:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:BOT計畫投資時點選擇之價值評估--以大鵬灣國家風景區為例
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:陳明吉 引用關係蘇培魁羅容恆
作者(外文):Chen, Ming-chiSu, Pei-kueiLo, Henry Y.
出版日期:2004
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁825-853
主題關鍵詞:遞延選擇權投資決策民間參與投資公共建設Option to deferInvestment decision-makingBOT
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:49
傳統現金流量折現法之基於目前的時點作決策,無法考慮未來做決策之彈性價值。然而投資環境常是多變的,因此決策者可採取等待策略,當投資有利潤時,再執行投資開發。在目前民間參與投資公共建設計畫中(BOT)中,優先議約權可被特許公司用來決開發時機,此乃類似選擇權理論中之遞延選擇權,因此可用來估計此不確定性中所隱含的投資時點價值。本研究以「大鵬灣國家風景區開發案」為例,進行投資時點選擇之價值評估,結果發現,此BOT專案僅以傳統淨現值評估會使得計畫中的民間管理彈性價值遭到低估。而變異數、存續期間兩者與實質選擇權有正向關係,這反應出選擇權的特性,亦即未來市場狀況的變動情形將會帶給投資計畫正向的貢獻。
Investment decision-making is based on the current time-point for the traditional discounted cash flow model, which is unable to estimate the value of uncertainly. However, the economic environment is always changing. Investment decision hence can be deferred until situation is favorable. In the project of Built-Operate-Transfer, the right of contract negotiation can be used to decide the timing of an investment for the concessionaire. The theory of option to defer would be an appropriate methodology for evaluating the right of contract negotiation. Therefore, this study examines the value of investment timing by using the Case of Tepeng Bay National Science Area. The results suggest that the value of the project is underestimated by the traditional net present value method. The variance and duration has positive relationship with value of real option, indicating the choice of timing has contributions of the project’s value.
期刊論文
1.Dixit, Avinash K.、Pindyck, Robert S.(1995)。The Options Approach to Capital Investment。Harvard Business Review,73(3),105-115。  new window
2.Luehrman, Timothy A.(1998)。Strategy as a portfolio of real options。Harvard Business Review,76(5),89-100。  new window
3.Titman, Sheridan(1985)。Urban land prices under uncertainty。The American Economic Review,75(3),505-514。  new window
4.Smit, Han T. J.、Ankum, L. A.(1993)。A Real Options and Game-Theoretic Approach to Corporate Investment Strategy under Competition。Financial Management,22(3),241-250。  new window
5.Trigeorgis, L.、Mason, S. P.(1987)。Valuing Managerial Flexibility。Midland Corporate Finance Journal,5(1),14-21。  new window
6.Quigg, Laura(1993)。Empirical Testing of Real Option-pricing Models。Journal of Finance,48(2),621-640。  new window
7.Geske, Robert(1979)。The Valuation of Compound Options。The Journal of Financial Economics,7(1),63-81。  new window
8.Myers, Stewart C.(1977)。Determinants of Corporate Borrowing。Journal of Financial Economics,5(2),147-175。  new window
9.Cox, John C.、Ross, Stephen A.、Rubinstein, Mark(1979)。Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach。Journal of Financial Economics,7(3),229-263。  new window
10.Luehrman, T. A.(1998)。Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers。Harvard Business Review,76(4),102-116。  new window
11.王健安(1998)。資本投資計畫評核術的新觀念-實質選擇權之理論與實證方法的文獻回顧。臺灣土地金融季刊,35(4),75-99。  延伸查詢new window
12.李志文(1988)。Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty: the Issue of Optimal Timing。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,15(2),155-168。  new window
13.Teisberg, E. O.(1994)。An Option Valuation Analysis of Investment Choices by a Regulated Firm。Management Science,40(4),535-548。  new window
學位論文
1.邢志航(1998)。引用獎參條例進行開發財務評估之研究--以民間參與興建觀光遊憩設施為 例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李宗政(1999)。民間參與投資BOT交通建設之決策分析--相關開發機會之考量(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.涂新南(2001)。實質選擇權在BOT資本投資決策之應用-以高雄捷運為例,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.許光華(2000)。專案融資風險之評估與分析-臺灣高鐵計劃個案研究,沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃志強(2000)。民間參與港埠設施投資興建及經營管理方式之研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.倪成彬(2000)。中長期授信實務。中長期授信實務。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.Amram, M.、Kulatilaka, N.(1999)。Real Options。Real Options。沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Hull, J. C.(1997)。Options, Futures, and the Other Derivatives。Options, Futures, and the Other Derivatives。N. J.。  new window
其他
1.交通部觀光局(2001)。大鵬灣國家風景區整體開發構想報告,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部觀光局(2001)。民間參與大鵬灣國家風景區(BOT)先期規劃書,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top