:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:(不)令人讚賞的靈光對象:數位獨體化時代的藝術研究
作者:楊成瀚
作者(外文):Yang, Chen-Han
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:社會與文化研究所
指導教授:朱元鴻
魏德驥
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:獨體化數位獨體化藝術藝術作品行動前端行動應用程式行動後端席蒙東黑格爾巴迪烏小工具真理程序物聯網雲端運算大數據3D列印場所邏輯individuationdigital individuationartart workmobile front endmobile applicationmobile back endGilbert SimondonG.W.F. HegelAlain Badiougadgettruth procedureinternet of thingscloud computationbig data3D printinglogic of place
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
本論文旨在探討在現今的這個獨體跨個體且集體地透過智慧型手機或平板電腦等行動數位裝置的數位使用將自己與其他獨體區辨開來的這個數位獨體化時代所具有的狀態和命運,及其所具有的可能性。我們可發現獨體對智慧型手機或平板電腦等行動數位裝置進行數位使用,並開展數位獨體化時的使用者經驗與席蒙東和黑格爾所談論的意識經驗邏輯間的呼應性。透過席蒙東所謂的「轉導」的方法論操作和梅洛—龐蒂的知覺概念的中介,在獨體透過行動數位裝置的前端、應用程式和後端解決在世存有問題,或進行數位獨體化的過程中,我們進一步發現的是某種從主觀精神、客觀精神,到絕對精神的這個黑格爾式的邏輯,以及獨體所賦予數位技術物件和自身的「表面—軀體」、「小工具—強迫者」和「場所—轉化者」的這三組位相。因此,在這個獨體跨個體且集體進行著數位獨體化的時代中,藝術和藝術作品(在數位獨體眼中)基本上是不同於班雅明所說的「沒有靈光的物件」,也並非葛羅伊斯所說的「沒有物件的靈光」,而基本上是以某種「令人讚賞的靈光對象」的姿態進行顯現的。正是面對藝術和藝術作品在今天早已成了某種「令人讚賞的靈光對象」的狀況,包括托瑞爾、劉和讓、陳界仁和高重黎這四位藝術家才會各自透過他們的藝術創作使某種真正的藝術靈光得以在其中出現。但因為使藝術和藝術作品以「令人讚賞的靈光對象」的姿態出現的可能性條件乃是獨體在今天跨個體和集體進行的數位獨體化,所以托瑞爾、劉和讓、陳界仁和高重黎這四位藝術家使真正的藝術靈光出現的實踐基本上還是無法對獨體帶來真正的影響和轉化的可能的。就此,我們所需要的乃是某種以「不令人讚賞的靈光物件」為大方向,以與「間歇性」對抗的「內歇性」為方法,以及以「機靈論」或「靈機論」為實踐策略的某種未來的藝術和美學實踐。
This thesis aims to explore the state, the destiny, and the possibility of art and art work in the age of digital individuation in which the individuated individuals transindividually and collectively differ themselves from the other individuated individuals by digitally operating the mobile digital devices such as the smartphone and the tablet. We discover the correspondence between the user experience the individuated individuals have when they make digital individuation possible by digitally operating the mobile digital devices and the logic of the experience of consciousness the philosopher Gilbert Simondon and G.W.F. Hegel provided. By applying the method of “transduction” Simondon provided and the mediation of the concept “perception” Maurice Merleau-Ponty presented, we can see the Hegelian logic which is composed of the spiritual movement from subjective logic to the absolute idea or absolute logic (via objective logic) and the system of phase and phase-shift which is constructed by three couples of phases such as “body-surface”, “forcer-gadget”, and “changer-place” the individuated individuals give to the digital technical object and themselves. Owing to this, art and art work are not only not considered as the “object without aura” Walter Benjamin mentioned, but also not considered as the “aura without object” Boris Groys presented. Art and art work are considered as the “admirable auratic ob-ject” in the age of digital individuation. What the contemporary artists such as James Terrell, Liu Ho-jang, Chen Chieh-jen, and Kao Chung-li face is exactly the situation of the “admirable auratic ob-ject”; they have created the real artistic aura in this situation. However, due to the fact that the condition of possibility of the birth of art and art work as the “admirable auratic ob-ject” is the digital individuation the individuated individuals transindividually and collectively undergo, the artistic creation James Terrell, Liu Ho-jang, Chen Chieh-jen, and Kao Chung-li presented are no use for the real becoming and transformation of the digitally individuated individuals. Henceforth, what we need is the artistic and aesthetic practices-to-come that takes the “unadmirable auratic ob-ject” as the goal, the against-the-intermittence “enmittence” as the method, and the “animachinism” or the “machanimism” as the strategy of practice.
參考書目

外文部分

Agamben, Giorgio. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.
Alloa, Emmanuel. La résistance du sensible: Merleau-Ponty critique de la transparence. Paris: Kimé, 2008.
Azuma, Hiroki. General will 2.0: Rousseau, Freud, Google. New York: Vertical, 2014.
Badiou, Alain. Infinite Thought: Truth and the Return to Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2003.
. Logics of Worlds: Being and Event, 2. London: Continuum, 2009.
. Philosophy and the Event. London: Polity Press, 2013.
Bauman, Zygmunt. The Individualized Society. Malden: Polity Press, 2001.
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, Lash, Scott, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.
Berardi, Franco “Bifo”. Heroes: Mass Murder and Suicide. London: Verson, 2015.
Bergson, Henri. L'Idée de lieu chez Aristote. Paris: Alcan, 1889.
Berry, David. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Berry, David, Dieter, Michael, Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Bishop, Claire. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso, 2012.
Boehm, Gottfried. Was ist ein Bild? München: W. Fink, 2001.
Bourriaud, Nicolas. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: Presses du réel, 2002.
Byung-Chul, Han. Shanzhai: Dekonstruktion auf Chinesisch. Berlin: Merve, 2011.
. Psychopolitik: Neoliberalismus und die neuen Machttechniken. Berlin: Fischer Taschenbuch, 2015.
. The Transparency Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.
Chow, Rey. The Age of the World Target: Self-Referentiality in War, Theory, and Comparative Work. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2011.
Delanda, Manuel. Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. London: Continuum, 2011.
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinéma 2: L'image-temps. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit,1985.
. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
. The Logic of Sense. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
Déotte, Jean-Louis. L'époque des appareils. Paris: Léo Scheer, 2004.
Desmond, William. Hegel's God: A Counterfeit Double? London: Routledge, 2003.
. God and the Between. Malden: Blackwell, 2008.
. Is There a Sabbath for Thought? Between Religion and Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.
. Being and the Between. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
Didi-Huberman, Georges. La Ressemblance par contact: Archéologie, anachronisme et modernité de l'empreinte. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 2008.
. L'Œil de l'histoire - Tome 2: Remontages du temps subi. Paris: Minuit, 2010.
. L’Œil de l'Histoire - Tome 3: Atlas ou le gai savoir inquiet. Paris: Minuit, 2011.
Elias, Norbert. Society of Individuals. New York: Bloomsbury, 2001.
Esposito, Roberto. Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life. London: Polity Press, 2011.
Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Frabetti, Federica. Software Theory: A Cultural and Philosophical Study. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2014.
Galloway, Alexander. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004.
. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.
. The Interface Effect. London: Polity, 2012.
. Laruelle: Against the Digital. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
Groys, Boris. In the Flow. London: Verson, 2016.
Guattari, Félix. Machinic Eros: Writings on Japan. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2015.
Hegel, G. W. F. Science de la logique. Paris: Kime, 2007.
. The Science of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. Le Je-ne-sais-quoi et le Presque-rien, v.1. Paris: Seil, 1981.
Jarczyk, Gwendoline. Science de la logique: Hegel. Paris: Ellipses, 1998.
Leroi-Gourhan, André. Milieu et techniques. Paris: Albin Michel, 1945.
. Le Geste et la parole, v.1. Paris: Albin Michel, 1964.
. Le fil du temps. Paris: Fayard, 1983.
Manovich, Lev. Software takes command: Extending the language of new media. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Laruelle, François. En tant qu'un: la "non-philosophie" expliquée aux philosophes. Paris: Aubier, 1991.
. Philosophie non-standard: générique, quantique, philo-fiction. Paris: Kimé, 2010.
Maffesoli, Michel. The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage, 1996.
Malabou, Catherine. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. London: Rouledge, 2004.
. Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
. Avant demain. Épigenèse et rationalité. Paris: P.U.F., 2014.
Marion, Jean-Luc. Givenness & Hermeneutics. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2012.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 2012.
. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Michaud, Philippe-Alain. Aby Warburg et l'image en mouvement. Paris: Macula, 2012.
Miller, Paul D., Matviyenko, Svitlana, The Imaginary App. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2014.
Mitropoulos, Angela. Contract & Contagion: From Biopolitics to Oikonomia. New York: Minor Compositions, 2012.
Norretranders, Tor. The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. New York: Penguin, 1998.
Pepperell, Robert. The Postdigital Membrane: Imagination, Technology and Desire. Portland: Intellect, 2000.
Rancière, Jacques. Staging the People: The Proletarian and His Double. London: Verso, 2011.
. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2010.
Sloterdijk, Peter. Bubbles: Spheres Volume I: Microspherology. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2011.
Spinoza, Baruch de. Éthique. Paris: Editions de l’Eclat, 2005.
Simondon, Gilbert. L'Individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information. Paris: Jérôme Millon, 2005.
. Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier, 1989.
. Imagination et invention (1965–1966). Chatou: Editions de La Transparence, 2008.
Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
. Symbolic Misery, V. 1: The Hyperindustrial Epoch. London: Polity Press, 2014.
Tung-Hui, Hu. A Prehistory of the Cloud. Cambirdge: The MIT Press, 2015.
Thomas-Fogiel, Isabelle. Le Concept et le lieu: figures de la relation entre art et philosophie. Paris: Cerf, 2008.
Toscano, Alberto. Theatre of Production: Philosophy and Individuation between Kant and Deleuze. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006.
Väliaho, Pasi. Biopolitical Screens: Image, Power, and the Neoliberal Brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2014.
Wark, Mckenzie. A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
. Telesthesia: Communication, Culture and Class. London: Polity, 2012.
Yuk, Hui. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
Žižek, Slavoj. Trouble in Paradise: From the End of History to the End of Capitalism. New York: Melville House, 2015.

中文部分

王俊琪等著,《城市.魅感 = Urban synesthesia》,高雄:高雄市立美術館,2015。
西田幾多郎著、黃文宏譯注,《西田幾多郎哲學選輯》,台北:聯經,2013。
伯納賽克、蒙根著,吳慕書譯,《失控的大數據:當企業比你更了解你,該如何保護自己和口袋裡的錢?》,台北:商周,2015。
林欣怡著,〈繞過攝影機:以身為目,操干戚以舞〉,《藝術觀點 ACT》,No. 66,2016年4月。
柄谷行人著,林暉鈞譯,《帝國的結構:中心.周邊.亞周邊》,台北:心靈工坊,2015。
里夫金著,陳儀、陳琇玲譯,《物聯網革命》,台北:商周,2014。
洪席耶著,黃建宏譯,國立編譯館主譯,《影像的宿命》,台北:典藏藝術,2011。
荀伯格、庫基耶著,林俊宏譯,《大數據.教育篇 : 教學與學習的未來趨勢》,台北:遠見,2014。
東浩紀著,黃錦容譯,《動物化的後現代 2:遊戲性寫實主義的誕生》,台北:唐山,2014。
海德格著,王慶節、陳嘉映譯,《存在與時間》,台北:桂冠,2002。
陳界仁著,〈從《蔣渭水—臺灣大眾葬葬儀》紀錄片談異議音像「從對抗策略到再質變運動」〉,《藝術觀點 ACT》,No.63,2015年7月。
高重黎著,〈實驗—我的電影史〉,《藝術觀點 ACT》,No. 51,2012年7月。
,〈影像判斷力批判〉,《藝術觀點 ACT》,No. 61,2015年1月。
,〈學習,是我的動畫術〉,《藝術觀點 ACT》,No. 66,2016年4月。
張世英著,《黑格爾的哲學》,上海:上海人民出版社,1972。
黃冠閔著,《在想像的界域上:巴修拉詩學曼衍》,台北:國立台灣大學出版中心,2014。
龔卓軍著,〈身體與影像的重新部署:限界藝術與媒介轉換〉,《藝術家》,第486期,2015年11月號。

網路資料

網路支付協議

阿里巴巴集團,〈支付寶服務協定〉,https://help.alipay.com/lab/help_detail.htm?help_id=211403, 2016年2月13日檢索。
蘋果公司,〈Apple pay 安全和隱私概述〉,https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203027,2016年3月28日檢索。
騰訊控股有限公司,〈微信支付服務協議〉,https://pay.weixin.qq.com/index.php/apply_sign/protocol,2016年3月20日檢索。

維基百科

“Object Storage.” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 2nd June 2016. Web. 14th June 2016.
“Modular Smartphone.” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 22nd June 2016. Web. 22nd June 2016.

電子書與網路文章

斯蒂格勒著,〈斯蒂格勒:逃离人类纪〉,http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MjM5OTUyMzcwNg==&mid=402075795&idx=2&sn=e4c2c3a66a4d35d3c6c1578a69ebc984&scene=5&srcid=0322zFEDAlX3JMzvJQH7LrzK#rd, 2016年5月10日檢索。
Bergson, Henri. "Henri Bergson, Essai Sur les données immédiates de la conscience." Les Classiques des Sciences Sociales. L'université Du Québec à Chicoutimi, 22 Jan. 2003. Web. 23 June 2016.
Galloway, Alexander R. "A "GPL" for Metaphysics." Alexander R. Galloway. N.p., 1 May 2016. Web. 16 June 2016.
. "The Desire Called Speculative Realism." Alexander R. Galloway. N.p., 25 Apr. 2016. Web. 23 May 2016.
Gardels, Nathan. "Controversial Philosopher Says Man and Machine Will Fuse into One Being." The World Post. The Huffington Post, 3 Sept. 2015. Web. 4 June 2016.
Manovich, Lev. "Competitive Photography and the Presentation of the Self." Manovich. N.p., 2016. Web. 21 Apr. 2016.
Melitopoulos, Angela, and Maurizio Lazzarato. "Assemblages: Félix Guattari and Machinic Animism." E-flux. E-flux Publications, July 2012. Web. 23 June 2016.

網路視頻

Macpherson, Amy. "Nicolas Bourriaud: What Is the Exform? | Blog | Royal Academy of Arts." Nicolas Bourriaud: What Is the Exform? | Blog | Royal Academy of Arts. N.p., 9 Nov. 2013. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE