:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:人體組織於我國民法物權客體適用之評析
書刊名:醫事法學
作者:陳冠蓁陳重見 引用關係王嬿婷劉榮宏董道興
作者(外文):Chen, Kwan-chenChen, Chung-chienWang, Yen-tingLiu, Jorn-honTung, William Tao-hsin
出版日期:2010
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁35-42
主題關鍵詞:人體組織物權所有權Human tissueProperty lawOwnership
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:6
人體組織所隱涵諸多經濟與學術價值,造成多數法律上爭議之原因,凸顯了人體組織物與其衍生物在法律上的重要性,並有賴民法物權編之規範,方能釐清人與物之分際、提供合理之法律邏輯。因此本評論即從多方面(包括人體組織定義、我國人體組織法令規範現況、物權客體定義、物權與人體組織之論述、實例說明、人體組織財產權歸屬認知、人體組織是否具有交易特性等)之論述,期能探究當研究題材涉及另一個權利主體並以其人體組織為研究對象之同時,兼顧研究參與者的權利與研究自由之保障。
Human tissues imply a number of economic and academic values, resulting in the majority of legal issues, underscore the importance of law in the complex human organism and its derivatives. It only depends on the property and civil rights norms to clarify the distinction between persons and objectives, and supply a reasonable legal logic. Therefore, this comment contain various aspects, including the definition of human tissues, the legal regulations status of human tissues in Taiwan, the object definition of property, the discussions of the property rights and human tissues, the examples, the property ownership cognition of human tissues, and whether the human tissues exist the trading characteristics. This article wants to investigate how to guarantee the study participants rights and research freedom when the research materials related to another subject rights, and use their human tissues to be the study topics for the same time.
期刊論文
1.李宗棠(20080100)。美國Washington University v. Catalona 判決評析--學術機構與研究人員對人體組織所有權之爭。法律與生命科學,4,18-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳仲嶙(20080400)。「臺灣生物資料庫管理條例」草案評介。法律與生命科學,5,23-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉承慶、劉承愚(20030200)。人體組織應用於生物科技之管制法令與財產權。月旦法學,93,254-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.McIntire, T.(2002)。Does a person have a property right in human tissue after it is removed from the body? In essay-legal issues of stem cell transplantation and the family。University of Memphis Law Review,32,727。  new window
學位論文
1.王素珍(2003)。人體組織之保障與管制--財產權與人格權結合的另類思考(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.高培桓(2001)。生物醫學人體試驗之國際法規範(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱玟惠(2005)。臍帶血幹細胞及其衍生物之法律地位(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王澤鑑(2002)。民法總則。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.史尚寬(1970)。民法總論。台北:正大印書館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Rowland, R.(20010627)。Genetic testing of embryos raises ethical issues,http://transcripts.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/06/27/embryo.testing/index.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE