:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大專校院學生自治發展指標建構之研究
作者:吳律德
作者(外文):Wu, Lu-Te
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:公民教育與活動領導學系
指導教授:林佳範
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:學生自治校園民主學生參與Self-Governance of the studentsCampus DemocracyStudent Involvement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究旨在建構我國大專校院學生自治發展指標。採用文獻分析法建構學生自治發展的核心價值及發展指標的基本理念,並據此運用修正式德菲法、層級分析法建構指標評估向度、面向、次面向及其具體內涵與定義。
主要結論如下:
一、我國大專校院學生自治發展的核心價值:維護學生權利、落實校園民主、遵守法治國原則、學習民主自治。
二、我國大專校院學生自治發展指標之基本理念為大專校院為提昇其學術品質及學生學習效果,以具學生公共意見與意志參與的校園民主治理為核心,從其學生自治發展條件、組織發展本身、學生自治發展成效等,以前中後的三個向度評估之。
三、指標建構結果
(一)學生自治發展條件(評估向度)
(A)學生個人的校園公共參與
(A-1)學生的社團參與程度及自願程度
(A-2)學生自治組織的參與程度、自願程度及多樣性
(A-3)學生自身以個人參與途徑的校園公共事務參與程度
(A-4)學生自身以團體參與途徑的校園公共事務參與程度
(B)大專校院對學生自治的支持程度
(B-1)大專校院對其學生自治組織定位的認知程度
(B-2)大專校院促進學生自治組織與其他單位的合作程度
(B-3)大專校院對學生自治組織獨立性的保障程度
(B-4)大專校院在學生自治組織申訴的支持程度
(B-5)大專校院對學生參與校園民主治理的支持程度
(二)組織發展本身(評估向度)
(C)學生自治之組織發展
(C-1)學生自治組織人力及財務資源的運作、財務的透明度及規範度
(C-2)學生自治組織參與內部治理且經選舉產生的成員性別平等保障制度及其行為規範公共的可及性
(C-3)學生自治組織在科技的使用及互動程度
(C-4)全校性學生自治組織與非全校性學生自治組織或其他學生社團的合作程度
(C-5)學生自治組織參與校外或國外學生自治組織聯盟的程度
(三)學生自治發展成效(評估向度)
(D)學生自治組織內部(對學生或會員)的影響力
(D-1)學生自治組織蒐集與處理學生公共意見與意志的行動及影響程度
(D-2)學生自治組織對學生提升在校學習自治能力的行動及影響程度
(D-3)學生對學生自治組織政策落實學生自治之核心價值的行動及影響程度
(D-4)學生對學生自治組織的信任與支持程度
(E)學生自治組織外部(對學校)的影響力
(E-1)學生自治組織對校園公共議題的行動及影響程度
(E-2)學生自治組織對大專校院政策的行動及影響程度
最後本研究針對教育部、校方、學生自治組織實務參與者、未來相關研究及指標施測發展提出具體建議。
The aim of this study is to construct the indicators for the Development of Self-governance of the students of higher education in Taiwan. The basic principles of the core values and indicators for the development of self-governance of the students of higher education in Taiwan are formed using a literature analysis method. Based on this, the modified Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process are employed to construct the dimensions, aspects, sub-aspects, and their specific content and definitions for assessing the indicators.
The main conclusions are as follows:
1. The core values of the development of self-governance of the students of higher education in Taiwan are: Safeguarding students' rights, Implementing campus democracy, Upholding the principles of rule of law, Learning democratic self-governance.
2. The fundamental concept of the development of self-governance of the students of higher education in Taiwan is centered around the principle of enhancing academic quality and student learning outcomes through campus democratic governance that involves students' public opinions and will. The evaluation of this student self-governance development is conducted through three dimensions: the conditions for student self-governance development, the development of student self-government organizations themselves, and the effectiveness of student self-governance development. The assessment covers the stages of pre-development, development, and post-development.
3. Results of Indicator Construction
(1) Conditions for Development of Self-Governance of the students.(Evaluation Dimensions)
A. Individual Student's Campus Public involvement
A-1. Degree and voluntariness of students' involvement in clubs.
A-2. Degree, voluntariness, and diversity of student involvement in student self-government organizations.
A-3. Degree of students' individual participation in campus public affairs through personal channels.
A-4. Degree of students' group participation in campus public affairs through collective channels.
B. Degree of Support for the Development of Self-Governance of the students in colleges and universities
B-1. The level of awareness of colleges and universities regarding the positioning of student self-government organizations.
B-2. The extent to which colleges and universities promote collaboration between student self-government organizations and other units.
B-3. The degree to which colleges and universities ensure the independence of student self-government organizations.
B-4. The level of support provided by colleges and universities in addressing complaints raised by student self-government organizations.
B-5. The extent of support from colleges and universities for encouraging student involvement in campus democratic governance.
(2) Organizational Development Itself (Evaluation Dimensions)
C. Organizational development of Self-Governance of the students
C-1. Operation, transparency, and standardization of human and financial resources in student self-government organizations.
C-2. Ensuring gender equality and public accessibility of behavioral norms for members elected through student self-government organizations' participation in internal governance.
C-3. Utilization of technology and level of interaction within student self-government organizations.
C-4. Degree of collaboration between campus-wide student self-government organizations and self-governing organizations of students at the level of departments or other student clubs.
C-5. Degree of involvement of student self-government organizations in external or international student self-government organization alliances.
(3) Effects of Development in Self-Governance of the students (Evaluation Dimensions)
D. Influence within student self-government organizations (on students or members)
D-1. Actions and level of influence of student self-government organizations in collecting and processing students' public opinions and will.
D-2. Actions and level of influence of student self-government organizations in enhancing students' ability to self-govern their learning in school.
D-3. Actions and level of influence of students in implementing the core value of student self-governance within student self-government organizations.
D-4. Level of trust and support of students towards student self-government organizations.
E. Influence outside of student self-government organizations (on the school)
E-1. Actions and level of influence of student self-government organizations on campus public issues.
E-2. Actions and level of influence of student self-government organizations on college and university policies.
Finally, this study provides specific suggestions for the Ministry of Education, schools, practical participants of student self-government organizations, future research, and the development of indicators for testing.
中文文獻
方建良(2021)。國中小教師數學領域素養導向評量設計指標建構之研究。臺南大學博士論文,未出版,臺南市。
王壹珊(2009)。大學學生會會費政策之研究。逢甲大學碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
白逸軒(2019)。我國學生自治的運作與想像-學生自治組織設計的探索性研究。國立政治大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU201900423
石原康(1998)。市民社會與民主。殷海光基金會,市民社會與民主,1-54頁。臺北市:桂冠出版社。
吳秀明、楊坤樵(2006)。憲法與我國經濟部門之基本秩序,收錄於蘇永欽等合著,部門憲法,頁226,臺北市:元照出版有限公司。
吳律德(2015)。我國大學學生自治與政治社會化之研究-以四所大學為例。國立臺東大學碩士論文,未出版,臺東縣。
吳律德、蘇秉玄、劉麗娟(2017)。大學學生自治組織發展與學生參與度之分析,中國行政評論,23(1):90-116。https://doi.org/10.6635/cpar.2016.23(1).04
吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用(2版)。臺北市:高等教育。
宋文娟(2001)。一種質量並重的研究法-德菲法在醫務管理學研究領域之應用。醫務管理期刊,2(2),10-21。https://doi.org/10.6174/JHM2001.2(2).11
李立旻(2017)。高等教育學生權利意識發展層次影響因素之初探。學生事務與輔導,56(1),11-30。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.2017.5601.03
李立旻(2018)。大學生公共參與經驗與學生權利意識關係之研究-以北區大學校院為例。國立臺灣師範大學博士論文,未出版,臺北市。https://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DCEL.028.2018.F02
李佃來(2006)。公共領域與生活世界-哈伯瑪斯市民社會理論研究。上海市:人民出版社。
李宥融(2011)。公民社會指標之調查研究:以多元就業開發方案為例。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李彥慧、柯志堂(2014)。實踐學生自治理念及促進校園參與之行動研究─以某校社團搬遷為例。學生事務與輔導,53(1),35-53。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.2014.5301.05
李紋勝(2016)。雲端未來學校管理指標建構之研究。國立高雄師範大學博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
周宇修(2007)。新世紀台灣大專學生自治組織公共性初探。中華人文社會學報,6,66-100。
林佳範(2007年4月)。大學法與學生自治。96年全國學生自治發展會議發表之論文,逢甲大學。
林佳龍(1990)。剖析大學的權力結構─黨、團、軍訓、情治單位在臺大,載於賀德芬(主編),大學之再生:學術自由,校園民主(頁85-89),臺北市:時報文化出版企業有限公司。
林信志(2014)。高級中學教科書性別偏見檢視規準之建構:德懷術與層級分析法之應用。課程與教學,17(3),119-146。
林振春(1992)。德惠法,民意月刊,169,82-101。
林德昌(2007)。臺灣公民社會指標之研究:兼論青年公共參與。青年輔導委員會委託之研究報告(編號:1009604060)。臺北市:青年輔導員會。
林慧敏(2022)。高齡者身心教育個別化教學模式之建構與驗證。臺灣師範大學博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
邱淑芬、蔡欣玲(1996)。德爾菲預測術-一種專家預測的護理研究方法,護理研究,4(1),92-98。https://doi.org/10.7081/NR.199603.0092
柯志堂(2002)。學生權利中關於申訴制度之探討。學生事務與社團輔導第2輯,349-362。
柯志堂(2006)。高等教育學生權利之研究。國立臺灣師範大學博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
洪碧達(1993年12月28日)。大學法一波三折 歷經四年終於通過。師大青年,2版。
胡輝華(2005)。公民社會指數評述。中國行政管理,241,104-107。
袁頌西(2003)。當代政治研究—方法與理論探微。臺北市:時英出版社。
張魁峯(2017)。Super Decisions軟體操作手冊。臺北市:鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
教育部(1998)。邁向學習社會白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2008)。97年度大專校院全校性學生自治組織概況調查。委託學生自治暨公民教育實踐政策諮詢小組辦理。
教育部(2011)。100年度大專校院全校性學生自治組織概況調查。委託學生自治暨公民教育實踐政策諮詢小組辦理。
教育部(2011)。大專校院輔導學生自治組織參考手冊。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2017)。106年公私立大專校院校園學生權利調查。委託國立臺灣師範大學辦理。
教育部(2021)。109年公私立大專校院校園學生權利調查。委託國立臺灣師範大學辦理。
教育部青年發展署(2013)。102年度大專校院全校性學生自治組織概況調查。委託國立高雄應用科技大學辦理。
教育部青年發展署(2014)。103年度大專校院全校性學生自治組織概況調查。委託國立臺灣師範大學辦理。
教育部青年發展署(2022)。111年大專校院學生會輔導計畫。
許巧靜(2000)。國小班會學生自治功能探討。臺東師院學報,11,109-136。
許育典、朱朝煌(2003)。學術自由、大學法制與學生自治。學生事務與社團輔導第3輯。178-200。
許育典、盧浩平(2009)。友善校園下的大學學生自治-由大學法談起。教育部人權教育暨諮詢中心電子報。取自http://hre.pro.edu.tw/
許育典、林姁璇(2019)。大學自治下校規法律性質的探討:從在學關係談起。學生事務與輔導,58(2),27–42。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.201909_58(2).0004
許育典(2020)。教育行政法。臺北市:元照出版有限公司。
郭展瑋、張倢妤(2007)。新世紀台灣大專學生自治組織公共性初探。中華人文社會學報,6,66-100。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南出版社。
陳明國(2018)。107年度全國大專校院學生會概況調查。教育部青年發展署委託之調查。
陳明國(2019)。108年全國大專校院學生會環境調查。教育部青年發展署委託之調查。
陳堅(2008)。公民社會評價體系之比較及基於中國情況的思考。中國非營利評論,2,55-73。北京,社會科學文獻出版。
陳欽春(2008年12月)。公民社會指標之價值面向分析:臺灣社會信任測量模式初探。2008年公民社會國際論壇發表之論文,國立中央大學客家學院公民社會研究中心。
陳樺潔(2011)。新北市客家社團公民社會化之研究:CIVICUS公民社會指標的初探。國立中央大學碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
傅仰止(2014)。公民意識的社會參與效應:志願結社及日常接觸。臺灣社會學刊,55,179-226。https://doi.org/10.6786/TJS.201412_(55).0004
曾建元(2000)。大學通識教育理念與學生社團參與。公民訓育學報,9,265-284。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2000(9)11
曾建元(2020)。學生自治選舉與臺灣民主轉型─以國立臺灣大學為中心的討論。中華行政學報,26,107-140。https://doi.org/10.6712/JCPA.202006_(26).0006
童永全(2010)。大學學生會會費收取的法律分析與檢討。國立成功大學法律學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。https://doi.org/10.6844/NCKU.2010.00395
鈕文英(2017)。研究方法與論文寫作(二版修訂版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
黃俊英(1996)。企業研究方法。臺北市:東華書局。
楊仕裕(2000)。課外活動中輔導學生自治之探討與展望。訓育研究,39(3),14-27。
葉至誠、葉立誠(1999)。研究方法與論文寫作(1版)。商鼎文化公司。
葉連祺(2005)。層級分析法和網絡分析法。教育研究月刊,132,152-153。
葛蘭西(1988)。獄中札記。臺北市:谷風出版社。
賈西津(2007)。海峽兩岸暨香港公民社會指數比較。行政論壇,84: 73-77。
賈西津(2009)。什麼是公民社會?。取自http://www.interhoo.com/content/4369.aspx.
劉典倡(2010)。大學學生自治組織之研究。逢甲大學碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
盧浩平(2015)。大學生基本權利與自治的保障。國立成功大學法律學研究所博士論文,未出版,臺南市。https://doi.org/10.6844/NCKU.2015.00159
謝邦昌、柯惠新、盧傳熙(2000)。市場調查與分析技術。臺北市:曉園出版社。
顧忠華(2002)。公民社會在臺灣的成形經驗。載於瞿海源、顧忠華、錢永祥(主編),法治、人權與公民社會:殷海光基金會自由、平等、社會正義研討會論文集第2冊(頁161-196)。臺北市:桂冠出版社。
外文文獻
Anosov, I.P., Prykhodko, V.M., Prykhodko, M.I.(2008). Socio-pedagogical foundations of student self-government as a source of democratization of higher education(management aspect). LLC “Publishing House” MMD, Melitopol.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
Benne, K. D..(1987). The Meanings of Democracy in a Collective World, Teachers College Record, 88(6), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146818708800602
CIVICUS(2011), CSI Methodology. Retrieved from. http://www.civicus.org/csi/csimethodology.
European Students’ nion.(2021). Student Participation Innovative Practice Guide, European students’ union.
European students’ union.(2021). TUPS Moves Toward The First Student Participation Index. Retrieved from. https://www.esu-online.org/?news=stups-moves-toward-the-first-student-participation-index.
Feldman, L., Pasek, J., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H.(2007). Identifying best practices in civic education: Lessons from the student voices program. American Journal of Education, 114(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1086/520692
Ferguson, A.(1767). An Essay on the History of Civil Society.
Gergely, C., & Varga, K. Z.(2020). The development of the situation of student governments in higher education, Miskolci Jogtudó, 3, 10-16.
Green, B., Jones, M., Hughes, D., & Green, A. W.(1999). Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health and Social Care in the Community, 3(7), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00176.x
Habermas, J.(1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, London: Polity Press.
Heinrich, V. F..(2004). Assessing and Strengthening Civil Society Worldwide: a Project Description of the CIVICUS Civil Society Index: A Participatory Needs Assessment & Action-Planning Tool for Civil Society. CIVICUS Civil Society Index Paper Series, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845208589-45
Higher Education and Research Committee(CC-HER).(2000). Universities as Sites of Citizenship and Civic Responsibility, Document DGIV/EDU/HE 36. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Jones A. Glen, Shanahan, T., & Goyan, P.(2001). University Governance in Canadian Higher Education, Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 163-180.
Klemenčič, M.(2011). Student representation in European higher education governance: principles and practice, roles and benefits. In Egron-Polak, E., Kohler, J.,
Klemenčič, M.(2014). Student power in a global perspective and contemporary trends in student organising. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.896177
Klemenčič, M.(2015). Student Involvement in University Quality Enhancement. In: Jeroen Huisman, Harry de Boer, David D. Dill und Manuel Souto-Otero (Hg.): The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, S. 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_28
Kondur, O., Koturbash, N., & Mykhaylyshyn, G.(2021). The Role of Student Self-Government in Ensuring the Quality of Higher Education. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 8(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.8.1.65-71
Kumar, R.(2000)。研究方法:步驟化學習指南(潘中道、黃瑋瑩、胡龍騰譯)。學富文化事業公司。(原著出版於1996年)
Law on Higher Education and Science available in English(2018). Poland Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Retrieved from. https://www.gov.pl/web/science/constitution-for-science.
Lee, H.(1987). The Nature and Scope of Student Participation in Policy-Making in Academic Government. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar Current Issues in University Education of Korea and Japan. Seoul: Korean Council for University Education.
Luescher T. M. (2008). Student governance in transition: University democratisation and managerialism: a governance approach to the study of student politics and the case of the University of Cape Town. Ph. D Thesis, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30508
Macfarlane, B.(2012). Re-framing student academic freedom: a capability perspective. High Educ 63, 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9473-4
Mati, J., Silva, F., & Anderson, T. (2010). Assessing and Strengthening Civil Society Worldwide, An updated programme description of the CIVICUS Civil Society Index Phase 2008-2010.
McKenna H. P..(1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for nursing?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(6), 1221-1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x
Mead, D. M.(1992). Innovations in Nursing Care. the Development of Primary Nursing in Wales Unpublished Report. Department of Health, London.
Menon, M. E.(2003). Student Involvement in University Governance: A Need for Negotiated Educational Aims?. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2003.9967106
Miles, J. M., & Miller, M. T.(1997). Increasing Student Involvement in Self-Governance Activities: A Delphi Approach. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED423757)
Miles, J. M., Miller, M. T., & Nadler, D. P.(2008). Student Governance: Toward Effectiveness and the Ideal. College Student Journal, 42(4), 1061-1069.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O.(1995). Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
National Institute for Health Research.(2021). Briefing note two: What is public involvement in research?. Retrieved from. https://www.invo.org.uk/posttyperesource/what-is-public-involvement-in-research/
Payne, R. L., Fineman, S., & Wall, T. D.(1976). Organizational climate and job satisfaction a conceptual synthesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90006-4
Putnam, R. D.(1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045657
Rockwell, L.(1950).Academic Freedom: German Origin and American Development. AAUP bull, 36(2) ,225-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/40220717
Saaty, T. L.& Vargas, L. G.(1991). Prediction, projection and forecasting: Application of the analytic hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games and sports. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Saaty, T. L.(1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Student participation without borders.(2021). European index of student participation. Retrieved from. https://studentparticipation.eu/index/.
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency(2021), HESF Domain 6: Governance and accountability. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/hesf-domain-6.
Trowler, V., & Trowler, P.(2011). Student engagement toolkit for leaders. Leadership. foundation for higher education and Higher Education Research and Evaluation.
Trowler, V.(2010). Students Engagement Literature Review. The Higher Education Academy.
White, G., Howell, J. A., & Shang Xiaoyuan.(1996). In Search of Civil Society. Clarendon Press.
Wood, D.(1993, June). Faculty, Student, and Support Staff Participation in College Governance: An Evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Canadian Community Colleges. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Yashchuk I.P.(2008). Optimization of student self-government bodies in higher educational institutions in the context of realization of ideas A. S. Makarenko. Origins of pedagogical skill, 4, 214-221.
Бескорса, О., & Максимюк, А.(2020). Student self-governance as a way of empowerment in the system of higher education. Професіоналізм педагога: теоретичні й методичні аспекти, 12, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.31865/2414-9292.12.2020.206742
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE