:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政策工具對節能減排與經濟成長之影響評估
書刊名:新竹教育大學人文社會學報
作者:單珮玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Shan, Pei-ling
出版日期:2011
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:低碳經濟脫鉤指標EKC假說雙紅利環境稅Low carbon economyDecoupling indicatorEKC hypothesisDouble dividendsEnvironmental taxes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:20
由於能源短缺、溫室氣體排放、全球暖化及氣候變遷等潛在危機,不僅威脅全球的自然生態與環境,同時亦對經濟成長造成嚴重的衝擊。在各類溫室氣體中,又以二氧化碳比重最高(約占七成左右),使其成爲影響全球溫室效應最主要的氣體。節能減排近年來已蔚爲國際組織共同關注的問題,亦爲國內各界咸所重視的政策焦點,相關目標與政策的研擬無不成爲各國施政重點之一。惟適當且有效之政策工具的擬定,須詳實掌握各項政策工具對節能減排及經濟成長的影響。本文深入回顧相關文獻之理論與實證方法,據以建立適合臺灣的3E聯立模型,並進行實證分析,藉以推估多項政策工具(如環境稅、關稅,以及能源價格等)與經濟變數(如貿易條件、所得等)對於節能減排與GDP的影響。實證分析結果顯示,臺灣之能源消費、CO2排放,以及GDP對於各項政策工具與經濟變數之彈性不僅各異其趣,而且有些彈性並非固定不變,可隨時間經過動態調整。
Energy saving and emission reduction have become an issue commonly concerned by international communities as well as domestic policy makers. Since, in order to initiate effective policy to save energy and reduce emission, one needs to reasonably capture the potential impacts of various policy instruments on energy consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth, this paper, after extensively reviewing the literature, builds a locally ideal empirical model that facilitates the estimation of various policy elasticities. The empirical results indicate that policy elasticities may not only differ from one to the others, but also change dynamically, implying the 3E impacts of some policy instruments might be weakening over time.
期刊論文
1.Vollebergh, Herman R. J.(2008)。Lessons from the Polder: Energy Tax Design in The Netherlands from a Climate Change Perspective。Ecological Economics,64(3),660-672。  new window
2.吳珮瑛、劉哲良、蘇明達(20061200)。由永續發展概念到生活品質內涵的檢視--臺灣EKC的再驗證與SKC的呈現。農業經濟叢刊,12(1),61-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ederington, J.、Minier, J.(2003)。Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier?。An Empirical Analysis, Canadian Journal of Economics,36(1),137-154。  new window
4.Bruvoll, A.、Larsen, B. M.(2004)。Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Norway: Do Carbon Taxes Work?。Energy Policy,32,493-505。  new window
5.Kuznets, S.(1995)。Economic Growth and Income Inequality。American Economics Review,45(1),1-28。  new window
6.Grossman, Gene M.、Krueger, Alan B.(1995)。Economic Growth and the Environment。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(2),353-377。  new window
7.黃宗煌、蔡攀龍、李蕙君(1997)。「貿易政策對環境的影響」。臺灣經濟預測與政策,28(1),133-170。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊維娟、周登陽、陳正良(2007)。「跨國污染與貿易同盟」。農業經濟叢刊,12(2),297-324。  延伸查詢new window
9.Andreoni, J.、Levinson, A.(2001)。The simple analytics of environmental Kuznets curve。Journal of Public Economics,80,269-286。  new window
10.Bruvoll, A.、Medin, H.(2003)。Factors behind the environmental Kuznets curve。Environmental and Resource Economics,24,27-48。  new window
11.Bruyn, S. M.、Bergh, J. C. J. M.、Opschoor J. B.(1998)。Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves。Ecological Economics,25,161-175。  new window
12.Burguet, R.、Sempere, J.(2003)。Trade liberalization, environmental policy, and welfare。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,46,25-37。  new window
13.Richmond, A. K.、Kaufmann, R. K.(2006)。Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and /or carbon emissions?。Ecological Economics,56(2),176-189。  new window
14.Copeland, B. R.、Taylor, M. S.(2004)。Trade, growth, and the environment。Journal of Economic Literature,XLII,7-71。  new window
15.Galeotti, M.、Manera, M.、Lanza, A.(2009)。On the robustness of robustness checks of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis。Environ Resource Econ,42,551-574。  new window
16.Glasure, Y. U.、Lee, A. R.(2002)。The impact of oil prices on income and energy。International Advanced in Economic Research,8(2),148-154。  new window
17.Jasen, H.、Klaassen, G.(2000)。Economic impacts of the 1997 EU energy tax: Simulations with three EU-Wide Models。Environmental and Resource Economics,15,179-197。  new window
18.Liu, C. C.(2007)。An extended method for key factors in reducing CO2 emissions。Applied Mathematics and Computation,189,441-451。  new window
19.Managi, S.、Jena, P. R.(2008)。Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India。Ecological Economics,65,432-440。  new window
20.Selden T. M.、Forrest, A. S.、Lockhart, J. E.(1999)。Analyzing the reductions in U. S. air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990。Land Economics,75(1),1-21。  new window
21.Sterner, T.(2007)。Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy。Energy Policy,35(6),3194-3202。  new window
22.Zaim, O.、Taskin, F.(2000)。A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: An application on OECD countries。Environmental and Resource Economics,17,21-36。  new window
會議論文
1.Huang, C. H.、Shan, P. L.、Yang, C. W.(2009)。Measurement of Energy Efficiency in Taiwan and Its Relevance to CO2 Decoupling。The Workshop on Innovations in Energy Efficiency。California:Stanford University。  new window
2.梁啟源(2007)。「全球油價走勢及其對臺灣經濟的影響與因應政策」。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Fullerton, D.、Andrew, L.、Smith, S.(2008)。Environmental taxes。  new window
圖書
1.陳明郎(2006)。總體經濟學。臺北:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡慧貞、黃宗煌(2003)。「脫鉤--當經濟成長遇上環境負荷」。與地球對話--永續臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hung, M. F.、Shaw, D.(2004)。Economic growth and the environmental Kuznets curve in Taiwan: A simultaneity model analysis。Human capital, trade and public policy in rapidly growing economies, from theory to empirics。  new window
4.OECD(2006)。The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes。OECD。  new window
5.OECD(2002)。Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth。OECD。  new window
6.OECD(2005)。Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Industry: Implications for Steel。OECD。  new window
其他
1.外交部/經濟部國際貿易局(2008)。「入會六年對臺灣經濟之影響」。  延伸查詢new window
2.林建甫,周麗芳,何金巡(2005)。「建構臺灣總體計量模型:油價、景氣與政府財政的總體經濟計量分析」,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃耿信,單珮玲,黃宗煌(2008)。「CO2排放與經濟成長脫鉤的機制」。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃宗煌,鄧秀玲(2003)。「環境顧志耐曲線的斜率以及關稅的環境效果」。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE