:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:清朝駐外使館的設立--以考慮清朝決策派遣駐外使節的過程及其目的為中心
書刊名:臺灣師大歷史學報
作者:箱田惠子
作者(外文):Hakoda, Keiko
出版日期:2005
卷期:33
頁次:頁169-195
主題關鍵詞:外交駐外公館自強運勳李鴻章赫德DiplomacyPermanent legation abroadSelf-strengthening movementLi Hong-zhangRobert Hart
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:220
本報告的目的是讓大家進一步加深對十九世紀後半清朝派遣駐外使節的了解。從前,由清朝派遣駐外使節被認為是清朝適應近代西方“條約體制”的一環。因此,以前的研究只集中到赫德(R. Hart)等在華外國人的思想影響及清朝的對應上。考察清朝決定派遣使節過程的徐中約(I. Hsü)的研究代表了這樣的觀點;他說明了,條約改訂的日期在即,為了避開西洋諸國附加要求而被派遣的蒲安臣使節團的成功,使派遣使節的重要性給清朝官僚們留下了印象,而且牡丹社事件(1874年)的刺激及於馬嘉理(Margary)案與威妥瑪(T. Wade)交涉等事件使清朝理解了赫德等提倡的派遣使節的必要性。 本報告,從與上述觀點不同的角度,對李鴻章等清朝地方督撫對於派遣使節的意見和政策決定上的作用加以考慮,進行研究,得出以下的三個結論。一、雖然總理衙門與李鴻章都對蒲安臣使節團很成興趣,但他們有各自的企圖;一方面負責條約改訂交涉的總理衙門,為了避開迫使中國改革的西洋諸國的要求,需要派遣蒲安臣使節團,一方面李鴻章認為派遣使節不僅有進一步加強中國與西洋社會聯係的作用,而且能夠促進自強活動。二、受到杜丹社事件的打擊,清朝痛感自強活動的必要,於是決定了派遣駐外使節。可是,對於政策決定過程,總理衙門起了使李鴻章與守舊派保持均勢的作用。三、雖然赫德與李鴻章都了解,駐外使節會促進中國改革,但是赫德徹底站在總理衙門為中國外交政策中心的立場上,因此,他實際上與自強活動領導核心的李鴻章對立了。
This paper tries to achieve a better understanding of the Qing Dynasty's diplomatic representation abroad in the late 19(superscript th) century. China's dispatch of envoys has long been considered one of its political responses to the ”treaty system” introduced by the strong Western powers. Previous research has focused mainly on influential foreigners in China, such as R Hart, and Qing's reactions to them. Among these studies, I. Hsü's study of how the Qing made decisions to dispatch envoys is representative. Hsü showed that the success of the Burlingame mission, which had been dispatched to prevent further demands from Western powers, impressed on the Qing the importance of foreign missions. He also noted that several incidents, such as the Formosa Incident of 1874, and contacts with foreigners, such as the negotiations with T. Wade on the Margary Incident in 1875 and 1876, made the Qing realize the necessity of dispatching diplomatic representatives abroad, as Hart and others had suggested. In contrast to approach summarized above, this paper tries to bring attention to the Qing side, discussing how influential provincial officials, such as Li Hong-zhang, thought and acted in the decision-making process. Three conclusions have been reached as a result of this approach. First, although both the Zong-li Yamen and Li Hong-zhang approved the Burlingame mission, they had different concerns. The Zong-li Yamen, which was responsible for the negotiations of treaty revisions, welcomed the mission because it helped the Zong-li Yamen avoid further demands that would force the Qing to reform; Li, on the other hand, realized that foreign missions would let China conclude commitments with the West and then would be a help in his promotion of the self-strengthening movement. Second, the Formosa Incident made the Qing realize the need for self-strengthening and to agree to dispatch envoys, but in the policy-making process, the Zong-li Yamen functioned as the ”buffer” between Li, the reformer, and other conservatives. Third, although both Hart and Li understood that the dispatch of foreign mission would spur reform in China, Hart's insistence that the Zong-li Yamen as the central institute in the Qing court be the sole office in charge of its diplomacy sharpened his differences with Li.
期刊論文
1.Biggerstaff, Knight(1936)。The Establishment of Permanent Chinese Diplomatic Mission Abroad。The Chinese Social and Political Science Review,20。  new window
2.箱田惠子(2002)。試析清末領事的派遣--以一八六〇、一八七〇年代的議論為中心。東洋史研究,60(4),39-71。  延伸查詢new window
3.張富強(1991)。李鴻章與清末遣使駐外。廣東社會科學,2,46-51。  延伸查詢new window
4.園田節子(1999)。出使大臣アメリ力大臣の「洋務」と「僑務」--南北アメリ力への「ひと」の移動と清國常駐使節の設立。年報地域文化研究,3,189-209。  延伸查詢new window
5.Biggerstaff, K.(1950)。The secret correspondence of 1867-1868: views of leading Chinese statesmen regarding the future opening of China to western influence。Journal of Modern History,22(2)。  new window
6.Hsü, I. C. Y.(1965)。The Great Policy Debate in China, 1874: Maritime Defense vs. Frontier Defense。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,25。  new window
7.劉石吉(1971)。清季海防與塞防之爭的研究。故宮文獻,2(3),37-59。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王曾才(1988)。自強運動時期中國外交制度的發展。清季自強運動研討會。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。131-156。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hsü, I. C. Y.(1960)。China's Entrance into the Family of the Nations: The Diplomatic Phase 1858-1880。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.陳體強(1945)。中國外交行政。重慶:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wong, Owen Hong-hin(1987)。A New Profile in Sino-Western Diplomacy: The First Chinese Minister to Great Britain。中華書局。  new window
4.坂野正高(1973)。近代中國政治外交史。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Williams, F. W.(1912)。Anson Burlingame and the First Chinese Mission。New York:C. Scribner。  new window
6.Morse, H. B.(1918)。The International Relations of the Chinese Empire。Shanghai。  new window
7.片岡一忠(1991)。清朝新疆統治研究。東京:雄山閣出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Wan, S. T.(1940)。The Margary Affair and the Chefoo Agreement。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.岑練英(1978)。中英煙臺條約的研究。香港:珠海書院中國文學歷史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fairbank, J. K.(1876)。The I. G. in Peking。  new window
11.Campbell, Robert Ronald(1970)。James Duncan Campbell: A Memoir by His Son。Harbard University Press。  new window
12.王立誠(1991)。中國近代外交制度史。蘭州:甘肅人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Anderson, David L.(1985)。Imperialism and Idealism, American Diplomats in China, 1861-1898。Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press。  new window
14.Boulger, D. C.(1908)。The Life of Sir Halliday Macartney。London:J. Lane, the Bodley Head。  new window
15.Wright, Stanley F.(1950)。Hart and the Chinese Customs。WM. Mullan & Son。  new window
16.包遵彭(1970)。中國海軍史。中華叢書編審委員會。  延伸查詢new window
17.林慶元(1986)。福建船政局史稿。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Wright, Mary Clabaugh(1957)。The Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism: The T'ung-Chih Restoration, 1862-1874。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
其他
1.(18691109)。Note on Chinese Matters。  new window
2.(18750909)。Archives of China is Imperial Maritime Customs。  new window
圖書論文
1.中國第一歷史檔案館、福建師範大學歷史系(1985)。清末駐外使臣年表。清季中外使領年表。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.王曾才(1985)。中國駐英使館的建設。中國近現代史論集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.坂野正高(1970)。同治年間(一八六二--一八七四年)の條約論議。近代中國外交史研究。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.同治五年二月丙午附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺附「總稅務司赫德遞局外旁觀論」。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
5.同治五年正月丙寅附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
6.同治六年九月乙丑附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺附「總理衡門條說」。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
7.同治六年十月甲辰附,陝甘總督左宗棠奏摺。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
8.同治六年十一月庚午附,總理船政前江西巡撫沈葆楨奏摺。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
9.同治七年十二月甲子附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺附「美國公使照會」。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
10.同治八年九月丁亥附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺附「英使阿禮國節略」。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
11.同治六年十二月乙酉附,湖廣總督李鴻章奏摺附「李鴻章條款」。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
12.同治九年丙寅附,總理各國恭親王等奏摺。籌辦夷務始末。  延伸查詢new window
13.「論臺灣」,同治十三年四月二十一日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
14.「籌辦鐵甲兼遣使片」,同治十三年十一月初二日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
15.「復沈幼丹節帥」,同治十三年四月十八日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
16.「復文博川中堂」,同治十三年十一月初四日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1961)。光緒元年二月二十七日附,禮親王世鐸等奏摺。洋務運動。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.(1961)。光緒元年四年二十六日附,總理各國事務恭親王等奏摺附單。洋務運動。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.「籌議海防摺附奏摺議覆各條清單」,同治十三年十一月初二日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
20.(1961)。光緒元年二月二十七日附,通政使於凌辰奏摺。洋務運動。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1961)。光緒元年二月二十七日附,大理寺少卿王家璧奏摺附片。洋務運動。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.周家楣。擬奏覆海防事宜疏。期不負齋全集。  延伸查詢new window
23.王繩祖(1981)。馬嘉里案和煙臺條約。中英關係論叢。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.(1876)。Correspondence respecting the Attack on the Indian Expedition to Western China, and the Murder of Mr. Margary, 1876; No.36, Wade to Derby, Aug.26, 1875。British Parliamentary Papers, China。  new window
25.(1876)。Inclosure in No.34, Memorandum for the Information of his Excellency the Grand Secretary Li, Aug.ll, 1875。British Parliamentary Papers, China。  new window
26.(1876)。Inclosure in No.36, Memorandum from the Tsung-li Yamen in reply to Mr. Wade’s Memorandum of August 11, address to the Grand Secretary Li, Aug. 22, 1875。British Parliamentary Papers, China。  new window
27.「論滇案不宜決裂」,光緒元年七月二十四日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
28.「復郭意城內輪」,光緒元年十二月初四日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
29.坂野正高(1973)。ロバート•ハ一卜。近代中國政治外交史。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
30.岡本隆司(1999)。清末總稅務司的設立。近代中國與海關。名古屋:名古屋大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
31.「復赫德條議並請速遣使」,光緒二年閏五月二十日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
32.「與赫德總稅司問答說略」,光緒二年閏五月十九日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
33.「論遣使」,光緒二年閏五月二十七日附。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
34.「覆幼丹制軍」,光緒元年七月十九日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
35.「論遣官駐日本」,光緒元年八月二十五日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
36.光緒二年四月十四日,復李丹崖部郎。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
37.巴斯蒂•瑪麗昂娜、張富強、趙軍(1991)。清末赴歐的留學生們--福州船政局引進近代技術的前前後後。辛亥革命史叢刊。台北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
38.「議派弁赴德學習」,光緒二年三月初四日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
39.「復丁雨生中丞」,光緒二年三月初六日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
40.「致沈幼丹制軍」,光緒二年三月十七日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
41.「議選員管帶學生分赴任各國學習」,光緒二年八月二十五日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
42.「復郭筠仙侍郎」,光緒二年三月初八日。李鴻章全集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE