:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以人為主體之社會科學研究倫理議題
書刊名:人文社會科學研究
作者:吳芝儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chih-yi
出版日期:2011
卷期:5:4
頁次:頁19-39
主題關鍵詞:人類受試者人類參與者社會科學研究倫理Human subjectsHuman participantsSocial science researchResearch ethics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:322
鑒於國科會人文處擬針對社會行為科學領域研究研擬制定「人類行為研究倫理治理架構」,建立「人類研究倫理審查機制」來審查所有以人類為受試者或參與者的研究計畫,務使研究均能善盡對於人類受試者或參與者的保護責任。本文乃擷取各美、英、加、澳等先進國家政府部門所出版的政策性刊物,同時廣泛涉獵各國政策性刊物中所提及的相關報告、重要文件和法規內容,進行文獻探討和文件分析,以呈現各國統籌社會科學研究倫理的主要政府部門和架構、所界定之社會科學「研究」範疇,以及所揭示的核心倫理原則等項。藉由文件分析歷程,本文從美國、英國、加拿大和澳洲等有關人類受試者或參與者之社會科學研究倫理之發展進程,歸納出數項核心倫理議題與倫理行動,包括四大核心倫理原則、以國家層級法令規範研究倫理行動,以及知情同意的內容與歷程等主題,以提供我國規劃研究倫理審查機制之參考。最後,藉由論述社會科學研究倫理議題的新挑戰,結合筆者於研究實務經驗中的觀察和省思,提出可行的建議。
The Department of Humanities and Social Science within the National Science Council in Taiwan has been worked hard toward the establishment of a "Human Behavior Research Governance Framework", aimed at setting up an ethical review mechanism to review all research proposal involving human subjects or human participants, and to protect vulnerable participants from any potential harms. This article is intended to do literature review and document analysis on government publications retrieved from websites among several developed countries, including the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, in order to present their governance frameworksfor social research ethics, various definitions and domains for social research involving human participants, and core ethical guidelines delineated by each nation. Based on literature review and document analysis, this article further investigates some core ethical issues and ethical conducts, such as four core ethical guidelines, national legislations for moderating ethical research conducts, as well as informed consent documents and processes. Finally, several new challenges in social science research involving human participants are further discussed.
期刊論文
1.莊惠凱、邱文聰(20101200)。臺灣人類研究倫理治理架構之推動。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),4-9。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱文聰、莊惠凱(2010)。建置當代人類研究倫理的治理架構:一個反身凝視的契機。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),33-39。  延伸查詢new window
3.Goodwin, D.、Pope, C.、Mort, M.、Smith, A.(2003)。Ethics and Ethnography: An Experiential Account。Qualitative Health Research,13(4),567-577。  new window
4.Stanley, L.、Wise, S.(2010)。The ESRC’s 2010 Framework for Research Ethics: Fit for Research Purpose?。Sociological Research Online,15(4),2011。  new window
圖書
1.Beauchamp, Tom L.、Childress, James F.(2001)。Principles of biomedical ethics。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Wood, S. Y.、Friedland, B. A.、McGrory, C. E.(2001)。Informed Consent: From Good Intentions to Sound Practices。New York。  new window
3.吳芝儀、李奉儒、Patton, M. Q.(2002)。Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage。質性研究與評鑑。嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王瑞伶,林秀美(20100322)。我的血液,你的專利,原民被犧牲?。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣心理學會(1999)。心理學專業人員倫理守則,http://wiki.kmu.edu.tw/index.php/, 20110605。  延伸查詢new window
3.希雅特.烏洛(2010)。研究倫理早已經被扭曲。  延伸查詢new window
4.台灣社會學會(2002)。台灣社會學會倫理守則,http://proj3.sinica.edu.tw/~tsa/modules/tadnews/index.php?ncsn=8, 20110605。  延伸查詢new window
5.段洪坤(2007)。向違反研究倫理的人說不。  延伸查詢new window
6.國立成功大學研究倫理計劃辦公室(2010)。三大倫理原則,http://rec.chass.ncku.edu.tw/ethics/what-is-research-ethics/ethical-principles, 20110605。  延伸查詢new window
7.臺灣人類學與民族學學會(2010)。對「研究倫理審查制度」建置的聲明,http://www.taiwananthro.org.tw/post/47, 20110605。  延伸查詢new window
8.Economic & Social Research Council(2010)。Framework for Research Ethics,http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf, 20110605。  new window
9.National Institutes of Health(2004)。Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Involving Human Subjects,http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/GrayBooklet82404.pdf, 20110605。  new window
10.National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health(2011)。IRB Review Standards,http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/irb/protocol.html, 20110605。  new window
11.Australian Government(2007)。National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research,http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72.pdf?q=publications/synopses/_files/e72.pdf。  new window
12.Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada(1998)。Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans,Ottawa。,http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/archives/tcps-eptc/docs/TCPS%20October%202005_E.pdf, 20110605。  new window
13.Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada(2010)。Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans,http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf, 20110605。  new window
14.Economic & Social Research Council(2004)。Research Ethics Framework,http://www.gold.ac.uk/media/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6-11291.pdf, 20110605。  new window
15.Office for Human Research Protections(2011)。OHRP Home,http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/, 20110605。  new window
16.Ortiz, A.,Hagemann, J.,Mestaz, P.,Rose, S.(2008)。Informed Consent in Human Subjects Research,http://www.usc.edu/admin/oprs/private/docs/oprs/brochures/IFC_Booklet.pdf, 20110605。  new window
17.Wiles, R.,Heath, S.,Crow, G.,Charles, V.(2005)。Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review,http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/media/249157/ajsi44bishop.pdf, 20110605。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE