:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以父職資源理論探討1949前後大陸遷臺青年之父職
作者:易君常
作者(外文):Yi, Chun-Chang
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:人類發展與家庭學系
指導教授:黃迺毓
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2022
主題關鍵詞:父職父職資源理論生命歷程Resource Theory of FatheringFatheringLife Course
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究旨為瞭解1949年前後大陸跨海遷臺世代青年之生命故事與父職歷程,並以驗證「父職資源理論」(Resource Theory of Fathering)之觀點對其等之適用性。訪談12對父子,主要參與者父親年齡均超過90歲,期以兩代的視角瞭解該世代父職與父職資源的樣貌;採質性研究,以半結構式訪談,蒐集資料進行分析。
歸納結果發現:一、跨海世代的父職學習來源多樣,「父愛在心」幫助走出己路,其父職參與仍與其原生家庭父親相似,是以認知責任為中心,情感以「管」與「食」行動展現的Cba模式。戰亂離家時,其內在也儲備資源並以培養孩子走出不同的路彌補生命;其中妻子是重要人際資源,也帶來龐大非物質資源。二、由父職資源理論論述跨海世代乃呈現「隱而不顯的情感」、「賺食為重的行為」、「家族為大的認知」的父職參與,以個人能動「求生」、約束家中人事物「求好」、面對困難因應「求助」的資源管理基礎。三、父職資源與管理則因華人文化與遷臺世代的差異而不同,本理論確實為我們提出了一種正向父職管理方向。此外,研究結果也從華人文化中與跨海世代的經驗中,擴展與填補了「父職資源理論」對資源的概念及父職資源管理的實證。
本研究為受訪者世代父職經驗和生命賦予輪廓,也依此建議對少子化世代更積極提供父職資源管理認知教育,以助其父職之實踐。
The purpose of this study, based on the resource theory of fathering, is to investigate the fathering experiences of 12 older people who came from mainland China around 1949 and were over 90 years-old now. The qualitative method with semi-structured interviews for both of participates and their sons are used in this study. The main results show: (1) The participates were the supplier of family resources just like their fathers, and discipline and food are the main resources they provided for family. At the same time, their wives were the key person to connect other relatives and friends to bring many non-material resources for living. (2) The resources and management of fathering are different between participates and their fathers. No matter how fathering is involved, it was found that each participates tried their best to get all the resources for family survive and wellbeing, which included emotional, financial, and relational resources. (3) The empirical evidence of this study also tested and extended the " Resource Theory of Fathering " based on Chinese culture and specific generations.
The study highlighted on the fathering experiences of the participants and provide a bunch of information for next generation how their can manage their resource to become a better father.
中文部分
尤美華(2014)。父職參與及父子親密感之初探。家庭教育雙月刊,49,6-16。
王大維(2000)。「父職參與」或 「參與親職的父親」?應用心理研究,7,12- 18。
王文科、王智弘(2008)。教育研究法。台北:五南。
王以仁(2001)。未來的家庭發展與親職教育。婚姻與家庭生活的適應。台北:心理。
王向賢(2019)。轉型期的父親責任,權利與研究路徑:國內父職社會學研究評述。 青年研究,1,84-93.
王宏仁(1999)。1950年代的臺灣階級結構與流動初探。臺灣社會研究季刊,
36,1-35
王亞元(2002)。臺灣『外省人』生命記憶與敘事資料。
http://ndweb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/TWM/Public/content/story/collectable.jsp?pk=222
王舒芸(1996)。父職角色--養家者?照顧者?婦女與兩性研究通訊,41,23-28。
王舒芸(2003)。新手爸爸難為?。台北:遠流。
王叢桂(1998)。父職的實踐及影響因素的研究-社會心理學角度的分析。載於行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告 (編號: NSC87-2413-H031-001)。未出版。
王叢桂(2000)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究,6,131-172。
包蕾萍(2005)。生命歷程理論的時間觀探析。社會學研究,4,120-133。
朱則剛(1994)。建構主義知識論的起源與近代哲學知識論的趨勢。載於教育工學的發展與派典演化(頁173-219)。台北:師大書院。
吳嘉瑜、蔡素妙(2006)父親派外對家庭的影響 ─從成年前期學生的回溯經驗
中探討。中華輔導學報,19,137-174。
李旻陽(2005)。成為一個父親:父職的經驗與意涵(未出版博士論文)。國立
彰化師範大學。彰化。
沈筱綺(2010)。故土與家園:探索「外省人」國家認同的兩個內涵。載於張茂桂(主編),國家與認同臺灣-一些外省人的觀點(頁143)。台北:群學。
林平(2010)。家鄉中的異客:新移民的雙重困境。載於張茂桂(主編),國家與認同臺灣-一些外省人的觀點(頁306、320)。台北:群學。
林如萍、周麗端、徐達光、柯澍馨、唐先梅(2005)。家庭資源與管理。台北:空大。
林秀慧 (2013)。新婚苦惱者婚姻經驗之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北。
林國亮(2004)。家庭樹.生命樹--原生家庭探討完全手冊。台北:雅歌。
林桶法(2009)。1949大撤退。台北:聯經。
林雅娟(2007)。親職角色之探討。網路社會通訊,61。https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/61/61/ 89.htm
兒童福利聯盟(2020)。2020 年臺灣男性育兒態度及現況調查報告。兒童福利聯盟-兒盟資料館。https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/71/1688
周玉慧、吳明燁、黃朗文(2007)。中年生活感受與憂鬱之關係:以情緒支持為中介。人文及社會科學集刊,19,4,439-471。
周麗端、唐先梅(主編)(2020)。教育部家庭教育議題教師手冊IV(頁7)。台北:教育部。
尚道明(2010)。「外省人」第二代的國家認同。載於張茂桂(主編),國家與認同臺灣-一些外省人的觀點(頁3)。台北:群學。
武之璋(2019)。外省人的故事。台北:風雲時代。
近十年家庭組織型態概況(2006)。行政院主計處國情統計通報。
邱珍琬(2004)。大學生眼中的父親形象-以一次焦點團體討論為例。教育與社會
研究, 6,69-108。
邱素沁(1990)。家政概論。台北:復興。
姜添輝(2005)。資本社會中的社會流動與學校體系 – 批判教育社會學的分
析。高點。[Chiang, T.- H. (2005). Social mobility and school system in capital
society: An analysis of critical education sociology. Get Co.]
唐先梅 (1996)。家庭決策(頁33-56),家庭管理的程序(頁57-84),個人與家庭管
理(頁197-222),非傳統家庭的管理(頁223-244)。載於黃迺毓等人編著,家
庭管理。台北:空大。
唐先梅 (1999)。家庭建立期、家庭擴展期、家庭收縮期。載於周麗端等人編著,
婚姻與家人關係(頁127-225)。台北:空大。
孫鴻業(2010)。「外省人」第二代的國家認同。載於張茂桂(主編),國家與認同臺灣-一些外省人的觀點,(頁31)。台北:群學。
涂妙如(2007)。以生態系統論評析國內近二十年來 [父職角色] 之研究脈絡,
弘光學報,50,199-219。
翁志遠(1999)。1990之臺灣地區人口之婚姻狀況分布的省籍差異探討(未發表
碩士論文)。國立政治大學。台北。
教育大辭典編篡委員會(1998)。教育大辭典。上海:教育。
章英華(1994)。變遷社會中的家戶組成與奉養態度:臺灣的例子。社會學刊,
23,1-34。
許琅光(1989)美國人與中國人--兩種生活方式的比較。台北:華夏。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。台北:五南。
陳伯璋(2000)。質性研究方法的理論基礎。載於中正大學教育研究所(主
編),質的研究方法。台北:麗文。
陳德文(1986)。臺灣『外省人』生命記憶與敘事資料
http://ndweb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/TWM/Public/content/story/collectable.jsp?pk=725
張思嘉,許詩淇,李惟新等(2018)。 新好男人,新好女人?當代華人婚姻關
係中的角色義務。本土心理學研究,50,209-261。
張茂桂(2008)。多元文化主義在臺灣與其困境。載於沈憲欽(主編),知
識分子的省思與對話(頁310-325)。台北:時報文教。
張茂桂主編(2010)。國家與社會認同-一些外省人的觀點。台北:群學。
https://doi.org/ 10.6456/JTS.201012.0133
黃秀政、張勝彥、吳文星(2002)。臺灣史。台北:五南。
黃迺毓(1988)。家庭教育。台北:五南。
黃迺毓、柯澍馨、唐先梅編著(1996)。家庭管理。台北:空大。
黃迺毓(1999)。學習型家庭的課題-家庭生活教育的啟示。載於教育部「學習型家庭研討會」資料(頁25-34)。台北:師大。
黃慧森、王以仁(2015)。高職男生父職角色知覺與認同之研究. 家庭教育與諮
商學刊,18,1-33。
程懷德(1986)。臺灣『外省人』生命記憶與敘事資料庫。
http://ndweb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/TWM/Public/content/sto y/collectable.jsp?pk=899
鈕文英(2016)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(第二版)。台北:雙葉。
溫明麗(2004)。詮釋典範與教育研究。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論--觀點與方法(頁155-186)。台北:心理。
楊靜利、劉一龍(2002)。臺灣的家庭生活歷程。臺灣社會學刊,27,77-105。
葉光輝(2009)。臺灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研
究,31,97-141。
葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模式研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32, 101-148。
葉高華(2018)。外省人的人數、來源與分布。臺灣學通訊,103,15-17。
費孝通(1983)。家庭結構變動中的老年贍養問題-再論中國家庭變動。北京大
學學報:哲學社會科學版,3,7-16。
廖永靜(2000)。社會變遷、家庭變遷與家庭教育需求。家庭教育學,頁35-
78。台北:師大書苑。
趙文滔、徐君楓、張綺瑄、徐蕾、謝宜芳、李如玉、呂伯杰(2016)。在關係
中,讓愛流動-華人家庭關係的評估與修復。台北:張老師文化。
齊力(1990)。臺灣地區近二十年來家戶核心化趨勢的研究。社會學刊,20,
41-83。
劉惠琴(2005)。親子關係中 “多元個體化” 歷程的內涵與測量.。中華心理衛生
學刊, 18,4,55-92。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究: 理論與應用。台北:心理。
鍾艷攸(2002)明清家訓族規之研究(未出版博士論文) 。國立臺灣師範大學。台北。
蘇國賢、喻維欣(2007)。臺灣族群不平等的再探討:解釋本省/外省族群差
異的縮減。臺灣社會學刊,39,1-63。

西文部分
Arnett, J.J., & Schwab, J. (2013). The Clark University Poll of Emerging Adults, 154 2012: Thriving, struggling, and hopeful. Worcester. Clark University.
Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (2014). Family: Socialization and interaction process. routledge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Barber, B. L., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). Long-term influence of divorce and single parenting on adolescent family-and work-related values, behaviors, and aspirations. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 108.
Barnhill, L. R., & Longo, D. (1978). Fixation and regression in the family life cycle. Family Process, 17(4), 469-478.
Behson, S., & Robbins, N. (2016). The Effects of Involved Fatherhood on Families, and How Fathers can be Supported both at the Workplace and in the Home. Development, 12, 13.
Bekkengen, L. (2002). Man får välja-om föräldraskap och föräldraledighet i arbetsliv och familjeliv (Doctoral dissertation, Liber).
Boss, P. G. (1977) A clarification of the concept of psychological facher presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Joumal of Mamiage and the Family, 39, 141-151.
Boss, P. G. (2002). Family stress management. Sage.
Brophy, J. (1995, November). Thoughts on the quantitative-qualitative debate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392734).
Chodorow, N. (1978). Mothering, object-relations, and the female oedipal configuration. Feminist Studies, 4(1), 137-158.
Chung, H., & Gale, J. (2006). Comparing self-differentiation and psychological well-being between Korean and European American students. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(3), 367-381.
Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (1999)。 敘事探究:質的研究中的經驗和故事(蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯)。台北:心理。(2003)。
Cochran, L. R. (1990). Narrative as a Paradigm. Methodological approaches to the
study of career, 71.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing Qualitative Research (2nd ed). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell , J. W. & Poth , C. N. (2016)。質性研究的五種取徑(李政賢譯)。台北:五南。(2018)。
Daly, K. J. (1993). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. Journal of Family
Issues, 14(4), 510-540.
Daly, K. J. (1995). Reshaping fatherhood. Finding the Models. Teoses W. Marsiglio (toim.) Fatherhood. Contemporary Theory, Research and Social Policy, 21-40.
Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1975). Home management; context and concepts.
Demos, J. (1982). The changing faces of fatherhood: A new exploration in American family history. Father and child: Developmental and clinical perspectives, 425-445.
Dienhart, A. (1998). Reshaping fatherhood. Sage.
Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erickson, M. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 277-292.
Dollahite, D. C., & Hawkins, A. J. (1998). A conceptural ethic of generative fathering. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 79(1), 109-132.
Duvall, E., & Hill, R. (1948). Co-chairmen, Report of the Committee on the Dynamics of Family Interaction. Washington DC.
Duvall, E. M. (1977). Marrage and Family Development. Philadelphia:Lippincott.
Elder, G. H. (1974)。大蕭條下的孩子們。(田禾、馬春華譯)。南京:譯林。(2002)
Elder Jr, G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social psychology quarterly, 4-15.
Elder Jr, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child development,69(1), 1-12. doi:10.2307/1132065
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In Handbook of the life course (pp. 3-19). Springer.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed). W. W. Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1998). The life cycle completed (extended version). WW Norton & Company.
Fagan, J., & Palkovitz, R. (2011). Coparenting and relationship quality effects on father engagement: Variations by residence, romance. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(3), 637-653.
Finn, J. E. (1987). Separation and military family. Toronto: Canadian Forces College.
Fricke, T., Chang, J. S., & Yang, L. S. (1994). Historical and ethnographic perspectives on the Chinese family. Social change and the family in Taiwan, 22-48.
Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1986). Narrative Form and the Construction of. Psychological Science'. In Sarbin, TR (ed). Narrative Psychology. New York: Praeger.
Germain, C. B. (1994). Emerging conceptions of family development over the life course. Families in Society, 75(5), 259-268.
Gerson, K. (1997). An institutional perspective on generative fathering: Creating social supports for parenting equality. In Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 36-51). Sage.
Gross, I. H., Crandall, E. W., & Knoll, M. M. (1980). Management for modern families. Prentice-Hall.
Heilbrun, A. B., Wydra, D., & Friedberg, L. (1989). Parent identification and gender schema development. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150(3), 293-299
Hobson, B. (2002). Making men into fathers: Man, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, D. P. (1978). The variable order of events in the life course. American Sociological Review, 573-586. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jftr.12352
James M. White, David M. Klein .(1991)。家庭理論。124-125。(馬永年、梁婉華譯)。台北:五南。(2009)。
Kalmijn, M. (2013). Adult children's relationships with married parents, divorced parents, and stepparents: Biology, marriage, or residence?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(5), 1181-1193.
Laidlaw, P. A. (1999). Absent father: African-American adolescent males from urban areas: A different path towards health. Dissertation Abstract International: Section B—Sciences & Engineering, 60(5B), 2348.
Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). (1986). The father’s role: Applied perspectives. Wiley.
Lamb, M. E., Pleck J. H., Charnov E. L., Levine J. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective
on paternal behavior and involvment. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altman, A. S. Rossi,
L. R. Sherrod (eds.) Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial
Dimension.(pp.111-142). Hawthorne, New York: Aldine Publishing Co.
Lamb, M. E. (2010). How do fathers influence children’s development? Let me count the ways. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The role of father in child development (5th ed), (pp. 1–26). Wiley.
LaRossa, R. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family relations, 451-457.
Lieblich, A.,Tuval-Mashiach, R.,& Zilber, T.(2008)。敘事研究:閱讀、分析與詮釋(吳芝儀譯)。嘉義:濤石。(1998)。
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.
Losh-Hesselbart, S. (1987). Development of gender roles. In Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 535-563). Springer.
Lu, L., Gilmour, R., & Kao, S. F. (2001). Culture values and happiness: An east-west
dialogue. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 477-493
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing
the human competitive edge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Machin, A. (2019)。父親養成指南(張馨方)。台北:馬可孛羅。(2018)。
Mackey, W.C. (2001) ‘Support for the Existence of an Independent Man-to-child
Affiliative Bond: Fatherhood as a Biocultural Intervention’, Psychology of Men
and Masculinity 2(1): 51–66.
Manen, M.V. (1997)。探究生活經驗-建立敏思行動教育學的人文科學(高淑清、連雅惠、林月琴等譯)。台北:揚智。(2004)。
Mariampolski, H. (2001). Qualitative market research: A comprehensive guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2001)。質性研究─設計與計畫撰寫。(李政賢
譯)。台北:五南。(2008)。
Marsiglio, W., & Cohan, M. (2000). Contextualizing father involvement and paternal influence: Sociological and qualitative themes. Marriage & Family Review, 29(2-3), 75-95.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
Masten, A. S. (2014). Invited commentary: Resilience and positive youth development frameworks in developmental science. Journal of youth and adolescence, 43(6), 1018-1024.
Matta, D. S. (2006 ). Father responsivity: Couple processes and the coconstruction of
fatherhood. Family Process, 45(1), 19-37.
McBride, B. A., & Darragh, J. (1995). Interpreting the data on father involvement: Implications for parenting programs for men. Families in Society, 76(8), 490-497.
McCarthy, D. D., Gersten, J. C., & Langner, T. S. (1982). The behavioral effects of father absence on children and their mothers. Social Behavior and Personality, 10(1), 11-23.
Mead, M. (1969). Research with human beings: A model derived from anthropological field practice. Daedalus, 361-386.
Noël‐Miller, C. M. (2013). Repartnering following divorce: Implications for older fathers' relations with their adult children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 697-712.
Olsavsky, A., Yan, J., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. & Kamp Dush, C. (2019). New fathers’ perceptions of dyadic adjustment: the roles of maternal gatekeeping and coparenting closeness. Family Process.
Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Palkovitz, R. (1997). Reconstructing " involvement": Expanding conceptualizations of men's caring in contemporary families. https://doi.org/ record/1997-97192-013
Palkovitz, R. (2002a). Involved fathering and child development: Advancing our understanding of good fathering. Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 119-140.
Palkovitz, R. (2002b). Involved Fathering and Men’s Adult Development: Provisional Balances. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Palkovitz, R., Fagan, J., & Hull, J. (2013). Coparenting and children’s well-being. Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 202-219.
Palkovitz, R.(2014). Involved fathering and men's adult development: Provisional balances. Psychology Press.
Palkovitz, R., Trask, B. S., & Adamsons, K. (2014). Essential differences in the meaning and processes of mothering and fathering: Family systems, feminist and qualitative perspectives. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12048
Palkovitz, R., Dutton, K., & Hull, J. (2015). European American fathers. Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles and diverse practices of dads, 229-248.
Palkovitz, R., & Hull, J. (2018). Toward a resource theory of fathering. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 181-198.
Parke, R. D. (1981). Fathers. Cambridge, Harvard University.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F.(1955). Family, Socialisation and Interaction Process.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Pleck, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. The role of the father in child development, 3, 33-48.
Pleck, J. H. (2007). Why could father involvement benefit children? Theoretical perspectives. Applied development science, 11(4), 196-202.
Pillemer, K., Munsch, C. L., Fuller‐Rowell, T., Riffin, C., & Suitor, J. J. (2012). Ambivalence toward adult children: Differences between mothers and fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1101-1113.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Sage.
Rohner, R.P. and Veneziano, R.A. (2001) ‘The Importance of Father Love: History and Contemporary Evidence’, Review of General Psychology 5(4): 382–405.
Rotundo, E. A. (1985). American fatherhood: A historical perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(1), 7-23.
Scanzoni, J. H. (1975). Sex roles, life styles, and childbearing: Changing patterns in marriage and the family. Free Press.
Seidman, I. (2006)。訪談研究法。(李政賢譯)。台北:五南。(2009)。
Simmons, C., Steinberg, L., Frick, P. J., & Cauffman, E. (2018). The differential influence of absent and harsh fathers on juvenile delinquency. Journal of adolescence, 62, 9-17.
Snarey, J. R.(1993). How fathers care for the next generation: A four-decade study. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674365995
Snarey, J. (1997). Foreword: The next generation of work on fathering. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp.ix-xii). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Simon, D. R. (2005). Hope theory: Amember of the positive psychology family. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (257-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2009). Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action. Psychology of sport and exercise, 10(5), 491-497.
Spruijt, E., DeGoede, M., & Vandervalk, I. (2001). The well-being of youngsters coming from six different family types. Patient Education and Counseling, 45(4), 285-294.
Stoop, D. (1994)。父愛不缺席:心理醫生剖析父親的十二種模式。(柯里斯、林為正譯)。台北:智庫。(1995)。
Swanson, B.B.(1981). Introduction to Home Management. New York:Harper and Row.
United Nations Environment Programme (2009). ABC of SCP clarifying concepts on sustainable consumption and production. Retrieved from http://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/sites/default/files/10yfp-abc_of_scpen.pdf
Wark, L. (2000). Young boys with absent fathers: A child-inclusive intervention. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 11(3), 63-68.
Weisberger, A. (1992, September). Marginality and its directions. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 425-446). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.
White, J. M. (1991). Dynamics of family development: The theory of family development. New York: Guilford.
Williams, W. C.(1958). The PLAS test: A technique for children to evaluate both parents. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 478-495.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The family and individual development. New York: Basic.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE