:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論環境信託制度之理論與實際:以美國法經驗與對我國之立法借鏡為中心
書刊名:高大法學論叢
作者:吳行浩 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Hsing-hao
出版日期:2008
卷期:4
頁次:頁85-115
主題關鍵詞:環境信託公益信託慈善信託國民信託信託法公益團體非營利組織近似原則Trusts lawCharitable trustsNational trustEnvironmental trustNon-profit organizationTax incentivesPerpetual conservation easementCy presLand use control
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:97
傳統上,我國環境保護之管制策略,主要可區分為以污染排放許可證發放為中心的管制機制,以及按污染排放量徵收污染稅(費)的經濟誘因手段兩種型態。然而不論係採用行政管制手段亦或是污染稅(費)的徵收的方式,皆是由政府所主導並形成國家(管制者)與人民(被管制者)的對立關係。如此規範架構將使人民有環境保護是政府責任的印象,並導致民眾因欠缺環境倫理的認知,消極的逃避擔負環境責任,增加政府稽查與執法的困難與行政成本。據此,未來環境保護應朝向調整政府與人民彼此關係的方向而努力,亦即由對立關係轉化為夥伴關係。「環境信託」是一個不需由政府主導,而是由民間自發集合民間資金與資源、自我管理與經營環境公共財的替代性手段。基於公益信託設立簡便、信託財產運用彈性與運作成本低廉、委託人得落實自身公益理念等優點,對於我國民間自主保護生態的現況而言,透過環境信託的發展,確有可能開啟我國民間自主保護環境生態的新契機。然而環境信託的發展能否於我國開花結果,實有賴於建構一個建全的法律制度以相應配合。本文為啟拋磚引玉之效,將由法律面向切入,探討為建全我國環境信託制度所涉及的法律問題,並以美國相關法制的研究為中心藉以提供我國未來修法方向之建議。本文第二部份將介紹美國環境信託的發展經驗與相關法律環境的特色。本文第三及第四部份將檢視我國現行公益信託規範內容與特色,並以美國法之發展經驗為借鏡,作為建構我國健全的環境信託法律環境的參考依據,並就未來修法方向提出具體建議。
Environmental protection has now moved to a new age that requires more collaborative approaches to tackle new environmental challenges. Biodiversity protection, for instance, requires citizen's active participation to protect wildlife habitant owned by private parties. Environmental trusts have provided appropriate means to establish citizen-based environmental management programs. Environmental trusts are intended to protect specific environmental interests in accordance to environmental protection purposes specified by the donor. It also provides landowners incentives to donate their lands because the trustee should be bound to manage the land consistent with donor's specified environmental protection purposes. Moreover, landowners could benefit from tax incentives as a result from the establishment of an environmental trust. This article focuses on the evaluation of promise and limits of relevant law and policy with respect to environmental trusts in the United States and Taiwan. This article first analyzes judicial opinions as well as academic comments regarding to perpetual conservation easement in the U.S. jurisdiction. I will then outline some of drawbacks of Taiwan's charitable trust law. By learning from U.S.'s experience with respect to modification and termination of perpetual conservation easement, the concluding part of this article provides some suggestions for future regulatory reforms of Taiwan's environmental trusts law.
期刊論文
1.王志誠(20040200)。信託法之二面性--強行法規與任意法規之界線。政大法學評論,77,163-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳春山(19951100)。我國信託法制之發展。月旦法學,7,78-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.King, Mary、Fairfax, Sally(2006)。Public Accountability and Conservation Easement: Learning from the Uniform Conservation Easement Act Debates。Nat. Resources J.,46,65。  new window
4.Harte, John(2001)。Land Use, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Integrity: The Challenge of Preserving Earth's Life Support System。Ecology Law Quarterly,27(4),929-965。  new window
5.Dukeminier, Jesse、Krier, James(2003)。The Rise of the Perpetual Trust。U.C.L.A. L, Rev.,50,1303。  new window
6.Bowman, Kevin(1997)。The Short term Versus Dead Head: Litigating Our Dedicated Public Parks。U. Cin. L. Rev.,65,595。  new window
7.French, Susan(2006)。Trust Law in the 21st Century: Perpetual Trusts, Conservation Servitudes, and the Problem of Future。Cardozo L. Rev.,27,2523。  new window
8.Mclaughlin, Nancy(2005)。Rethinking the Perpetual Nature of Conservation Easement。Hard Envtl. L. Rev.,29,421。  new window
9.Mclaughlin, Nancy(2007)。Conservation Easement: Perpetunity and Beyond。Ecology L. Q.,34,673。  new window
10.李秋靜(19980500)。保育與發展之均衡策略--英國國民環境信託簡介。臺灣經濟研究月刊,21(5)=245,32-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳仲嶙(20021200)。富陽森林公園的空間管制:環境信託的操作嘗試。臺灣土地金融季刊,39(4)=154,201-219。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳春山(20020100)。公益信託的理念與制度。律師雜誌,268,62-70。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Scott, Austin、Fratcher, William(1989)。The Law of Trust。  new window
2.Byers, Elizabeth、Ponte, Karin Marchetti(2005)。The Conservation Easement Hand Book。  new window
3.Keiter, Robert(2003)。Keeping Faith With Nature。  new window
4.謝哲勝(200703)。信託法。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝哲勝(2003)。信託法總論。元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王志誠(2005)。信託法。五南圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE