臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：英國電信自由化與無線電頻譜法制變遷之探討
書刊名：國立中正大學法學集刊
作者：林俊宏 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Chun Hung
出版日期：2008
卷期：24
頁次：頁247-295
主題關鍵詞：電信自由化；無線電頻譜管理；英國2003通訊法；英國通訊局；頻譜交易制度；Telecommunication liberalization；Spectrum management legislation；Communication act 2003；Office of communications；OFCOM；Spectrum trading market
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:35
隨著通訊科技進步及網路普及化，電信市場的產業價值不斷增加，尤其是無線電通訊技術的發展，為全球電信市場提供了良性自由競爭的機會。其中，英國是最早進行電信自由化的國家之一，在1980年代開始即以民營化、市場機制為核心展開電信自由化的歷程，並因應科技及產業匯流而作出相關法制調整，使英國成為世界上電信自由化和無線電頻譜管理化程度最高的國家之一。另一方面，因無線電頻譜為自然界的有限資源且無國界之分，各國基於國際化和國際接軌的精神，須遵守國際間有關無線電技術性之規定，使國內頻譜使用能與世界各國和諧共存，英國之電信自由化和頻譜管理法制之調整，因而受國際電信聯合會的相關協定與歐盟電信的框架及指令之深刻影響。因英國頻譜管理政策之走向常為其他各國所仿傚，故本文擬從英國電信自由化歷程，分析英國無線電頻譜的管制方向，尤其是頻譜交易機制之建立，除確保競爭性市場外，亦包含對消費者權益保護之意義。
Following with progress of communication technology and universalization of network use, the increasingly industrial values on telecommunication market have provided the benign competition opportunity for the global telecommunication industries. Meanwhile, United Kingdom is one of the earliest countries starting the process of telecommunication liberalization. Since 1980s, using the way of market mechanism to privatize state-owned telecommunication enterprises, and making the related legal adjustment to fit the technological and industrial afflux, United Kingdom has become one of the most successful countries achieving telecommunication liberalization and efficient spectrum management. In addition, radio spectrum is a limited natural resource and does not respect national border; therefore, most countries had gathered together to debate international rules regarding radio use and spectrum sharing. Based on the importance of internationalization, various countries also have observed international related technical stipulation, as well as adjusted domestic frequency spectrum uses to coexist harmoniously with other countries. Hence the spectrum regulatory mechanism has strong international and European influences. This article draws up from English telecommunication liberalization courses to analyze English radio spectrum controlling directions, establishment of spectrum market, telecommunication competitive policy, etc. In the end, the article would provide recommendations for the model of English spectrum regulatory system and see if such a model is suitable for Taiwan's current situation.
期刊論文
1.Bryan, Carsberg(1992)。Telecommunications Competition in the United Kingdom: A Regulatory Perspective。N. Y. L. Sch. L. Rev.，37，285-286。  new window
2.Chun, Hung Lin(2003)。Regionalization or Globalization? The Telecommunication Cooperation in Europe。Australian International Law，14，95。  new window
3.Chun, Hung Lin(2004)。The International Telecommunication Union and the Republic of China (Taiwan): Prospect of Taiwan's Participation。Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law，10(1)，133。  new window
4.EU(1998)。Green Paper on the Convergence of the Telecommunications, Media and Information Technology Sectors。COM，97，623。  new window
5.Francesco, Portolano、Ernesto, Apa(2007)。Gentiloni Bill: What Is The Future of Italian DTT。Entertainment Law Review，18(3)，116-119。  new window
6.Ingo, Vogelsang(1995)。Micro-Economic Effects of Privatizing Telecommunications Enterprises。Boston University International Law Journal，13，313。  new window
7.Bosland, Jason(2007)。Regulating for Local Content in the Digital Audiovisual Environment - A View from Australia。Entertainment Law Review，18(3)，103-113。  new window
8.Yetes, Jeffrey(2001)。CALEA and the RIPA: The U.S. And The U.K. Responses To Wiretapping in an Increasingly Wireless World。Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology，6(12)，125。  new window
9.Miles, Jeremy(2007)。Call to Action: The Future Regulation of Participation TV。Entertainment Law Review，18(3)，122-124。  new window
10.Hausman, Jerry A.、Sidak, J. Gregory(2005)。Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries。Journal of Competition Law and Economics，8(1)，173。  new window
11.Brito, Jerry(2007)。Sending out an S.O.S.: Public Safety Communications Interoperability as a Collective Action Problem。Federal Communications Law Journal，59，457。  new window
12.Finley, Jessica(2006)。Anticipating Regulation of New Telecommunications Technologies: An Argument for the European Model。Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business，26，447。  new window
13.Black, Julia(2007)。Tensions in the Regulatory State。Public Law，SPR，58-73。  new window
14.Bravo, Laura Ferrari、Siciliani, Paolo(2007)。Exclusionary Pricing and Consumers Harm: The European Commission's Practice in the DSL Market。Journal of Competition Law and Economics，3，243。  new window
15.(200203)。Reforming UK Spectrum Policy。UK Spectrum Management Review。  new window
16.Conradi, Mike(2007)。Freedom of Information and ISPS in the United Kingdom: Report Card。Journal of Internet Law，10(7)。  new window
17.Feintuck, Mike(2003)。Walking the High-Wire: The UK's Draft Communications Bill。Europe Pub. L.，9，105-122。  new window
18.Pimlott, Nick(2007)。ICSTIS - 20 Years On。Entertainment Law Review，18(4)，135-137。  new window
19.Rosen, Robert Eli(2005)。Resistances to Reforming Corporate Governance: the Diffusion of QLCCS。Fordham Law Review，4(74)，1251。  new window
20.Durie, Robyn(2007)。United Kingdom: Telecommunications - Regulation - Consultation On Spectrum Allocation。Computer and Telecommunications Law Review，13(3)，N61-N62。  new window
21.Farrell, Sean P.(1996)。Note Telecommunications in the United Kingdom: A Prototype for Deregulation or A Flash in the Pan?。Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal，12(18)，321。  new window
22.Crane, Thomas、Calleja, Rico(2002)。The Communications Bill - New Dawn or False Dawn?。Communication Law，7，116。  new window
23.Waelde, Thomas W.、Kolo, Abba(1999)。Renegotiating Previous Governments Privatization Deals: The 1997 U.K. Windfall Tax On Utilities And International Law。Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business，8(19)，405。  new window
24.Valletti, Tommaso M.、Inderst, Roman(2007)。A Tale of Two Constraints: Assessing Market Power in Wholesale Markets。European Competition Law Review，28(2)，84-91。  new window
25.呂兼志(20050114)。淺介英國通訊管理局(OFCOM)--一個統合性的電信與傳播管制機構的範例。智邦生活館電子報，2(1)。  延伸查詢new window
26.高凱聲、劉柏立(20050100)。歐盟2003年通訊法之研析。經社法制論叢，35，319-340。  延伸查詢new window
27.連耀南(19990100)。固網規劃風雲--為我國電信自由化催生的推手。臺灣經濟研究月刊，22(1)=253，82-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.陳麗娟(20050900)。從歐洲法院的判決論共同體法的法律性質與優先適用的效力。臺灣本土法學雜誌，74，221-227。  延伸查詢new window
29.詹婷怡(19990400)。英國電信自由化發展之介紹。通訊雜誌，63，81-84。  延伸查詢new window
30.詹婷怡(19990900)。電信產業之規範核心--競爭法規與政策。資訊法務透析，43-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.詹婷怡(19991200)。歐洲共同體電信自由化發展之介紹。資訊法務透析，52-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.詹婷怡(1994)。由英國電信自由化看台灣通訊事業之發展。通訊雜誌，63，81。  延伸查詢new window
33.廖書賢(20061000)。英國頻譜管理改革政策介紹。科技法律透析，18(10)，13-21。  延伸查詢new window
34.王碧蓮、劉柏立(20060700)。英國OFCOM成立後之電信競爭策略研析。科技法律透析，18(7)，40-62。  延伸查詢new window
35.黃仁德、姜樹翰(20020300)。電信產業的發展與電信自由化。經濟情勢暨評論，7(4)，183-221。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Federalist, Society(2007)。Transcript of 2006 Telecommunications Federalism Conference: Role of Public Utilities Commissions。2006 Telecommunications Federalism Conference, Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum，(會議日期: Sep. 26, 2007)。  new window
2.Ingo, Vogelsang(1995)。Micro-Economic Effects of Privatizing Telecommunications Enterprises。Boston University International Law Fall 1995 Symposium。  new window
3.Brito, Jerry(2007)。Sending out an S.O.S.: Public Safety Communications Interoperability as a Collective Action Problem。Symposium: The Crisis in Public Safety Communications。  new window
4.Waelde, Thomas W.、Kolo, Abba(1999)。Renegotiating Previous Governments Privatization Deals: The 1997 U.K. Windfall Tax On Utilities And International Law。Symposium Perspectives in International Privatization of Public Utilities。  new window
研究報告
1.UK Radiocommunications Agency(200203)。Strategy for the future use of the Radio Spectrum in the UK。  new window
2.劉柏立、左峻德、彭心儀(2003)。因應技術匯流發展，相關法規之修訂研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉紹樑、陳民強(2001)。電信、資訊及傳播跨業整合監管機構組織之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Thatcher, Mark(1999)。The Politics of Telecommunications。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.(2003)。Case COMP/37.451 -Deutsche Telecom AG。  new window
2.Financial Accounts for the period 1 April 2003-28 December 2003，London：BSC UK。  new window
3.ITC Financial Report and Accounts 2003 for the period ended 28 December 2003，London：ITC UK。  new window
4.(2002)。Martin Cave, Reforming UK Spectrum Policy。  new window
5.OFCOM(2001)。ADSL margin squeeze。  new window
6.OFCOM(2001)。Effective competition review of Internet connectivity，London。  new window
7.OFCOM Consumer Panel Annual report 2004-05。  new window
8.OFCOM。A Statement on Spectrum Trading: Implementation in 2004 and beyond，London, UK。  new window
9.OFCOM's Annual Plan 2006。  new window
10.Office of Telecommunications Annual Report 2003，London：OFTEL U K。  new window
11.Tarjanne, Pekka，Leive, David M.(1997)。The Changing Role of Government in an Era of Telecom Deregulation，Geneva。  new window
12.Radio Authority Annual Report 2003，London：RA U K。  new window
其他
1.Andrew T. Kenyon，Liberman, Jonathan(200604)。Controlling Cross-Border Tobacco: Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship-Implementing the FCTC (2006)。  new window
2.Staff(20040322)。New Approaches to Spectrum Management。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brock, G. W.(1993)。Institutional and Procedural Effects on the Development of United States Telecommunication Policy。International Review of Comparative Public Policy。Greenwich：JAI Press。  new window
2.Brooks, M.(1997)。BT's Experience of Privatization。Privatization and Competition in Telecommunications: International Developments。Westport：Praeger。  new window
3.戴豪君(2003)。因應數位匯流通信法制革新之研究。電信法制新紀元。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：595（臺灣：577，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67480577
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上