|
1. Adebayo, E.L. &; Adesope, O.M. (2007). Awareness, access and usage of information
and communication technologies between female researchers and extensions,
International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and
Communication Technology, 3(1): 85-93.
2. Agarwal R. &; Prasad J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal
Innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems
Research, 9(2): 204–215.
3. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., &; Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving
relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: An empirical
assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4): 418–430.
4. Ajzen, I. &; Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social
Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
5. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J Kuhl
and J. Beckman (ed). New York: Springer-verlag.
6. Ali ASB (2005). An Assessment of the Impact of the Fit among Computer Self Efficacy,
Task Characteristic and System Characteristic on Performance and Information
System Utilization. PhD Thesis, George Washington University. USA.
7. Ali GE &; Magalhaes R. (2008). Barriers to implementing e-learning: a Kuwaiti case
study. International Journal of Training and Development, 12(8. Ali, M. (2004). e-Learning in Indonesian Education System. A paper presented at
Seminar-Workshop on E-Learning: The Seventh Programming Cycle of APEID
Activities, 30 August – 6 September 2004 in Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan.
9. Al-Somali S.A,, Gholami R., Clegg B. (2009). An investigation into the acceptance of
online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29 (2009):130–141.
10. Andersson A. &; Grönlund Å. (2009). A conceptual framework for e-learning in
developing countries: A critical review of research challenges. The Electronic
Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(8): 1-16.
11. Arbaugh, J.B., (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with
Internet-based MBA. Journal of Management Education, 24(1): 32-54.
12. ASTD (The American Society for Training &; Development) (2011). e-Learning
Glossary. http://www.astd.org/LC/glossary.htm.
13. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational
research. Admin Science Quarts 36(3): 421–30.
14. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review 84(2): 191-215.
15. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
human behavior (pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
16. Barker, A. (2003). Faculty Development for Teaching online: Educational and
Technology Issues. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 34(6): 273-278.
17. Basuki, S.L. (2007). IT and education, the case study of e-Learning in Indonesia.
Paper, CONSAL Meeting, Manila, Philippines.
18. Barron, T. (2000). Getting IT support for e-learning. Training and Development,
54(12): 32–37.
19. Bersin, J. (2005). The Four Stages of E-learning: An Maturity Model for Online
Corporate Training. Bersin &; Associates, Oakland, CA.
20. Brown, I.T.J., (2002). Individual and Technology Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of
Use of Web-Based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country. The Electronic
Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(5): 1-15.
21. Burkhardt, M.E. &; Brass, D.J., (1990). Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The
Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 104- 127.
22. Capper, J. (2001). e-Learning Growth and Promise for the Developing World.
TechKnowLogia, May/June, Available [Online]: http://www.techknowlogia.org
23. Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center
success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2):
309–334.
24. Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage
behavior. Journal of End-User Computing, 13(1): 26-33.
25. Chau P.Y.K. &; Hu P.J.H. (2001) Information technology acceptance by individual
professionals: A model comparation approach, Decision Sciences. 32(4): 699-721.
26. Chong, A.Y.L, Lin, B., Ooi, K.B. &; Raman, M. (2009). Factors affecting the
adoption level of e-commerce: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Information
Systems, 50(2): 13-22
27. Christensen, E.W., Anakwe, U.P. &; Kessler E.H. (2001). Receptivity to distance
learning: the effect of technology, reputation, constraints, and learning preferences.
Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3): 263-279.
28. Collis, B. (1995). Anticipating the impact of multimedia in education: Lessons from
the literature. Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2: 136–149.
29. Compeau, D.R. &; Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a
measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340.
30. Compeau, D.R. &; Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to
computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2): 145-58.
31. Compeau, Deborah , C.A. Higgins &; S. Huff. (1999). Social cognitive theory and
individual reactions to computing technology: A Longitudinal Study. MIS Quarterly,
23(2): 145.
32. Culnan, M. J. (1983). Environmental scanning: The effects of task complexity and
source accessibility on information gathering behavior. Decision Sciences, 14: 194–
206.
33. Davis, F. D., 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new enduser
information systems: Theory and results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
34. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance
of IT. MIS Quarterly. 13(3): 319-340.
35. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System
characteristics, user perceptions and behavior impacts. International Journal of Man-
Machine Studies, 38: 475–487
36. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., &; Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer
technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8):
982–1003.
37. DeAlfa, J. (2000). Remaking the academy in the age of information. Issues in Science
and Technology. Winter 1999/2000. 16(2):52.
38. DeRouin, R.E., Fritzsche, B.A., Salas E. (2005). E-Learning in Organizations.
Journal of Management, Vol. 31(6): 920-940.
39. Doll,W. J., Hendrickson, A., &; Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis perceived usefulness
and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multigroup
invariance analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4): 839–869.
40. Downey S., Wentling R.M., Wentling, T., Wadsworth A. (2005). The Relationship
between National Culture and the Usability of an E-learning System. Human
Resource Development International, 8(1): 47 – 64.
41. Eastin, M.S. (2002). Diffusion of e-commerce: an analysis of the acceptance of four
e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics. 19(3): 251–267.
42. Eastin, M.A.&; LaRose, R.L. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the
digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 6 (1) Available at
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
43. Esch, T. J. (2003). E-learning effectiveness: An examination of online training
methods for training end users in new technology systems. Doctoral dissertation,
Touro University International, 2003. Dissertation Abstracts International, 06 (64).
44. Fenech, T., (1998). Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict
acceptance of the World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7):
629-630
45. Fishbein M &; Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An
Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Willey, Reading. MA. USA.
46. Fornell, C. &; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with
unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18:
39–50.
47. Fry K (2001). E-learning markets and provides: some issues and prospects. Education
and Training 43(4/5): 233-239.
48. Gallahar, W.J. (2002). The adoption of e-learning across professional groups in a
Fortune 500 Company. Dissertation. University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.
49. Gefen, D. (2003). TAM for just plain habit: A look at experienced online shoppers.
Journal of End User Computing, 15(3): 1-13.
50. Gefen, D. &; Straub, D.W. (1997). Gender difference in the perception and use of e-
mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS Quarterly, 21(4): 389-
400.
51. Gefen, D. &; Straub, D.W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in
IS acceptance: a study of e-commerce acceptance, Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, 1: 1-28.
52. Glass N (1998). Management Masterclass: A Practical Guide to the New Realities of
Business. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Sonoma, CA.
53. Gordon, J. (2003). E-learning tagged as best corporate IT investment. E-learning,
4(1): 8-16.
54. Govindasamy T (2002) Successful implementation of E-learning pedagogical
considerations. Internet and Higher Education 4(3–4): 287–299.
55. Graham, P. S., (1995). Requirements for the digital research libraries. College and
Research Libraries, 56: 331–339.
56. Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL &; Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis,
5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. USA.
57. Hairston, N.R. (2007). Employees' attitude toward e-learning: Implications for policy
in industry environments. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Arkansas. USA.
58. Harter, S. P., &; Kim, H. J. (1996). Accessing electronic journals and other e-
publications: An empirical study. College and Research Libraries, 55: 323–341.
59. Harrison, R. (2001). Employee Development, 2nd ed. CIPD, London
60. Harun, M. H. (2002). Integrating E-learning into the workplace. Internet and Higher
Education, 4(2002): 301–310.
61. Hashim J. (2008). Factors influencing the acceptance of web-based training in
Malaysia: applying the technology acceptance model. International Journal of
Training and Development 12(4): 253-264.
62. Hardgrave B.C., Davis F.D., Riemenschneider C.K. (2003). Investigating
determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of
Management Information System 20(1): 123-151.
63. Hayashi A., Chen C., Ryan T., Wu J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-Learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education 15(2): 139-154
64. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., &; Smaldino, S. E. (1996). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning (Rev. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
65. Heinssen RK, Glass, CR, &; Knight LA (1987) Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior 3(1): 49–59.
66. Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W. M., &; Tam, K. Y. (2001). Determinant of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3): 97-124.
67. Howard S.G. &; Smith D.R. (1986). Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality?. Communications of the ACM 29(7): 611-615.
68. Hoyle R.H. (1995) The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and
fundamental issues, In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69. Hsu, C. &; Backhouse J. (2001). The Implementation of Online Educationon Campus. America’s Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Association for Information Systems. USA. 70. Hsu, M. &; Chiu, C. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour &; IT, 23 (51), 359–373.
71. Huang, T. C. (2001). The relation of training practices and organizational
performance in small and medium size enterprises. Education &; Training, 43(8/9):
437-445.
72. Hussein R., Aditiawarman, U. &; Mohamed N. (2007). E-learning acceptance in a
developing country: A case of the Indonesian Open University. German e-science
Conference.
73. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. &; Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of
microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 11(4): 87–114.
74. Igbaria, M. &; Iivari, J. (1995). The Effects of Self-efficacy on Computer Usage.
International Journal of Management Science. 23(6): 587-605.
75. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. &; Cavaye, L.M. (1997). Personal computing
acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model, MIS Quarterly, 21(3):
279-302.
76. Intel (2006) Wireless technologies and e-Learning: Bridging the digital divide.
Retrieved October 15, 2007 from: http://www.intel.com/it/pdf/wireless-technologies-
and-e-Learning-bridging-the-digital-divide.pdf
77. Internet World Stat. (2012). Internet usage in Asia.
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm
78. Jiang, J.J., Klein G. &; Carr, C.L. (2002). Measuring Information System Service
Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side, MIS Quarterly. 26(2): 145-166.
79. Joo, Y.J., Bong, M. &; Choi, H.J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Webbased instruction.
Educational Technology, Research and Development. 48 (2): 5–17.
80. Johansen, R. &; Swigart, R. (1996). Upsizing The Individual In The Downsized Organization: Managing The Wake Of Reengineering, Globalization, And
Overwhelming Technological Change, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
81. Kaplan-Leiserson, E. (2002). E-learning Glossary.
http://www.astd.org/LC/glossary.htm
82. Kerka S. (1999). Distance learning, the Internet, and the World Wide Web. ERIC
Digest, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395214).
http://www.ericdigests.org/1997-1/distance.html
83. Kilmurray, J. (2003). E-learning: It’s more than automation. The Technology Source archives. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from
http://technologysource.org/article/elearning/
85. Koohang, A., &; Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid
instructional model. Journal of Informational Technology Education, 2: 105–113
85. Konradt U, Christophersen T, Schaeffer-Kuelz U (2006) Predicting user satisfaction,
strain and system usage of employee self-services. International Journal of Human–
Computer Studies 64(11): 1141–1153
86. Kuntoro, R.D. &; Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2003). E-learning in Higher Educational
Institutions in Indonesia, Journal of Information &; Knowledge Management. 2(4):
361-374
87. Landry B.J.L., Griffeth R. &; Hartman S. (2006) Measuring tudent perceptions of
blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences 4(1): 87-99.
88. Lau S.H. &; Woods P.C. (2009). Understanding learner acceptance of learning
objects: The roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences. British
Journal of Educational Technology. 40(6): 1059–1075
89. Lee, M.C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking: An
integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic
Commerce Research and Applications 8(3): 130-141
90. Lee, Y.C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the acceptance
of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5): 517-541.
91. Lee Y.H., Hsieh Y.C. &; Ma C.Y. (2010). A model of organizational employees’ e-
learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3): 355-366.
92. Lim H., Lee S.G. &; Nam K. (2007). Validating E-learning factors affecting training
effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 27 (2007): 22–35.
93. Lin, J. C., &; Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to
use a Web Site. International Journal of Information Management, 20: 197–208.
94. Liu I-Fan, Chen M.C., Sun Y.S., Wible D. &; Kuo C.H. (2010). Extending the TAM
model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning
Community. Computers &; Education 54(2): 600–610.
95. Little, B. (2001), Achieving high performance through e-learning‘, Industrial and
Commercial Training, 33(6): 203–7.
96. Long, L.K., DuBois, C.Z., Faley, R.H. (2008). Online training: the value of capturing
trainee reactions. Journal of Workplace Learning. 20(1): 21-37
97. Lucas, H.C., &; Spitler, V.K. (1999). Technology use and performance: a field study
of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(1999): 291–311.
98. Madorin, S. &; Iwasiw, C., (1999). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the
self-efficacy of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 38(6):
282-285.
99. Masrom, M. (2007). Technology Acceptance Model and e-learning. 12th
International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of
Education. Universiti Brunei Darussalam. 21-24 May 2007.
100. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology
acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems
Research, 2(3): 173–191.
101. McFarland D.J. &; Hamilton D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the
technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior 22(3): 427–447.
102. MOE (Ministry of National Education), (2009). ICT and Education in Indonesia.
Jakarta. Indonesia.
103. Moore, G. C., &; Benbasat, T. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the
perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information System
Research, 2(3): 192–222.
104. Mun Y.Y. &; Hwang Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information
systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation and the technology
acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4): 431-
449.
105. Ndubisi N.O. &; Jantan M. (2003). Evaluating IS usage in Malaysian small and
medium-sized firms using the technology acceptance model. Logistics Information
Management 16(6): 440–450.
106. Negash, S., Ryan, T., Igbaria, M., (2003). Quality and effectiveness in Web-based
customer support systems. Information &; Management 40(8): 757–768.
107. Nelson D.L. (1990). Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: a
critical review. MIS Quarterly 14(1): 79–98.
108. Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., &; Chan, Y. H. C. (2007), Empirical examination of
the acceptance of WebCT using TAM, Computers and Education, 48(2): 250–267
109. Norman, D.A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In
The Age Of The Machine, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
110. Norton, P., &; Hathaway, D. (2008). Exploring two teacher education online learning
designs: A classroom of one or many? Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 40(4): 475-494.
111. Ong, C.S., Lai, J.Y. &; Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance
of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information &;
Management, 41(6): 795-804.
112. Ong, C.S. &; Lay J.Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships
among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior.
22(2006): 816–829.
113. O’Reilly, C. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources:
The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management
Journal, 25(4): 756–771.
114. Park N., Roman R., Lee S. &; Chung, J.E. (2009). User acceptance of a digital
library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology
Acceptance Model. International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 29(3):
196–209.
115. Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in
Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning.
Educational Technology &; Society, 12 (3): 150–162.
116. Pan, C.C., Sivo, S. &; Brophy, J. (2003). Student’s Attitude in a Web-enhanced
Hybrid Course: A structural Equation Modeling Inquiry. Journal of Educational
Media &; Library Sciences. 14(2): 181-194.
117. Pannen, P. &; Abubakar (2005). Designing e-learning: Shouldn’t We Be Ready?
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on e-Learning for Knowledge-
Based Society, August 4-7, 2005, Bangkok, Thailand.
118. Poon, W.C., Low, K.L. &; Yong, D.G. (2004). A study of Web-based learning
(WBL) environment in Malaysia. The International Journal of Educational
119. Picciano, A.G. (2001). Distance Learning: Making Connections across Virtual
Space and Time. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
120. Piccoli, G., Ahmad R. &; Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments:
A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT
skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4): 401-426.
121. Pituch K.A. &; Lee Y.K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-
learning use. Computers &; Education. 47(2): 222–244.
122. Priyanto (2007). Redesign of e-Learning development in Indonesia. Faculty of
Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. Indonesia.
123. Purnomo S.H. &; Lee Y.H. (2010). An assessment of readiness and barriers towards
ICT program implementation: Perceptions of agricultural extension officers in
Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT. 6(3):
19-36.
124. Raab R.T., Ellis W.W., Abdon, B.R. (2001). Multisectoral Partnerships in e-
learning: A Potential Force for Improved Human Capital Development in the Asia-
Pacific. Paper presented at Paper presented at "Exploring the Evolution of e-
Learning, 2nd Symposium on Online Learning", Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5-6
September 2001. Conference hosted by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, MIMOS
Berhad, Ministry of Education Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
http://www.sdlearn.net/aprtc/occasional_papers/solep.htm
125. Rezai M, Mohammadi HM, Asadi A &; Kalantary K (2008) Predicting e-learning
application in Agricultural Higher Education using Technology Acceptance Model.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 9(1): 85-95.
Management, 18(6): 374-385.
126. Rogers E (1995). Diffusion of Innovations 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
127. Rocaa, J.C., Chiub, C.M., Martı´neza, F.J. (2006). Understanding e-learning
continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.
International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 64 (2006): 683–696.
128. Saade R.G. &; Kira D. (2006). The emotional state of technology acceptance. Issues
in informing science and information technology, 3: 529-539.
129. Saade R.G. &; Kira D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of
computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education 8: 177-191.
130. Saadé, R. G. (2003). Web-based education information system for enhanced
learning, EISL: Student assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education,
2: 267–277.
131. Saade, R. &; Bahli, B. (2005). The Impact of Cognitive Absorption on Perceived
Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use in On-line Learning: an Extension of the
Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management, 42: 317-327.
132. Schmeeckle, J. M. (2002). Online training: An evaluation of the effectiveness and
efficiency of training law enforcement personnel over the Internet. (Doctoral
dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts
International, 02 (61).
133. Segars, A. H. &; Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success:
an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 22(2): 139–
163.
134. Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course
websites. Computers &; Education, 40: 343–360.
135. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance:
Confirmatory factor models. Computer &; Education, 49: 396-413.
136. Serwatka, J.A. (1999). Internet distance learning: how do I put my course on the
Web? The Journal Technology Horizons in Education, 26(10): 71-75.
137. Soekartawi (2005). Constraints in Implementing ‘E-learning’ Using WebCT:
Lessons from the SEAMEO Regional Open Learning Center. Malaysian Online
Journal of Instructional Technology. 2(2): 97-105.
138. Straub DW, Keil M &; Brenner WH (1997). Testing the technology acceptance
model across cultures: a three country study. Information &; Management, 33(1): 1–
11.
139. Sugiarsono, J. (2007). e-Learning Award 2007. SWA Online, Jakarta, Indonesia.
140. Suhendra E.S., Hermana B. &; Sugiharto T. (2009). Behavioral Analysis of
Information Technology Acceptance in Indonesia Small Entreprises. Paper
presented at EconAnadolu 2009: Anadolu International Conference in Economics
June 17-19, 2009, Eskisehir, Turkey.
141. Sun H. &; Zhang P. (2006) The role of moderating factors in user technology
acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(2): 53–78.
142. Sun P.C., Tsai R.J., Finger G, Chen Y.Y. &; Yeh D. (2008). What drives a successful
e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner
satisfaction. Computers and Education. 50 (2008): 1183–1202
143. Swanson, E. B. (1988). Information system implementation: Bridging the gap
between design and utilization. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
144. Tan M. &; Teo T.S.H. (2000) Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking.
Journal of the association for information system 1(5): 1-42.
145. Taylor S. &; Todd P. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The role of prior experience. MIS
Quarteriy 19(4): 561-570
146. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. &; Lai, R.Y.C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in
Internet usage. Omega, 27 (1): 25–37.
147. Teo T., Lee, C.B. &; Chai, C.S. (2007). Understanding pre-service teachers’
computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model,
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 24(2): 128–143.
148. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong,W. &; Tam, K.Y. (2002).Understanding user acceptance of
digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational
context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human–Computer
Studies, 57: 215–242.
149. Tornatzky, L.G. &; Klein, K.J. (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation
adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management. 29(1): 28-45.
150. Untari R. (2007). E-learning for MSME in Central Java Indonesia, International
Conference on E-learning for Knowledge-Based Society, November 18-19,
Bangkok, Thailand
151. Vaughan K &; MacVicar A (2004). Employees’ pre-implementation attitudes and
perceptions to e-learning A banking case study analysis. Journal of European
Industrial Training 28(5): 400-413
152. Venkatesh V (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role
intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 23(2): 239–260
153. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control,
intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.
Information Systems Research, 11(4): 342–365.
154. Venkatesh, V. &; Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease
of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3): 451–481.
155. Venkatesh, V., &; Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology
acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2):
186–204.
156. Venkatesh, V., &; Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for
directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and
usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1): 115–139.
157. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., &; Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance
of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27: 425–478.
158. Volery T. &; Lord D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The
International Journal of Educational Management. 14(5): 216-223.
159. Wahyuni A.S. (2008). Analysis of e-learning system acceptance by using
Technology acceptance Model on PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Master Thesis.
Magister Management. Gadjah mada University. Yogyakarta. Indonesia.
160. Walker G.M. (2004). Faculty Intentions to Use Web-Enhanced Instructional
Components, PhD Thesis. Capella university. USA.
161. Webster, J. &; Hackley, P., (1997). Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated
Distance Learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6): 1282-1310.
162. Wu J.H. &; Wang S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical
investigation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information &;
Management 42(5): 719–729.
163. Yi, M.Y. &; Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information
systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology
acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 59(4): 431-
449.
164. Yuheti, H., 2003. Use of ICT in Education in Indonesia. A paper submitted for the
experts‟ group meeting for documenting experiences in the use of Education and
SchoolNet operation, Bangkok.
165. Zhang, Y. &; Estabrook, L. (1998). Accessibility to Internet-based electronic
resources and its implications for electronic scholarship. Annual Meeting of
American Society for Information Science (ASIS). Proceeding (463–473). Pittsburg, USA.
|