:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:住宅改善之居住調整行為初探
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:靳燕玲華昌宜
作者(外文):Chin, Yen-lingHua, Chang-i
出版日期:2004
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁69-88
主題關鍵詞:住宅改善居住調整住宅需求遷移Home improvementHousing adjustmentHousing demandMigration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
居住者需求條件並非靜態的恆常不變,而是隨著住戶經過長年歲月人口不斷增減呈現動態的變化過程,住戶如何藉由動態的調整提昇居住品質?住戶如何因應及不同的選擇調整策略有哪些?多數研究取向多認為必須經由住戶遷徙來達成。然而「搬家」對台灣住戶而言是不易為之的決定,依據中央研究院民國八十八年華人動態家庭固定樣本追蹤(panel studies)調查結果,平均居住同一住宅時間約為11.33年,三年遷移率僅佔5.5%左右。相關研究將住戶遷移視為居住調整行為的重要觀察指標,忽略了對於不遷移住戶行為的探討。 事實上不遷移者並非處於消費均衡狀態,不遷移者可能透過人口增減、原屋改善、或是以消極忍耐因應調整,以達成短暫的均衡;另一方面,剛搬家的遷移者是否已調整達到居住消費的均衡?普遍存在的搬家改善行為亦隱含居住調整實際上是動態的回應住戶需求的變動。 國內有關住戶改善調整的討論及經驗資料十分缺乏,因此本研究初步探究住戶之居住品質提昇行為的意義,針對住戶在長期的居住需求改變進行居住質量調整的全貌提出概念性的分析架構,其次推估被忽略遺漏的住宅改善市場總體投入價值,以及住宅質量提升效果,藉此點出房屋改善在住宅研究領域及相關政策之重要性。
Due to continued changes of the population in the family, the needs of different stages of the life cycle for housing is dynamic. Most research approach considers that the equilibrium can be reached through migration. However, Taiwan is a society of low mobility; “relocation” to the average Taiwan household is a decision that does not come by easily. In terms of a dynamic household panel study conducted by the Academia Sinica (中央研究院) in 1999, the results showed that the length of time an average household lives in one residence is about 11.33 years, 3-year relocation rate was only about 5.5%. In fact, the non-relocating households are not at a state of expenditure balance. Non-relocating households may possibly through addition or reduction of population, furnishing of residence or by pessimistic endurance adjust to reach temporary balance. The common behavior of furnishing a residence when relocating to a new residence implies that housing adjustment is actually a dynamic response to the need of households to change. In any case, there is a lack of domestic discussion and experience data relating to household furnishing adjustment. Therefore this study preliminary investigates the meaning of household behavior in promoting living quality, and provides a conceptual framework for the analysis of housing adjustment under changes of long term housing demand. Then the value of the market for home improvements and housing quality improvement effect that has been overlooked is estimated. Through this investigation, the general status of housing improving demand in the Taiwan area is looked into, and the importance of housing improvement in housing studies and relevant policies are pointed out.
期刊論文
1.Brummell(1979)。A Model of Intraurban Mobility。Economic Geography,55,338-352。  new window
2.Alden, Speare Jr.(1974)。Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility。Demography,11(2),173-188。  new window
其他
1.中央研究院(1999)。民國八十八年華人動態家庭資料庫。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部營建署(2001)。中華民國九十年台閩地區各縣市建築執照統年報。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處(1980)。中華民國六十九年臺閩地區人口與住宅普查報告。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院主計處(1990)。中華民國七十九年臺閩地區戶口及住宅普查報告。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院主計處(1992)。中華民國八十一年台灣地區國內遷徙調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院主計處(1993)。中華民國八十二年住宅狀況調查。  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院主計處(1998)。台灣地區國富調查。  延伸查詢new window
8.行政院主計處(1999)。中華民國臺灣地區家庭收支調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院主計處(2000)。中華民國八十九年臺閩地區戶口及住宅普查報告。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院主計處(1996)。中華民國統計年鑑。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳建良(2000)。住宅租擁、世代組成與家計儲蓄間關係之探討-以台灣家計收支調查為對象的分析。  延伸查詢new window
12.Amanda Littlewood and Moira Munro(1996)。Explaining Disrepair:Examining Owner Occupiers’ Repair and Maintenance Behaviour。  new window
13.Amanda Littlewood and Moira Munro(1997)。Moving and Improving: Strategies for Attaining Housing Equilibrium。  new window
14.Brown, D. L., E. G., Moore(1970)。The Intraurban Migration Process: A Perspective。  new window
15.Clark,W. A. V., J. L., Onaka(1983)。Life Cycle and Housing Adjustment as Explanations of Residential Mobility。  new window
16.Edgan O. Olsen(1969)。A Competitive Theory of the Housing Market。  new window
17.Hoang Huu Phe and Patrick Wakely(2000)。Status, Quality and the Other Trade-off: Towards a New Theory of Urban Residential Location。  new window
18.Keith Ray Ihlanfeldt(1981)。A Empirical Investigation of Alternative Approaches to Estimating the Equilibrium Demand for Housing。  new window
19.Kermit Baker and Bulbul Kaul(2002)。Using Multiperiod Varibles in the Analysis of Home Improvement Decisions by Homeowners。  new window
20.Moira Munro and Philip Leather(2000)。Nest-Building or investing in the future? Owner-occupiers’ home improvement behaviour。  new window
21.N.H.Seek(1983)。Adjusting Housing Consumption: Improve or Move。  new window
22.Per-Anders Edin and Peter Englund(1991)。Moving costs and housing demand: Are recent movers really in equilibrium?。  new window
23.Robert Mendelsohn(1977)。Empirical Evidence on Home Improvements。  new window
24.Sounders, P.(1990)。A Nation of Home Owners。  new window
25.Weinberg, D. H.(1979)。The Determinants of Intra-Urban Household Mobility。  new window
26.Wolpert, J.(1966)。Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress。  new window
27.Council for Economic Planning and Development(2002)。Taiwan Statistical Data Book。  new window
圖書論文
1.Muth, Richard F.(1960)。The Demand for Non-Farm Housing。The Demand for Durable Goods。University of Chicago press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE