臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：文化導向都市再生之政策及評估系統之研究
作者：李玫欣
作者(外文)：LEE, MEI-SHIN
校院名稱：中國文化大學
系所名稱：建築及都市設計學系
指導教授：邱英浩
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2021
主題關鍵詞：文化再生；都市再生；創意城市；生活品質；創意氛圍；都市在生前進基地；cultural regeneration；urban regeneration；creative city；quality of life；creative milieu；urban regeneration station
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
歐美先進國家自1980-1990年代起即採取文化導向策略包括文化創意產業、文化設施、文化活動、文資保存利用、營造文創地標等，並結合創意城市(Creative City)理念，作為以提振經濟發展為目標的都市再生策略，然2000年代起的城鄉願景，文化導向都市再生不再僅是實體的建物或經濟提振，而是地區環境、社會及經濟面等都市全方位的健全，更與都市創意氛圍與鄰里的生活品質息息相關。
臺灣的都市更新(Urban Renewal)始於1970年代，採都市計畫、區段徵收及市地重劃的手段實施，1990年以後因應都市建築老化，則陸續訂定都市更新相關法規積極推動，主要處理方式為實質建物的重建、整建及維護，遲至2005年以後才慢慢引入都市再生的作法，期透過大面積國有土地及資產的再開發，以資產產導向再生的方式(Property-led Regeneration)企圖帶動整合文化、社會、經濟、環境等面向的都市再生效果。
台灣的文化資產保存於1982年即已立法，惟自1990年代始積極推動，文化創意產業(Cultural and Creative Industries)則於2000年以方案形式開始討論，2002年行政院「挑戰2008年國家發展重點計畫」提出促進文創產業的方向，2009年提出五大文創園區計畫，文化逐漸與空間發展連結，2018年「文化創意產業發展法」公布實施，但文化創意連結都市發展是否效果加乘，又如何促成文化導向成為下一波台灣都市再生的動力，是本研究起始的動機。
本研究首先從聯合國世界城市狀況報告中，探討1990年以來，世界城市從對經濟發展追求、資產導向都市更新，及至文化導向都市再生的發展趨勢，再從文化導向都市再生的相關研究中，整理出評估文化導向都市再生策略之績效評估指標，透過都市更新政產學的專家學者問卷，運用ANP及AHP等計量方法，並經深度訪談(In-depth Interview)中央地方都市更新主管機關具經驗之高階主管、社區的店家與居民代表，以及主導推動大稻埕都市再生及台中綠光計劃之專家後，提出臺灣文化導向都市再生策略之績效評估指標，包括:活化與再生、創意與創新、產業與經營以及營造創意氛圍等5個面向下的11項指標，並建議各項指標下的衡量子標。
此外，本研究以台北市都市再生前進基地（URS）計畫為文化導向都市再生之實證案例，透過IPA滿意度分析及深度訪談結果，提出台灣文化導向都市再生政策、策略之相關建議，以及文化導向都市再生後續研究建議。
Western countries have applied the cultural strategies in urban regeneration projects since 1980s. The theme of the culture- led regeneration projects, from hardware to software, containing the facilities, sites, places of culture, the cultural and creative industries, the creative class and even the creative milieu among the area. The goals of culture-led urban regeneration was set not only for the economic growth or the improvement of the physical environment, but also for the promotion of social inclusion, living quality, and even the achievement of social sustainability.
In Taiwan, The Urban Renewal ACT of Taiwan was enacted in 1998. The major points of the Act include renewal area enlargement and private investment enhancement to promote street-scale renewal projects instead of reconstruction of single buildings. However, the main value of the renewal projects still relies on property development to provide the driving force for urban regeneration.
As to the cultural development, Cultural Heritage Preservation Act was enacted in 1982. The cultural strategies focused mostly on historical preservation. Till 2002, the policy of cultural and creative industrial park was firstly advocated. Plus, the Development of the Cultural and Creative Industries Act was enacted in 2010. Therefore, cultural strategies have gradually become the drive of urban regeneration.
Following the trend of culture-led regeneration, this research would like to discuss the culture-led Urban Regeneration strategy in Taiwan. Literature review, FDM, ANP and AHP methods are applied to set up the optimal indicators to evaluate the strategies of culture-led urban regeneration. Subsequently, Urban Regeneration Station, defined as a culture-led urban regeneration strategy, practicing in Dadaocheng is taken as an empirical case. IPA analysis is performed and furtherly, in-depth interviews with professionals, government officials and resident/community are practiced. Therefore, five dimensions of the evaluation indicators, including localization & revitalization, community cohesion, creativity & innovation, industry & management and creative milieu, and detailed indexes under every indicator are recommended. The promoting focus of culture-led urban regeneration policy and strategies is recommended.
Anon. 2001. CITIES IN A GLOBALIZING WORLD.
Bassett, K. 1993. “Urban Cultural Strategies and Urban Regeneration: A Case Study and Critique.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 25(12):1773–88.
Bassett, Keith, RonGriffiths, andIanSmith. 2002. “Cultural Industries, Cultural Clusters and the City: The Example of Natural History Film-Making in Bristol.” Geoforum 33(2):165–77.
Bianchini, F., & Parkinson, M. (Eds. .. 1994. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience. Manchester University Press.
Bianchini, Franco andMichaelParkinson, eds. 1994. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience.
Binns, Luke. 2004. “Capitalising on Culture: An Evaluation of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration Policy.” Futures Academy.
Carolyn Boyce, By. 2006. Monitoring and Evaluation-2 CONDUCTING IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input.
Chao, Jen-Chih andKuo-WeiHsu. n.d. “臺北市都市再生前進基地效益評估架構之研究 The Study on the Efficacy Assessment Frame of Taipei City Urban Regeneration Station.”
Chiu, Shu-Yi. 2014. The Arts and Creative Transformation of Dihua Street Urban Regeneration Stations in Taipei City: Whose Culture? Whose City? Vol. 28.
Chiu, Yin-Hao, Mei-ShinLee, andJung-WeiWang. 2019. “Culture-Led Urban Regeneration Strategy: An Evaluation of the Management Strategies and Performance of Urban Regeneration Stations in Taipei City.” Habitat International 86:1–9.
Coll-Martínez, Eva andJosep-MariaArauzo-Carod. n.d. “Creative Milieu and Firm Location: An Empirical Appraisal.”
Cooper, Richard N. andRichardFlorida. 2010. “The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent.” Foreign Affairs 84(5):170.
Couch, Chris andAnnekatrinDennemann. 2000. “Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Development in Britain. The Example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership.” Cities 17(2):137–47.
Dalkey, Norman andOlafHelmer. 1963. “An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts.” Management Science 9(3):458–67.
Delbecq, Andre L., Van de Ven, Andrew H. andDavid H.Gustafson. 1975. Group Techniques for Program Planning : A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes /.
Devine, Carol M., Margaret M.Connors, JefferySobal, andCarole A.Bisogni. 2003. Sandwiching It in: Spillover of Work onto Food Choices and Family Roles in Low-and Moderate-Income Urban Households. Vol. 56.
Doloreux, D. 2002. “What We Should Know about Regional Systems of Innovation.” Technology in Society 24(3):243–63.
Evans, Graeme. 2005. “Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration.” Urban Studies 42(5/6):959–83.
Evans, Graeme andSteveShaw. 2008. “Urban Leisure and Transport: Regeneration Effects.” Journal of Retail & Leisure Property 1(4):350–72.
Florida, Richard. 2003a. “Cities and the Creative Class.” City & Community 2:1(March):3–19.
Florida, Richard. 2003b. “Cities and the Creative Class.” City and Community 2(1):3–19.
Florida, Richard. 2006. “The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent.” Liberal Education 92(3):22–29.
Frediani, Alexandre Apsan. 2010. “Sen’s Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development.” Development in Practice 20(2):173–87.
García, Beatriz. 2004. “Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration in Western European Cities: Lessons from Experience, Prospects for the Future.” Local Economy 19(4):312–26.
Grodach, Carl. 2013. “Cultural Economy Planning in Creative Cities: Discourse and Practice.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(5):1747–65.
Grodach, Carl andCarlGrodach Senior Lecturer Property. n.d. “Urban Cultural Policy and Creative City Making.”
Hall, Peter. 2004. “Creativity, Culture, Knowledge and the City.” Built Environment 30(3):256–58.
Healey, Patsy. 1994. “Urban Policy and Property Development : The Institutional Relations of Real-Estate Development in an Old Industrial.” 26:177–98.
Healey, Patsy. 1995. “The Institutional Challenge for Sustainable Urban Regeneration.” Cities 12(4):221–30.
Hollenhorst, S. J. ,Olson, D. , Fortney, R. 1992. “Use of Importance-Performance Analysis to Evaluate State Park Cabins: The Case of the West Virginia State Park System.” Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 10:1–11.
Hsu, Chia-Chien andBrian A.Sandford. 2007. “The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 12:10.
Imrie, R. andH.Thomas. 1993. “The Limits of Property-Led Regeneration.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 11(1):87–102.
Ishikawa, Akira, MichioAmagasa, TetsuoShiga, GiichiTomizawa, RumiTatsuta, andHiroshiMieno. 1993. “The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 55(3):241–53.
ITREAD01. 2019. “文創與地產聯姻，玩轉跨界混搭 - IT閱讀.” ITREAD01. Retrieved September14, 2020 (https://www.itread01.com/hkpexlq.html).
Jaffe, P. G., A. W.Leschied, W.Willis, United Nations Human Settlements Programme(UN-Habitat), WordCount, W. C.Durward, StephenEssex, andBrianChalkley. 2013. State of the World’s Cities 2012/2013 Prosperity of Cities. Vol. 17.
Jones, Deborah andKarenSmith. 2005. “Middle-Earth Meets New Zealand: Authenticity and Location in the Making of the Lord of the Rings.” Journal of Management Studies 42(5):923–45.
Kostopoulou, Stella. 2013. “On the Revitalized Waterfront: Creative Milieu for Creative Tourism.” Sustainability 5(11):4578–93.
Ku, Yi-ling and廖淑容. 2004. “文化產業政策發展的趨勢與問題.” 都市與計劃 31(2):91–111.
Landry, By Charles. 2005. “Lineages of the Creative City.” Culture 1–13.
Landry, Charles. 2004. Imagination and Regeneration: Cultural Policy and the Future of Cities.
Landry, Charles. 2008a. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. second.
Landry, Charles. 2008b. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Regeneration. Vol. 36.
Landry, Charles andFrancoBianchini. 1995. The Creative City.
Landry, Charles, LesleyGreene, FrancoisMatarasso, andFrancoBianchini. 1996. The Art of Regeneration: Urban Renewal Through Cultural Activity.
Lee, Jin Woo andSoung HieKim. 2001. “Integrated Approach for Interdependent Information System Project Selection.” International Journal of Project Management 19(2):111–18.
Liu, Yi-De, Liu, andYi-De. 2019. “Event and Sustainable Culture-Led Regeneration: Lessons from the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool.” Sustainability 11(7):1869.
Liu, Yu Yun andYin HaoChiu. 2017. “Evaluation of the Policy of the Creative Industry for Urban Development.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 9(6).
Loftman, Patrick andBrendan N.Evin. 1996. Going for Growth: Prestige Projects in Three British Cities. Vol. 33.
Loftman, Patrick andBrendanNevin. 1995. “Prestige Projects and Urban Regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: A Review of Benefits and Limitations.” Planning Practice & Research 10(3–4):299–316.
Malmir, Maryam, Mir Masoud KheirkhahZarkesh, Seyed MasoudMonavari, Seyed AliJozi, andEsmailSharifi. 2016. “Analysis of Land Suitability for Urban Development in Ahwaz County in Southwestern Iran Using Fuzzy Logic and Analytic Network Process (ANP).” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188(8).
Mascarenhas, André, Luís M.Nunes, andTomás B.Ramos. 2015. “Selection of Sustainability Indicators for Planning: Combining Stakeholders’ Participation and Data Reduction Techniques.” Journal of Cleaner Production 92:295–307.
Matzler, Kurt, FranzBailom, Hans H.Hinterhuber, BirgitRenzl, andJohannPichler. 2004. “The Asymmetric Relationship between Attribute-Level Performance and Overall Customer Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of the Importance-Performance Analysis.” Industrial Marketing Management 33(4):271–77.
McCarthy, John andS. H. Ala.Pollock. 1997a. “Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Dundee: A Comparative Evaluation.” Land Use Policy 14(2):137–49.
McCarthy, John andS. H. Ala.Pollock. 1997b. “Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Dundee: A Comparative Evaluation.” Land Use Policy 14(2):137–49.
Miles, Steven andRonanPaddison. 2005. “Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 42(5–6):833–39.
Molotch, Harvey. 2002. “Place in Product.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26(4):665–88.
Mommaas, Hans. 2004. “Cultural Clusters and the Post-Industrial City: Towards the Remapping of Urban Cultural Policy.” Urban Studies 41(3):507–32.
Montgomery, John. 2017. The New Wealth of Cities. Routledge.
Moreno, Eduardo Lopez andRasnaWarah. 2007. State of the World’s Cities in 2006/7.
Nedučin, Dejana, MilenaKrklješ, andZlatomirGajić. 2019. “Post-Socialist Context of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration – Case Study of a Street in Novi Sad, Serbia.” Cities 85:72–82.
Paddison, Ronan andStevenMiles. 2005. “Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 42(5):833–39.
Peck, Jamie. 2005. “Struggling with the Creative Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(4):740–70.
Peyroux, Elisabeth., D.Eckert, andC.Thouzellier. 2006. “Toulouse: Embracing the Knowledge Economy. Pathways to Creative And.” Women 45(47.4):49.3.
Porter, Michael E. 1998. “Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity.” Development 1–23.
Porter, Michael E. 2007. Clusters and Economic Policy: Aligning Public Policy with the New Economics of Competition.
Pratt, Andy C. 2010. “Creative Cities: Tensions within and between Social, Cultural and Economic Development a Critical Reading of the UK Experience.” City, Culture and Society 1(1):13–20.
Programme, United Nations Development. 1993. “Human Development Report 1991 . United Nations Development Programme.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 41(4):865–70.
Rezaei, Naimeh, MahsaRasouli, andBaharehAzhdari. 2018. “The Attitude of the Local Community to the Impact of Building Reuse: Three Cases in an Old Neighborhood of Tehran.” Heritage and Society 11(2):105–25.
Richard, F. 2002. “The Rise of the Creative Class.” Washington Monthly 1–30.
Rius Ulldemolins, Joaquim. 2014. “Culture and Authenticity in Urban Regeneration Processes: Place Branding in Central Barcelona.” Urban Studies 51(14):3026–45.
Saaty, T. L. 1996. “Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process.” P. 370 in RWS Publications, 1996, ISBN 0-9620317-9-8.
Sacco, P. L., G.Tavano Blessi, andM.Nuccio. 2008. “Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts.” Università Iuav Di Venezia DADI Dipartimento Delle Arti e Del Disegno Industriale Working Papers - DADI/ WP_5/08 44(4):555–70.
Sacco, Pierluigi, GuidoFerilli, andGiorgio TavanoBlessi. 2014. “Understanding Culture-Led Local Development: A Critique of Alternative Theoretical Explanations.” Urban Studies 51(13):2806–21.
Sasaki, Masayuki. 2010. “Urban Regeneration through Cultural Creativity and Social Inclusion: Rethinking Creative City Theory through a Japanese Case Study.” Cities 27(SUPPL. 1):S3–9.
Scott, Allen J. 2004. “Cultural-Products Industries and Urban Economic Development: Prospects for Growth and Market Contestation in Global Context.” Urban Affairs Review 39(4):461–90.
Semm, Kadri. 2011. “Neighborhood Milieu in the Cultural Economy of City Development: Berlin’s Helmholtzplatz and Soldiner in the German ‘Social City’ Program.” Cities 28(1):95–106.
Sen, Amartya. 1987. The Standard of Living. edited by G.Hawthorn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shin, HaeRan andQuentinStevens. 2013. “How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-Led Urban Regeneration.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(5):1707–23.
Turok, I. 1992. “Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 24(3):361–79.
United Nations. 2018. “The World ’s Cities in 2018.” The World’s Cities in 2018 - Data Booklet (ST/ESA/ SER.A/417) 34.
United Nations Center for Human Settlements(HABITAT). 1996. An Urbanization World Global Report on Human Settlements 1996.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. 2004. The State of the World’s Cities 2004/2005 : Globalization and Urban Culture. Earthscan.
URS, Village Taipei. n.d. “About Village Taipei | Village Taipei URS.” Retrieved (https://www.urstaipei.net/en/about).
URS, Village Taipei. n.d. “Village Taipei URS.” Retrieved June7, 2019b (https://www.urstaipei.net/en/about).
Vickery, Jonathan. 2007. The Emergence of Culture-Led Regeneration: A Policy Concept and Its Discontents.
Wey, Wann Ming andYin HaoChiu. 2013. “Assessing the Walkability of Pedestrian Environment under the Transit-Oriented Development.” Habitat International 38:106–18.
Wojan, T. R., D. M.Lambert, andD. A.McGranahan. 2007. “Emoting with Their Feet: Bohemian Attraction to Creative Milieu.” Journal of Economic Geography 7(6):711–36.
Wood, Phil andCharlesLandry. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage.
Wu, Weiping. 2004. “Cultural Strategies in Shanghai: Regenerating Cosmopolitanism in an Era of Globalization.” Progress in Planning 61(3):159–80.
Yu, Tao, QiTang, YongxiangWu, YaowuWang, andZezhouWu. 2019. “What Determines the Success of Culture-Led Regeneration Projects in China?” Sustainability 11(18):4847.
內政部建築研究所. 2003. 台灣傳統街屋建築空間形式與再利用之研究.
劉冠德. 2003. “以農村社區土地重劃方式取得集村興建農舍用地之研究.” 國立台北大學.
古宜靈 and廖淑容. 2003. “文化產業的地方性與經濟性.” Pp. 1–11 in.
台北市都市更新處. 2020. “臺北市都市再生前進基地推動計畫暨相關推動辦法.” Retrieved January13, 2021 (https://uro.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=E1ACB74A351802D3&sms=124DD99015F92BE8&s=26E5436E2269AEAC).
天地人文創. n.d. “【天地人×希嘉文化】文創產業三大哉問推動迪化街文化復興｜TDRwatch.” Retrieved June20, 2020 (https://blog.tiandiren.tw/archives/17117).
張鈞硯. 2011. 國立政治大學科技管理研究所 碩士學位論文 大台北地區利用文創事業導入 都市再生過程之研究 指導教授：李仁芳博士 研究生： 張鈞硯 撰 中華民國一百年七月.
林欽榮. 2010. “創新區域與創意城市：產業創新與文化創意做為城市再生的動能.” 研考雙月刊 34(6):64–74.
林秀澧 and高名孝. 2015. 計劃城事：戰後臺北都市發展歷程. 田園城市.
游千慧. 2012. “我國實施都市更新制度之檢討與修法方向研析.” 土地問題研究季刊 11(2):23–30.
潘勇成. 2018. “地方產業發展評估與策略研擬之研究.” 中國文化大學.
經濟部、新聞局、文建會. n.d. 創意台灣—文化創意產業發展方案 行動計畫 98—102 年.
臺北市立重慶國民中學. n.d. “傾埕之美-觀光禮讚.” Retrieved June20, 2020 (http://library.taiwanschoolnet.org/cyberfair2014/cchs2014best/C-2.htm).
莊永明. 2012. 台北老街. 時報文化.
衛萬里 and張文智. 2005. “應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究.” 設計學報 10(3):59–77.
鄭永祥. 2009. “網路分析程序法之理論與應用.” 國防管理學報 30(2):69–79.
鄭滄濱. 2001. “軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式.”
金家禾. 2007. “創意產業於台北都會中心區群聚發展之研究The Clustering of Creative Industries in Inner City of Taipei Chia-Ho Ching.” 都市與計ㄏㄨ 34(4):343–61.
陳亭聿. n.d. “從酒店旗袍到知名電影戲服，「玉鳳服裝號」陳忠信一身汗衫數十年如一日.” 中華文化總會 - 微笑台灣 - 用深度旅遊體驗鄉鎮魅力.
陳怡安. 2014. “政府運用公私協力治理之研究：以臺北市都市再生前進基地為例.” 國立台北大學.
顏亮一. 2006. “市民認同、地區發展與都市保存：迪化街個案分析.” 都市與計劃 33(2):93–109.
黃元鴻. 2012. “都市治理與空間再利用:以台北市URS為例.” 國立台灣大學.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：817（臺灣：806，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67489866
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上