:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧資本重要嗎? 評估IC設計公司之獲利能力與市場能力
作者:郭美奐
作者(外文):kuo, mei-huan
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
指導教授:楊千
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡分析測量效度模型效率評估智慧資本data envelopment analysisslacks-based measureperformance measurementintellectual capital
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
在高度競爭激烈和動態的產業環境下,如何精確評估和改進面對高知識競爭市場的積體電路設計公司的效率是非常重要的事.這篇論文主要在提出發展一個兩階段資料包絡分析結合智慧資本理論模型並透過財務或非財務資料去評估積體電路設計公司的效率. 採用新的測量效度模型來得到更精確效率和排序.本論文更進一步使用迴歸模式來探究智慧資本變數對公司效率和競爭優勢的影響力. 實驗結果分析證明智慧資本在效率評估上具有生產力指標和競爭優勢影響力. 積體電路設計公司可以透過生產和智慧資本變數指標得到更精確的評估數據和更有效改進他們的績效.
Under a highly competitive market and a dynamic industrial environment, how to evaluate precisely and enhance the performance of IC design companies to face a highly knowledge competitive environment is important. This thesis develops a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) combined intellectual capital theory through financial and non-financial data to evaluate a performance process on the IC design company. It adopts a new slacks-based measure (SBM) to obtain more accurate performance estimation and rank between companies. This thesis further uses the Simar and Wilson procedure with a truncated regression to explore the impact of intellectual capital variables on performance and competitive advantage. Empirical results show that intellectual capital is the productivity indices and competitive advantage of the performance estimates. IC firms can evaluate more precisely and accurately improve their efficiency in both production and intellectual capital productivity indices.
References
Aida, K., Cooper, W.W., Pastor, J.T., & Sueyoshi, T. (1998). Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: A range-adjusted measure of inefficiency. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 26(2), 232–307.
Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of non-financial information: the wireless communication industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 3-30.
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Phillips, L.W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,459–489.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 30( 9), 1078–1092.
Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5-8), 433–462.
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60.
Chakravarthy, B.S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 437–458.
Chang, P. L., & Tsai, C. T. (2002). Finding the niche position – competition strategy of Taiwan’s IC design industry. Technovation, 22(2), 101–111.
Chang, S. C., Lee, Z. Y., & Yu, H. C. (2003). Performance evaluation of IC design companies listed in TSE. Industry Forum, 5(1).
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 15, 333–334.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Charnes, A., Clark, C.T., Cooper, W.W., & Golany, B. (1985). A development study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air force. Annals of Operations Research, 2, 95–112.
Chou, P. Y., & Liu, M. H. (2005). The empirical study of the relationship between the intellectual capital and profitability in the fabless industry in Taiwan and America (master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.nctu.edu.tw
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models Applications References and DEA-Solver Software. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
D’Aveni, R.A., & Kesner, I.F. (1993). Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: A study of elite social networks and target firm cooperation during takeovers. Organization Science, 4,123-151.
Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivation, meanings and uses. Journal of Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Roots. New York: Harper Business.
Galbraith, J. K. (1969). The New Industrial State. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Management Science, 3,237–250.
Hu, C. C., & Li, H. L. (2004). A company performance measurement by ROIC and DEA – an example of Taiwan IC design house. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 21(4), 369-383.
Hung, S.W., Yang, C., & Lee, C.F. (2004). Vertical disintegration of Taiwan's semiconductor industries: price and non-price factors. Journal Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 7(4), 547-569.
Juma, N., & Payne, G.T. (2004). Intellectual capital and performance of new venture high-tech firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8, 297-318.
Khumbakar, C., & Lovell, C.A.K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuo, Y. H., & Shen, H. L. (2005). An empirical study on measuring performance for global top fifteen IC design companies - application of data envelopment analysis (master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://163.14.136.79/ETD-db.
Lu, W.M., & Hung, S.W. (2009). Evaluating the profitability and marketability of Taiwan’s IC fabless firms: An DEA approach. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 68, 851–857.
Luo, X. (2003). Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 56, 627–635.
Russell, R.R. (1985). Measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 35, 109–126.
Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketabiity of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two stage semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64.
Stewart, T. A. (1994). Your company’s most valuable asset: intellectual capital. Fortune, 130(7), 28-33.
Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
Sullivan, P.H. (2000). Value-Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. New York: Wiley.
Tofallis, C. (1996). Improving discernment in DEA using profiling. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 24(3), 361–364.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.
Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32–41.
Van Buren, M.E. (1999). A yardstick for knowledge management. Training and Development, 53(5), 71–78.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 71–180.
Wu, D. D., & Ho, C.T.B. (2007). Productivity and efficiency analysis of Taiwan's integrated circuit industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(8), 715 – 730.
Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105–124.
Zhu, J. (2001). Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2), 443–455.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE