:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐王度《古鏡記》之鑄鏡傳說辨析--兼論古鏡制妖的思考進路
書刊名:中國文學研究
作者:黃東陽 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Tung-yang
出版日期:2003
卷期:17
頁次:頁125-144
主題關鍵詞:王度古鏡記黃帝制器唐傳奇志怪小說Du WangGujingjiHaungti's making of vassalTang legendSupernatural fiction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:133
本文以探溯《古鏡記》所根據的「黃帝鑄鏡」傳說為旨要,發現其文本並非來自南宋高承《事物紀原》轉引《黃帝內傳》所記「黃帝與王母會於王屋而鑄大鏡十二面」的傳說系統,亦與《玄中記》所載「尹壽作鏡」無關,而是援用「黃帝鑄鏡以配律曆」的故事作為敷衍成文的基礎。在細繹六朝時造曆傳說的流變、並比對唐代所盛行的古鏡傳說後,除明瞭《古鏡記》未受唐代諸多古鏡故事的直接影響外,亦由此更確定《古鏡記》與「黃帝鑄鏡以配律曆」二者間的嫡承關係。其次在探討古鏡形成制及其特質所蘊藏的意涵上,已見王度雖在六朝以降「物老為魅」的思想流行下,以「古鏡」、「妖魅」二者對抗為思想基調,但卻賦予古鏡擁有自主的個性,除有別於唐代以先的照妖思維外,亦與道教以物理觀點建構的鑄鏡理論不同,形成自相衝突而又獨特的思考模式。
This essay targets to examine the legend of Huangti forging the mirror found in Gujingji (Tales of Ancient Mirrors), in order to argue that the text does not come from the legend system of Hunagtineizhuan (Inner Biography of Hungti) where “Huangti (the Emperor) met Huangmu (the Queen) at Wangwu Mountain in order to mold twelve mirrors,” as quoted in Zheng Gao's Xiwujiyuan (The Origin of Things) during the Southern Song Dynasty. Moreover, it is not related to Xuanzhungji, which holds that “Yunshou was said to make a mirror, in any sense; instead, it employs and adapts from the legend of the “Huangti molded mirror in order to match the calendar”, which serves as the foundation for the story. After closes interpretation of the legend and metamorphosis concerning calendar making in the Sixth Dynasty and comparing it with the legend concerning the making of ancient mirrors that was popular in the Tang Dynasty, it is discovered that Gujingji was not influenced by the many legends concerning the ancient mirror that were popular in Tang Dynasty; moreover, its direct connection with the “Huangti molded mirror in order to match the calendar” becomes obvious. Further, regarding the study of the system of gujing (ancient mirror) and its implications, although Du Wang was situated in the Sixth Dynasty, in which they thought “everything antique is demonoic”, it is explainable for him to regard the “ancient mirror” and “demon” countering each other. However, he incarnated the ancient mirror with autonomy. In addition to its differences from the early Tang thinking concerning demons, it is different from the Taoist physical view of mirror making, constituting contradictory and spectacular thinking patterns.
期刊論文
1.李豐楙(19800600)。六朝鏡劍傳說與道教法術思想。中國古典小說研究專集,2,1-28。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁上椿(1951)。中國古鏡銘文叢譚。大陸雜誌,2(3)。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫望(1957)。王度考。學術月刊,1957(3)/1957(4)。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉瑛(1985)。古鏡記著者考。中華文化復興月刊,14(12),69-72。  延伸查詢new window
5.馮承基(1965)。古鏡記著成之時代及其有關問題。臺大文史哲學報,14。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.任昉。述異記。  延伸查詢new window
2.王國良(1989)。漢武洞冥記研究。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.魯迅(1994)。魯迅小說史論文集--中國小說史略及其他。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.袁珂(2000)。中國神話傳說。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.汪辟疆(1983)。唐人小說。臺北:純真出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.任繼愈。道藏提要。北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.孔祥星、劉一曼(1997)。中國銅鏡圖典。文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳元龍。格致鏡原。  延伸查詢new window
9.中國青銅器全集編輯委員會(1998)。中國青銅器全集(十六)銅鏡。北京:文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.譚旦冏(1981)。銅器概述。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
11.李劍國(1993)。唐五代志怪傳奇敘錄。南開大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳槃(19910200)。古讖緯研討及其書錄解題。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
13.葛洪、王明(1996)。抱朴子內篇校釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.Frazer, James George、徐育新、汪培基、張澤石(1998)。金枝:巫術與宗教之研究。北京:大眾文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.段熙仲(1962)。古鏡記的作者乃其他。文學遺產增刊(10)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
16.張西堂(1993)。《左氏春秋考證》序。古史辨。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.王夢鷗(1973)。陳翰異聞集校補考釋。陳翰異聞集校補考釋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.羅振玉(1986)。漢兩京以來鏡銘集錄。漢兩京以來鏡銘集錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(五代)譚峭(1996)。化書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)董誥。全唐文。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)馬國翰。玉函山房輯佚書。  延伸查詢new window
4.(北宋)張君房。雲笈七籤。  延伸查詢new window
5.(漢)戴德。大戴禮記。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)司馬承禎。上清含象劍鑑圖。  延伸查詢new window
7.(東漢)應劭。風俗通義,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(晉)王喜。拾遺記。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE