:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣於美國法院之法律地位
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:謝笠天
作者(外文):Hsieh, Pasha L.
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁53-84
主題關鍵詞:臺灣關係法美國在臺協會駐美國臺北經濟文化代表處承認繼承外國主權豁免法國家行為中美友好通商航海條約華沙公約舊金山和約Taiwan Relations ActAmerican Institute in TaiwanTaipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the U.S.RecognitionSuccessionForeign Sovereign Immunity ActAct of stateR.O.C.-U.S. FCN TreatyWarsaw ConventionSan Francisco Peace Treaty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:43
美國政府於1979年與中華民國斷交並轉承認中華人民共和國之決定,對台灣在美國法律地位有關鍵性之影響。美國於同年通過之《台灣關係法》排除因失去外交承認而可能導致之國際法後果。經過近三十年判例累積,美國法院確立以《台灣關係法》處理台灣地位的原則,法院依該法將台灣「視爲」一般主權國家,不受行政部門斷交之影響,台灣因此得以有效主張其具美國法律上之國家地位,適用《外國主權豁免法》及國家行爲原則,其國有財產不受中共繼承且不受中共締結之條約拘束。據此,美國的司法實踐使台灣的國家資格及政府權能受充分之尊重,亦因此對台美關係的發展有相當助益。
In 1979, the United States government terminated its official relations with the Republic of China and switched recognition to the People's Republic of China. In the same year, the United States Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) with the aim of protecting Taiwan from negative legal consequences which may stem from the withdrawal of recognition. After nearly thirty years, U.S. courts have established the principle of treating the TRA as the legal basis in dealing with the status of Taiwan. The courts have consistently considered Taiwan as a state regardless of the U.S. government’s termination of diplomatic ties. Hence, Taiwan has been able to possess state status under U.S. law, invoke the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and the act of state principle, retain its state assets in the United States, and assert an independent legal status from China under treaty obligations. The jurisprudence established by U.S. courts not only respects Taiwan's state status and sovereignty, but also exerts a positive impact on Taiwan-U.S. relations.
期刊論文
1.陳長文、羅智強(20050600)。現代菁英應有的超國界法律思維。中華國際法與超國界法評論,1(1),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.盧惠芬(1208)。重開雙橡園。光華雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
3.Handsell, Herbet J.(19951996)。Letter from Herbet J. Handsell,Legal Advisor of the Dep’t of State, to Sen. Frank Church, Chairman of the Committee (Feb. 16, 1979)。Y.B. Int’l L. & Aff,106。  new window
4.Mangelson, Michael E.(1992)。Taiwan Re-Recognized: A Model for Taiwan's Future Global Status。Brigham Young University Law Review,1992(1),231-251。  new window
5.Silk, Mitchell A.、Ross, Lester(1990)。Transnational Deposits, Government Succession, Frozen Assets and the Taiwan Relations Act: National Bank of Pakistan v. The International Commercial Bank of China。Int’l Tax & Bus. L.,8(1)。  new window
6.(19880413)。Nat’l Bank of Pakistan v. Int’l Commercial Bank of China。N.Y.L.J.,199。  new window
7.(1995)。Property of “De-recognized” Government。CHINESE (TAIWAN) Y.B. In t’lL . & Aff.,14(105/106)。  new window
8.陳純一(200208)。臺灣關係法二十年:美國法院的見解與其意涵。中國國際法與國際事務年報,13,3-19。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃居正(20050600)。國際航空運送人責任規範之理論與實踐--名古屋地裁華航空難訴訟判決評釋。臺灣國際法季刊,2(2),9-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hsieh, Pasha L.(2007)。An Unrecognized State in Foreign and International Courts: The Case of the Republic of China on Taiwa。Mich. J. Int’l L.,28,765。  new window
圖書
1.丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Background Note: Taiwan, U.S. Dep't of State,http://www.state.gOv/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm, 2009/06/30。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top