Nelson, R. R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2): 61-74.
66.Nesta, L., and Saviotti, P. P. 2005. Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm''s Innovative Performance: Evidence from the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(1): 123-142.
67.Pakes, A., and Griliches, Z. 1980. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters, 5(4): 377-381.
68.Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. 1997. The technological competency of the world''s largest firms: complex path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 6(2): 141-156.
69.Pavitt, K., Robson, M., and Townsend, J. 1989. Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983. Management Science, 35(1): 81-99.
70.Pitt, M., and Clarke, K. 1999. Competing on Competence: A Knowledge Perspective on the Management of Strategic Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3): 301 - 316.
71.Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79-91.
72.Quintana-Garica, C., and Benavides-Velasco, C. A. 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3): 492-507.
73.Reed, R., and Luffman, G. A. 1986. Diversification: The growing confusion. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 29-35.
74.Sanchez, R., and Heene, A. 1997. Reinventing Strategic Management: New Theory and Practice for Competence-based Competition. European Management Journal, 15(3): 303-317.
75.Scherer, F. M. 1999. New Perspectives on Economics Growth and Technological Innovation. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
76.Schoenecker, T., and Swanson, L. 2002. Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 49(1): 36-44.
77.Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423.
78.Souitaris, V. 2002. Firm-Specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation: A Survey in Greece R&D Management, 32(1): 61-77.
79.Stolpe, M. 2002. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 31(7): 1181-1198.
80.Stuart, T. E., and Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue): 21-38.
81.SubbaNarasimha, P. N., Ahmad, S., and Mallya, S. N. 2003. Technological Knowledge and Firm Performance of Pharmaceutical Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1): 20-33.
82.Suzuki, J., and Kodama, F. 2004. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3): 531-549.
83.Thomas, P., and McMillan, G. S. 2001. Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D As a Business. Engineering Management Journal, 13(3): 9.
84.Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172-187.
85.Utterback, J. M. 1994. Innovation and Industrial Evolution Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
86.Valvano, S., and Vannoni, D. 2003. Diversification Strategies and Corporate Coherence Evidence from Italian Leading Firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(1): 25-41.
87.Walsh, S., and Linton, J. D. 2002. The measurement of technical competencies. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1): 63-86.
88.Watanabe, C., Matsumoto, K., and Hur, J. Y. 2004. Technological diversification and assimilation of spillover technology: Canon''s scenario for sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(9): 941-959.
89.Watts, R. J., and Porter, A. L. 2003. R&D cluster quality measures and technology maturity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(8): 735-758.
90.Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
91.Wu, J., and Shanley, M. T. 2009. Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research, 62(4): 474-483.
92.Wu, M.-C., and Tseng, C.-Y. 2006. Valuation of patent - a real options perspective. Applied Economics Letters, 13(5): 313 - 318.
93.Yamada, A., and Watanabe, C. 2006. Co-evolutionary dynamism between adaptability and diversification of R&D: The case of Japan''s high technology firms. Paper presented at the IAMOT 2006, 15th International Conference on Management of Technology, Beijing, China.
94.Zahra, S. A. 1996. Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm''s competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3): 189-219.
95.Zander, U., and Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science, 6(1): 76-92.