:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:反省美國拜杜法的理論與經驗
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:楊智傑
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-chieh
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁207-240
主題關鍵詞:拜杜法政府資助大學研發成果專利科學技術基本法Bayh-Dole actGovernment-funded researchPatentScience and technology basic law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:80
期刊論文
1.王偉霖(20060700)。美國產學合作制度利弊之檢討--臺灣科學技術基本法之借鏡。世新法學,3,1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王偉霖(20071000)。我國學術機構技術移轉機制實施成效與法律制度之檢討。科技法學評論,4(2),59-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Rai, Arti K.(1999)。Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science。Nw. U. L. Rev.,94,77。  new window
4.Rai, Arti K.、Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(2003)。Bayh-Dole reform and the progress of biomedicine。Law and Contemporary Problems,66,289-314。  new window
5.Dueker, Kenneth Sutherlin(1997)。Biobusiness on Campus: Commercialization of University-Developed Biomedical Technologies。Food & Drug L. J.,52,453。  new window
6.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(1996)。Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-sponsored Research。Virginia Law Review,82(8),1663-1727。  new window
7.Heller, Michael A.(1998)。The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets。Harvard Law Review,111(3),621-688。  new window
8.黃孝惇(20040500)。試看我國學術機構之專利授權實務。智慧財產權月刊,65,22-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Mowery, David C.、Nelson, Richard R.、Sampat, Bhaven N.、Ziedonis, Arvids A.(2001)。The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980。Research Policy,30(1),99-119。  new window
10.鄧曉芳(2002)。評析美國政府研發成果介入權制度:以 CellPro 案為例。科技法律透析,14(7),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
11.Arno, Peter S.,、Michael H. Davis(2000)。Why Don’t We Enforce Existing Drug Price Control? The Unrecognized and Unenforced Reasonable Pricing Requirements Imposed upon Patents Deriving in Whole or in Part from Federally-Funded Research。TUL. L. REV.,75,631。  new window
12.Boettiger, Sara、Alan Bennett(2006)。The Bayh-Dole Act: Implications for Developing Countries。IDEA,46,261。  new window
13.Eberle, Mary(1999)。March-In Rights Under the Bayh-Dole Act: Public Access to Federally Funded Research。MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV.,3,155。  new window
14.Miller, Aaron(2005)。Repairing the Bayh-Dole Act: A Proposal for Restoring Non-Profit Access to University Science。B.C. INTELL. PROP. & TECH. F.,093001。  new window
15.Mowery, David C.、Bhaven Sampat(1980)。The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?。J. TECH. TRANSFER,30,115。  new window
16.Sampat, Bhaven N., David C. Mowery、Arvid A. Ziedonis(2003)。Changes in University Patent Quality After the Bayh-Dole Act: A Re-examination。INT’L. J. INDUS. ORG.,21,1371。  new window
17.Silfen, Molly(2005)。How Will California’s Funding of Stem Cell Research Impact Innovation?: Recommendations for an Intellectual Property Policy。HARV. J. L. & TECH.,18,459。  new window
18.Tullis, Terry K.(2005)。Application of the Government License Defense to Federally Funded Nanotechnology Research: The Case for a Limited Patent Compulsory Licensing Regime。UCLA L. REV.,53,279。  new window
學位論文
1.范文昇(2006)。論美國專利法及拜杜法案對生技產業發展之影響--兼論我國專利法及科學技術基本法(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳東洋(2002)。國家創新系統下研發成果規範之研究:以智慧財產權歸屬與行政介入權為探討核心。  延伸查詢new window
3.鍾詩敏(2008)。生物科技研究工具之專利法與競爭法交錯。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蔡明誠(2002)。科學技術基本法的制定及影響。新世紀經濟法制之建構與挑戰-廖義男教授六秩誕辰祝壽論文集。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2008)。Compendium of Patent Statistics 2008,http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/19/37569377.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE