影像資料
吳泉源，2004，《當教授遇上黑手》。台北：米蘭昆工作室。

圖書資料
Akrich, Madeline, 1992, “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” Pp. 205-224 in Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. London: The MIT Press.
Akrich, Madeline, and Bruno Latour, 1992, “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” Pp. 259-264 in Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. London: The MIT Press.
Aneesh, A., 2001, “Skill Saturation: Rationalization and Post-industrial Work.” Theory and Society 30: 363-396.
Barley, Stephen R., 1986, “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78-108.
Barley, Stephen R., 1990, “The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 61-103.
Barrett, Michael and Eivor Oborn, 2010, “Boundary Object Use in Cross-cultural Software Development Teams.” Human Relation 63(8): 1199-1221.
Beunza, Daniel, and David Stark, 2004, “Tools of the Trade: The Socio-technology of Arbitrage in a Wall Street Trading Room.” Industrial and corporate change 13(2): 369-400.
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1993, “Do Not Despair: There is Life after Constructivism.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18(1): 113-138.
Bijker, Wiebe E., 1995a, “Sociohistorical Technology Studies.” Pp. 229-254 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Revised Edition), edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E Markle, James C Peterson and Trevor Pinch. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Bijker, Wiebe E., 1995b, Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Böhle, Fritz, 1994, “Relevance of Experience-based Work in Modern Processes.” AI & Society 8(3): 207-215.
Braverman, Harry, 1974, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review.
Briken, Kendra, Shiona Chillas, Martin Krzywdzinski and Abigail Marks(eds), 2017, The New Digital Workplace: How New Technologies Revolutionise Work. London: Palgrave.
Burawoy, Michael, 1979, Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burawoy, Michael, 1985, The Politics of Production. London: Verso.
Burris, Beverly H., 1998, “Computerization of the Workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 141-157.
Carlile, Paul R., 2002, “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13(4): 442-455.
Carlile, Paul R., 2004, “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15(5): 555-568.
Cheng, Tun-jen, 1990, “Political Regimes and Development Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan.” Pp. 139-178 in Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, edited by Gary Gereffi and Donald L. Wyman. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Dodgson, Mark, David M. Gann and Ammon Salter, 2007, ““In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator”: Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering.” Organization Science 18(5): 849-864.
Edwards, Richard, 1979, Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.
Friedman, Andrew L., 1977, Industry and Labour──Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Macmillan.
Grint, Keith and Steve Woolgar, 1997, The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hall, Richard, 2010, “Renewing and Revising the Engagement between Labour Process Theory and Technology.” Pp. 159-181 in Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis, edited by Paul Thompson and Chris Smith. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamilton. Gary G., and Nicole W. Biggart著，張維安譯，1990，〈市場、文化與權威：遠東地區管理與組織的比較分析〉。頁303-370，收錄於Gary G. Hamilton.著，《中國社會與經濟》。台北：聯經。
Hard, Mikael, 1993, “Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18(4): 408-432.
Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, 2016, “Digitization of Industrial Work: Development Paths and Prospects.” Journal for Labour Market Research 49(1): 1-14.
Hsieh, Michelle Fei-yu, 2011, “Similar Opportunities, Different Responses: Explaining the Divergent Patterns of Development between Taiwan and South Korea.” International Sociology 26(3): 364-391.
Hsieh, Michelle Fei-yu, 2014, “Hollowing Out or Sustaining? Taiwan’s SME Network-based Production System Reconsidered, 1996-2011.” 《台灣社會學》28：149-191.
Hsieh, Michelle Fei-yu, 2015, “Learning by Manufacturing Parts: Explaining Technological Change in Taiwan’s Decentralized Industrialization.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 9: 331-358.
Hutchby, Ian, 2001, “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35(2): 441-452.
Johnson, Ann and Johannes Lenhard, 2011, “Toward a New Culture of Prediction: Computational Modeling in the Era of Desktop Computing.” Pp. 189-199 in Science Transformed? : Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, edited by Alfred Nordmann, Hans Radder and Gregor Schiemann. Pittsburgh PA : University of Pittsburgh Press.
Klein, Hans K. and Daniel Lee Kleinman, 2002, "The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations." Science, Technology, & Human Values 27(1): 28-52.
Leonardi, Paul M., 2009, “Crossing the Implementation Line: The Mutual Constitution of Technology and Organizing Across Development and Use Activities.” Communication Theory 19(3): 277-310.
Leonardi, Paul M., 2010, “From Road to Lab to Math: The Co-Evolution of Technological, Regulatory, and Organizational Innovations in Automotive Crash Testing.” Social Studies of Science 40(2): 243-274.
Leonardi, Paul M., 2011, “When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly 35(1): 147-167.
Leonardi, Paul M., and Stephen R. Barley, 2008, “Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing.” Information and Organization 18: 159-176.
Leonardi, Paul M., William C. Barley and DaJung Woo, 2021, “Why should I Trust Your Model? How to Successfully Enroll Digital Models for Innovation.” Innovation: Organization & Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1873787.
Lin, Angela and Leiser Silva, 2005, “The Social and Political Construction of Technological Frames.” European Journal of Information Systems 14: 49-59.
MacKay, Hughie and Gareth Gillespie, 1992, “Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation.” Social Studies of Science 22: 685-716.
Marx, Karl著，中共中央馬克思恩格思列寧斯大林著作編譯局譯，2004，《資本論(第一卷)》。北京：人民出版社。
Mathews, John A. and Dong-Sung Cho, 2000, Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milkman, Ruth and Cydney Pullman, 1991, “Technological Change in an Auto Assembly Plant: The Impact on Workers’ Tasks and Skills.” Work and Occupations 18(2): 123-147.
Mollona, Massimiliano, 2009, Made in Sheffield: An Ethnography of Industrial Work and Politics. New York: Berghahn Books.
Moore, Phoebe V., Martin Upchurch and Xanthe Whittaker(eds), 2018, Humans and Machines at Work: Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Neff, Gina, Brittany Fiore-Silfvast and Carrie Sturts Dossick, 2010, “A Case Study of the Failure of Digital Communication to Cross Knowledge Boundaries in Virtual Construction.” Information, Communication & Society 13(4): 556-573.
Noble, David F., 1979, “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools.” Pp. 18-50, in Case Studies on the Labor Process, edited by Andrew Zimbalist. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Noble, David F.著，李風華譯，2007，《生產力：工業自動化的社會史》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
Orlikowsk, Wanda J., 2000, “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science 11(4): 404-428.
Orlikowski, Wanda J. and Debra Gash, 1994, “Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organization.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12(2): 174-207.
Orlikowski, Wanda J., 1996, “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective.” Information Systems Research 7(1): 63-92.
Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2007, “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28(09): 1435-1448.
Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2010, “The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 125-141.
Orlikowski, Wanda J., and Susan V. Scott, 2008, “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization.” The Academy of Management Annals 2(1): 433-474.
Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T., 2008, “User-Technology Relationships: Some Recent Developments.” Pp. 541-565 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Pfeiffer, Sabine, 2017, “The Vision of "Industrie 4.0" in the Making —a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded.” Nanoethics 11(1): 107-121. DOI 10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3.
Pfeiffer, Sabine, 2018, “Industry 4.0: Robotics and Contradictions.” Pp. 19-36 in Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction, edited by Paško Bilić, Jaka Primorac and Bjarki Valtýsson. London: Palgrave.
Pinch, Trevor J. and Wiebe E. Bijker, 1986, “Science, Relativism and the New Sociology of Technology: Reply to Russell.” Social Studies of Science 16(2): 347-360.
Pinch, Trevor J. and Wiebe E. Bijker, 2012/1987, “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Pp.17-50 in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pinch, Trevor J., 1996, “The Social Construction of Technology: A Review.” Pp. 17-35 in Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology, edited by Robert Fox. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Piore, Michael J. and Charles F. Sabel著，李少民、劉英莉譯，1989，《第二次產業革命──走向繁榮的可能》。台北：桂冠。
Russell, Stewart, 1986, “The Social Construction of Artefacts: A Response to Pinch and Bijker.” Social Studies of Science 16(2): 331-346.
Sabel, Charles and Jonathan Zeitlin, 1985, “Historical Alternative to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization.” Past and Present 108: 133-176.
Sabel, Charles F., 1982, Work and Politics──The Division of Labor in Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salaman, Graeme, 1985, “Factoty Work.” Pp. 1-21 in Work, Cultutre and Society, edited by Rosemary Deem and Graeme Salaman. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Schwab, Klaus著、世界經濟論壇北京代表處譯，2017，《第四次工業革命》。台北：天下。
Sendler, Ulrich著、鄧敏、李現民譯，2014，〈工業4.0：通過系統生命週期管理(SysLM)控制工業的複雜性〉。頁1-27，收錄於Ulrich Sendler編，《工業4.0：即將來襲的第四次工業革命》。北京：機械工業出版社。
Sennett, Richard, 2009, The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Smith, Vicki, 1994, “Braverman’s Legacy: The Labor Process Tradition at 20.” Work and Occupation 21(4): 403-421.
Star, Susan Leigh, 2010, “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(5): 601-617.
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer, 1989, “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387-420.
Thompson, Paul, 1989, The Nature of Work. Houndmills: Macmillan.
von Hippel, Eric, 1994, ““Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation.” Management Science 40(4): 429-439.
Wajcman, Judy, 2006, “New Connections: Social Studies of Science and Technology and Studies of Work.” Work, Employment and Society 20(4): 773-786.
Williams, Robin and David Edge, 1996, “The Social Shaping of Technology.” Research Policy 25: 865-899.
Winner, Langdon, 1993, “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18(3): 362-378.
Winner, Langdon著，方俊育、林崇熙譯，2004，〈技術物有政治性嗎？〉。頁123-151，收錄於吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編，《科技渴望社會》。台北：群學。
Woolgar, Steve, 1990, “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” Sociological Review 38(S1): 58-99.
Zammuto, Raymond F., Terri L. Griffith, Ann Majchrzak, Deborah J. Dougherty and Samer Faraj, 2007, “Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization.” Organization Science 18(5): 749-762.
Zimbalist, Andrew(ed), 1979, Case Studies on the Labor Process. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Zuboff, Shoshnan, 1982, “New Worlds of Computer-Mediated Work.” Harvard Business Review 60(2): 142-152.
王志卿，2001，〈台灣經濟的動力：中小企業的網絡化〉。頁313-355，收錄於張維安主編，《台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力》。台北：聯經。
王承順，2010，〈資訊技術之發展與展望〉。《中興工程季刊》107：143-151。
王茂齡、張榮語、許嘉翔，2018，《模具分析理論與實務》。新竹：科盛科技。
王振寰，1999，〈全球化，在地化與學習型區域：理論反省與重建〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》34：69-112。
王振寰，2007，〈從科技追趕到創新的經濟轉型：南韓、台灣與中國〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》68：177-226。
王振寰，2010，《追趕的極限：台灣的經濟轉型與創新》。台北：巨流。
王振寰、高士欽，2000，〈全球化與在地化：新竹與台中的學習型區域比較〉。《台灣社會學刊》24：179-237。
田畠真弓、莊致嘉，2010，〈引進技術的過程和發展結果：比較台灣與日本液晶面板產業〉。《台灣社會學》20：145-184。
何明修，2008，《四海仗義 曾茂興的工運傳奇》。台北：台灣勞工陣線。
何龍編撰，1993，〈台灣區模具工業調查報告〉。台北：台北銀行經濟研究室編印。
吳思華，1999，〈台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡〉。《台灣產業研究》2：65-128。
吳泉源，2002，〈從黑手到電腦輔助工程：社會階層、專業意識形態與技術典範的轉移〉。頁35-60，收錄於王玉豐、江淑芳編，《科學、醫療與社會學術研討會論文集》。高雄市：國立科學工藝博物館。
李仁芳，1999，〈技術與產業分工網絡運作：四個產業個案之對照〉。《台灣產業研究》2：129-200。
李傑、倪軍、王安正，2017，《從大數據到智慧生產與服務創新》。台北：前程。
林宗弘，2009，〈台灣的後工業化：階級結構的轉型與社會不平等，1992-2007〉。《台灣社會學刊》43：93-158。
林宗弘、胡伯維，2017，〈進擊的巨人：台灣企業規模迅速成長的原因與後果〉。頁229-266，收錄於李宗榮、林宗弘主編，《未竟的奇蹟：轉型中的台灣經濟與社會》。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
林倬仲，1997，〈產業調查報告：台灣金屬模具工業之現況與展望〉。《產業經濟》196：1-26。
林崇田，2019，〈金屬製品產業導入智慧製造應用〉。《工程》92(1)：35-49。
林登立，2004，〈評論：吳泉源，《當教授遇上黑手》〉。《臺灣社會學刊》33：263-272。
柯志明，1993，《台灣都市小型製造業的創業、經營與生產組織──以五分埔成衣製造業為案例的分析》。台北市：中央研究院民族學研究所。
柯志哲、張榮利，2006 ，〈協力外包制度初探：以一個鋼鐵業協力外包體系為例〉。《台灣社會學刊》37：33-78。
韋康博，2015，《工業4.0：從製造業到「智造業」，下一波產業革命如何顛覆全世界？》。台北：商周。
徐進鈺，1998，〈邁向一個學習性的區域：台北－新竹高科技走廊的廠商群聚與技術學習〉。《師大地理研究報告》29：143-159。
康鳳梅，吳煥昌，2000，〈台灣機械加工業使用CAD軟體的現況與未來趨勢之研究〉。《CAD與自動化》153：43-46。
張庭榕，2004，《自動化對台灣塑膠模具產業技能傳承影響之探討》。台中：東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所。
郭文正，2014，《圖解模具製造》。台北：五南。
陳介玄，1994，《協力網絡與生活結構》。台北：聯經。
陳東升，2008，《積體網路：台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北：群學。
陳炤彰、李瑞陽，2014，《塑膠射出成形模具設計與分析》。台北：五南。
彭莉惠，2015，〈台灣製造業廠商採用數位化訓練的制度分析：以高科技業為主〉。《社會分析》 11：1-67。
彭莉惠、熊瑞梅，2015，〈台灣製造業廠商人才培訓的制度分析：以高科技業為主〉。《台灣社會學》29：43-87。
黃崇憲，2008，〈利維坦的生成與傾頹：臺灣國家研究範例的批判性回顧，1945-2005〉。頁321-392，收錄於謝國雄編，《群學爭鳴：臺灣社會學發展史，1945-2005》。台北：群學。
經濟部工業局，2017，《製造大未來》。台北：中國生產力中心。
趙蕙鈴，1995，〈協力生產網絡資源交換結構之特質－經濟資源交換的「社會網絡化」〉。《中國社會學刊》18：75-115。
劉仁傑、吳銀澤、巫茂熾、邱創均及桑元喜代和，2018，《面對未來的製造者：工業4.0的困惑與下一波製造業再興》。台北：大寫出版。
劉清耿，2021，〈台灣汽車零組件產業的技術擴散與產業升級：從火藥、高壓氣瓶到安全氣囊〉。《台灣社會學》40：47-88。
潘美玲，2001，〈技術、社會網絡與全球商品鍊：台灣製造業部門間生產組織的差異〉。頁187-222，收錄於張維安主編，《台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力》。台北：聯經。
潘美玲、張維安，2001，〈彈性生產與協力網絡：協力廠觀點的個案研究〉。《台灣社會學刊》25：201-242。
鄭力軒，2011，〈彈性專業化作為產業轉型途徑：以台灣遊艇製造業為例〉。《台灣社會學》22：157-196。
鄭力軒、王御風，2011，〈重探發展型國家的國家與市場：以臺灣大型造船業為例，1974-2001〉。《臺灣社會學刊》47：1-43。
謝國雄，1997，《純勞動：台灣勞動體制諸論》。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。
謝斐宇，2017，〈從頭家島到隱型冠軍：台灣中小企業的轉型〉。頁345-382，收錄於李宗榮、林宗弘主編，《未竟的奇蹟：轉型中的台灣經濟與社會》。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
謝斐宇，2019，〈超越（發展）國家vs.網絡的迷思：重探現代經濟的替代發展途徑〉。頁365-394，收錄於湯志傑主編，《交互視野下的現代性：從台灣出發的反省》。台北：台大出版中心。
瞿宛文、Alice H. Amsden著，朱道凱譯，2003，《超越後進發展：臺灣的產業升級策略》。臺北：聯經。
瞿宛文、李佳靜，1999，〈成長與產業組織：臺灣與南韓自行車業之比較研究〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》35：47-73。
黃俊豪，2014，〈【薩克斯風工匠】打造音符的手藝人〉。頁88-98，收錄於何明修、劉鈐佑主編，《人間社會學：24則關於溫拿、魯蛇、大小確幸的生命故事》。新北：群學。