:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:負Alpha信度係數指標在運動技能測驗之研究
書刊名:體育學報
作者:姚漢禱 引用關係
作者(外文):Yau, Han-dau
出版日期:2001
卷期:31
頁次:頁271-280
主題關鍵詞:運動技能測驗負Alpha係數古典測量理論信度Rasch個別信度係數Psychomotor testsNegative coefficient alphaClassical test theoryReliabilityRasch separation reliability coefficients
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:381
     本研究的目的是探討負Alpha信度係數問題,並尋求適當的表示運動技能測驗的信 度。 從測量理論分析 Alpha 信度係數的背景,再以運動技能重複測量單一項目測驗的實例 說明,比較古典測量理論的 Alpha 係數、組內相關係數和 Rasch 個別信度係數的誤差,結 果發現:在受試者同質性高且重複測量單一項目( MASI )的運動技能測驗情況下, Alpha 係數容易得到負值, 而 Rasch 個別信度係數能有效的估計測驗信度。 本研究的結論為: Rasch 個別信度係數( separation reliability coefficients )能夠有效的克服負 Alpha 係數的問題。
     The purpose of the study was to investigate the meaning of negative coefficient alpha as an index of psychomotor tests. The background of psychometric theories was analyzed to the coefficient alpha for reliability. An illustration of the test of multiple-attempt, single-item had introduced. The errors of test scores were compared to the coefficient alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient of classical test theory and Rasch separation reliability coefficients. The result indicated that negative value of generating in the methods of coefficient alpha. They are not satisfaction both the high homogeneity of subjects and Multiple-Attempt, Single-Item Tests in the psychomotor. But, Rasch separation reliability coefficients can be valid estimation a tests' reliability. The conclusion of this study was that the Rasch separation reliability coefficients were valid overcome with the problem of negative coefficient alpha.
期刊論文
1.Clauser, B.、Linacre, J. M.(1999)。Relating Cronbach and Rasch Reliabilities。Rasch Measurement Transactions,13(2),696-696。  new window
2.Green, S. B.、Lissitz, R. W.、Mulaik, S. A.(1977)。Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality。Educational and Psychological Measurement,37(4),827-838。  new window
3.Wright, B. D.(2001)。Separation, Reliability and Skewed Distributions。Rasch measurement Transactions,14(4),786。  new window
4.Shavelson, Richard J.、Webb, Noreen M.、Rowley, Glenn L.(1989)。Generalizability theory。American Psychologist,44(6),922-932。  new window
5.Cronbach, Lee J.(1951)。Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests。Psychometrika,16(3),297-334。  new window
研究報告
1.姚漢禱(1999)。編製羽球效標參照組合測驗 (計畫編號:NSC88-2413-H-179-007)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Marcoulides, G. A.(1987)。An alternative method for variance component estimation: Applications to generdizability theory(博士論文)。University of California,Los Angeles。  new window
圖書
1.American Educational Research Association、American Psychological Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。American Educational Research Association。  new window
2.Cronbach, L. J.、Gleser, G. C.、Nanda, H.、Rajaratnam, N.(1972)。The depend ability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
3.McDonald, R. P.(1999)。Test Theory: A Unified Treatment。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Wright, B. D.、Stone, M. H.(1979)。Best Test Design: Rasch Measurement。Chicago, IL:Mesa Press。  new window
5.Suen, H. K.(1990)。Principles of test theories。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Embretson, Susan E.、Reise, Steven P.(2000)。Item Response Theory for Psychologists。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Baumgartner, T. A.(1989)。Norm-Referenced measurement reliability。Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science。Champaign:Human Kinetics Publishers。  new window
2.Armor, D. J.(1974)。Theta reliability and factor scaling。Sociological methodology, 1973-1974。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE