:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鄉村社區賦權問題之探討:以六龜鄉與茂林鄉為例
書刊名:臺灣鄉村研究
作者:王培蓉鄭欽龍
作者(外文):Wang, Pei-jungZheng, Chin-long
出版日期:2006
卷期:6
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:鄉村發展公眾參與賦權資源管理Rural developmentPublic participationEmpowermentResource management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
社區參與是鄉村發展計畫的重要手段,但一些開發中國家的研究指出有些社區參與計畫僅滿足社區內權力階層的利益,忽略婦女及窮人的需要及參與機會,反而加劇社區內不同團體在社經層面的差距。基於賦權觀點,本文分析六龜和茂林兩鄉地方領袖與一般居民對社區發展目標和過程的差異。計有35人經地位威望法被選為地方領袖,其中大多數是男性地方民選官員與民代。本研究在2003年和2004年舉辦四場地方發展座談會,並記錄與會者發言意見,研究發現,地方領袖與一般居民對地方發展的目標與方法的看法一致,但在公眾參與的表達態度和技巧上有明顯差別。就一般居民而言,理想的賦權與其實際仍有距離。
Community participation is an important approach for rural development projects; however, some studies in developing countries pointed out that public participation projects might satisfy only those in power and neglected the needs and opportunities of women and the poor. The kind of projects even deepened the socio-economical gap among different groups in a community. Based on the viewpoint of empowerment, the study analyzed the differences of aims and process of public participation between local leaders and residents of Liukuei and Moulin communes. There were 35 local leaders identified by positional-reputation method, and most of them were male and reputed due to their political status. Four local forums on communal development were hold in 2003 and 2004 and the relevant opinions were recorded. From forums, we found that local leaders and residents had consistency of the goal and means of communal development, but they had a significant gap of the attitude and communication skill of implementing public participation between each other. For common residents, there was certain distance from the ideal empowerment.
期刊論文
1.賴爾柔(19991200)。Empowering Communities through Implementing an Integrated Reconstruction Development Program in Taiwan: With a Case Study of Bai-Mi Community。農業推廣學報,16,83-102。  new window
2.鄭欽龍、古曉燕(19990300)。社區林經營與公眾參與。中華林學季刊,32(1)=124,79-89。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪廣冀、鄭欽龍(20010600)。地方觀光的發展與困境--新竹司馬庫斯原住民部落的個案研究。中華林學季刊,34(2),229-239。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bhattacharya, A.、Basnyat, B.(2003)。Empowering people through Joint Forest Management: a study from Madhya Pradesh (India)。International Forestry Review,5(4),370-378。  new window
5.王培蓉、鄭欽龍(2001)。社區居民集體行動之研究--以多納村民對森林議題反應之個案分析。國立臺灣大學農學院實驗林研究報告,15(3),223-235。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kyem, P.(2004)。Power, participation, and inflexible institutions: An examination of the challenges to community empowerment in participatory GIS applications。Cartographica,38(3/4),5-18。  new window
7.Lin, H.(2004)。Community forestry initiatives in Myanmar: an analysis from a social perspective。International Forestry Review,6(2),79-88。  new window
8.O'Brien, D.、Raedeke, A.、Hassinger, E.(1998)。The social networks of leaders in more or less viable communities six years later: a research note。Rural Sociology,63(1),109-127。  new window
9.Smith, P. D.、Chhetri, B.、Regmi, B.(2003)。Meeting the needs of Nepal's poor: creating local criteria and indicators of community forestry。Journal of Forestry,101(5),24-30。  new window
10.Storey, D.(1999)。Issues of Integration, participation and empowerment in rural development: the case of LEADER in the Republic of Ireland。Journal of Rural Studies,15(3),307-315。  new window
11.Westphal, L. M.(2003)。Urban greening and social benefits: a study of empowerment outcomes。Journal of Arboriculture,29(3),137-147。  new window
12.Pretty, J. N.(1997)。The sustainable intensification of agriculture: Making the most of the land。The Land,1(1),45-65。  new window
會議論文
1.王培蓉、鄭祈全(2000)。森林經營對地方社區發展影響之研究--以高雄縣茂林鄉多納村為例。森林資源保育與經營研討會。台北:林業試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bass, S.、Dalal-Clayton, B.、Pretty, J.(1995)。Participation in Strategies for Sustainable Development。London:International Institute for Environment and Development。  new window
2.六龜鄉公所(1985)。六龜鄉誌。高雄:六龜鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
3.茂林鄉公所(1987)。茂林鄉志。高雄:茂林鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ostrom, E.、Schroeder, L.、Wynne, S.(1993)。Institutional incentive and sustainable development: infrastructure policies in perspective。Boulder:Westview Press。  new window
其他
1.王培蓉(2001)。六龜試驗林社會人文影響評估計畫,台北:林業試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
2.茂林鄉公所(1999)。茂林鄉綜合建設規劃,高雄:茂林鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Crawley, H.(1998)。Living up to the empowerment claim? The potential of PRA。The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development。London:Intermediate Technology Publications。  new window
2.Guijt, I.、Shah, M.(1998)。Waking up to power, process and conflict。The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development。London:Intermediate Technology Publications。  new window
3.Sarin, M.(1998)。Community forest managements: whose participation...?。The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development。London:Intermediate Technology Publications。  new window
4.Shah, M. K.(1998)。'Salt and spices': addressing gender issues in participatory programme implementation in ADRSP, India。The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development。London:Intermediate Technology Publications。  new window
5.World Bank(2002)。What is empowerment?。Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: a Sourcebook。Baltimore:World Bank。  new window
6.Servaes, J.(1996)。Introduction: Participatory communication and research in development settings。Participatory Communication for Social Change。Thousand Oaks:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE