:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:全球轉化脈絡下的憲政改造
書刊名:國家發展研究
作者:李佩珊 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Pei-Shan
出版日期:2006
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁1-19
主題關鍵詞:憲政改造制度聚合聯盟動態分析Constitutional restructuringInstitutional convergenceCoalitional dynamic analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
在歷經一九九零年代的六次修憲之後,台灣的憲政體制爭論仍然無法塵埃落定,逐步落實發展為民主政體下的立憲主義,在第三波民主化的國家中,屬於尚未穩定的憲政體制。本文從國內政治動態與國際結構交互影響的角度,探討憲政改造的機會結構,以理解台灣憲政體制演變的脈絡,並探索幾種可能的出路。本文提一個貫穿國際結構與國內政治的聯盟動態分析:一國的憲政秩序若欲穩固生根,其國內的憲政聯盟(constitutional coalition)必須取得多數民意的支持,而且其憲改主張與所處之國際秩序必須相容,這個憲政秩序才有可能成為政體最高層次的治理原則(the first-level order),在其指導下展開政治體制的重整與民主遊戲規則的制訂。當國內憲政爭議的任何一方無法取得多數民意支持時,便只能在民主化的動態過程中迂迴漸進,此時互相競爭的政治勢力都會以憲政改革作為政治鬥爭的場域,犧牲了長治久安的憲政秩序。當執政者不斷的以制訂新憲或修改憲法,作為鞏固其統治聯盟(ruling coalition)的利益或圍堵其他政黨的手段時,憲政不穩定的惡性循環於焉展開。對外而言,國內憲政聯盟的偏好(preferences)與制度選擇必須與國際體系的結構、價值與理念相容,才有鞏固發展的前景。
Having gone through six rounds of constitutional revisions in the 1990s, Taiwan's constitutional controversy is yet to be settled and the prospect of a consolidated democracy is yet to be seen. This paper presents a coalitional dynamic analysis under which international structure and domestic politics are integrated in explaining the genesis and evolution of constitutional restructuring in Taiwan. Constitutional consolidation will only occur when domestic constitutional coalition obtains majority support and its preferences and institutions must be compatible with the dominant values and ideas in international society.
期刊論文
1.Linz, Juan J.(1990)。The Perils of Presidentialism。Journal of Democracy,1(1),51-69。  new window
2.Linz, Juan J.(1990)。The Virtues of Parliamentarism。Journal of Democracy,1(4),73-91。  new window
3.Mainwaring, Scott(1993)。Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination。Comparative Political Studies,26(2),198-228。  new window
4.Horowitz, Donald L.(1993)。Democracy in Divided Societies。Journal of Democracy,4(4),18-38。  new window
圖書
1.Horowitz, Donald L.(1991)。A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society。University of California Press。  new window
2.Tsebelis, George(2002)。Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work。New York:Russell Sage Foundation Press。  new window
3.Przeworski, Adam、Alvarez, Michael E.、Cheibub, José Antonio、Limongi, Fernando(2000)。Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Linz, Juan J.、Valenzuela, Arturo(1994)。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives。Baltimore, Maryland:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
5.Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamic。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Sartori, Giovanni(1997)。Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes。New York, NY:New York University Press。  new window
7.Skach, Cindy(2005)。Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.李佩珊(2003)。政權移轉與民主治理:南韓經驗與啟示。  延伸查詢new window
2.Croissant, Aurel(2003)。Legislative Powers, Veto Players, and the Emergence of Delegative Democracy: A Comparison of Presidentialism in the Philippines and South Korea。  new window
3.Dimitrova, Antoaneta and Geoffrey Pridham(2004)。International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and Its Limits。  new window
4.Hollifield, James F. and Calvin Jillson(2000)。Pathways to Democracy: The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions。  new window
5.Munck, Gerardo L. and Carol Skalnik Leff(1999)。Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective。  new window
6.Reed, Steven R. and Michael F. Thies(2001)。The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan。  new window
7.Saxer, Carl J.(2003)。Democratic Transition and Institutional Crafting: The South Korean Case。  new window
8.Schmitz, Hans Peter(2004)。Domestic and Transnational Perspectives on Democratization。  new window
9.Sharman, J. C. and Roger E. Kanet(2000)。International Influences on Democratization in Postcommunist Europe。  new window
10.Solingen, Etel(1998)。Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy。  new window
11.Stanger, A.(2004)。How Important are New Constitutions for Democratic Consolidation? Lessons from the Post-Communist States。  new window
12.Stepan, Alfred(2001)。Arguing Comparative Politics。  new window
13.Valenzuela, Arturo(2000)。External Actors in the Transitions to Democracy in Latin America。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shugart, Matthew Soberg、Wattenberg, Martin P.(2001)。Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and Typology。Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE