:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人情境下組織結構、創新能力與創新績效
作者:林靜宜
作者(外文):LIN,JING-YI
校院名稱:亞洲大學
系所名稱:經營管理學系
指導教授:邱文宏
紀慧如
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2021
主題關鍵詞:華人情境領導決策組織設計創新能力創新績效Chinese ContextLeadership DecisionOrganizational DesignInnovation CapabilityInnovation Performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
創新為各產業持續追求基業長青的目標,尤其在華人情境下之產業持續為轉型或升級為智慧製造。本計畫探討在華人情境下以創新能力為觀點,探討製造業在追求創新的同時,公司領導決策以組織結構對於創新能力與創新績效為研究目的。故本計畫以台灣智慧製造產業為主要研究對象,收集 105 家上市公司自民國 95 年至 108 年公司財報,以次級資料內容逐步分析並建構本文次級資料庫,並將整理後各項關鍵字與數據,匯集本研究所需要數據庫,透過統計分析,以數據化呈現,探討領導決策對於公司之組織設計、創新能力與績效影響情形,並對製造業之創新在國內產業發展上提供理論貢獻與實務管理意涵。公司需要有好的領 導決策,具備他人無法替代的洞察力,藉此激發員工產生前所未有的創意,凝聚公司團隊與員工,提升公司創新能力與企業創新績效。
Innovation continues to pursue the goal of everlasting foundation for all industries in Chinese context, especially the transformation or upgrading of manufacturing to smart manufacturing. This project takes the innovation capability as the point of view, discusses that while the manufacturing industry is pursuing innovation, the company's leaders’ decisions impact organizational structure as the research purpose of innovation capability and innovation performance. Therefore, this project takes Taiwan’s smart manufacturing industry as the main research object. There are 105 companies in total. The financial reports are subordinated. The data content is gradually analyzed and constructed the sub-database of this topic, and the various keywords and data after collation are collected, and the database needed by this research is collected. Through statistical analysis, it is presented in data to explore the impact of leadership decision on the company’s organizational design and innovation. Ability and performance affect the situation, and provide theoretical contributions and practical management implications for manufacturing innovation in domestic industrial development. Companies need good leaders with insights that others cannot replace, so as to inspire employees to generate unprecedented creativity, unite the company's team and employees, and enhance the company's innovation capabilities and the profitability of innovation performance.
一、中文
中小企業白皮書(2019)。頁34-75。
方文琪(1996)。技術資源管理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究。
王文英、李佳跨、邱紫芸(2012)。智慧資本與組織學習方式對學習能力與織績效影響之實證研究。管理學報,29卷1期,17-44。
王存國、戴基峰(2001)。組織特性與資訊科技對組織結構之影響。資訊管理學報7卷2期,3-6。
行政院生產力 4.0 發展方案(2015)。46-58。
吳淑鈴、古若涵(2016)。員工分紅費用化政策對高科技產業獎酬制度影響之探討。科技管理學刊,21(1),29-66。
李振宇、黃彥智 (2017)。激勵專案團隊創新:獎酬與團隊學習導向在新產品開發的角色。科技管理學刊,22卷4期,7-85。
沈姵君(1925)。組織結構、員工工作滿意度、組織承諾與工作績效關係之研究—以房屋仲介業從業人員為例。屏東商業技術學院不動產經營系碩士論文。
林良陽、吳思華、項維欣、楊燕枝(2013)。智慧資本與動態能耐對研發團隊創新績效的影響。管理評論,32卷4期,51-80。
邱皓政、陳燕禎、林碧芳(2009)。組織創新氣氛量表的發展與信效度衡鑑。測驗學刊,56(1),69-97。
邱紫芸(2010)。組織文化、智慧資本、組織學習以及績效間關係之探討。國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
夏松明(2018)。領導力:如何讓團隊成員心甘情願的跟隨你。人才培訓網。
戚樹誠、黃瓊億(2014)。團隊安全感氛圍與團隊認知閉合需求對資訊分享與創新績效的影響。組織與管理,7卷1期,1-40。
郭為傑(2008)。產業群聚效應、價值系統與市場進入障礙對技術創新績效影響之研究--以數位電視IC 設計產業為例。大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
陳協勝、劉馨琳(2009)。產業外部環境、行銷組織行為、組織結構與創新策略對創新績效影響模式之研究-以螺絲產業廠商為例。績效與策略研究,6 (2) ,21-22。
陳明惠、邱文宏、張家維(2015)。法人研究機構之技術商品化合作模式:以中科院為例。科技管理學刊,20(1),55-92。
喬友慶、于卓民、林月雲(2002)。國際化程度與產品差異化能力對廠商績效之影響─台灣大型製造廠商之實證研究。管理學報,19(5),811-842。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
曾信超(2006)。企業環境、技術創新能力與技術資源管理能力對創新績效之影響。科技管理學刊,11卷3期,1-30。
黃芳銘(2000)。結構方程模式理論與運用。台北:五南。
黃政仁、闕伶倫(2014)。企業創新能力與國際化程度對創新績效及企業績效之影響:以台灣電子資訊業為例。會計評論,59期,107-147。
黃麗安、張魁峰(2005)。製造策略、組織結構與組織績效之探討-以駿興工業為例。
經濟部智慧財產局(2018)。專利研究報告。
董正玫(2015)。未來製造業發展趨勢與重要議題。8-28。
劉常勇、俞慧芸(1996)。政府所屬研究機構組織特性之研究(計畫編號NSC85-2416-H110-015 )。高雄:國立中山大學企業管理學系。
蔡明宏、劉曉雯(1998)。創造力工作環境特質與資訊科技特徵對組織創新之影響—本國數位文化產業之實證分析。載於第七屆產業管理研討會論文集。台北:國立政治大學科技管理研究所,133-167。
蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(2001)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報,18,527-566。
賴宛靖(2017)。全球百大科技研發獎工研院勇奪九大獎:璀璨十年2017 R&D 100 Awards 出爐。工業技術與資訊月刊,314,36-39。
羅耀宗(2004)。Google:成功的七堂課。台北:梅霖。

二、英文
Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9), 929-958.
Argyres, N., Rios, L. A., & Silverman, B. S. (2020). Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management Journal, 41(11), 2015-2049.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of management 17: 99-120.
Baron, R.A.,Byrne, D.(1997). Social Psychology. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
Buners T., and Stalker G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Oxford University Press. London, UK: Tavistock.
Chang, F. S. and Henry, W. A. (1996). The Idea Culture Profile for Total Quality Management: A Competing Values Perspective. Engineering Management Journal, 18(2), 19-27.
Chang, S. J.,Van Witteloostuijn, A.,Eden, L.(2010).From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies,41(2),178-184.
Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 187-204.
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal,23(9),1095-121.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissert and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 1191-1201.
DeSanctis, G., Glass, J. T., & Ensing, I. M. (2002). Organizational designs for R&D. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 55-66.
Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153.
Doz, Y, Santos, J., & Williamson,P (2004).Is your innovation process global.MIT Sloan Management Review,45(4),31-37.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
Feldman, M. P.Florida,R.,(1994).The Geographic Sources of Innovation:Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 84(2),210-229.
Galunic, D.C.&Rodan,S. (1998). Resource recombinationa in the firm : Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal,19(1),193-1201.
Gil, F., Rico, R., Alcover, C. M., & Barrasa, A. (2005). Change-oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups: Effects of team climate and group potency. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 312-328.
Hill, S., Martin, R., & Harris, M. (2000). Decentralization, integration and the post‐bureaucratic organization: The case of R&D. Journal of Management Studies, 37(4), 563-586.
Holtzhausen, D. (2002).The effects of a divisionalised and decentralized organisational structure on a formal internal communication function in a South African organization. Journal of communication management, 6(4), 323-340.
Kobrin, S. J. (1991). An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Global Integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12,17-31.
Kono Toyohiro (1990).Corporate Culture and Long-Range Planning.Long Range Planning, 23(4),9-19.
Kotabe, M. (1990). The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innovativeness of U.S. Multinational Firms: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 623-638.
Love, J. H., and P. Ganotakis. (2013). Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs. International Business Review, 22 (1),1-17.
McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27, 248-264.
Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Creativity and group innovation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 400-406.
Parker, S. K., Sprigg, C. A.(1999).Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: the role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied psychology,84(6),925-939.
Robbins, Stephen P. (1990). Organizational Theory: Structure Design and Application, 3rd.ed.N J: Pretence Hall.
Robbins, Stephen P.(2003). Essentials of Organizational Behavior, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mansfield, E.(1975). International Technology Technology Transfer: Forms, Journal of American Economic Association, 68-69.
Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of organizational slack. The Academy of Management Review, 13, 601-614.
Yannopoulos, P., Auh, S., Menguc, B.(2012).Achieving fit between learning and market orientation: Implications for new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management,29(4),531-545.
Teece, D. J.,Pisano, G.,Shuen, A.(1997).Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
Tirpak, T. M., Miller, R., Schwartz, L., & Kashdan, D. (2006). R&D structure in a changing world. Research-Technology Management, 49(5), 19-26.
Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 801-814.
Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly,20 (1),49-53.
Zhang, L.,Zhang, Z.(2014).The effects of incentive mechanism on knowledge management performance in China: The moderating role of knowledge attributes. Project Management Journal,45,34-47.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
Zhang, J., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2010). The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 679-704.
Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. (2007). Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Research policy, 36(4), 515-528.

三、網路資料
工業技術研究院(n.d.)。工研院簡介,2021年1月9日取自:https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=05&SiteID=1&MmmID=1036233406503070534
洪銘賜(2019)。破除五大迷思,培養自己的領導力,吐納商業評論。2021年1月15日取自:https://tuna.press/?p=13536。
編輯部(2011)。張忠謀:領導人5大特質,天下雜誌。2021年1月15日取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5010167?template=transformers。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE