:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文萌樓的鬼 -- 都市性產業空間,從主流社會的它者到打造激進政治的原點
作者:張榮哲
作者(外文):Jung-Che Chang
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:建築與城鄉研究所
指導教授:夏鑄九
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:它者歷史保存都市更新公娼館再現虛擬資本
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
1997年台北市政府粗暴廢娼並引發公娼抗爭起,自那時起,日日春協會就開始著力性工作的全面除罪化與去汙名化。2006年該組織提出申請,台北市政府將文萌樓 – 曾經是公娼館的前公娼抗爭總部 – 指定為古蹟,以資見證與保存自日據時代起漫長的性產業史與社區史。本文分析在2010年後,日日春如何力抗席捲台北的都市更新浪潮,並繼續力保這個性產業空間。自本世紀初始,台灣國家機器經由都市更新政策在全國及地方層次,都重新將自己打造為新的經濟成長機器。就如同文萌樓的處境所示,都更的海嘯已經侵襲每個都會與社區,資本已經快要取代歷史。替都更推土機開路的則是國家機器。新自由主義下的一連串自由化、去管制化與、以及私有化政策,打造了以虛擬房地產為籌碼的超高風險的賭場資本主義遊戲,政府作莊,全民豪賭。文萌樓,這個過去性工作者與它們的抗爭的精神象徵,並沒有默默消音,而是發出刺耳的聲響,競爭都市的意義。
When Taipei City government made an abrupt decision in 1997 to abolish its license-based prostitution system and was resisted by sex workers and their supporters, COSWAS (Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters) has been campaigning for the total decriminalization and de-stigmatization of sex work and sex workers since. In 2006, the organization succeeded in lobbying the city government to designate Wen-Meng-Lou, the brothel house and headquarter of the 1997 campaign for sex work rights, as an official heritage site. At the turn of this century, the Taiwanese authorities on both the national and local levels have successfully re-cast themselves as pro-growth regimes. The campaign of Wen-Meng-Lou demonstrates the tidal wave of gentrification invading the Taipei City that is facilitated by the deregulation and privatization of public lands. This trend in turn accelerates financial speculations based on a system of virtualization and monetization of real-estate properties.
Benjamin, W., 1999, The Arcades Project, trans. Tiedemann, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Bourassa, S. C., 2010, “The rent gap debunked”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader ,Vol. 1, pp.107-117, London: Routledge.
Buck-Morss, S. ,2006, “The flaneur, the sandwichman and the whore: the politics of loitering”, Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project (Vol. 1), pp. 33-65, London: A&C Black.
Caulfield, J., 2010, “Gentrification and desire”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp. 161-170, London: Routledge.
Clark, E. ,1988, “The rent gap and transformation of the built environment: Case studies in Malmö 1860-1985”, Human Geography, pp. 241-254.
Clark, E. ,2010, “The order and simplicity of gentrification”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.24-30, London: Routledge.
Cowen, D. ,2012, “Neil Smith: a critical geographer”, Environment and Planning-Part D, 30(6), 947.
Derrida, J., 1994, Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International, trans. Kamuf, New York: Routledge
Emanuele, V., 2017, “Rebel cities, urban resistance and capitalism: a conversation with David Harvey”, Counter Punch, retrieved from http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/02/01/rebel-cities-urban-resistance-and-capitalism-a-conversation-with-david-harvey/
Engels, F., 1935, The Housing Question, New York: International publishers.
Freud, S., 1915, “The unconscious”, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. Strachey, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Freud, S., 1939, Moses and Monotheism, trans. Jones, New York: Vintage Books.
Freud, S., 1962, Civilization and its Discontents (1st American ed.), New York: W.W. Norton.
Freud, S., 2010, The Interpretation of Dreams: The Complete and Definitive Text, New York: Basic Books.
Graeber, D., 2014, Debt: The First 5,000 Years, New York: Melville House.
Grass, R., 2010, “London: aspects of change”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.7-9, London: Routledge.
Hall, S., 2005, “Whose heritage? Un-settling ‘the heritage’, re-imagining the post-nation”, The Politics of Heritage: the Legacies of Race, The Politics of Heritage: the Legacies of Race, pp.23-35, London: Routledge.
Hamnett, C., 2010, “The blind man and the elephant”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.233-250, London: Routledge.
Hardt, M., 2010, “The common in communism”, in Rethinking Marxism, 22(3), pp.346-356.
Hardt, M., Negri, A., 2009, Commonwealth. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Harvey, D., 1978, “The urban process under capitalism: a framework for analysis”, in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1‐4), pp.101-131.
Harvey, D., 1989, The Condition of Postmodernity: an Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D., 2001, Spaces of Capital: towards a Critical Geography, London: Routledge.
Harvey, D., 2003, The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D., 2006, The Limits to Capital, London: Verso.
Harvey, D., 2011, “The future of the commons”, Radical History Review, (109), pp.101-107.
Harvey, D., 2012, Rebel Cities: from the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London: Verso.
Harvey, D., 2014, Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D., 2015, “Consolidating power: the left has to rethink its theoretical and tactical apparatus”, A. Malabocas (ed.), Roar Magazine, from http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=16900
Harvey, D., 2016, The Ways of the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D., 2017, Marx, Capital and the Madness of Economic Reason, London: Profile Books.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2015, The Philosophy of Right, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Howell, P., 2000, “Prostitution and racialised sexuality: the regulation of prostitution in Britain and the British Empire before the Contagious Diseases Acts”, Environment and Planning D, 18(3), pp.321-340.
Howell, P., 2005, “Prostitution and the place of empire: regulation and repeal in Hong Kong and the British imperial network”, in M. M. Roche (ed.), Displacing Empire: Renegotiating British Colonial Geographies, Farnham: Ashgate Pub.
Howell, P., 2010, “Geographies of Regulation: Policing Prostitution in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the Empire”, The Geographical Journal, Volume 176, Issue 4, pp.378–379, Cambridge, UK.
Hsu, J.-y., & Hsu, Y.-h., 2013, “State transformation, policy learning, and exclusive displacement in the process of urban redevelopment in Taiwan”, Urban Geography, 34(5), pp.677-698.
Jager, M., 2010, “Class definition and the aesthetics of gentrification”, in L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp. 153-160, London: Routledge.
Jou, S.-C., Clark, E., & Chen, H.-W., 2014, “Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei”, Urban Studies, Vol 53, Issue 3, pp. 560 – 576.
Karatani, K., 1995, Architecture as Metaphor: Language, Number, Money, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Karatani, K., 2005, Transcritique: On Kant and Marx, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kingsbury, P., & Pile, S., 2014, Psychoanalytic Geographies, London: Routledge.
Knopp, M. L., 2010, “Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.272-284, London: Routledge.
Kojève, A., 1980, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Lacan, J., 1974-5, Seminar XXII of Jacques Lacan, R.S.I., unpublished.
Lacan, J., 1988, Freud''s Papers on Technique, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lefebvre, H., 2003, The Urban Revolution, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ley, D., 1986, “Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: a Canadian assessment”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(4), pp.521-535.
Lotz, C., 2016, “Fiction without fantasy: capital fetishism as objective forgetting”, Crisis & Critique, Volume 3, pp.346-382.
Madden, D. J., & Marcuse, P., 2016, In Defense of Housing: the Politics of Crisis, London: Verso.
Marazzi, C., 2008, Capital and Language: from the New Economy to the War Economy, Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Marazzi, C., 2010, “Financial entropy: the struggle within and against empire”, from https://anarchistwithoutcontent.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/marazzi-rewrite.pdf
Marazzi, C., 2011, The Violence of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge MA: MIT Press Books.
Marx, K., Engels, F., 2008, The Communist Manifesto, London: Pluto Press.
Marx, K., 1964, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, New York: TB Bottomore.
Marx, K., 1967, Capital (Vol. One), New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K., 1981a, Capital (Vol. Two), New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, K., 1981b, Capital (Vol. Three), London: Penguin.
Marx, K., 1993, Grundrisse. London: Penguin.
Rancière, J., 1999, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rose, D., 2010, “Rethinking gentrification”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.195-219, London: Routledge.
Shaw, K., 2008a, “Gentrification: what it is, why it is, and what can be done about it”, Geography Compass, 2(5), pp.697-728.
Shaw, K., 2008b, “A response to ‘The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research’ ”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp.192-194.
Shih, M., & Chang, H. B., 2016, “Transfer of development rights and public facility planning in Taiwan: An examination of local adaptation and spatial impact”, Urban Studies, 53(6), pp.244-260.
Smith, N. ,1996, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, Hove: Psychology Press.
Smith, N., 2010a, “New globalization, new urbanism”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.495-508, London: Routledge.
Smith, N., 2010b, “Towards a theory of gentrification”, L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp. 85-98, London: Routledge.
Strange, S., 1997, Casino Capitalism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Strange, S., 1998, Mad Money, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Taylor, M. M. ,2010, “Can You Go Home Again”, in L. Lees, E. K. Wyly & T. Slater (eds.), The Gentrification Reader (Vol. 1), pp.285-298, London: Routledge.
Tomsic, S., 2015, The Capitalist Unconscious: Marx and Lacan. London: Verso.
Wacquant, L., 2008, “Relocating gentrification: the working class, science and the state in recent urban research”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp.198-205.
Watt, P., 2008, “The only class in town? Gentrification and the middle‐class colonization of the city and the urban imagination”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp.206-211.
Yang, D. Y.-R., Chang, J.-C. (張榮哲),2017,“Financialising space through transferable development rights: Urban renewal, Taipei style”, Urban Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098017710124
Zizek, S., 1989, The Sublime Object of Ideology, London: Verso.
Zizek, S., 2006, The Parallax View, Cambridge MA: MIT press.
Zizek, S., 2008, The Fragile Absolute, or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for? London: Verso.
Zizek, S., 2009, First as Tragedy, then as Farce, London: Verso.
Zizek, S., 2010, “How to begin from the beginning”, in C. Douzinas & S. Zizek (eds.), The Idea of Communism, London: Verso.
Zizek, S., 2011, Living in the End Times, London: Verso.
Zizek, S., 2012, The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology (film), directed by Sophie Fiennesm Zeitgeist Films, 72.
Zizek, S., 2016, “Can one exit from the capitalist discourse without becoming a saint?”, Crisis & Critique, Volume 3, pp.480-499.
日日春關懷互助協會(編),2000,《日日春:九個公娼的生涯故事》,台北:台灣工運雜誌社。
日日春關懷互助協會(編),2001a,《百年公娼,台北再見》,台北:日日春關懷互助協會。
日日春關懷互助協會(編),2001b,《與娼同行,翻牆越界:公娼抗爭運動文集》,台北:巨流。
日日春關懷互助協會,2013a/01/15,〈日日春二審敗訴古蹟公共性不敵房地產炒作公娼活歷史即將被迫出走〉(新聞稿)。
日日春關懷互助協會,2013b/12/31,〈搶救妓運古蹟文萌樓,文化局責無旁貸〉(新聞稿)。
日日春關懷互助協會,2014a/04/16,〈文萌樓都更事業計畫公聽會全紀錄〉(新聞稿)
日日春關懷互助協會,2014b/9/29,〈文萌樓第二次都更審議〉(新聞稿) 。
王已田,2007/08/31,〈白手套洪正雄判刑六年〉,《中國時報》,A14版。
王芳萍,2002,〈公娼運動: 社會行動的認識論〉,引自《應用心理研究》(14),58-59頁。
王芳萍,2015a,〈日日春行動者的反思: 性交易修法歷程的社會探究〉,《社會分析》(10),127-167頁。
王芳萍,2015b,《性工作者去汙名的社會過程探究──臺灣日日春的另類社會運動個案研究》,博士論文,北京:中國人民大學。
王芳萍、張榮哲,2014,〈古蹟文萌樓與日日春運動〉,《台灣人權學刊》2(4),151-168頁。
王聖蔾,2006/12/19,〈涉貪汙羅宗勝求刑十七年〉,《聯合報》,A11版。
王聖蔾、詹三源,2006/05/31,〈羅宗勝提告 洪要再爆料〉,《聯合報》,C4版。
台北市公娼自救會、女人團結生產線、粉領聯盟、女人陣線(編),2000,《公娼抗爭大事紀》(節縮版),台北:巨流。
列寧,1985,〈政論家劄記〉,《列寧全集》,32 卷,北京:人民出版社。
佛洛依德 (Freud, S.),2003,《一種幻想的未來 ;文明及其不滿》,嚴志、張沫譯,石家莊市: 河北教育。
吳若瑩,2009,《性感地誌:公娼館文萌樓的保存與大稻埕性產業地景》,碩士論文,台北:臺灣大學。
沈廷君,2013/05/22,〈內湖「土地」暴增萬坪 北市容積6年總增4萬坪〉,《好房N e w s》(網路版)。
周宸安,201603/19,〈覺得在士林再生計畫說明會跌倒了痛痛〉,臉書動態時報 (網路版)。
周憲文,1958,《日據時代台灣經濟史》,台北:台灣銀行經濟研究室。
東森新聞,2013/10/13,〈新板特區豪宅擋人!天橋堵砂包變私地〉,《東森新聞》(網路版)。
林怡秀,2016/06/01,〈文化資產保存法修正案>修正案通過之後,《典藏今藝術》,285期,100-105頁。
林萬傳,1989,〈大同區耆老座談會紀錄〉,《台北文獻》,直字九十一期,1-16頁。
林詩茵,2013/01/30,〈建商10年借殼30家!何不走IPO大路〉,《精實新聞》(網路版)。
邱瓊玉,2013/08/08,〈道路徵收慢 地主要求廢容積銀行〉,《聯合新聞網》(網路版)。
胡智凱,2013/03/09,〈台中首創容積銀行 搶先引爆爭議〉,《好房NEWS》(網路版)。
郁良溎,2016/06/01,〈公益與私利失衡的都市更新容積獎勵〉,《典藏今藝術》,285期,104-106頁。
夏林清,2002,〈尋找一個對話的位置: 基進教育與社會學習歷程〉,《應用心理研究》(16),119-156頁。
夏鑄九,2014,〈公娼魂護文萌樓,麗君精神永不死〉,引自日日春關懷互助協會臉書,麗君追思系列文章 (網路版)。
時事新報,1932/09/01 (昭和七年),〈強硬手段に訴え「横倉」乗取計画 日銀条例に牴触? 日銀と永楽土地〉,《時事新報》,神戸大学経済経営研究所/新聞記事文庫/土地 (8-056) (網路版)。
荒川久 (編),1928 (昭和三年),《御大典紀念:台北市六十餘町案內》,台北:世相研究所出版社。
馬克思,2004,《資本論》,第一卷,北京:人民出版社。
馬克思、恩格斯,1956,《馬克思恩格斯全集》(46 ),北京:人民出版社。
高年億&李光儀,2006/07/05,〈羅宗勝債務纏身 傳有黑道保護〉,《聯合報》,A10版。
堀込憲二,2011,〈治時期台灣近代建築外牆磁磚形式與色彩變遷之研究〉,《建築與城鄉研究學報》18,19-48頁。
張菱育,2013a/03/08,〈政府推容積銀行,地主反彈〉,《蘋果日報》(網路版)。
張菱育,2013b/10/09,〈建商互賣屋,藉「實價」炒房〉,《蘋果日報》(網路版)。
張榮哲,2017,〈陰不是陽的反面〉,《臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌》(86),57-60頁。
張曉旻、梁秋虹、張州禮、陳姃湲,2012,〈欲望的邊緣地景:娼妓們的非日常生活〉,《看不見的殖民邊緣 : 日治台灣邊緣史讀本》,陳姃湲 (編),48-67頁,台北: 玉山社。
郭安家,2013/10/5,〈都更融資平台 挨批讓卡奴變屋奴〉,《自由電子報》(網路版)。
陳光儀,2006/07/06,〈羅宗勝數月前立長生牌位〉,《聯合報》,C4版。
陳姃湲,2010,〈在殖民地臺灣社會夾縫中的朝鮮人娼妓業〉,引自《臺灣史研究》17(3),107-149頁。
陳虹穎,2016/03/25,〈都市更新,業主「股東化」的心魔〉,《福爾摩沙:一種關注》(網路版)。
陳虹穎、張榮哲,2013/05/22,〈救人一命,還是謀財害命〉,《苦勞網》(網路版)。
陳韋綸,2014a/07/06,〈反炒作古蹟,籲收歸國有〉,《苦勞網》(網路版)。
陳韋綸,2014b/08/04,〈麗君過世,日日春送訃聞〉,《苦勞網》(網路版)。
陳惠惠、邱瓊玉,2014/04/03,〈都更條例修法若不過,逾300案停擺〉,《聯合報》(網路版)。
游蓓茹,2014/08/01,〈文萌樓維護計畫 屋主逾期未提將挨罰〉,《自由時報》(網路版)。
楊文琪,2013,〈北市容積銀行 年底提辦法〉,《聯合新聞網》(網路版)。
歌德 (J. W. Goethe),2011,《浮士德》,錢春綺 譯,上海: 上海譯文。
趙國明,2006/06/27,〈羅宗勝80萬元交保〉,《中國時報》,A6版。
劉永祥,2006/05/30,〈羅宗勝提告 洪要再爆料〉,《聯合報》,C4版。
劉建宏,2012/03/09,〈低價買古蹟變高價豪宅,建商賺容積暴利絕招公開〉,《中時電子報》(網路版).。
劉建宏,2013/07/05,〈洪正雄賣天璽 張琪高唱天天歡喜〉,《時報周刊》(網路版)。
劉建宏、張毓琪,2012/04/20,〈1坪天價630萬 國有財產局逼出全台最貴釘子戶〉,《中時電子報》(網路版)。
劉開元,2006/06/26,〈羅宗勝研究室遭搜索〉,《聯合晚報》,9版。
劉鴻濃、張榮哲,2012/11/08,〈配合文萌樓都更案,台銀即將標售土地,國家資產私有化,一同到場見證〉,《苦勞網》(網路版)。
蔡佩蓉,2013/09/06,〈首例「容積銀行」買賣!〉,《好房N e w s》(網路版)。
蔡崇榮,2001,〈公娼啟示錄〉(紀錄片),台北:公共電視。
聯合報,2016/03/20,〈政府容積獎勵不應胡亂揮霍〉,《聯合新聞網》(網路版)。
謝梅芬,2013/06/17,〈容積移轉代金制度 下月起實施〉,《聯合新聞網》(網路版)。
蘇彥菱,2013/11/14,〈容積銀行地點出爐〉,《好房N e w s》(網路版)。
蘇碩斌,2010,《看不見與看得見的台北》,台北: 群學。
鹽見俊二,2001,《秘錄.終戰前後的台灣》,台北: 貿騰發賣總經銷。
鹽見喜太郎,1941 (昭和 11年),《台灣諸會社行錄》,台北: 臺灣實業興信所。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE