:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:所有權知覺的前導因素與後續效益--以中興紙業民營化為例
書刊名:人力資源管理學報
作者:林家五熊欣華林明志
作者(外文):Lin, Chia-waHsiung, Hsin-huaLin, Ming-chih
出版日期:2003
卷期:3:3
頁次:頁57-79
主題關鍵詞:國營事業民營化員工自行承接所有權知覺組織承諾工作行為State-owned enterprisesPrivatizationEmployees' raising funds to buy inPsychological ownershipOrganizational commitmentWork behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:35
國營事業在台灣產業中確有其歷史的必然與貢獻。但隨著經濟與產業發展,自由市場競爭的機制不斷地衝擊國營事業的營運與績效。重新檢討某些非重大工業資源或民生必需品之國營事業營運與績效,已屬燃眉之急。不可否認的,大部分國營事業的績效常常處於虧損的狀態,不但耗費國家資源,更或多或少阻礙了產業能力的提升與經濟的發展。在此背景下,中興紙業進行了首批由國營事業員工自行集資承接的民營化措施,「興中紙業」是其民營化後的存續公司。在民營化方式上,中興紙業採取員工集資自行承接的特殊作法,也進一步牽引出管理領域中相當重要的概念,所有權知覺的形成。為何所有權知覺重要呢?因為員工所有權知覺的高低會對員工後續的工作工作、行為表現與績效產生相當深遠的影響。因此,本研究針對民營化後興中紙業員工的所有權知覺、組織承諾以及工作行為表現等向度進行研究。研究者首先以參與觀察的方式整理出,促使「興中紙業」員工願意投資承接的原因,接著以問卷調查方式分析這些繼續留存員工的所有權知覺,並請員工的主管評估其在民營化後的工作行為表現。本研究共發出271 份問卷,回收159份有效問卷。在分析方法上,主要採取因素分析、相關分析、迴歸分析以及結構方程式模型分析等方式。研究結果發現,「未來性考量」此因素對員工的「擁有知覺」與「參與控制知覺」有顯著的影響,而高度「擁有知覺」的員工,其「努力承諾」與「留職承諾」相對也會比較高,至於「參與控制知覺」則僅對「努力承諾」有影響。而所有權知覺對工作行為則無直接的效果,必須透過組織承諾作為中介因素,才能進一步影響工作行為。顯示所有權知覺短期內確能改變員工的工作態度,但對實際的工作行為表現並無直接的影響。
State-owned enterprises exist with historical reason in Taiwan and have made great contributions in the past decades. However, as the economy and industry progress, Taiwan has transformed into a developed country, free-market system incessantly impacts on state-owned enterprises' operation and performance. Most of these enterprises are still in debts. Therefore, not only do they waste the national resources, but also retard the growth of economy and the improvement of industries more or less. In such circumstances, Taiwan Chung Hsing Paper Corporation took its privatization. It's the beginning that the employees of state-owned enterprise raise funds to buy their company. "Hsing Chung Paper Corporation" is the continuative company after privatization. Employees' raising funds for investment relates to a quite important managerial concept-psychological ownership. The employees' ownership perception may result in profound influence toward their work behaviors and performance. Consequently, this study focuses on several aspects, such as the employees' ownership perception, organizational commitment, and work performance in Hsing Chung Paper Corporation. Through questionnaire survey, researchers request the employees to rate their ownership perception, and ask their supervisors to evaluate the work performance after privatization. In sum, 271 questionnaires were delivered, and 159 qualified questionnaires were returned. Our analysis methods included factor analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling. The main findings are as follows. First, "future consideration" has significant effect on employees' "ownership perception" and "participation and control perception". Second, the higher the employees' "ownership perception" is, the higher the "commitment to work" and "commitment to stay" would be. Third, "participation and control perception" only affects "commitment to stay". Fourth, "ownership perception" has no direct effect on the working behaviors, only by means of the intervention of "organizational commitment", can it indirectly influences working behaviors. This indicates ownership perception can change employees' work attitudes in the short term, but create no direct effect on actual work performance.
期刊論文
1.Wheatley, M. J.、Kellner-Roger, M.(1996)。Self-organization: The Irresistible Future of Organizing。Strategy & Leadership,24(4),18-24。  new window
2.Pierce, Jon L.、Rubenfeld, Stephen A.、Morgan, Susan(1991)。Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects。The Academy of Management Review,16(1),121-144。  new window
3.Gioia, Dennis A.、Schultz, Majken、Corley, Kevin G.(2000)。Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability。Academy of Management Review,25(1),63-81。  new window
4.Baron, R. M.、Kenny, D. A.(198612)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182。  new window
5.Pierce, J. L.、Kostova, T.、Dirks, K. T.(2001)。Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations。Academy of Management Review,26(2),298-310。  new window
6.Wan-Huggins, Veronica N.、Riordan, Christine M.、Griffeth, Rodger W.(1998)。The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(8),724-749。  new window
7.Albert, S.、Ashforth, B. E.、Dutton, J. E.(2000)。Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges。Academy of management review,25(1),13-17。  new window
8.Steers, R. M.(1977)。Antecedents and Outcome of Organizational Commitment。Administrative Science Quarterly,22(1),46-56。  new window
9.Hogg, Michael A.、Terry, Deborah J.(2000)。Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts。Academy of Management Review,25(1),121-140。  new window
10.Morris, James H.、Sherman, J. Daniel(1981)。Generalizability of an organizational commitment model。Academy of Management Journal,24(3),512-526。  new window
11.黃國隆(19860500)。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。國立政治大學學報,53,左55-84。  延伸查詢new window
12.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550。  new window
13.Belk, Russell W.(1988)。Possessions and the Extended Self。Journal of Consumer Research,15(2),139-168。  new window
14.Lichtenstein, B. B.(2000)。Self-organized transitions: A pattern amid the chaos of transformative change。Academy of Management Executive,14(4),128-141。  new window
圖書
1.Dittmar, H.(1992)。The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
2.Mowday, R. T.、Porter, L.M.、Steers, R.M.(1982)。Employee organizational link ages : The psychology of commitment absenteeism, and turnover。New York:Academic Press。  new window
3.魏萼(1993)。中國式資本主義--臺灣邁向市場經濟之路。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yin, R. K.(1989)。Case Study Research--Design and Method。Newburry Park, Calif:Sage Publications。  new window
5.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
6.Heider, Fritz(1958)。The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.Festinger, Leon(1957)。A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance。Stanford University Press。  new window
8.Hackman, J. Richard、Oldham, Greg R.(1980)。Work Redesign。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
其他
1.許嘉棟(1983)。公營事業與民營事業經濟效率的計量分析--成本函數之應用。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bazerman, M. H., Giuliano, T. & Appelman, A.(1984)。Escalation in individual and group decisions making。  new window
3.Beggan, J. K. & Brown, E. M.(1994)。Association as a psychological justification for ownership。  new window
4.Brown, A. D. & Starkey, K.(2000)。Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective。  new window
5.Kubzansky, P. E. & Druskat, V. U.(1993)。Psychological sense of ownership in the workplace: Conceptualization and measurement。  new window
6.Mondy, R. W., Noe, R. M. & Premeaux, S. R.(1999)。Human resource management,NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Payne, T.(1996)。Management by behavior。  new window
8.Pratt, M. G. & Dutton, J. E.(2000)。Owning up or opting out: The role of identities and emotions in issue ownership,New York:Quorum。  new window
9.Pratt, M. G. & Foreman, P. O.(2000)。Classifying managerial response to multiple organizational identity。  new window
10.Rudmin, F. W.(1994)。Property,Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
11.Staw, B. M. & Ross, J.(1987)。Behavior in escalation situation。  new window
12.VandeWalle, D., Van Dyne, L. & Kostova, T.(1995)。Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequence。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pratt, Michael G.(1998)。To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification。Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE