:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「無知的理解」:蘇格拉底與盧梭的兩種德行觀
書刊名:國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:苑舉正 引用關係
作者(外文):Yuann, Jeu-jenq
出版日期:2007
卷期:33
頁次:頁91-132
主題關鍵詞:蘇格拉底盧梭無知德行SocratesJ.-J. RousseauIgnoranceVirtue
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
「無知的理解」(the understanding of ignorance )可以視作一種對於蘇格拉底思想的表達方式。盧梭即曾經在他的〈論科學與藝術〉中,直接以這種表達方式,作為蘇格拉底有關「德行」論述的代表思想。本文主要的論證,在於說明,盧梭引用蘇格拉底在《辯護篇》(Apology)中的章節,並非全然為發展自己觀點所作,而確實符合蘇格拉底有關「德行」的看法。然而,在如是說的同時,我們並不因此而認為蘇格拉底與盧梭抱持著相同的「德行觀」。我們企圖指出,雖然這兩位哲學家的德行觀皆與「無知」相關,但是在針對「德行為何?」這個問題上,兩人各自有不同的看法。所以,我們擬在「無知的理解」的這個主要標題之下,區分這兩位哲學家有關「德行」的論述。在行文過程中,我們先看盧梭的引文,並且提出一些文獻,說明針對這一部份所引發的對立觀點。然後,我們將針對蘇格拉底的「德行觀」做論述。我們將先針對「蘇格拉底的思想」與「以蘇格拉底為代表所表達的柏拉圖思想」之間作區隔後,解析「統一的德行即知識」與「無知的理解」這兩個概念。然後,我們將依照類似的架構,闡述盧梭的「德行觀」。最後,我們將從盧梭的角度,說明在其〈論科學與藝術〉中,引用蘇格拉底的觀點,成功地將「無知即德行」引伸成為「自然賦予人德行」觀點外,也表達了他本人與蘇格拉底在「德行觀」上的精神契合。
“Ignorance” is generally considered a simplified form of expressing Socrates’ philosophy. Rousseau, once cited this expression in his Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, has explicitly portrayed it as the core idea of Socrates’ view of virtue. The main argument of this paper will proceed to prove that passages of Apology cited by Rousseau are not made intentionally to further develop his own ideas. Instead, they do manifest an essential part of Socrates’ view of virtue. Having proved so, we nonetheless aware also that Socrates and Rousseau remain to be different concerning their views of virtue. They both hold “ignorance” being crucial in ethical significance; yet differ in its reference. Hence, we endeavor to distinguish their views on the basis of the label “understanding ignorance to be virtuous”. In the order of this article, we will proceed to see first of all Rousseau’s citation of Socrates’ words. Then, we move to a documentary analysis concerning the divergent opinions about this citation. After that, we illustrate Socrates’ view of virtue by distinguishing Socrates’ own thought from that of Plato in the persona of Socrates. With this distinction, we then approach to an examination of “the unity of virtue is knowledge” and “the understanding of ignorance”. With a similar structure of analysis, we finally come to the exposition of Rousseau’s view of virtue. We will vindicate that in Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, Rousseau successfully extended Socrates’ ideas from “admitting ignorance” to that “nature makes all people virtuous”. With this success, this article, while making explicit the divergence of their views of virtue, demonstrates a “spiritual correspondence” between Socrates and Rousseau.
期刊論文
1.Bingham, A. R.。Trousson's Socrate devant Voltaire, Diderot, et Rousseau。Modern Language Journal,53,208-209。  new window
2.Goulemot, J.-M.。La politique selon Jean-Jacques。Magazine Littéraire,357,41-43。  new window
3.Gourevitch, V.。Rousseau on the Arts and Sciences。The Journal of Philosophy,69(20),737-754。  new window
4.Leborgne, Ē.。Chronologie。Magazine Littéraire,357,21-22。  new window
5.Orwin, C.。Rousseau's Socratism。Journal of Politics,60(1),174-187。  new window
6.Strauss, L.。On the Intention of Rousseau。Social research,14(4),455-487。  new window
7.Todorov, T.。Le Rousseau que je l'aime。Magazine Littèraire,357,19-21。  new window
圖書
1.Hamilton, Edith、Cairns, Huntington、Plato(1961)。Plato: The Collected Dialogues。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Rousseau, J. J.、何兆武(1997)。論科學與藝術。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.Vlastos, G.、Bumyeat, M. F.(1994)。Socratic Studies。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques、李常山(1997)。論人類不平等的起源和基礎。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Popper, Karl R.(1997)。The Lesson of This Century: With Two Talks in Freedom and the Democratic State。Routledge。  new window
6.Cranston, M. Jean-Jacques(1982)。The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712-1754。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Cranston, M. Jean-Jacques(1991)。The Noble Savage. Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1754-1762。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Hulliung, M.(1994)。The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Plato、Auberger, J.、Leroux, G.(1989)。Le Banquet。Paris:Hachette。  new window
10.Plato(1900)。Platonis Opera。Paris:Fermin-Didot。  new window
11.Reeve, C.(1989)。Socrates in the Apology。Indianapolis, Indiana:Hackett。  new window
12.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques(1971)。Discours sur les Sciences et les Arts and Discours sur l'Origine de l'Inégalité。Paris:Garnier-Flammarion。  new window
13.Roussea, Jean-Jacques(1964)。Oeuvres complètes, a la bibliothèque de la Pléiade。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
14.Rousseau, Jea、Masters, R.、Hanover, N. H.(1992)。Discourse on the Sciences and Arts。University Press of New England。  new window
15.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques(1992)。Discourse on the Origins of Inequality。  new window
16.Rousseau, JeanJacque、Gourevitch, V.(1997)。The First and Second Discourses Together with the Replies to Critics and Essay on the Origin and Languages。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Trousson, R.(1967)。Socrate devant Voltaire, Diderot, et Rousseau. La Conscience en face du Mythe。Paris:Minard。  new window
18.Trousson, R.(1981)。Thèmes et Mythes。Bruxelles:Ēditions de l'Université de Bruxelles。  new window
19.Vlastos, Gregory(1991)。Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brandwood, L.(1992)。Stylometry and chronology。The Cambridge Companion to Plato。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Brès, Y.(1989)。Parcours Philosophique。Plato, Le Banquet。Paris:Hachette。  new window
3.Cooper, J.(1998)。Socrates。Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy。London:Routledge。  new window
4.Davidson, D.(1990)。Plato's Philebus。Harvard Dissertations in Philosophy。New York:Garland。  new window
5.Davidson, D.(2005)。Dialectic and Dialogue。Truth, Language and History。Oxford:Clarendon。  new window
6.Gagnebin, B.(1964)。Les ecrits politiques。Oeuvres complètes, a la bibliothèque de la Pléiade。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
7.Gully, N.(1968)。Confession of ignorance。The Philosophy of Socrates。London:Macmillian。  new window
8.Penner, T.(1992)。The Unity of Virtue。Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates。Oxford:Oxford university Press。  new window
9.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques(1946)。Discours sur les Sciences et les Arts。Edition critique avec une introduction et un commentaire par G. R. Havens。New York:The modern Language Association。  new window
10.Roger, J.(1971)。[Discours sur les Sciences et les Arts et Discours sur l’Origine de l’Inégalité] Introduction。Discours sur les Sciences et les Arts et Discours sur l’Origine de l’Inégalité。Paris:Garnier-Flammarion。  new window
11.Schofield, M.(1998)。Plato。Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy。London:Routledge。  new window
12.Steward, H.(1998)。Akrasia。Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy。London:Routledge。  new window
13.Trousson, R.(1996)。Socrate。Dictionnaire de Jean-Jacques Rousseau publié sous la direction de R. Trousson et F. Eigeldinger。Paris:Honoré Champion Ēditeur。  new window
14.Davidson, Donald(1999)。Intellectual Autobiography。The Philosophy of Donald Davidson。Chicago, I:Open Court.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE