:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:成年男性親密關係議題之諮商經驗研究
作者:趙慈慧
作者(外文):Tzu-Hui Tsao
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育心理與輔導學系
指導教授:李佩怡
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:男性諮商親密關係親密關係諮商male counselingintimate relationshipintimate relationship counseling
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:87
本研究為探討成年男性案主在接受心理諮商後對親密關係議題的諮商經驗以及親密關係諮商的改變經驗。本研究邀請五位成年男性在心理諮商後接受深度訪談,將深度訪談逐字稿資料以質性紮根研究法進行資料歸納分析,得到以下研究結論與建議:
一、成年男性對親密關係困擾議題與形成影響因素的經驗
成年男性案主的親密關係困擾議題包括親密關係中情感溝通表達困難的問題、男子氣概形象影響在親密關係中展現真實自我、男尊女卑的期待不同帶來的關係衝突、對女性的不瞭解與不信任、多重戀情帶來的兩難掙扎、經營長期親密關係遇到的挑戰問題。成年男性受訪者受到來自母親、父親、家庭溝通以及社會文化等因素影響而形成其親密關係困擾問題。
二、成年男性親密關係議題的諮商經驗
成年男性案主的正面諮商經驗為體驗到自己被他人瞭解與重視、瞭解在親密關係中的自己、主動表達感受、誠實面對自己在親密關係中不一致。對於負面諮商經驗的觀點為諮商師強迫案主接受想法和做法、沒有得到諮商師的瞭解與重視、諮商師無法維持專業中立的信任關係。
三、成年男性親密關係議題的諮商改變經驗
成年男性親密關係諮商的改變核心經驗為找到自我生命存在的價值、嘗試表達內心真實感受、在親密關係中主動直接表達、在親密關係中誠實面對自己、親密關係中生氣情緒的自我掌控。
根據本研究結果建議諮商實務工作者需要理解男子氣概對男性造成的影響以及需要自我覺察態度與價值觀。
This study investigates that adult men have of their counseling experiences regarding intimate relationships and personal and relationship change experiences after completing psychological counseling. We conducted in-depth interviews with five adult men, and performed a summary and analysis of the interview transcripts using the qualitative grounded research method. Based on the study results, we provide the following conclusions: (1) The perspectives on experiences regarding difficulties in intimate relationships included the following: difficulties in intimate relationships related to emotional communication and expression, the effects of masculinity or the masculine image on demonstrating ones’ true self in intimate relationships, relationship conflicts resulting from differing expectations regarding ideas of male domination and female subordination, a lack of understanding and confidence toward women, dilemmas caused by extradyadic love affairs or involvements, and the challenges faced during long-term intimate relationships. The adult male interviewees were influenced by factors such as their parents, family communication, and social culture, which caused problems and difficulties in their intimate relationships. (2) The positive counseling experiences regarding intimate relationships included the following: being considered and valued by other people; understanding themselves in intimate relationships; taking the initiative to express their feelings; honestly admitting their inconsistencies within intimate relationships.The negative counseling experiences included the following: counselors forcing participants to accept certain perceptions and behaviors, not being understood and valued by counselors, and an inability on the part of counselors to maintain a professional and neutral trust relationship. (3) The following changes were experienced after intimate relationship counseling: the participants were able to identify the value in their existence, endeavored to express their innermost feelings, took the initiative to directly express their feelings in intimate relationships, were honest with themselves in intimate relationships, and had superior control of their angry emotions in intimate relationships.
中文部分
王大維(2002):婚姻關係的評量及其在婚姻治療中的應用。諮商與輔導,202, 2-9。
王大維(2010):與男性在關係中工作–男性氣概理論對伴侶與家族治療之啟示。輔導季刊,46(1),32-43。new window
王行(2004):男人不壞女人不愛。台北:華谷文化。
王沂釗(2000):婚姻衝突的敘說性研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系博士論文。new window
王秀惠(2005):台灣南部地區有偶老年人性親密及其相關因素探討。樹德科技大學性學研究所碩士論文。
王純娟(2001)。婚姻與親密關係。台北:教育部社會教育司。
王麗斐、林淑君(2010):國內諮商與心理治療質性研究之研究方法與研究題材之初步性整合分析。教育心理學報,41(4),799-822new window
田秀蘭(1997):紮根理論在諮商心理學研究中的應用。輔導季刊,36(4),35-40。new window
安辰赫(2003):治療社區中成年男性藥癮者戒癮復原歷程之改變因子研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
呂嘉惠(2006):專業助人工作者面對學生性議題的自我準備。學生輔導,102, 26-35。
呂嘉惠(2008):性諮商專業訓練講義。未出版之原始資料。
李冠興(2007):情侶參加薩提爾取向婚前諮商之改變經驗。國立高雄師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
李選、徐麗華、黃曉黎(1997):性諮商的應用與展望。護理雜誌,44(3),61-67。
林美珣(2007):諮商歷程中兩對兩性伴侶情感關係衝突協調之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林淑君(2011):資深諮商心理師從遭逢兒童青少年案主臨床困境到安頓身心之轉變歷程研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。new window
林蕙瑛(2005):性諮商實務中的女性情慾自覺。台灣性學學刊,11(1),61-76。new window
邱文彬(1999):後形式思考的發展及其與人際關係之容忍性、同理心、自我揭露、自主性之關係。國立政治大學心理研究所博士論文。new window
邱瓊慧(2009):社區心理諮商的性別關照。教育部性別平等教育季刊,45(1), 40-43。
洪素珍、王玥好(2004)。童年期性創傷婦女處理原諒議題之歷程。台灣性學學刊,10(1),35-52。new window
洪雅琴(2006):婚姻中的轉折:跨國婚姻中夫妻衝突因應過程之對偶分析。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。
胡幼慧(2008):質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。高雄:復文出版。
胡至家(2005):憂鬱傾性、親密關係與乳癌術後婦女身體意象關係之探討。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。
范嵐欣(2008):華人夫妻關係衝突之人我關係協調諮商改變歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
徐乃義(2010):桃園張老師諮詢,男性諮商個案攀升。桃園:大紀元時報網站。台北市衛生局(2008):男人角色沉重,壓力大。取自台北衛生局網站:http://subweb.health.gov.tw/comic/comic_content.aspx?id=20,2012年9月20日。
徐依婷(2010):諮商師性與性別的自覺與反思歷程――以諮商師性與性別訓練團體為例。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。
梁淑娟(2005):婚姻諮商改變歷程研究:案家夫妻之觀點。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所博士論文。new window
畢恆達(2003):導讀。載於劉建台、林宗德(譯),男性氣概的當代觀點(1-9)。台北:女書。Clatterbaugh, K. (1996). Contemporary perspectives on masculinity: Men, women, and politics in modern society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
許瑛玿(2000)。身心障礙兒童的母親之憤怒情緒之諮商技術、治療因素與改變歷程之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文。new window
許鈴惠(2003):師院生的情與愛――三對情侶愛情故事的質性分析。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
郭麗安(2004):女性主義家族治療的訓練、實務與省思。彰化師大輔導與諮商學系主辦「諮商專業的演進與實踐學術研討會」宣讀之論文(彰化)。
郭麗安(1994):兩性對親密需求的差異及輔導對策。諮商與輔導,107,13-15。
陳秀菁(2002):大學生的共依附特質、人際親密能力與親密感之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。new window
陳秉華(1999):自我價值感之諮商改變歷程。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC 86-2413-H-003-012-G10)。
陳秉華(2004):諮商中的人我關係協調歷程初探—個案研究。中央研究院主辦「第七屆華人心理與行為科技學術研討會」宣讀之論文(台北)。
陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2008):諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究,29,117-182。new window
陳秉華、林美珣、李素芬(2009):人我關係協調之伴侶諮商研究。教育心理學報,40(3),463-488。new window
陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001):台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療。亞洲輔導學報,8(2), 153-174。new window
陳筱萍、卓紋君(2009):婚姻互動、飲酒行為與暴力行為之分析—以一對婚姻暴力夫妻為例。諮商與輔導,12,1-38。new window
陳謙仁(2009):夫妻關係協調工作坊方案助益分析。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞(2004):華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學,22,11-80。new window
楊國樞(2005):本土心理學的意義與開展。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(1-52)。台北:遠流。new window
楊連謙、董秀珠(2008):主體實踐婚姻/家庭治療:在關係和脈絡中共構主體性。台北:揚智。new window
楊惠娟(2005):夫婦懇談會對婚姻關係之影響研究。國立暨南大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。
趙淑珠(2009):性別的多元面貌:談諮商中的性別意識。性別平等教育季刊,45,12-16。
劉淑瀅(1996):已婚婦女在家庭事件中的生氣情緒諮商之改變歷程分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文。new window
鄭喜月(2005):高中職學生異性交往關係品質與人際親密能力、性別角色之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
賴美蒨(2009):大學生背景變項、人際親密、社會支持與幸福感之差異研究。台北市立教育大學心理諮商研究所碩士論文。
謝銀沙(1992):已婚婦女個人特質、婚姻溝通與婚姻調適相關之研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文new window
鍾聖校(1999):質性研究方法論的認識與再議。國立台北師範學院學報,12, 259-283。new window
簡文英(2011):「同儕互助」夫妻成長團體對衝突夫妻的改變經驗研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。new window
王聖棻、魏婉琪譯(2011):教出好兒子。台北:野人出版。Biddulph, S. (2011). Raising boys: Why boy different and how to help them become happy and well-balanced men. Sydney, Australia: Finch Publishing.
余伯泉、李茂興譯(2003):社會心理學。臺北:弘智。Elliot, A., Timothy, D. W., & Robin, M. A. (2002). Social Psychology. New York, NY: Longman.
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯(2001):質性研究入門:紮根理論研究法。嘉義:濤石文化。 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
吳書榆譯(2000):該隱的封印~揭開男孩世界的殘忍文化。台北:商周出版。Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Raising cain: Protecting the emotion life of boys. London, England: Penguin Books.
吳就君譯(1994):家庭如何塑造人。台北:張老師文化。Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
吳嘉寶、林素妃、陳靜儀譯(2008):性別諮商與心理治療。台北:心理出版社。Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M. (1999). Gender and sex in counseling and psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
吳麗娟等譯(2012):人際歷程取向治療~整合模式。台北:雙葉。Teyber, E., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Interpersonal process in therapy: An integrative Model. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
李淑烟譯(2002):愛就是彼此珍惜~幸福婚姻的對話。台北:張老師文化。Heitler, S. (1997). The Power of two: Secrets to a strong and loving marriage. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
周素鳳譯(2001):親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾。台北:巨流。Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love & eroticism in modern society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
易之新譯(2005):關係花園。台北:心靈工坊。Mckeen, J., & Wong, B. (1996). The relationship garden. Gabriola Island, BC: PD Publishing.
林沈明瑩等譯(1998):薩提爾的家族治療模式。台北:張老師文化。Satir, V. (1998). The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
洪蘭譯(2006):養男育女調不同。台北:遠流。Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex difference. Doubleday, NY: Silverman.
洪蘭譯(2008):浮萍男孩。台北:遠流。Sax, L. (2007). Boys adrift: The five factors driving the growing epidemic of unmotivated boys and underachieving young men. New York, NY: Basic Books.
徐宗國譯(1997):質性研究概論。台北:巨流。Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). The basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
徐憑譯(2004):關係療癒--建立良好家庭、友誼、情感五步驟。台北:張老師文化。Gottman, J. M., & DeClaire, J. (2001). The relationship cure: A five step guide for building better connections with family, friends, and lovers. New York, NY: Crown.
張美惠譯(2003):破壞性情緒管理--達賴喇嘛與西方科學大師的智慧。台北:時報出版。Goleman, D. (2003). Destructive emotion: How can we overcome them? New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
陳榮彬譯(2011):說男人的壞話。台北:大寫出版。Biddulph, S. (2010).The new manhood: The handbook for a new kind of man. Sydney, Australia: Finch Publishing.
劉婷譯(2001):情緒取向婚姻治療。台北:張老師文化。Johnson, S. M. (1996). The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy: Creating connection. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
劉婷譯(2009):抱緊我--扭轉夫妻關係的七種對話。台北:張老師文化。Johnson, S. M. (2008). Hold me tight: Seven conversation for lifetime of love. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
鄭玄藏等譯(2009):諮商與心理治療-理論與實務。台北:雙葉書廊。Corey, G. (2003). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
魯宓譯(2006):親愛的,怎麼說你才懂。台北:心靈工坊。Marianne, J., Legato, M. D., & Tucker, L. (2005). Why man never remember and women never forget. New York, NY: Rodale Books.
黎盈、鄭玉英譯(2007):伴侶療傷~從傷之舞到關係重建之舞。台北:上智文化。Rovers, M. (2005). Healing the wounds in couple relationships. Ottawa, ON: Novalis.
鍾瑞麗、曾琼蓉譯(2004):情緒焦點治療。台北:天馬文化。Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion focused therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
闕旭玲譯(2011):愛情的哲學。台北:商周出版。Precht, R. D. (2009). Liebe: Ein unordentliches gefuhl. Munich, German: Goldmann Verlag.
譚智華譯(1996):鐵約翰~一本關於男性啟蒙的書。台北:張老師文化。Bly, R. (1990). Iron John: A book about men. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

英文部分
Blazina, C., & Marks, L. I. (2001). College men's affective reactions to individual therapy, psychoeducational workshops, and men's support group brochures. Psychotherapy, 38, 297-305.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Carlson, J., & Sperry, L. (Eds.) (1999). The Intimate couple. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
Chambers, C. (2004). Autonomy and equality in cultural perspective: Response to Sawitri Saharso. Feminist Theory, 5(3), 329-332.
Christensen, L. L., Russell, C. S., Miller, R. B., & Peterson, C. M. (1998). The Process of change in couples therapy: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 177-188.
Englar, M., & Stevens, M. A. (2006). In the room with men-A casebook of therapeutic change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gilbert, L. A., & Walker, S. J. (2001).Contemporary marriage: Challenges for clients and therapists. In G. R.Brooks & G. E. Good (Eds.), The new handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with men: A comprehensive guide to settings, problems, and treatment approaches (pp. 387-402). San Francisco, CA: Josses-Bass.
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic- A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., & Elliott, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: Themoment-by-moment process. New York, NY: The Guilford press.
Halford, W.K. (2001). Brief therapy for couples: Helping partners help themselves. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Johnson, S. M. (1996). The practice of emotionally focused maritaltherapy: Creating connection. New York, NY: Bruner/Mazel.
Johnson, S. M., Makinen, J. A., & Millikin, J. W. (2001). Attachment injuries in couples relationships: A new perspective on impasses in couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 145-155.
Johnson, S., & Lebow, J. (2000). The “coming of age”of couple therapy: A decade review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(1), 23-38.
King, A., Sweeney, S., & Fletcher, R. (2005). A checklist for organizations working with men using the nondeficit approach. Children Australia, 30(3), 32-39.
Mahalik, J. R., Good, G. E., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2003). Masculinity scripts, presenting concerns, and help seeking: Implications for practice and training. Professional Psychology, 34 ,123-131.
Michelle, N., Klayne, R., Patrick, M., & Kurt, J. (1997). Sources of influence and topic areas in family therapy: Trends in three major journals. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(4), 389-398.
Miller, S. A., & Byers, E. S. (2008). An exploratory examination of the sexual intervention self-efficacy of clinical psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2, 137-144.
Minuchin, S., & Nichols, M. (1993). Family healing: Tales of hope and renewal from family therapy. New York, NY: Touchstone Books.
Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-260.
Murstein, B. I. (1970). Stimulus-Value-Role Theory: A theory of marital Choice. Journal of Marriage & the family, 32, 465-481.
Nylund, D., & Nylund, D. A. (2003).Narrative therapy as a counterhegemonic practice. Men and Masculinities, 5, 386-394.
Prager, K. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York, NY: Guilford.
Protinsky, H., Flemke, K., & Sparks, J. (2001). EMDR and emotionally oriented couple therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 23(2), 153-168.
Real, T. (2002). How can I get through to you? Closing the intimacy gap between men andwomen. New York, NY: Fireside.
Reis, H. T. (1986). Gender effects on social participation: Intimacy, loneliness, and the conduction of social interaction. In R. Gilmour, & S. Duck, (Eds), The emergence field of personal relationships (pp. 91-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sinclair, S. L., & Taylor, B. A. (2004). Unpacking the tough guise: Toward a discursive approach for working with men in family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 389-408.
Waldinger, R. J., Schulz, M. S., Hauser, S. T., Allen, J. P., & Crowell, J. A. (2004). Reading others’ emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality, and tability. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 58-71.
Waring, E. M. (1988). Enhancing marital intimacy through facilitating. Cognitive self-disclosure. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
Weingarten, K. (1991). The discourses on intimacy: Adding a social constructionist and feminist view. Family Process, 30, 285-305.
Wexler, D. B. (2009). Men in therapy-New approaches for effective treatment. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Brooks.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE