:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政黨的國會領導與凝聚力--2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:盛杏湲 引用關係
作者(外文):Sheng, Shing-yuan
出版日期:2008
卷期:5:4
頁次:頁1-46
主題關鍵詞:政黨國會領導政黨凝聚力政黨輪替政黨對立Party leadershipParty cohesionParty turnoverInter-party conflict
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(8)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:230
  • 點閱點閱:186
本研究旨在探討我國主要政黨在立法院的領導與立委的政黨凝聚力,觀察的時間點放在2000年首次政黨輪替前後的1996年至2008年。本文旨在建構理論以廣泛地探索政黨得以領導立法的原因,政黨所使用的策略,以及產生的效果。本研究採用兩種分析方法,一方面透過深入訪談方法訪問立委(包括黨團幹部與一般立委),藉此瞭解政黨領導人所使用的策略,以及立委之所以願意遵從政黨領導的理由。另一方面透過分析立委記名表決,以瞭解政黨凝聚力(亦即政黨領導的效果)跨不同時間點、不同政黨對立程度、不同的投票類型,與不同議題的狀況。本研究的主要論點在於:首先,政黨輪替後政黨之所以表現出相當的凝聚力,是因為強烈的政黨對立,致使敵對政黨的獲勝將危害到立委自己的政治生命,因此同黨立委感受到他們是政治生命共同體,所以有團結的強烈動機。然而,本研究也強調政黨之所以可以成功地領導立法,也是因為政黨領袖瞭解立委的需要,同時也會去滿足這些需要,也因此,政黨雖然在某些立法與決策上相當堅持,但在某些立法與決策上則提供立委相當的自由空間,以使立委得以回應其選區不同的利益。
The purpose of this research is to examine the party leadership and party cohesion in the Legislative Yuan, focusing on the period of time from 1996 to 2008, before and after the first party turnover in the executive branch in 2000. I try to elaborate a theory to explain party leadership, including why a party can lead its legislators, what strategies it takes, and what results the leadership brings. Two major methods are used in this research. One method is conducting intensive interviews with party leaders and rank-and-file legislators to learn the party leaders’ strategies and individual legislators’ motivations to follow the party line. The other is an analysis of roll call votes, which enable comparisons of party cohesion across different time periods, different degrees of inter-party conflict, different categories of votes, and different issue areas. I argue that party cohesion strengthened after the party turnover due to the intense inter-party conflict. In this context, the possibility of the other party’s victory posed a greater threat to many individual legislators’ political lives, more closely linking their fates to that of their parties and strongly motivating them to be cohesive. However, successful party leadership also depends on the party leaders knowing and satisfying the needs and desires of their party’s rank-and-file legislators. Therefore, party leaders have to strike a balance between insisting on some items of legislation and leaving space for the rank and file to respond to the needs of their constituents.
期刊論文
1.Sinclair, Barbara(1999)。Transformational Leader or Faithful Agent? Principal-Agent Theory and House Majority Party Leadership。Legislative Studies Quarterly,24(3),421-449。  new window
2.Ho, M. S.(2005)。Weakened state and social movement: The paradox of Taiwanese environmental politics after the power transfer。Journal of Contemporary China,14(43),339-352。  new window
3.Amorim Neto, Octavio、Santos, Fabiano(2003)。The Inefficient Secret Revisited: The Legislative Input and Output of Brazilian Deputies。Legislative Studies Quarterly,28(4),449-479。  new window
4.Carey, John M.、Shugart, Matthew Soberg(1995)。Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas。Electoral Studies,14(4),417-439。  new window
5.盛杏湲(20010900)。立法委員正式與非正式立法參與之研究:以第三屆立法院為例。問題與研究,40(5),81-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳東欽(20080900)。從議事阻撓觀點探討我國中央分立政府運作之影響。臺灣民主,5(3),71-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.朱雲漢、靳菱菱(19921200)。臺灣政權轉型期政商關係的再結盟。中山社會科學季刊,7(4),58-78。  延伸查詢new window
8.盛杏湲(20050900)。選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色。東吳政治學報,21,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.盛杏湲(20001100)。政黨或選區﹖立法委員的代表取向與行為。選舉研究,7(2),37-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.盛杏湲(20031200)。立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力:一致政府與分立政府的比較。臺灣政治學刊,7(2),51-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃秀端(20031200)。少數政府在國會的困境。臺灣政治學刊,7(2),3-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃秀端(20040500)。政黨輪替前後的立法院內投票結盟。選舉研究,11(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.盛杏湲、陳義彥(20030500)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Edwards, G. C., III、Edwards, George C. III(1976)。Presidential Influence in the House: Presidential Prestige as a Source of Presidential Power。American Political Science Review,70(1),101-113。  new window
15.Crowe, Edward(1986)。The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons。Legislative Studies Quarterly,11(2),161-186。  new window
16.Machidori, Satoshi(2007)。Change of the Japanese Parliamentary System: To be Continued。Japan Now,31(4),1-12。  new window
會議論文
1.盛杏湲(2005)。立法委員的立法提案:第五屆立法院的分析。2005年臺灣政治學會年會暨臺灣民主的挑戰與前景學術研討會,(會議日期: 2005/12/10-12/11)。臺北:國立政治大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.盛杏湲(2007)。Issues, Political Cleavage and Party Competition in Taiwan: From the Angles of the Elites and the Public。0。  new window
3.黃秀端(2003)。分立政府、議程設定與程序委員會。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.盛杏湲(1999)。政黨動員與立法政治。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃麗香(1999)。國會政黨的組織誘因與立法團結:以第二屆立法院為例的探討(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ho, Szu-Yin Benjamin(1986)。Legislative Politics of the Republic of China: 1970-1984(博士論文)。University of California,Santa Barbara。  new window
3.鄒篤麒(1993)。我國黨政關係之研究:以國民黨為例,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.盛杏湲(1996)。Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation : The Case of Taiwan。University of Michigan。  new window
2.鄭明德(2004)。一脈總相承:派系政治在民進黨。臺北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rohde, D.、Rohde, David(1991)。Parties and Leaders in the Post Reform House。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.羅達菲(2005)。Party Politics in Taiwan: Party Change and the Democratic Evolution of Taiwan。London, UK/ New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
5.Cox, Gary(1987)。The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Evans, Diana(2004)。Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalition in Congress。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Fenno, Richard F. Jr.(1973)。Congressmen in Committees。New York:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
8.Sinclair, Barbara(1995)。Legislators,Leaders,and Lawmaking:the U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Neustadt, Richard E.(1990)。Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents。New York:Free Press。  new window
10.Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamic。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Mathew D.(2005)。Setting The Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Ramseyer, J. Mark、Rosenbluth, Frances McCall(1993)。Japan's Political Marketplace。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
13.郭正亮(1998)。民進黨轉型之痛。臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Arnold, R. Douglas(1990)。The Logic of Congressional Action。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
15.廖達琪(19970000)。立法院衝突現象論衡。高雄:復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Matthew D.(1993)。Legislative Leviathan。CA:University of California。  new window
17.Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。  new window
18.Smith, Steven、Gamm, Gerald(2001)。The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress。Congress Reconsidered。Washington, DC。  new window
19.Aldrich, John H.、Rohde, David W.(2001)。The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection。Congress Reconsidered。Washington, DC:A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
20.Rasch, Bjorn Erik(1999)。Electoral Systems, Parliamentary Committees, and Party Discipline: The Norwegian Storting in a Comparative Perspective。Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government。Columbus, OH。  new window
21.Bowler, Shaun(2002)。Parties in Legislature: Two Competing Explanations。Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Oxford, UK。  new window
22.Ranney, Austin(1954)。The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origin and Present State。The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origin and Present State。Urbana, IL。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ames, Barry(2002)。Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies。Legislative Politics in Latin America。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE