:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:族裔化國家空間:馬來西亞雙城都市論
作者:顏聖錝
作者(外文):GAN SIN TIONG
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:建築與城鄉研究所
指導教授:周素卿
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2022
主題關鍵詞:國家空間重構馬來西亞雙城都市化族裔政治都市鉅型計畫State Spatial RestructuringMalaysiaDual City UrbanismEthnic PoliticsUrban Mega Project
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本論文以國家空間族裔化的研究觀點,分析1990年至2018年期間,馬來西亞國家空間重構中多元族裔社會結構下的國家與社會關係。在既有的研究典範中,「國家空間」的討論基本上是以「國家」與「經濟全球化」的互動作為理論框架,並以單一國族為基礎解釋國家空間重構的機制。本研究認為過去的研究多以由上而下的宏觀視角探究國家空間重構的結果,缺乏對國家空間重構過程中多元族裔政治異質性的關照,及其對「國家」與「經濟全球化」互動關係之影響分析。本文將研究脈絡放在「多元族裔社會」對馬來西亞國家空間重構的影響,以回應既有國家空間研究所較少著墨的「族裔問題」。
馬來西亞在國家發展歷史中,在1990年至2018年間歷經了兩波的國家空間重構營造,打造出「雙城」(dual-cities)策略性空間,除了實現與全球經濟接軌之目的外,更是為調解自1970年代以來,馬來西亞不斷增強的族裔政治矛盾。讓強調「邁向全球經濟」的國家建設,成為打造象徵「馬來伊斯蘭」語彙的行政首都—「布城」(Putrajaya),及藉由多個都市鉅型與都市更新計畫,讓具有多元族裔社會特色的吉隆坡(Kuala Lumpur)成為「經濟首都」。隨著雙城建成環境、土地使用與地租的改變,讓雙城的空間打造,出現了國家與地方社會族裔與階級的「替換」、「迫遷」、甚至是「邊緣化」的摩擦過程。
本研究指出,馬來西亞的國家空間重構不僅顯示經濟生產空間的重構,其背後也隱含馬來中心主義的族裔政治發展議程,過程中更充滿各族裔在地方社會與國家之間的相互摩擦,進而形成「族裔化的國家空間」。因而,馬來西亞的馬來伊斯蘭與多元族裔社會的族裔政治摩擦,與既有的國家空間理論提示的由上而下之作用合體,提供一個由下而上的作用歷程,呈現多元族裔社會在國家建設的日常生活中,所進行的馬來伊斯蘭化抵抗、妥協與協商的互動過程。簡言之,本研究具體分析出在「資本主義全球化」和「國家機器」的大框架下,具有多元族裔社會的馬來西亞,所呈現的國家空間重構之複雜性過程與其背後之意涵。
This thesis focuses on the relationship between state spatial restructuring and multi-ethnic social structure in Malaysia during 1990-2018. In the existing research paradigm, the discussion of "state space" focuses on the interaction between "state" and "economic globalization" as a theoretical framework to explain the elements of state spatial restructuring. However, this study argues that relevant discussions explore the results of state spatial restructuring from a macroscopic theoretical perspective. This form above view cant capture the heterogeneity of the process of state spatial restructuring and can also affect the interaction between "state" and "economic globalization." In addition, the restructuring of Malaysia's state space in the context of "multi-ethnic society" also lacks the discussion of "ethnic issues."
From 1990 to 2018, Malaysia underwent two waves of national space reconstruction and created a dual-city strategic space. In addition to integrating with the global economy, is also a way to mediate the growing ethnic political tensions in Malaysia since the 1970s. It built the administrative capital of Putrajaya, a symbol of Malay-Islam, and turned Kuala Lumpur into the "economic capital" through multiple urban megaprojects and urban renewal. With the change of the built environment, land use and land rent of the two cities, the "displacement," "translocation," "forced eviction" and even "marginalization" there have been heterogeneous friction processes of ethnic groups and classes appeared in the plantation estates of Putrajaya and the old town of Kuala Lumpur.
The restructuring of state space in Malaysia creates space for economic production and implies the ethnic political development agenda of Malay centrism. The process is full of heterogeneous friction between the local society and the country. This study through the ethnic politics Beyond the existing state-space theory, to provide a bottom-up perspective, to capture the "ethnic issues" in the local society, "daily life," and "resistance" to the state infrastructure plan of the interaction process, to understand the "capitalist globalization" and "state apparatus" framework, What is the meaning behind the heterogeneous friction process with the subaltern people.
參考文獻

一、馬來文部分

Aidila., R.(2011). Prasarana tak berganjak ambil alih tanah Jalan Sultan, Malaysiakini, 11 August: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/172690.
Ibrahim, I. (2002). Pemikiran Dr. Mahathir tentang Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Mahathir Mohamad. (1995) Teks Ucapan Upacara Pelancaran Putrajaya 29 August.
Pandian, S. (2005). Abdullah Ahmah Badawi: Jalan ke Puncak. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Zainal Abidin bin Haji Abdul Kadir. (1995). “Wawasan Islam Dr. Mahathir Mohamad dari Perspektif Bahagian Hal Ehwal Islam.” Jurnal Penyelidikan Islam 9.

二、中文部分

王振寰(2002)。〈東亞「世界城市的不同途徑」:漢城與台北〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》(47): 85-139。
左正東(2014)。《金融危機與馬來西亞經濟自由化:比較馬哈迪與納吉對新經濟政策的改革》,遠景基金會季刊,15(2)P79 - 128 。
吳清德。(1989)《馬來西亞的種族政治》。吉隆坡:遠東。
周素卿 & 林潤華(2008)與世爭高:台北市高層建築生產的在地脈絡都市與計劃,35(1),1-28。
周素卿(2003)。全球化與新都心的發展:曼哈頓意象下的信義計畫區,國立臺灣大學理學院地理學系地理學報,41-60。
唐南發(2016)。〈金融管制的災難雪球〉,林宏祥(編),《馬來西亞大崩壞》,頁151-162,吉隆坡:大將書局。
徐進鈺(2017)。〈把民族找進發展型國家理論:評論瞿宛文《台灣戰後經濟發展的源起:後進發展的為何與如何》〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》107: 205-212。
祝家華(1994)。《解構政治神話》,吉隆玻:華社資料研究中心。
祝家華(1994)。《解構政治神話——大馬兩線政治的評析(1985-1992)》,吉隆坡:華社資料研究中心。
祝家華(1994)解構政治神話,吉隆玻:華社資料研究中心。
張集強(2012)。《消失中的吉隆坡》,吉隆坡:大將出版社
陳亞才(2016)《在吉隆坡遇見葉亞來》,大將出版社。
陳鴻瑜(2012)。《馬來西亞史》,蘭臺網路。
陳鴻瑜(2012)馬來西亞史,東南亞研究叢刊,國家教育研究主編:蘭臺網路出版
廖文輝(2019)。《馬來西亞:多元共生的赤道國度》,台北:聯經。
廖文輝(2019)。馬來西亞:多元共生的赤道國度,台北:聯經出版公司。
劉鎮東(2003)。〈布特拉再也:解讀馬哈迪的權力地圖〉。魏月萍(編),《再見馬哈迪》, 頁68-109,吉隆坡:大將書局。
鄧玉英(2019)。《馬來西亞經濟發展的思路與策略》,臺灣國際研究季刊,15(2),181 - 206 。
鄭為元(1999)。《發展型「國家」或發展型國家「理論」的終結?》,台灣社會研究季刊,34:1-68。
瞿宛文(2017)。《台灣戰後經濟發展的源起:後進發展的為何與如何》,台北:聯經出版社。
顏清湟(1963)。《雪蘭莪史》,新加坡新加坡國家語文局。
顏聖錝(2019)。《馬來西亞的政治文化與民主化:州層次的歷史比較分析》。蕭新煌、楊 昊(編),《東南亞的新貌:轉型的動力與未來圖像》頁37-86,台北:洪葉。

三、英文部分

Abdul Rahman Embong. (2012) Developmental State Capacity and Institutional Reform, in Khoo Boo Teik (ed.) Policy Regimes and the Political Economy of Poverty Reduction in Malaysia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 217–250.
Abidin, M. Z. & Loke, W.H. (2008). “Revealed Comparative Advantage of Malaysian Exports: The Case for Changing Export Composition.” Asian Economic Papers 7(3): 130-147.
Ahmad Basri Sulaiman and Suhana Shamsuddin (2001) 'The vanishing streets in the Malaysian urbanscape', in Pu Miao (ed.) Public Places in Asia Pacific Cities: Current Issues and Strategies, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.137-149.
Aiken, S. Robert., (1981). Squatters and squatter settlements in Kuala Lumpur, Geographical Review Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 158-175.
Alexander J. Reichl, (2007) “Rethinking the Dual City,” Urban Affairs Review 42(5) : 659-687.
Ali, Syed Husin (2008). Ethnic Relations in Malaysia: Harmony and Conflict. Malaysia: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre (SIRD).
Allen, J. (1999) Cities of power and influence: settled formations. In J. Allen, D. Massey and M. Pryke (eds.), Unsettling cities, Routledge, New York.
Amin, A. and Graham, S. (1997) The ordinary city.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22: 411–429.
Amin, A. and S. Graham (1999) Cities of connection and disconnection. In J. Allen, D. Massey and M. Pryke (eds.), Unsettling cities, Routledge, London.
Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Amsden, A. H. (2001). The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anazawa, M. (1985). “Free trade zones in Malaysia.” Hokudai Economic Papers 15: 91-148.
Anderson, K. J. (1991). Vancouver’s Chinatown: Racial discourse in Canada, 1875–1980. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Angnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53-80.
Appleyard, D. (1981) Livable Streets. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Arasaratnam, Sinnappah. (1970) Indians in Malaysia and Singapore. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ariffini, S. B. J. (2003). “Putrajaya, Malaysia.” Australian Planner 40(3): 40-42.
Athukorala, P.C. & Waglé, S. (2011).“ Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia: Is Malaysia Falling Behind?” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 28(2): 115-133.
Athukorala, Prema-chandra & Swarnim Waglé, (2011). “Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia: Is Malaysia Falling Behind?” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 115-133.
Aziz, K. & Omar, A. (2001). “MSC: A Physical Manifestation of the Malaysia National System of Innovation.” Paper presented at the Conference the Future of Innovation Studies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Sept 20-23.
Baxstrom, R. (2010) Transforming brickfields: Development and governance in a Malaysian city. Singapore: NUS Press.
Brenner, N (2013) Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
Brenner, N, Jessop., Bob , Jones., Martin , Gordon MacLeod.(2003) State/Space: A Reader, Wiley-Blackwell.
Brenner, N. (1999). “Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies.” Theory and Society 28(1): 39-78.
Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Brenner, N., Madden, D.J. & Wachsmuth, D. (2011): Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 15(2): 225-240.
Brown, Graham (2005) “The Rough and Rosy Road: Sites of Contestation in Malaysia’s Shackled Media Industry.” Pacific Affairs, 78(1): 39-56.
Bunnell, T. (2002). “Cities for nations? Examining the city-nation-state relation in information age Malaysia.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26(2): 284-298.
Bunnell, T. (2004). Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor: A Critical Geography of Intelligent Landscapes. London: Routledge Curzon.
Case W. F., (1993). Semi-Democracy in Malaysia: Withstanding the Pressures of Regime Change. Pacific Affairs Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 183-205.
Case W. F., (1996). Elites and Regimes in Malaysia: Revisiting a Consociational Democracy. Clayton, Vic., Australia: Monash Asia Institute, Monash University.
Case W. F., (2004). Testing Malaysia's Pseudo-Democracy, in The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform, edited by ed. Gomez. E. T., RoutledgeCurzon Taylor & Francis Group, p. 29-48.
Case, William, (2005) “Malaysia: New Reforms, Old Continuities, Tense Ambiguities,” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 284-309.
Castells M(1999)Grassrooting the space of flows[J]. Urban Geography, 20(4):294-302.
Castells, M (1989) The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford; Basil Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1996) The information age: economy, society and culture, Volume 1, The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford.
Castells, M. and P. Hall (1994) Technopoles of the world: the making of twenty-first century industrial complexes. Routledge, London.
Chan., Jeffrey K. H. (2001) The Next Generation of Singapore’s Public Space: The New Downtown, in Pu Miao (ed.) Public Places in Asia Pacific Cities: Current Issues and Strategies, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.349-365.
Chang, T. C. (2000) Renaissance revisited: Singapore as global city for the arts, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4): 818-831.
Chang, T. C. and Yeoh, B. S. A. (1999) New Asia-Singapore: communicating local cultures through global tourism, Geoforum, 30: 101-115.
Chin, James. and Wong, Chin Huat. (2009), Malaysia’s Electoral Upheaval, Journal of Democracy Vol. 20, Number 3, July, pp.71-85.
Christiansen, F. (2003). Chinatown, Europe: An exploration of overseas Chinese identity in the 1990s. London: Routledge.
Clarkson, James D., (1968). The Cultural Ecology of a Chinese Village: Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Clay, Phillip L. (1979). Neighborhood renewal : middle-class resettlement and incumbent upgrading in American neighborhoods. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Cliff Moughtin, Taner Oc, Steve Tiesdell., (1995) Urban Design: Ornaments and Decorations, London: Architectural Press.
Cowan, C. D., (1951). Sir Frank Swettenham's Perak Journals, 1874-1876, Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 24(4): 157.
Crouch, H. (2001).Managing ethnic tensions through affirmative action: The Malaysian experience. In N. J. Colletta,T.G.Lim, &A.Kelles-Viitanen(Eds.),Social cohesion and conflict prevention in Asia (pp. 225-262). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Dasimah, O & Oliver Leh L.H., (2009) Malaysian Development Planning System: Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan and Public Participation, Asian Social Science, Vol. 5, no.3; 30- 36.
Daud. D, F Raji, S Samsudin, WIFW Ismail, MNB Jaafar, I Omar (2018) Compulsory land acquisition in Malaysia: Critical challenges, approach and success stories. In Frances Plimmer and William McCluskey (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation, pp.282-297. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur., (2008). Draft Kuala Lumpur City Plan 2020: Towards a world class city, (Volume 1). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur.
Diane, Mauzy K., (1988) “Malaysia in 1987: Decline of ‘The Malay Way’,” Asian Survey, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 213-222.
Doner, R. F., Ritchie, B. K. & Slater, D. (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Organization Foundation 59(2): 327- 361.
Douglass, M. (1994). “The ‘developmental state’ and the newly industrialised economies of Asia.” Environment and Planning A 26(4): 543-566.
Douglass, M. (1998) World city formation on the Asia Pacific Rim: poverty, everyday forms of civil society and environmental management, in: M. Douglass and J. Friedmann (Eds) Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, pp. 107-137. London: John Wiley.
Douglass, M. (2000). “Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Globalization, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Pacific Asia.” Urban Studies 17(12): 2317-2337.
Douglass, M. and Jones, G. (2007) The Rise of Mega-Urban Regions in Pacific Asia, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Dufoix, S. (2008). Diasporas. London: University of California Press.
Edensor T and Jayne M (2012) Introduction: Urban theory beyond the West. In: Edensor T and Jayne M (eds) Urban Theory Beyond the West: A World of Cities. London: Routledge, pp. 1–27.
EPU (2010). Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011-2015.
Esa, M. (1997). Putrajaya: The Administrative Capital City of Malaysia in the 21st Century. In Asian Strategy and Leadership Institute (ed.), Malaysia Today Towards the New Millennium, pp.181-192. London: Asean Academic Press.
Esman, Milton (1972) Administration and Development in Malaysia: Institution Building and Reform in a Plural Society. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Farías, I. & Bender, T. (Eds.) (2010): Urban Assemblages: How Actor-network Theory Changes Urban studies. London: Routledge.
FDTCP (2010). National Physical Plan 2, Kuala Lumpur: Federal Department of Town and Country Planning.
Fender, K., Ramstedt, P., Mahmud Y. M. &Terenzio, D. (2016). “Merdeka PNB118 Case Study: Adding Value to the Growing. ” Paper presented at the Conference Cities to Megacities: Shaping Dense Vertical Urbanism, October.
Ford, L., (1998). Midtown, megastructure, and world cities, The Geographical Review, 88 (4): 528-547.
Ford, L., (2001). Skyscraper competition in Asia: new city images and new city form. In: Vale, L. J., and Warner, S. B. (eds.) Imaging the City: Continuing Struggles and New Directions, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 119-144.
Foucault, Michel. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. (2000) Subject and Power. pp.326-348. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Volume 3, edited by Paul Rabinow, trans. by Robert Hurley. NY: New Press.
Foucault, Michel. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78, trans. by Graham Burchell, edited by Arnold I. Davidson. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freedman, Maurice (1979)The Growth of a Plural Society in Malaya. In The Study of Chi- nese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman. G.W. Skinner, ed. Pp. 27–38. Stan- ford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Freedman, Maurice. (1979) The Growth of a Plural Society in Malaya. In The Study of Chinese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman. G.W. Skinner, ed. Pp. 27–38. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Friedmann, J. and Wolff, G. (1982) World city formation: an agenda for research and action, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 3: 309-344.
Fujita, Mari Anna. (2010) ‘Forays into Building Identity: Kampung to Kampong in the Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Area’. Journal of Architectural Education 63(2): 8–24.
Gale, Bruce (1981) Politics and public enterprise in Malaysia. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
Glass, Ruth. (1964). “Introduction: Aspects of change.” In Centre for Urban Studies (ed.), London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Goh, Ban Lee., (1988). Future of Urban Planning in Malaysia. Habitat International Vol.12. No.4 pp 5-12. Pergamon Press. UK.
Goldman, R. H. (1975) “Staple Food Self-Sufficiency and the Distributive Impact of Malaysian Rice Policy”, Food Research Institute Studies, 14 (3): 251-293.
Gomez, E. T. (2002). Political business in Malaysia: party factionalism, cor- porate development, and economic crisis. In E. T. Gomez (ed.), Political Business in East Asia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis (pp. 82–114). London and New York: Routledge.
Gomez, E. T. (2004). Paradoxes of governance: ownership and control of corporate Malaysia. In F. A. Gul and J. S. L. Tsui (eds.), The Governance of East Asian Corporations (pp. 117–54). London and New York: Pal- grave Macmillan.
Gomez, E.T., & Jomo, K.S. (1997) Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gomez, E.T., & Jomo, K.S. (1999). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gomez, James (2013). Malaysia‟s 13th General Election: Social Media and its Political Impact. Retrieved from: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/501b952bc4aaab201610ef06/t/52524142e4b 00c64c3d3c1c7/1381122370577/Malaysia%E2%80%99s+13th+General+Election-+Social+Media+and+its+Political+Impact.pdf.
Gopal, J. (1999) Malaysia’s Oil Palm Refining Industry: Policy, Growth, Technical Change and Competitiveness, in Jomo, K. S., Felker, G. and Rasiah, R. (eds.) Industrial Technology Development in Malaysia, New York: Routledge, pp. 360-395.
Graham S and Marvin S (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition.
Greenfeld, Liah. (1992) Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Greenfeld, Liah. (2001) The Spirit of Capitalism: Nationalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Guat Peng Ngoi., (2015) The historical discourse on the Malay communists and its limitation, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 16:1, 67-84.
Gullick., J. M. (1955). Kuala Lumpur 1880-1895 A city in the making, Kuala Lumpur, The Heritage of Malaysia Trust, Pelanduk Publications.
Gullick., J. M. (2000). A History of Kuala Lumpur 1856-1939, Kuala Lumpur, MBRAS Monograph No:29. S.R.
H. S. Barlow., (1995). Swettenham, Kuala Lumpur, Southdene Sdn. Bhd.
Hackworth, J. and Smith, N. (2001). “The changing state of gentrification.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92(4): 464-477.
Haggard, S. (1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hamzah, B. (1997). “Towards Building Excellence: The Kuala Lumpur City Centre Project.” In Malaysia Today: Towards the New Millennium, pp. 171-179. London: Asean Academic Press.
Harper, T. N. (1999) The End of Empire and the Making of Malaya, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Harper, T.N., (1996) New Malays, New Malays, New Malaysians: Nationalism, Society and History, Southeast Asian Affairs, pp.217–37.
Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, D. (1989) The urban experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1989). “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler 71(1): 3-17.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Oxford: Black- well.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005) Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Hashim, Halimaton Saadiah, Sarah Aziz, Nik Mohd Ruiz Razy, and Rekarancang Sdn. Bhd., (2017) Planning and Development Consultants, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA. ‘Urban Revitalisation for a City’s Soul: The Case of Kampong Bharu’. Kajian Malaysia 35 (1): 119–40.
Hill, R. C., and Kim, J. W., (2000) Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul, Urban Studies, 37(12): 2167-2195.
Hilley, J. (2001). Malaysia: Mahathirism, hegemony and the new opposition. London: Zed Books.
Ho, C. S., (2006) Lessons learned from planning of Putrajaya city Administrative centre of Malaysia: Paper presented at Seminar UTM-SIT workshop at Shibaura Institute, Japan on 14 December.
Home, Robert., (1997). Of Planting and Planning: The Making of British Colonial Cities. London: E&FN Spon.
Ian Morrison., (1949) Aspects of the Racial Problem in Malaya, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 239-253, University of British Columbia.
Ismail, A. R. H. (2009). “1948 and the Cold War in Malaya: Samplings of Malay Reactions.” Kajian Malaysia 27: 155-178.
Jacobs, A, B. (1996), Great Streets, The MIT Press. London: Cambridge Massachusetts.
Jarvis., Darryl S.L. (2017) The State and Development in Malaysia Race, Class and Markets, in Asia after the Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy, ed. Toby Carroll and Darryl S.L. Jarvis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201 - 236.
Jessop, Bob. (2007) From Micro-powers to Governmentality: Foucault’s Work on Statehood, State Formation, Statecraft and State Power. Political Geography 26: 34-40.
Jesudason, J. V. (1995). Statist democracy and the limits of civil society in Malaysia. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 33(3), 335–56.
Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. California: Stanford University Press.
Jomo, K. S. (1986) A Question of Class: Capital the State and Uneven Development in Malaya, Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Jomo, K. S. (1990) Growth and Structural Change in the Malaysian Economy, London: Macmillan.
Jomo, K. S. (2007). “Industrialization and Industrial Policy in Malaysia,” in K. S. Jomo, ed., Malaysian Industrial Policy. Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 1-34.
Jomo, K. S. & Tan Wooi Syn, (2013). “Privatization and Re-Nationalization in Malaysia: A Survey, https://7ff921bd-5952-44fe-813f-3fa622108015.filesusr.com/ugd/8cc4e0_de2dac6f2de048da9b953666d5b3df3e.pdf.
Jomo, K. S., Chung, C. Y., Brian C, F., ul-Hague, I., Phongpaichit, P., Simatu- pang, B., and Tateishi, M. (1997). Southeast Asia’s Misunderstood Mira- cle: Industrial Policy and Economic Development in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Juego, B. (2018). “The Institutions of Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Malaysia: A Critical Review of the Development Agendas Under the Regimes of Mahathir, Abdullah, and Najib. ” Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 11(1): 53-79.
Kang, D. C. (1995). “South Korean and Taiwanese development and the new institutional economics.” International Organization 49(3): 555-587.
Kempen, ET. van., (1994) The dual city and the. poor: social polarisation, social segregation and. life changes, Urban Studies, 31, pp. 995–1015.
Khoo Kay Kim., (1991). Malaysia - Malay Society: Transformation and Democratisation, Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications London: Cambridge University Press.
Khoo, B. T. (2002). The state and the market in Malaysian political economy. In G. Rodan, K. Hewison and R. Robison (eds.), The Political Economy of South-East Asia: Conflicts, Crises, and Change, pp. 178–205. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Khoo, B.T., (2003) Beyond Mahathir: Malaysian Politics and its Discontents. London: Zed Books.
King, R. (2008). Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya: Negotiating Urban Space in Malaysia. Singapore: NUS Press.
Kong, L. (2000) Cultural policy in Singapore: negotiating economic and socio-cultural agendas, Geoforum, 31: 409-424.
Lam, S F (2004) Insider's Kuala Lumpur. Singapore: Times Editions Marshall Cavendish.
Law of Malaysia (TCPAct172). (2006). Town and Country Planning Act 172, Published by The Commissioner of Law Revision, Malaysia in collaboration with Malaysia Law Journal SDN BHD.
Lee, Raymond L. M. (1990) “The State, Religious Nationalism, and Ethnic Rationalization in Malaysia.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13(4): 482-502.
Lefebvre, H. (1979) Space: Social Product and Use Value. In J. W. Freiberg (eds.) Critical Sociology: European Perspective. New York: Irvington. Pp. 285-295.
Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2003) The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Li, L.P., & Imm, A.O.C. (2007). Performance requirements in Malaysia. In K.S. Jomo (Ed.), Malaysian industrial policy (pp. 82–127). Singapore: NUS Press.
Liew., C.T. (2003). Putrajaya: Interpreting Mahathir’s Power Mapping. In Phoo., W.T. & Hgoi., G.P. (eds)., Goodbye Mahathir, pp.68-109. Mentor Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Lim, TN and Tay, L (2000) 80 Years of Architecture in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: PAM.
Lim. L.S, K.C. Ang, M.C. Mahani, A.W. Shahrom and B.M. Md-Zain, (2010) Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphism and Phylogenetic Relationships of Proto Malays in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 71-83.
Loo, Yat Ming. (2013) Architecture and Urban Form in Kuala Lumpur: Race and Chinese Spaces in a Postcolonial City, Publisher: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Loo, Yat-Ming. (2012) ‘No Chinatown, please!’: contesting race, identity and postcolonial memory in Kuala Lumpur, The Journal of Architecture, 17:6, 847-870.
Mahani, Z. A. & Loke, W.H. (2008). “Revealed Comparative Advantage of Malaysian Exports: The Case for Changing Export Composition.” Asian Economic Papers 7(3): 130-147.
Mahathir Mohamad.,(1997). Speech at the Annual Seminar of the World Bank, Hong Kong, 20 September, Asia Economies: Challenges and Opportunities, Foreign Affairs Malaysia, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 61-69.
Mahmoudi. M, F Ahmad, B Abbasi., (2015) Livable streets: The effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets, Cities 43, 104-114.
Makoto., A. (1985). "Free trade zones in Malaysia", Hokudai Economic Papers, Vol. XV.
Malaysiakini. (2011). Syed Hamid turned Chua from hero to zero in 24hrs, Malaysiakini, 25 August: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/174042.
Martin, N. Marger. (2014) Race and Ethnic Relations American and Global Perspectives, 10th Edition. Publisher. Cengage Learning.
Mauzy, D. K. (1988). “Malaysia in 1987: Decline of ‘The Malay Way’.” Asian Survey 28(2): 213-222.
Means, Gordon P., (1996). Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy. 7(4). pp. 103-117.
Mee, W. (1998) National citizenship and global difference. In J.S. Kahn (ed.), Southeast Asian identities: culture and the politics of representation in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
Meyer J W, Drori GS, Hwang H.(2006) World society and the proliferation of formal organization[M]//Drori GS, Meyer J W, Hwang H. Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25-49.
Michaud, Jean., Ruscheweyh, Meenaxi Barkataki., and Swain, Margaret Byrne. (2016) Historical Dictionary of the Peoples of the Southeast Asian Massif. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Middlebrook., S. M. and Gullick., J. M. (1983) Yap Ah Lo, Kuala Lumpur, MBRAS Reprint No:9.
Milne, Robert S. and & Diane K. Mauzy (1999) Malaysian Politics under Mahathir. London: Routledge.
Mohamad, M. B. (1998). The Way Forward. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Mohd Sani (2009) “The Emergence of New Politics in Malaysia: From Consociational to Deliberative Democracy.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 5(2): 97-125.
Mollenkopf, J. and M. Castells (eds.). 1991. Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Moser, S. (2010). “Putrajaya: Malaysia’s new federal administrative capital.” Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning 27(4): 285-297.
Myers G (2014) From expected to unexpected comparisons. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 35: 104–118.
Nah, A.,M. & Bunnell. T. (2005). “Ripples of hope: Acehnese refugees in post-tsunami Malaysia.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26(2): 249–256.
Nair., V.D. (2014).The Story of Prang Besar Estate. Agricultural Research & Advisory Bureau.
Najib, A.A. (2013) Traditional Architectural Heritage for Modern Malaysian Buildings; Department of National Heritage, Ministry of Information, Communications and Culture.
Narayanan. S. (2017). Putrajaya New Town Development, Force Displacement and Resettlement: The Social Impacts On The Original Settlers. Journal of Education and Social Sciences 7(1): 31-37.
Nasr, S. V. R. (2001). Islamic Leviathan: Islam and the Making of State Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC) (2010) New Economic Model For Malaysia Part 1: Strategic Policy Directions, Federal Government Administrative Centre Putrajaya Malaysia.
Newman, P. & Thornley, A. (2005). Planning World Cities: Globalization and Urban Politics. New York: Palgrave.
Ng Foong Peng and Ian A. S. Ng., (2018) Old Market Square as a Container of Diasporic Meaning in Chinese Kuala Lumpur. Millennial Asia 9 (1), 66-92.
Ng, V. and Kian, J. (2021). Public Life and Space of Petaling Street: Reading the Mutable Street from Socio-Spatial Perspectives. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(2), 12A2H, 1-14.
Ngoi, G. P. (2015). “The historical discourse on the Malay communists and its limitation.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 16(1): 67-84.
Nonini., Donald M. (2015) “Getting By”: Class and State Formation among Chinese in Malaysia.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Nordlinger, Eric A, (1988) The Return to The Space: Critiques, American Political Science Review, 82(3) 875-885.
Olds, Kris. (2001) Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture, and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects. Kris. Olds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Olds., Kris, (1997) Globalizing Shanghai: The 'Global Intelligence Corps' and the Building of Pudong, Cities 14(2) : 115–16. 49.
Omar, D., and Ling., Oliver HL., 2009, Malaysian development planning system: Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan and public participation. Asian Social Science, vol.5 (3), pp.30-36.
Ong., A and Roy., A (eds) (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments in the Art of Being Global. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Osbourne, T. and N. Rose (1999) Governing cities: notes on the spatialisation of virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17, 737–60.
Parkinson, C. N. (1996). The Guthrie Flagship: United Sua Betong. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. Monograph, No.26.
Patel S (2014) Is there a ‘south’ perspective to urban studies? In: Parnell S and Oldfield S (eds) The Routledge Handbook on the Cities of the Global South. London: Routledge, pp. 37–53.
PEMANDU (2010). Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) - A Roadmap for Malaysia. INTAN: National Institute of Public Administration, Prime Minister’s Department Malaysia.
Pletcher, J. (1991) “Regulation with Growth: The Political Economy of Palm Oil in Malaysia”, World Development, 19(6): 623-636.
Puspadevi., S. (2011). Acquisition is for people’s safety, says expert, The Star, 12 August: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2011/08/12/acquisition-is-for-peoples-safety-says-expert/.
Putrajaya Corporation. (1997). Putrajaya: The Federal Government Administrative Centre. Kuala Lumpur: Putrajaya Corporation.
Rahman A, N., and Shamsuddin, Shuhana., (2010) User Perceptions Towards Street Characteristics and Qualities That Contribute to User-Friendly Streets. In: Proceedings of Arte Polis 3: creative collaboration and the making of place. Institute of Technology Bandung (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 283-292.
Rahman.NA, Shuhana Shamsuddinb, Izham Ghania (2014) What makes people use the street?: Towards a liveable urban environment in Kuala Lumpur city centre. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 624-632.
Rasdi, M. T. H. M. (2005). Malaysian Architecture: Crisis Within. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.
Robinson, J. (2006) ‘Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development’. London: Routledge.
Robinson, J. and Roy, A. (2016) Debate on Global Urbanisms and the Nature of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(1),181-186.
Rock, M.T. (2015) Southeast Asia’s Democratic Developmental States and Economic Growth. Institutions and Economies. 7 (1): 15-43.
Rodan, G. (2004). Transparency and authoritarian rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London: Routledge.
Roff, W. (1994) The Origin of Malay Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, Tapsell. (2013). Negotiating Media Balance In Malaysia 2013 General Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(2), 39-60.
Roy, A. and Ong, A. (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Sons.
Saito, A. and A. Thornley (2003) Shifts in Tokyo's world city status and the urban planning response. Urban Studies, 40(4), pp. 665–85.
Salazar, Lorraine Carlos (2004) “First Come, First Served”: Privatization under Mahathir. In Reflections: The Mahathir Years, edited by Bridget Welsh 282-293. Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Studies Program, Paul H. Hitze School Of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University.
Salleh, Halim (2000) “Globalization and the Challenges to Malay Nationalism as the Essence of Malaysian Nationalism.” in Leo Suryadinata (ed.) Nationalism and Globalization: East and West. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. pp. 132-174.
Samuel Bassey Okposin & Cheng Ming Yu (2000) Economic Crises in Malaysia: Causes, Implications, and Policy Prescriptions, London: ASEAN Academic Press.
Sandhu, K.S., (1964). The Saga of the "Squatter" in Malaya: A Preliminary Survey of the Causes, Characteristics and Consequences of the Resettlement of Rural Dwellers during the Emergency between 1948 and 1960, Journal of Southeast Asian History Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 143-177.
Sandhu., K.S.(1969). Indians in Malaya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sarayed, Luiza FL, Rosilawati Zainol, and Faizah Ahmad. (2017) ‘Exploring Informality In A Global South City: Issues Of Power And Urban Development In Kuala Lumpur’. Journal of Design and Built Environment (17)1.
Sardar, Z. (2000) The consumption of Kuala Lumpur. Reaktion, Chichester.
Sassen, S. (1991) The global city: New York, London and Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Sassen, S. (1994). The informal economy: Between new developments and old regulations. The Yale Law Journal, 103: 2289-2304.
Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, rev. edn. (originally published in 1991). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Savage, M. and Warde, A. (1993). Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity. London: Macmillan Press.
Schindler, S. (2017) Towards a Paradigm of Southern Urbanism. City 21(1):47-64.
Scott, A.J., J. Agnew, E.W. Soja and M. Storper (2001) Global city-regions. In A.J. Scott (ed.), Global city-regions: trends, theory, policy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Sheppard E., Leitner, H. and Maringanti. A. (2013) Provincializing global urbanism: a manifesto, Urban Geography 34(7): 893-900.
Simone, A. (2010.) 'City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads'. London: Routledge.
Siong, H. C. (2006). “Lessons learned from planning of Putrajaya city Administrative centre of Malaysia.” Paper presented at Seminar UTM-SIT workshop at Shibaura Institute, Japan, December 14.
Soja, E.W. (2000) Postmetropolis: critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell, Oxford.
Spivak GC (2008) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C and Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 271–313.
Stockwell, Anthony J. (1982) “The White Man’s Burden and Brown Humanity: Colonialism and Ethnicity in British Malaya.” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 10(1): 59-62.
Sundaram, J. K. (2007). “Industrialization and Industrial Policy in Malaysia,” In Sundaram, J. K. (ed.), Malaysian Industrial Policy, pp. 1-34. Singapore: NUS Press.
Tan, Chee Beng (2000) “Ethnic Identities and National Identities: Some Examples from Malaysia.” Identities, 6(4): 441-480.
Tan, Chee Beng (2000) Ethnic Identities and National Identities: Some Examples from Malaysia. Identities, 6(4): 441-480.
Tarmizi., J. A. and Yeoh., Y. S. (2012). Time to Clear The Air, The Star, 21 April.
Taylor, P. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern worldsystem. Progress in Human Geography 18 (2): 151-62.
Taylor, P. (1995) World cities and territorial states: the rise and fall of their mutuality. In P. Knox and P. Taylor (eds.), World cities in a world system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Taylor, P. (2000) World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization. Political Geography 19, 5–32.
Teik, K. B. (2003). Beyond Mahathir: Malaysian Politics and its Discontents. London: Zed Books.
The Official Portal of Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department Malaysia (EPU). (2010). Tenth Malaysia Plan, 2011–2015.
Tsing., Anna Lowenhaupt. (2004) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Vorys, K. V. (1975), Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wagner, A. (2017). Malaysian Shophouses: Creating Cities of Character. Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/archuht/20.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, J. H. (2004). “World city formation, geopolitics and local political process: Taipei’s ambiguous development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(2): 384-400.
Wedeman, A. (2002). Development and corruption: the East Asian paradox. In E. T. Gomez (ed.), Political Business in Malaysia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis (pp. 155–81). London and New York.
Weiss, Meredith L. (2009) Edging Toward a New Politics in Malaysia: Civil Society at the Gate? Asian Survey Vol. 49, No. 5 (2009), pp. 741-758 Published by: University of California Press.
Willford. Andrew C. (2014). Tamils and the Haunting of Justice: History and Recognition in Malaysia's Plantations.University of Hawai'i Press.
Wong, S. F. (2011) Walkability and community identity in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur. PhD thesis, Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne.
Woo-Cumings, M. (2005). Back to basics: Ideology, nationalism, and Asian values in East Asia. In E. Helleiner & A. Pickel (Eds.), Economic nationalism in a globalizing world (pp. 91- 117). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Woon, T. K. (1989). Privatisation in Malaysia: restructuring or efficiency? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 5(3), 242–58.
Yeang, Ken., (1992) The Architecture of Malaysia, Amsterdam and Kuala Lumpur: The Pepin Press.
Yow., H.C.(2011). ACCCIM claims MRT abused as front for land grab, The Malaysian Insider, 27 August.
Zakaria Haji Ahmad., (1989), Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society, in Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz and Seymour martin Lipset (eds.) Democracy in Developing Countries, Boulder Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
Zeynep Elik, Diane Favro, Richard Ingersoll and Spiro Kostof., (1994). Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE