:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:博物館印刷文物數位典藏學習系統建構研究
作者:范成偉
作者(外文):Fan, Cheng-Wei
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:工業科技教育學系
指導教授:方榮爵
朱耀明
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:博物館數位典藏學習系統文物詮釋印刷文物MuseumDigital CollectionLearning SystemCultural Heritage HermeneuticPrint-related Artifacts
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
博物館數位典藏應探討其過去(物件數位化)、現在(文物詮釋)、未來(知識加值及經營)的做法與效益,因而需要有新的眼光來看待,其重要性及對博物館數位資源的保存與再利用都值得重視。檢視博物館的發展,當現代文化快速地從類比進步到數位的媒體、從原子進步到位元的世界,博物館從原來著重物品收藏的角色也跟著改變。資訊傳達的技術經由展品的複製及再現,對於創造、分享和保存博物館文化的資源也將變得更為重要。為配合國立科學工藝博物館 (以下簡稱科工館)數位典藏之整體發展,本論文以科工館印刷文物典藏資料為基礎,進行數位典藏的基本概念研究,釐清知識加值概念,發展設計數位典藏系統,並進行印刷文物資料的探勘和詮釋。然後根據詮釋研究結果據以發展印刷科技概念,配合科工館獨特及國內惟一的開放式典藏庫房展示,設計發展博物館的行動學習模式,以配合蒐藏庫房的環境限制,建立博物館自我學習的管道,並強化觀眾的學習興趣和成效。
The digital collection of museum needs to process its past (Objects Digitalization), nowadays (Cultural Heritage Hermeneutic) and future (Knowledge Value-added and Managed); so that we need to regard it as a new vision, it is worthy for us to pay more attention on its importance and the conservation, the reuse of digital resources of museum. To inspect the development of museum, while the modern culture changed rapidly from analogy to digital media, from atom to bit, museum also changed the way of paying attention on objects collections. The skill of information communication will become more and more important for creating, sharing and preserving the resources of museum culture via the copy and represent of exhibited objects. To coordinate with the whole development of digital archive for National Science and Technology Museum, the research starts from the basic conception of print-related artifacts digital collection, through the distinctions of the concept of knowledge value-added, expect to develop and design the digital archive, and process the print-related artifacts data mining and interpretation of heritage. According the result of research, we star to develop the printing technology concept and to design the museum’s mobile learning model according with the exhibition of unique environment of open storage in National Science and Technology Museum. The ultimate goal is to establish museum self-learning method and strengthen the learning interest and effectiveness of museum visitors.
參考文獻:
一、中文部分
王嵩山(1992)。文化傳譯:博物館與人類學想像。台北。稻鄉出版社。
文建會國家文化資料庫計畫辦公室(2005)。2006/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://km.cca.gov.tw/。
史梅岑(1996)。中國印刷發展史,四版。台北。台灣商務印書館。
朱邦復(1982)。中文電腦漫談。台北。全華科技圖書出版社。
朱邦復(1995)。智慧之旅。台北。時報文化出版。
呂理政(1999)。博物館展示的傳統與展望。台北。南天書局。
李政賢、廖志恒、林靜如譯(2007) 。(原作者:Uwe Flick)。質性研究導論。 台北:五南文化出版社。
李欽賢(1992)。台灣美術歷程。台北。自立晚報出版。
林潔盈等(譯)(2002) 。(原作者:Falk, J. H. &; Dierking, L. D.)。博物館經驗。台北。五觀藝術管理公司出版。(原著出版年:2001)
洪漢鼎(2008)。當代哲學詮釋學導論。台北。五南圖書出版社。
洪漢鼎譯(2002)。(原作者:Betti, E.)。作為精神科學一般方法論的詮釋學(Hermeneutics as the general methodology of the geisteswissenschaften)。載於洪漢鼎(編),詮釋學經典文選(上)(頁127-171)。台北。桂冠出版社。(原著出版年:1962)
洪漢鼎譯(1993) (原作者:Gadamer, Hans-Georg) 。真理與方法─哲學詮釋學的基本特徵 (Hermeneutik I Wahrheit und Methode) 。台北:時報文化出版。(原著出版年:1960)
余民寧、陳嘉成 (1996)。概念構圖:另ㄧ種評量法,政大學報,73,161-200。
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。台北。商鼎文化出版社。
許瀛鑑主編(1997)。中國印刷史論叢。台北。中國印刷學會出版。
吳思華(2000)。知識世紀的產業創新:議題與對策。科技發展政策報導SR8902。
吳漢英(1992)。卷軸心事-中國書籍裝幀藝術。台北。書田出版社
吳祖銘(1999)。1930~1990年代的台灣活版印刷發展之研究。高雄。國立科學工藝博物館。
陳亞寧、陳淑君(2001)。Metadata在數位博物館之發展與分析。圖書館學與資訊科學,27(2),52-66。
陳和琴(2001)。Metadata 與數位典藏之探討。大學圖書館, 5 ( 2) , 1-10。
陳政雄(1994)。陳清水~甲子還曆活字魂。印刷人雜誌,97,32-38。
陳嘉成(1998)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究學報,21,107-128。
陳雪華、陳昭珍、陳光華(2001)。數位圖書館XML/Metadata管理系統。台北。文華圖書館管理資訊股份有限公司。
陳昭珍、陳雪華、陳光華(2000)。XML/Metadata管理系統—Metalogy之設計。中國圖書館學會會報,65,1-11。
陳昭珍 (2002)。從實體到虛擬:談資訊組織發展現況與展望。中國圖書館學會會報,67,26-35。
范成偉(2006)。從王禎《農書》的轉輪排字架探討中文印刷活字檢索技術的發展。史物論壇,2,97-118。
高慧芬譯(1996)。遙遠的過去:博物館的責任。博物館學季刊,10(2),45-50。
曾于珍等(譯)(2003) (原作者:Waidacher,Friedrich)。博物館學-德語系世界觀點(Handbuch der Allgemeinen Museologie)。臺北。五觀出版社。
華藝數位藝術公司(2002)。國立科學工藝博物館服務建議書,未出版。
張敬宜(2001)。多元學習情境教學模組之研發-以「二氧化碳」主題為例。科學教育學刊,9(3), 235-252。
張秀民(1988)。中國印刷術的發明及其影響。台北。文史哲出版社。
張淑惠(1992)。印章及其對雕版印刷發明之影響。書府,13,158-163。
張增瑞(1961)。台式與大陸式的組版部。台北。台灣區印刷工業同業公會十三週年紀念特刊。
梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究的應用。載於中正大學主編。質的研究方法(頁221-238)。高雄。麗文。
梁福鎮(2006)。教育哲學辯證取向。臺北。五南。
郭文華(2006)。美感的標準。標準的美感:再看標準鍵盤。科學發展,408,82-84。
項潔、陳雪華、鄭惇方、魏雅惠(2003)。數位典藏加值應用之探討。圖書資訊學刊, 2(1),1-18。
項潔、陳雪華、陳昭珍、郭筑盈(2005)。數位典藏產業商業模式之探討。中國圖書館學會會報,75,63-74。
項翔(2001)。近代西歐印刷媒體研究-從古騰堡到啟蒙運動。上海。華東師範大學出版社。
黃萬居(1993)。國小學生的概念構圖和自然科學學習成就之研究。台北市立師範學院學報,24,47-66。
黃光國(2003)。社會科學的理路。臺北。心理出版社。
楊深坑(1988)。理論、詮釋與實踐:教育學方法論論文集(甲輯)。臺北。師大書苑。
楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北。心理出版社。
賴雯淑、許雯婷(2011)。詮釋取徑之藝術研究方法。藝術教育研究,22,109-145。
顧敏(2004)。論圖書館的四個文明。中國圖書館學會會報,73,21-26。
羅福林、李興才(1973)。印刷工業概論。台北。華岡書局。
魏宏晉(1993)。活版印刷的黃昏。台北。光華雜誌, 18(8),52-56。
曹錦清、馬振騁(譯)(1994)。(原作者:Georges Jean)。文字與書寫-思想的符號。台北。時報文化出版。
程祥徽、田小琳(1995)。現代漢語(三版)。台北。書林出版社。
宿白(1999)。唐宋時期的雕版印刷。北京。文物出版社。
賈士蘅(譯)(2003)。(原作者:Peter Burke)。知識社會史從古騰堡到狄德羅。台北。麥田出版社。
甄曉蘭(2000)。批判俗民誌及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學主編,質的研究方法(頁369-393)。高雄。麗文。
聯合目錄系統建置子計畫(2005)。國科會數位典藏國家型科技計畫_內容發展分項計畫。2007/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://catalog.ndap.org.tw/。
沈葆(2006)。中國文字之簡。2007/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://xinsheng.net/xs/articles/gb/2006/11/13/2006-11-13.htm#7
Wikipedia(2006)。部首分類的歷史。2007/12/1 [cited; Available from:http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%83%A8%E9%A6%96&;variant=zh-tw
Wikipedia(2007)。中文打字機。2007/2/1 [cited; Available from: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E6%89%93%E5%AD%97%E6%9C%BA
































二、英文部分
ADL Technical Team.(2004). Personal Assistant for Learning. Retrieved October 13th, 2010 from http://www.adlnet.org/downloads/70.cfm
Altheide, D. L., &; Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin &; Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Alvesson, M. &; Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology-new vistas for 191 qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt,Rinehart &; Winston.
Bekkestua(2003). Mobile Education - A Glance at the Future: Retrieved December 10th, 2010 from http://www.dye.no/articles/a_glance_at_the_future/introduction.html
Betti, E.(1962). Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften. In Bleicher, J.(Ed.), Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Reprinted from Polemical defense of a methodology of interpretation against Gadamer, 1980).
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., &; Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-41.
Chabra, T.&; Figueiredo, J. (2002). How To Design and Deploy Handheld Learning. Retrieved December 10th, 2010 from http://www.empoweringtechnologies.net/eLearning/eLearning_expov5_files/frame.htm
Chicago:ALA(2002). Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, Anglo- American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed..
Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C. &; Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld Use in K-12: A Descriptive Account, Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02)( pp. 23-30).
Dierking, L. D. (2002). The Role of Context in Children’s Learning from Objects and Experiences. In S. G.. Paris (ed.), Perspectives on Objects-centered Learning in Museums( pp.3-18).Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
EAD. (2002). Encoded Archival Description. 2003/10/31 [cited; Available from: http://www.loc.gov/ead/.
ECHO. (2000). Metadata Format Definition and Acquisition. 2003/10/31 [cited; Available from: http://pc-erato2.iei.pi.cnr.it/echo/workpackages/wp3.html.
Falk, J. H. &; Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from Museums: Visitors Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta-Mira.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., &; Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15-41). New York: MacMillian.
Harris, P. (2001). Going mobile. Learning Circuits, ASTD Online Magazine,Dec 2010, http://www.learningcircuits.org/2001/jul2001/harris.html
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie &; E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper &; Row.
Holmes, O. W. (1964). Archival Arrangement: Five Different Operations at Five Different Levels, American Archivist, 27(1), 21-41.
ICOM. ( 1995). CIDOC Guidelines for Museum Object Information. 2003/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://www.willpowerinfo.myby.co.uk/cidoc/guide/guideint.htm.
Klein, H. K., &; Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94.
Kunze, J. (1999). Encoding Dubin Core Metadata in HTML, 2003/10/29 [cited; Available from: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt.
Leinhardt, G. &; Crowley, K. (2002). Objects of learning, objects of talk: Changing minds in museums. In S. Paris (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on object-centered learning (pp. 301-324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Library of Congress. (2006). MARC Standards. 2006/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://www.loc.gov/marc/.
McCaslin, M.(2006). Student Motivational Dynamics in the Era of School Reform, The Elementary School Journal, 106( 5), 479-490.
Miller E., Miller P., and Brickley d.(1999) . Guidance on Expressing the Dublin Core within the Resource Description Framework (RDF)., [cited 2003/10/31]; Available from: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/resources/dc/datamodel/WD-dc-rdf/.
Mintzex, J., Wandersee, J. &; Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing Science Understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Morville, P., &; Rosenfeld, L. (2006). Information Architecture for the World Wide Web:Designing large-scale web sites (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Murtha, B.,&; Patricia, H. (2006). CDWA List of Categories and Definitions. 2006/12/25 [cited; Available from: http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/categories.html.
Novak, J. D., &; Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping : A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949
Novak, J. D. (1995). Concept mapping : A strategy for organizing knowledge. In Shawn M. Glynn &; Reinders Duit (eds.). Learning science in schools : Research reforming practice, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Okebukola, P. A. (1992). Attitude of teachers toward concept mapping and vee diagramming as meta learning tools in science and mathematics. Educational Research, 34(3), 201-213.
Panizzi, Antonio (1841). Rules for the Compilation of the Catalogue, The Catalogue of the British Museum 1:V-IX.
Piaget,J.(1964). Cognitive development in children: development and learning. Science teaching and the development of reasoning . Karplus,R. et al.(Eds.), U. of California, Berkeley.
Quinn, N. C.(2002). Flexible Learning: Mobile Learning Objects. Knowledge Anywhere, Bellevue.
Resnick, L. (1988). Learning in school and out. Educational Research, 16(9), 13-20.
Romance, N. R., &; Vitale, M. R. (2008). Perspectives for improving school instruction and learning: An interdisciplinary model for integrating science and reading in grades K-5. University of Chicago - Committee on Education Workshop on Education Lecture Series, Chicago, IL.
SAA (2004), Describing Archives: A Content Standard., Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
Schroeder, F.(1976). Designing Your Exhibits: Seven Ways to Look at an Artifact, AASLH Technical Leaflet 91. Nashville: American Association for State and Local History.
Seaman, T.(1990). On the high road to achievement: Cooperative concept mapping. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 140)
Stránský, E.(1971). Essays on the history of haematology.
Suchmon (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
VRA. (2002). VRA Core Categories, Version 3.0-a project of the Visual Resources Association Data Standards Committee 2003/12/1 [cited; Available from: http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm#core.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society, In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. &; Souberman, E. (Eds.), The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, K.(1992). The representation of the past : museums and heritage in the post-modern world, London: Routledge.
Williams, J. P. (1988). Identifying main ideas : A basic aspect of reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 8(3), 1-13.
Weinstein, C. E., &; Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies, In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Whorf, B. L. (1967). Languages and Logic in Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn &; Bacon.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top